<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx</link><description>By Jim Popkin, NBC News Senior Investigative Producer
The FBI does not have a pornographic home movie of actress Marilyn Monroe in its files and never did, FBI officials tell NBC News. Document analysts at the FBI have completed a manual search of FBI</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60608.1)</generator><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#969967</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 23:06:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:969967</guid><dc:creator>mel webster, bismarck, nd.</dc:creator><description>We know official FBI records show only what the FBI wants them to show. &amp;nbsp;I hope the FBI is not so naive as to believe that anyone actually believes the FBI!</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970065</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 23:29:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970065</guid><dc:creator>Will, Los Angeles </dc:creator><description>I was born and raised in Hollywood. I've worked in the industry. The city is filled with these guys (and gals) running around trying to self promote themselves. They want to be movie stars but they are far from it. They spend their lives chasing the spotlight because they are so disallusioned with themselves. They think that they have that special star quality, but they are nothing more than ordinary at best. Some eventually come to terms with reality, but most end up wasting their lives chasing a ghost. </description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970137</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 23:43:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970137</guid><dc:creator>Andy, Rochester, NY</dc:creator><description>Hillarious. &amp;nbsp;It would be interesting to hear Morgan's consiracy theory surrounding Marilyn's death. &amp;nbsp;I bet he thinks that the CIA killed JFK too...</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970154</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 23:47:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970154</guid><dc:creator>not stupid (but thee public is gullible) Seattle area</dc:creator><description>And he has pictures of the &amp;quot;Aliens&amp;quot; from Roswell, too!</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970161</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 23:48:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970161</guid><dc:creator>not stupid (but thee public is gullible) Seattle area</dc:creator><description>And he has pictures of the &amp;quot;Aliens&amp;quot; from Roswell, too! &amp;nbsp;And the extra shooter from the &amp;quot;Grassy knoll&amp;quot;</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970164</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 23:48:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970164</guid><dc:creator>E. Chapman, Vancouver, Canada</dc:creator><description>Good job exposing this Morgan guy. &amp;nbsp;Too bad this type of investigation doesn't happen before this type of person goes public. I guess vetting these types in advance might eliminate an audience grabbing story. Good for MSNBC publishing what is in effect a retraction, and for the FBI in helping rat out Morgan. &amp;nbsp;Guys like Morgan rely on people not making the effort to investigate their claims. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970292</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 00:41:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970292</guid><dc:creator>william moorefield,kingman, Arizona</dc:creator><description>Another hoax? Anything to make a buck? Keya Morgan is saying a lot and is providing no credible evidence. &amp;nbsp;I think it's about time someone representing Marilyn Monroe's estate tells him to &amp;quot;walk the walk&amp;quot; instead of just &amp;quot;talkin' the talk&amp;quot;. Put up or shut up! </description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970394</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 01:17:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970394</guid><dc:creator>R Fair    Richmond Ky</dc:creator><description>of course the fbi would not have anything like that in their files or anyother place that would be considered public or whatever. might show someones face that they(fbi) didnt want you or us (general public)to see...</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970403</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 01:20:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970403</guid><dc:creator>Nick Arena, Phoenix, AZ</dc:creator><description>PT Barnum still exists andhis outrageous claims were often met with disdain after you walked into the tent. &amp;nbsp;Keyo Morgan is the modern day equivalent promoting without proof. &amp;nbsp;Come on Mr. Morgan, show us your proof or &amp;quot;you're the sucker born every minute&amp;quot; for shelling out $1.5M for a phony stag film.</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970413</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 01:23:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970413</guid><dc:creator>mack14o@yahoo.com</dc:creator><description>Like the FBI would be forthcoming if the actually found the tapes. whats to stop. i might believe this Morgan guy but i certainly don't believe the FBI the governments puppets &amp;nbsp; </description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970423</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 01:26:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970423</guid><dc:creator>Angry Marine Corps Veteran, San Diego, California</dc:creator><description>This is great news for all those that care about celebrity gossip. The FBI spent &amp;quot;32 man hours&amp;quot; on confirming whether there was a sex tape of Marylin Monroe or not? I am in awe as to how they spend their time sifting through files for something so ridiculous but don't have enough time to spend it doing other useful things i.e. name checks for U.S. Naturalization Applications. God Bless America.</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970431</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 01:29:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970431</guid><dc:creator>Michelle, Springfield, MO</dc:creator><description>Sounds like a kid with a invisible purple dinosaur. Has anyone asked Keya if he's ever had any imaginary friends or serious side effects from smoking weed?</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970439</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 01:31:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970439</guid><dc:creator>Marilyn Sieck, Huntley, IL</dc:creator><description>It would be very nice if people would stop making up things about dead celebrities who can't defend themselves!