<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx</link><description>By Jim Popkin, NBC News Senior Investigative Producer
Former First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton's calendar entries are full of unexplained private meetings on key dates when she and President Clinton were fending off a variety of scandals, the newly released</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60608.1)</generator><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786502</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 00:24:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786502</guid><dc:creator>Stephanie, Baltimore, MD</dc:creator><description>I find it very ironic that Sen. Clinton's critics spent President Clinton's eight years in the White House complaining endlessly that Sen. Clinton had too much undeserved power and influence but now insist that she did nothing of substance while there. &amp;nbsp;Astonishingly convenient, isn't it?</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786531</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 00:31:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786531</guid><dc:creator>Rob S, Trinity Beach, Australia</dc:creator><description>&lt;br&gt;As an American citizen living abroad, I find this type of thing rather disturbing. &amp;nbsp;As such I felt a need to comment. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So much for transparency of information!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyone can make claims as to what they may or may not have done, regardless of the position they held. &amp;nbsp;It's time for HRC to fill in the blanks or to head back to Westchester.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We need a President who is open and honest; warts and all.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786539</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 00:34:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786539</guid><dc:creator>Deborah Jones, New Orleans, Louisiana</dc:creator><description>This is incredibly boring stuff. Hillary was first lady at this time and while she had access to power, she was not the final word on policy. In addition, the rehashing of the Monica controversy is a yawn considering all the other infidelities that have come to light on both sides of the aisle. I think it's time to move on folks.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786548</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 00:36:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786548</guid><dc:creator>S.P. Wiliams, Lakewood, CO</dc:creator><description>Well, I guess she did have a foreign policy role. Naturally, she was not president and cannot therefore take credit or blame for anything specific, but this is a far cry from the Laura-Bush-like figure Sen. Obama tries to paint. And it's good enough for me.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786568</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 00:40:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786568</guid><dc:creator>Terri Goodman, Snohomish, WA</dc:creator><description>I am truly disgusted with the media. &amp;nbsp;I would like would to know what Obama is giving to prove he has experience. &amp;nbsp;We all know that he can make a great speech, but what else? &amp;nbsp;He can blame race for everything, women have been held back just as much. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Your job is to report the news - not give one sided opinions.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786580</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 00:43:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786580</guid><dc:creator>Paul O'Brien Po Box 123 Denton,Md.21629</dc:creator><description>Mrs.Clinton was not an official of the U&amp;gt;S&amp;gt; Government so why was she included in any briefings relating to official business? I believe this must be a violation of the law pertaining to confidential business of the President.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786588</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 00:45:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786588</guid><dc:creator>LARRY S, RENO, NV.</dc:creator><description>O.K., SHE 'MET WITH' SOME IMPORTANT PEOPLE. &amp;nbsp;THE REAL QUESTION IS, WHAT DID THOSE MEETINGS ACCOMPLISH? &amp;nbsp;TO PARAPHRASE AN OLD T.V. AD CAMPAIGN, &amp;quot;WHERE'S THE HEADLINES?&amp;quot;</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786592</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 00:47:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786592</guid><dc:creator>Susan Norton, Eureka, CA</dc:creator><description>No matter there was some hesitancy in getting these records out. &amp;nbsp;No one, not even Hillary, wants to keep revisiting the Monica story, but you guys in the media just can't give it up. &amp;nbsp;Too bad your detective skills don't work so well when it comes to things like Obama, the war, etc. &amp;nbsp;Have fun!</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786594</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 00:47:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786594</guid><dc:creator>cnc Waverly PA</dc:creator><description>There are a lot of SECRETS in Hilliary Clinton's closet. &amp;nbsp;They will be brought out eventually.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786595</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 00:47:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786595</guid><dc:creator>Steve Malberg, Clarkston, Washington. </dc:creator><description>Interesting, 1998? 1996? 2000? Private meetings? Just what does all this mean? Officially the open record just may say one thing, that at least Mrs. Clinton has had some experience in world politics. I also must add as a married man my wife has a huge influence on how I face the world, just as her husband did. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786601</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 00:49:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786601</guid><dc:creator>Rick, mid-Iowa</dc:creator><description>I honestly dont see anything exlaining he real expereience. I cannot agree with stateent that she says she is more experienced than Obama. Her records are full of holes and blackouts.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786606</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 00:50:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786606</guid><dc:creator>Nwabufo Alor</dc:creator><description>What do you expect?She will not let you know the illegal things that She was involved.The so call foreign policy experience were as you know was having tea and gardening experiences around the world while Her husband was presiding over the affairs of the country</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786613</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 00:53:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786613</guid><dc:creator>Sue, Bloominton, IN</dc:creator><description>How was it that she was briefed by senior National Security Council officials when she didn't have National Security clearance?</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786614</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 00:53:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786614</guid><dc:creator>Melinda, Arcadia CA.</dc:creator><description>I think this is all old information and another biased treatment of Hilary Clinton. &amp;nbsp;How