</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970448</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 01:34:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970448</guid><dc:creator>Randall Griffin, Studio City, California</dc:creator><description>Sounds suspicious, a non-sexual still frame photo from said movie would validate him and garner legitimate interest in any documentary he's allegedly commandeering. And this isn't the first time a Monroe sex movie story has been generated. A Penthouse style magazine published grainy B&amp;amp;W stills back around '84 of an alledged MM from the late 1940's, although she wasn't any more discernable that the recent shots of Kristen Davis were. &lt;br&gt;If the film does exist, all it would prove is that Monroe knew how to have a good time, something that's painted she badly needed those last months. &lt;br&gt;In short, who cares? $1.5 mil sure burned a hole through that suckers pockets. Get an investor, big shot!</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970474</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 01:40:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970474</guid><dc:creator>USC_Trojan, Newport Beach, CA</dc:creator><description>If I were Mr Keya - I would protect all involved parties as well. I don't understand the confusion or skepticism thats presented in this article. Because My Keya doesn't provide information doesn't mean it doesn't exist. The 2 aren't mutually exclusive. Poor objectivity - your readers deserve an intelligent analysis.</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970491</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 01:48:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970491</guid><dc:creator>Fabula Dico</dc:creator><description>In the vast sea of real issues in the world one has to ask, Who the hell cares?&lt;br&gt;All I see here is another huckster making alot of scratch, while honest folks struggle. &amp;nbsp;Is that the lesson for the new millenium? &amp;nbsp;Forget hard work and perseverence, find a con and stick with it.</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970492</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 01:48:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970492</guid><dc:creator>Ronald McDonald, Sun City, AZ</dc:creator><description>Do you really think that this article is the highest and best use of bandwidth and the most interesting topic you can find to report on?</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970510</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 01:54:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970510</guid><dc:creator>JAMES F DES MOINES IA</dc:creator><description>JUST BECAUSE THE FEDS SAY IT DOESNT EXIST DOESNT MEAN IT DOESNT EXIST WE ALL KNOW HOW THE FEDS LOVE DENYING EVERYTHING </description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970531</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 02:05:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970531</guid><dc:creator>Ben M. Sioux falls, South Dakota</dc:creator><description>Sounds to me if Morgan wanted to show the proof or if he had any respect as he so called says he does of Marilyn Monroe then he would of just bought the tape and kept his mouth shut. Seems to me that Morgan has brought more publicity to this so called tape. He claims to respect Monroe when all he did was provide a more tarnished image of her.</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970559</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 02:12:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970559</guid><dc:creator>Papa Inculpatus</dc:creator><description>Six or seven agents for 32 man-hours... &amp;nbsp;Doesn't that equate to about half a day of work for each of them? &amp;nbsp;&amp;quot;Oops! &amp;nbsp;It's lunch time. &amp;nbsp;Better call it quits!&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970574</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 02:16:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970574</guid><dc:creator>Bill - Raleigh, NC</dc:creator><description>Thank you MSNBC - A fresh load of fertilizer just in time for srping. &amp;nbsp;Keya Morgan may be more potent than Miracle Grow.</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970601</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 02:26:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970601</guid><dc:creator>jamie nast, sunderland, durham, uk</dc:creator><description>this 'morgan' bloke is a waist of time, the only reason i would watch the documentary would be to see how much he shows himself up...</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970608</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 02:29:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970608</guid><dc:creator>sus, ashland, or</dc:creator><description>Nice imdb page. &amp;nbsp;I've got Photoshop. too &amp;nbsp; ;-)</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970610</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 02:30:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970610</guid><dc:creator>Joe Smith, Miami, FLA</dc:creator><description>Scam Artis with all the trimmings....</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970612</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 02:31:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970612</guid><dc:creator>Mike, Boston, MA</dc:creator><description>It doesn't surprise me that he isnt' willing to give all sorts of documentation to corroborate the story. If he truly has brokered a $1.5 million dollar deal between 2 parties who wish to remain nameless, then he'd better make sure they stay nameless! Also, I highly doubt the film would hold it's value if it were to be viewed by the general public in any form. Part of the appeal is in it's mystery!</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970616</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 02:32:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970616</guid><dc:creator>John Doe, Seattle, Wash</dc:creator><description>Sounds like another idiot that wants to make a lot of money off the public's desire for sex scandal in the Oval Office--if he were telling the truth he'd have no need for so much secrecy. I didn't like JFK for the Radio Americas disater he created, but slurring his memory as well as Monroe's at this late date sucks.</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970645</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 02:43:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970645</guid><dc:creator>james, Phoenix, Arizona</dc:creator><description>if he wouldnt allow NBc to publish the document then there realy aint no proof any one can fake bill of sales.</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970650</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 02:44:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970650</guid><dc:creator>mike, Chicago, Illinois</dc:creator><description>I was skeptical all along. Why would this movie suddenly surface after all these years, and if he really wanted to respect Monroe, why wouldnt he simply destroy the film? Just like I have doubts about that Jimi Hendrix movie. If you REALLY wanted to show respect for the memories of these deceased people, you should just destroy these movies instead of trying to profit from them. This is just morbid and disgusting!</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970664</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 02:49:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970664</guid><dc:creator>mon, atlanta, Georgia</dc:creator><description>wow..All i can say is that i want the last 10 minutes of my life back....what a joke...and doesn't the FBI have better things to do than to try to disprove a lunatic?</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970668</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 02:50:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970668</guid><dc:creator>Pat nd Phil McCrotch  Ben Dover, MD</dc:creator><description>So is this how we are spending our tax money? Even during a recession? Way to go FBI! 32 man hours @ how much an hour? Damn glad my money is going to something this exciting. I better get to see the damn movie.</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970671</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 02:51:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970671</guid><dc:creator>Grep, Atlanta, GA</dc:creator><description>I think he lied for fame and money. Sad that anyone would be low enough to tell vicious lies about a dead woman!</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970679</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 02:54:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970679</guid><dc:creator>Matt, PA</dc:creator><description>This article seems a bit biased&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970682</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 02:55:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970682</guid><dc:creator>john doe, seattle , washington</dc:creator><description>another conspiracy theorist trying to cash in </description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970694</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 02:59:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970694</guid><dc:creator>george  Fla</dc:creator><description>in 1973 I lived in Chicargo for several years and was very active in the entertainment business as a musician. I had a hoppy of colecting xxx loops at the time and would have dealers of these items come to be to sell these items to me. One night a dealer brought me some tapes and one was suppose to be Marilyn Monroe &amp;nbsp;I looked at it and it was a woman performing oral sex on some guy. The woman did look like MM but I found it had to be fake due to the type of film and there was no clear face shots. Do I think it was &amp;nbsp;NO. &amp;nbsp;No longer collect this type of trash anymore...I think it is a fake and some sucker has wasted his money</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970707</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 03:05:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970707</guid><dc:creator>Mr. Credible Roswell New Mexico</dc:creator><description>I am sorry to say that I too have a tape of Marilyn Monroe..but this one is with an alien. &amp;nbsp;HONEST, I am a friend of Morgan and we both saw it and Hoover also reviewed it. &amp;nbsp;We have a picture of him with Pink Pumps and a cute french maid outfit he wore watching the film... &amp;nbsp;Honest.</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970751</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 03:19:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970751</guid><dc:creator>LALA, MURRIETA, CA</dc:creator><description>THE FBI SHOULD BE TAKING CARE OF OTHER IMPORTANT THINGS OTHER THAN THIS. WE KNOW SHE WAS A SKANK SO SHE WOULDN'T BE THE FIRST OR LAST TO HAVE A SEX TAPE.</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970764</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 03:26:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970764</guid><dc:creator>Jon Roesler, Layton, Utah</dc:creator><description>This guy Morgan is maybe taking lessons from Mark Hofmann... or Hofmann was maybe taking lessons from him. &amp;nbsp;The White Salamander Letter was a tangible document produced by Hofmann; &amp;quot;tangible&amp;quot; being the operative word.&lt;br&gt;Hofmann is currently serving a sentence at the Utah Prison.</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970774</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 03:29:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970774</guid><dc:creator>B. Godoy, Ardmore, PA</dc:creator><description>Morgan is but one of many shyster types roaming around fooling intelligent people. &amp;nbsp;Vanity Fair had a feature once on a man who wormed his way into high society pretending to be a Rothschild (or one of those rich families). &amp;nbsp;The impostor was penniless; yet he got away with it for years. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970782</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 03:33:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970782</guid><dc:creator>Tired of the hype, Arlington, TX</dc:creator><description>Who cares if there's a sex tape? Honestly she came across as more stupid than exciting when she was alive and now (thank God) she's dead and gone. &amp;nbsp;She was a fake, drug using, unhappy bimbo of a woman. If you're wealthy and this is how you spend your money, your crazy! &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970783</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 03:33:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970783</guid><dc:creator>Anonyomous-Toledo,Ohio</dc:creator><description>how can you even trust the FBI or these people who only want publicity,Marilyn Monroe is and icon,and she deserves respect and honor.</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970797</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 03:41:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970797</guid><dc:creator>Kelsey Kostadinovic</dc:creator><description>I have yet to know of Keya Morgan until I read this article, but it sounds to me that this man is utterly foolish and needs to get off of his kick of &amp;quot;self-publicity&amp;quot;. &amp;nbsp;IF Marilyn Monroe was involved with such a tape, would it be such a surprise? Reputable within his line of business or not, he sounds absurd wiyh his allegations of Monroe and is only publicly making a fool of himself!</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970803</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 03:44:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970803</guid><dc:creator>Jack Ryan  Omaha, NE</dc:creator><description>So What... she's been dead over 50+ years. &amp;nbsp;Let her &amp;quot;rest in peace&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970804</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 03:45:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970804</guid><dc:creator>Peter Fonseca, Queens, New York</dc:creator><description>Very suspicious claim by Mr. Morgan. He can't prove that this Monroe film exists except to refer to a F.B.I. web site source which only states that it may exist not that it does exist. His own documentation is not difinitive by any means. The whole story seems made up to me.</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970815</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 03:50:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970815</guid><dc:creator>Ken Wever </dc:creator><description> &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Why, out of respect for Marilyn was the purchase even brought to the public's attention? Did the purchaser have the option to destroy it? Out of respect for Marilyn,the purchaser should prove the film exist or compensate Mrs Monroe's estate and reputation, $$$$$$$$$ ? </description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970817</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 03:54:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970817</guid><dc:creator>Marilyn O, New York, NY </dc:creator><description>If you look on the IMDb website, some of the pictures look like they were taken at the wax museum, especially the ones of Bill Clinton</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970863</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 04:24:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970863</guid><dc:creator>Jimmy Jackson</dc:creator><description>what a poser. &amp;nbsp;how does this&amp;nbsp;guy get to meet paris hilton? &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;1st</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970864</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 04:25:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970864</guid><dc:creator>Camraul Cadogan, SVG, West Indies</dc:creator><description>there are much questions in existence here. why wouldnt mr.morgan give any form of evidence to make his beliefs more &amp;quot;believable&amp;quot;.From what i have gathered, Mr.Morgan is in search of money and fame. He speals boastfully of what he can produce but refuses to give any information that would allow us to identify with him.</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970868</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 04:28:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970868</guid><dc:creator>Christina P. PA</dc:creator><description>Morgan is one smart cookie. &amp;nbsp;He knows the rules and how to use them to his benefit and that is admirable. &amp;nbsp;Who cares if the tape exists? &amp;nbsp;He has talent in his field and seems to be credible. &amp;nbsp;Maybe it is a bunch of old ladies that are envious. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970926</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 05:08:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970926</guid><dc:creator>John Doe, Seattle WA</dc:creator><description>Hmmm...“I’m not a sex dealer. I’ve devoted my life to Lincoln&amp;quot;, but he broadcasted to the world that he copped a deal for $1.5M in exchange for an oral sex flick. &amp;nbsp;I guess the act alone is not enough to bear the title of sex dealer, and a post-sale public admission of such a deal begs the question, &amp;quot;Why advertise now?&amp;quot; The deal is over. Though, the professional title of dealer might be a stretch after all. &amp;nbsp;Surely, dealers know to advertise before to get top dollar than just settle for $1.5M. &amp;nbsp;Either E-bay or some national tabloid would have garnered him ten-fold easily. &amp;nbsp;Consider the amounts paid for celebrity weddings and baby photos.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If it did exist, destroying the film and not saying anything would have been the thoughtful thing to do, but then there's no chance for 15 minutes of free notoriety.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The FBI probably doesn't care, but the IRS will be looking for their cut of the $1.5M at 14 Wall Street regardless of its source.</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970927</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 05:09:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970927</guid><dc:creator>Sa Na, Richardson, Texas</dc:creator><description>I am sure Keya is telling the truth. &amp;nbsp;This sounds to me that the government is twisting his words and trying to make him look suspect. &amp;nbsp;Respect his right to keep his sale confidential. &amp;nbsp;Why is the government SOOO interested in squashing Keya's sale? &amp;nbsp;Could there be a link to the idea that Ms Monroe was murdered?</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970936</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 05:13:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970936</guid><dc:creator>Brenda Lightfoot          TEXAS</dc:creator><description>LET IT REST&lt;br&gt;LET HER REST</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970937</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 05:14:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970937</guid><dc:creator>Daniel Ilario, Simi Valley CA</dc:creator><description>If it walks like a duck, swims like a duck and quacks like a duck (please insert fraud in the place of duck)...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Gee, why didn't I become a con man like mama wanted me to be?</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970951</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 05:21:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970951</guid><dc:creator>A. J. Tidwell, Los Angeles, CA</dc:creator><description>“Had you seen my documentary, you would have the most respect on the planet for me,” he said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Morgan sounds like a self-promoting little jack-hole. &amp;nbsp;Even if he was 100% correct, it would still be hard to take him seriously because of his WAY over-inflated ego. &amp;nbsp;He would do well to tone down his sense of &amp;quot;greatness&amp;quot;, and then there probably wouldn't be quite so many &amp;quot;little old ladies&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;who apparently hate him. &amp;nbsp;haha</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970956</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 05:25:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970956</guid><dc:creator>Tony Rosales, Retired US Army, San Antonio, Texas</dc:creator><description>What a hoax. &amp;nbsp;Another wanna be documentary writer attempting to boost his fame and probably an unauthorized biography of Marilyn Monroe. &amp;nbsp;Dribble, Dribble, Dribble. &amp;nbsp;Leave the dead alone, and deal with matters of today. &amp;nbsp;Geesh, does anybody care about gas prices, dead soldies, children without father, AIDS, starving children, rape, murder, or mass suicide. &amp;nbsp;I guess these things aren't important....</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970981</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 05:43:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970981</guid><dc:creator>Jessica H., San Francisco CA</dc:creator><description>I had a gut feeling from the very beginning of all of this hoopla, that it smelled like dirty laundry. Unforunately, media runs with whatever story is on the hot plate, instead of actually checking it's facts. I read this story when it first broke, and being a avid monroe fan, was completely surprised by what I was hearing. Now that the actually foot work and research has been collected on this person making these outrageous claims, it seems that my initial feeling were correct. PLease take notice of this as weak journalism, anmd maybe the media will be more careful next time.</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970982</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 05:45:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970982</guid><dc:creator>b</dc:creator><description>until he proves it, it is all crap</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970985</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 05:48:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970985</guid><dc:creator>Zalsmar, Indy</dc:creator><description>Okay so I don't know which is more worse. &amp;nbsp;The FBI wasting tax dollars to debunk this claim or MSNBC wasting reporters salary to air this non newsworty issue.</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#970997</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 06:04:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:970997</guid><dc:creator>Jeff, Balboa Island, CA</dc:creator><description>What a bozo this guy is. &amp;nbsp;He is clearly full of it and should be strung up by his cajones for tarnishing our dear Marilyn.</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#971022</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 06:20:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:971022</guid><dc:creator>Chris W, Atlanta, GA</dc:creator><description>Wow, I'm glad our FBI agents are spending quality time (&amp;quot;32 man hours&amp;quot;) to better our nation's security.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-Chris</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#971032</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 06:27:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:971032</guid><dc:creator>Lucille Haycox, Las Vegas, NV</dc:creator><description>Keya Morgan is a filthy liar. &amp;nbsp;All he wants to do is make headlines and money off of poor Marilyn. I can't think of enough vile names to call this jerk. &amp;nbsp;He should crawl back under the rock he came from.</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#971041</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 06:43:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:971041</guid><dc:creator>John anon        Dallas, TX</dc:creator><description>Mr. Popkin, I would not put a bet down that there was not a film. &amp;nbsp;There were 2 off color short films floating about at Ft. Polk, during the Cuban Missile crisis, with limited viewing. A Monroe and one of Candy a well endowed blond stripper from a Dallas strip club, I think the club where Jack Ruby hung out. &amp;nbsp;It’s been a long time ago, and my memory of those times has faded, most of my associates of the time are deceased. &amp;nbsp;I like the others have no proof just some recollections. At the time Candy and Jack Ruby were just names to me, I did not visit those establishments. I find it interesting that this is now coming up, back then those were back room occurrences, where today its common place.</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#971043</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 06:43:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:971043</guid><dc:creator>DontCare, Kissimmee, FL.</dc:creator><description>Wow, who cares!? Who cares about a sex tape of an actress whos been dead for decades? It doesnt matter now, it never mattered to begin with, and I think there are far more important things to write about and report than pointless journalistic stupidity. Its not like energy concerns, the War, our Economy, and our society arn't more important things to write about and weigh in on. Seriously MSNBC, get a life.</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#971054</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 06:58:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:971054</guid><dc:creator>Phil, New York, New York</dc:creator><description>If the FBI was so sure they did not have a copy of the sex tape, why did 7 agents spend 32 hours trying to find it?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why is it that the FBI has a Dr. King sex tape? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Where is that tape?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The film the Morgan guy is making is still being made, how is it that Gates knows its not good before its even made?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I also just saw the last three pages on FBI website. It says DiMaggio offered $25,000. Why would he offer that much if it was a fake?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am really glad to know that my tax money is going to FBI agents trying to find a porn tape.</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#971055</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 06:58:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:971055</guid><dc:creator>klseattle wash</dc:creator><description>Who the hell is this guy in all of his photos the stars look at him like hes a nut and its clear they dont know him maybe he likes the fame . As a MM fan I think this is sick why would a true fan buy this video he is seeking publicity period. Check out his photos . He is not a trustworthy person and I think it is all phoney . Money doesn't make the man . The stars are like what the hell......</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#971056</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 07:01:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:971056</guid><dc:creator>Tammy Warsaw,IN</dc:creator><description>Just let Marilyn rest in peace..So what if theres a sex tape she was human just like the rest of us except she was famous.She was a wonderful person who accomplished alot in her short life..she went through so much as an adolescent and into adulthood. Marilyn is my idol I can relate to her real life story..leave her alone...</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#971064</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 07:12:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:971064</guid><dc:creator>DANIEL RUIZ WINSLOW,ARIZONA</dc:creator><description>COME ON WHO CARES. LETS TALK ABOUT THIS WAR WE'RE IN . THE MEN THAT HAVE DIED, FAMILIES WHO LOST THIR DAD'S,MOM'S. COME ON LETS GET OUR EYES ON GOD AGAIN.</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#971065</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 07:12:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:971065</guid><dc:creator>Dave - Hermosa BEach ,CA</dc:creator><description>Give the guy a break - he is just trying to protect what little privacy he has left. If I brokered big deals like that I would not disclose any information eithier out of privacy and the fact it is no one elses damn business. Good find however, maybe one day we'll all get to see it..</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#971500</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 13:38:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:971500</guid><dc:creator>Jack Farrell, Rockaway Park, NY</dc:creator><description>The fact that MSNBC devotes that much space to a crackpot like Morgan tends to diminish its own credibility.</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#971517</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 13:40:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:971517</guid><dc:creator>Dianne Glatz</dc:creator><description>I believe Marilyn Monroe was murdered and that there is a sex tape. I would not go by any government official's opinion and believe there are more coverup's that the public is not aware of. We are supposed to be living in a democracy with the freedom of speach but there are greater forces at work here.</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#974965</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 20:25:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:974965</guid><dc:creator>Indignant, Nowhere, KS.</dc:creator><description>There's a lot of idiots here. &amp;nbsp;He doesn't have the tape, and he wasn't the one that sold it. &amp;nbsp;He didn't destroy it because it wasn't his to destroy. &amp;nbsp;He just said there he knew there was a tape to help promote his movie. &amp;nbsp;As for other stupid comments, the FBI doesn't have a MLK tape, the article says they wiretapped MLK(To help prove their claim of meticulous record keeping, even of embarassing facts) and people who suspect a government conspiricy have a rather high opinion of government efficiency and secrecy. &amp;nbsp;They can't even keep regular scandals(sex, bribary, wiretapping the country) a secret, how could they hide several conspiricies. &amp;nbsp;How would a conspiricy even form? &amp;nbsp;Would any politician really want to trust anybody else with the kind of career-ending information necessary to make them a co-conspiritor? &amp;nbsp;For the FBI, saying they had some agents look through their archives(probably a good idea anyway, I wonder if they found anything else) is probably a much better idea than telling the media they refuse to check because they're confident. And if you people want &amp;quot;better&amp;quot; news, try some of the other articles on the right side of this one. &amp;nbsp;An article about insurgents buying uniforms looks like it might be a better use of your time. &amp;nbsp;Ok, maybe you people aren't &amp;quot;idiots&amp;quot; but you should read the article before making assumptions about it, and while asking questions is good, I really think you should actually look for the answer if you truly care.</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#975192</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 21:19:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:975192</guid><dc:creator>Buck Rogers, Colorado</dc:creator><description>32 man hours to research whether or not there is grainy footage of an overrated celebrity, who has been DEAD for DECADES, going down on an unidentified man, who has also probably been dead for decades? &amp;nbsp;WHO CARES!! Well, since there are no violent crimes in this country, no terrorism, no spies selling government secrets to foreign countries, I guess the FBI had to find some way to spent thier time. &amp;nbsp;Absolutely absurd.</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#975208</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 21:24:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:975208</guid><dc:creator>Marilyns' twin sister</dc:creator><description> We must get to the bottom of this. We need a special investigation. Lawyers, polititions, and reporters galor. &lt;br&gt; Why has this taken so long? Someone find a backhoe. We'll have to exume the body.</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#975373</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 22:14:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:975373</guid><dc:creator>Brewoman,  Paducah, KY</dc:creator><description>In the type of business he is in, providing your clients of case histories of documented and authentic items, it seems unusual that such a smart business man would not stipulate some proof of existance to boost his claims as an authentic historian. &amp;nbsp;The benifit of doing so while keeping the client secret and showing respet for MM makes it seems a strange way of promoting your abilities as an artifac dealer.&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp;The FBI often have their reasons for the secrets they have kept, but as time goes on I hope the freedom of information act helps us learn more than they have ever been willing to divulge on their own to date. Everything must be taken into consideration, read between the lines, scrutenize, weigh all the possible options, decide for yourself what to believe. </description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#975397</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 22:24:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:975397</guid><dc:creator>John Rosengarten, Chicago, IL</dc:creator><description>You know, people are gullible and this just goes to show. &amp;nbsp;Even if it is true, it still is a half-centruy out of relevance.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Look, people, today's news is important. &amp;nbsp;Life and death decisions are being made and most citizens are wasting their time and attention chattering about old movie stars and young vapid starlets.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A responsible media would not waste our time covering this. &amp;nbsp;Reputable journalists used to call this kind of thing &amp;quot;Yellow Journalism&amp;quot; and avoided it like the plague that it really is.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Your government is taking your rights. &amp;nbsp;The administration and congress are stealing your earnings, and the president is spending the last of the social security funds on a war that has no benefit to America, that our children will be paying for a long time to come.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Quit reading this crap and find out what is really going on!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Find a real news source and read it. &amp;nbsp;Doubt anything that comes from official sources. &amp;nbsp;Think for yourself. &amp;nbsp;Tell your friends when you find out the lies you are being told daily by media and &amp;quot;unidentified sources&amp;quot;.</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#975465</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 22:53:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:975465</guid><dc:creator>Ramandus, Phoenix, AZ</dc:creator><description>The FBI is accused of being in many conspiracies, and I believe this guy, Morgan. &amp;nbsp;I also believe Marilyn Monroe was murdered.</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#976357</link><pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 09:12:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:976357</guid><dc:creator>Walt D</dc:creator><description>Either there's an error in the article, the FBI is incorrect, or the FBI is misleading. The statement &amp;quot;David Hardy, the current FBI official who oversees the FOIA Section, confirmed that the FBI Lab never had a copy of the tape back in 1965&amp;quot; is odd because the FBI would not have made a tape back in 1965, but instead a film dupe. There was no low-level casual use of videotape in 1965 because recorders were big expensive things owned by networks. Pornographers didn't use tape back then, they used film.</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#976478</link><pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 13:19:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:976478</guid><dc:creator>Rick Crabtree Montgomery, AL</dc:creator><description>Just because the FBI says the film doesn't exist doesn't mean it DOES! &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#976801</link><pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 17:24:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:976801</guid><dc:creator>Daniel Rutschman, Phoenix, AZ</dc:creator><description>For people who love conspiracy theories, lack of evidence - or, even worse, evidence which contradicts their theory - is actually seen as further proof of a conspiracy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Logic cannot be squared away with circular reasoning like this, so all one can do really is to just shake one's head and laugh at the absurdity... and try to educate those who are willing to let facts shape their opinions. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As the president of a large Marilyn Monroe fan club I've seen it all... Marilyn had 6 toes on one foot, was the model for Tinkerbell, sang the song Santa Baby, oh yeah, and let's not forget the Apples, Coke Bottles, and Knockers stag film -and the photo of Marilyn hitch-hiking in the nude.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The one thing that all this proves is that at least Marilyn Monroe is still being remembered so many years later after she died. Which, to us fans, is proof that she was worthy of her fame.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Danamo&lt;br&gt;President, NJ2MM/Norma2Marilyn&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#976828</link><pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 17:37:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:976828</guid><dc:creator>RSH, Royal Center, IN</dc:creator><description>Wow - I just read 50+ comments and only 4 of them mentioned that the FBI spent 32 man hours on this. &amp;nbsp;I want my money back. &amp;nbsp;I keep paying taxes - i.e. thier paychecks - and I get to find out that the FBI never had a copy of a sex video?! &amp;nbsp;What I'd rather find out is that there are no more terrorist trying to kill US citizens...</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#976831</link><pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 17:38:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:976831</guid><dc:creator>QOYN, Columbus, Ohio</dc:creator><description>Has anyone even taken a minute to look at the pictures from his imdb? Doesn't anyone else notice that most of the pics are just him photoshopped into an existing celeb pic? In some cases the celeb has been cut-out and added to an existing pic of Morgan, such as the Elijah Wood (they are both looking at different focal points) and Mariah Carey &amp;nbsp;photos.(Notice how much brighter she appears than he, and in the crook of her right elbow, the material doesn't match that of his suit). If you are in the same room with the same light source as someone else in the pic, you will both have the same shadows and light glow on your face! One person will not appear dull and the other appear brighter. The only pic that I think is legit is the &amp;nbsp;Antonia Bennett pic, see how the glow from the background consistently envelopes all people in the pic? Another obvious fake is the Catherine Zeta Jones, Michael Douglas Morgan pic, I blew the pic up and examined it, there is not enough room behind Jones chair for a person and there seems to be extra material near his left arm that doesn't quite fit...just my opinion though...</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#977183</link><pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 19:31:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:977183</guid><dc:creator>A. Davis, Southern CA</dc:creator><description>The FBI should sue him for man hours wasted...</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#977289</link><pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 20:09:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:977289</guid><dc:creator>John Doe JR, Seattle, Wash.</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;This just in: Keya Morgan has brokered the sale of a secret, illicit, FBI tape of Keya Morgan to an unidentified fan of Keya Morgan who prefers not to be publicly identified as Keya Morgan.&amp;quot;</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#977477</link><pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 21:17:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:977477</guid><dc:creator>Matt, Tacoma, WA</dc:creator><description>I guess I'm just going to have spend the money to watch his documentary.</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#977774</link><pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 23:28:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:977774</guid><dc:creator>Marissa, NYC</dc:creator><description>Just because Keya started collecting items when he was 14 - that doesnt mean that he doesnt have a legitimate business. Most collectors start young or take a hobby and then make it a business. I think this article is biased. I agree if he wanted to keep the seller and the buyers identity to himself than that is HIS right. He obviously does have a passion for this and that is why it is his livelihood. &amp;nbsp;I think that at the end of the day everything involving Marilyn was a mystery. </description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#978509</link><pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 10:20:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:978509</guid><dc:creator>Martin, Vancouver, BC.</dc:creator><description>The suggestion that there might have been a sex film would require the presence of a separate camera person at the time of the sex event. That is so unlikely as to render the suggestion impossible. </description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#978846</link><pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 15:25:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:978846</guid><dc:creator>K. Murphy</dc:creator><description>Nice to see our tax dollars put to such important use.</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#980144</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 01:49:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:980144</guid><dc:creator>becky florida</dc:creator><description>Hey guys,&lt;br&gt; 32 man hours for the FBI isn't all that bad, what if it were you? Wouldn't you like someone to disprove it's exsistance. They were tax payers.&lt;br&gt;Sleazey people do sleazy things I would like the FBI's help if I were in the same situation.....</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#980237</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 03:14:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:980237</guid><dc:creator>Chris. Boston, MA</dc:creator><description>I'd like to see a similarly pointed, skeptical investigative reporting effort launched on persons whose actions have profound impact on our lives for something which truly affects all of us directly or indirectly as individuals and a nation, e.g.: Cheney &amp;amp; his made-to-order, in-(White)House WMD &amp;quot;intelligence&amp;quot; and why he and others in his &amp;quot;Administration&amp;quot; have not been impeached for taking our country into a war of aggression for personal &amp;amp; political profit (repayment for his appointment to office), and why we can't prove that we have any right to call ourselves &amp;quot;America&amp;quot; until we restore the Constitutional rule of law to our highest governmental offices. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#980424</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 09:06:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:980424</guid><dc:creator>Betzel, Salina, Kansas</dc:creator><description>Well,suckers are still being born every minute, Mr. Morgan - um, I mean, Barnum, aren't they? But it seems much ado about something not very important, and about something that's not really anyone's business but MM's - However, who made the film, if it exists, and did MM know it had been made? That question might be interesting to answer.</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#980519</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 12:39:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:980519</guid><dc:creator>Alex, Cleveland, Ohio.</dc:creator><description>At first I thought this all was a waste of time, 32 man hours? But after reading some replies about FBI &amp;quot;hiding evidence&amp;quot; and the &amp;quot;government conspiracy&amp;quot; to keep us in the dark, I think it was &amp;nbsp;necessary because some people in the voting public really do get fooled easily. Some here think that a claim, and proof of that claim's validity are mutually exclusive! What? So I can say anything I want and not have anything but my word to show for it? Then there are those that keep insisting that &amp;nbsp;the government is out to get us. Well just put on your tin foil hat and stock up on emergency rations! Wait how do you know that the rations don't have mind controlling drugs in them? &lt;br&gt;I will point out that Morgan's evidence for this film come from a publicly available FBI document! Its just that he claimed that there were things in there that no one else can seem to see! Instead of claiming a conspiracy why dont some people just read the originals that Morgan is using as his ONLY proof. </description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#980911</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 14:26:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:980911</guid><dc:creator>Josh, Cleveland, OH</dc:creator><description>Evidently, the film exists...the only thing in question is whether or not the FBI ever had a copy. &amp;nbsp;Considering the trouble that the FBI has had keeping track of laptop computers with classified information, conveniently forgetting about a Marilyn Monroe film isn't impossible. </description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#988069</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 22:54:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:988069</guid><dc:creator>Jimmie McViewer</dc:creator><description>Does no one else see the flaw in &amp;quot;fbi.com&amp;quot; the gent cites? &amp;nbsp;How about &amp;quot;fbi.gov&amp;quot;? </description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#992839</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 20:40:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:992839</guid><dc:creator>FakerHater, FL</dc:creator><description>Btw, the comment from &amp;quot;Sa Na&amp;quot; looks like a phony planted comment from Keya. Good investigative reporting for calling this douche bag on all his phony claims! Morgan knows what a lot of fakers know, that the illusion of success and celebrity can often lead to real celebrity and success (money), a self-fulfilling prophecy. Look how much publicity he has already garnered! Most of the imdb photos are so fake it's hilarious with different exposure levels for two people supposedly in the same pic. Some pics could be unannounced walk-ups. Most of them are all dated Feb 3 2008, yet they are from like 8 different locations, some east coast, some west, lol! What a waste of life!(and my time!)</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#998646</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 22:59:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:998646</guid><dc:creator>Jack, Rose, CA</dc:creator><description>Funny how no one has ever seen the video, but does if its authentic or not. I just read the GBI.gov website and it is VERY CLEAR that the FBI and J. Edgar Hoover knew about the tape in the 1960s' Also the fact that DiMaggio offered $25,000. back in 1965 for the tape.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Are we also calling DiMaggio crazy?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ps-I have seen this Morgan guy in the past in several movies and commercials including Sea Of Love with Al Pacino, so I know it would be impossible for him to recreate a movies. Also, the dates on IMDB are when the photos were added, not when taken.</description></item><item><title>FBI: No Marilyn Monroe sex film</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/01/969700.aspx#1034750</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 07:10:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1034750</guid><dc:creator>Bill, Detroit, MI</dc:creator><description>Keya kept information from NBC? The nerve! Next thing you know, politicians will start working both sides of the fence and the FBI will have trouble finding information it would rather not locate.</description></item></channel></rss>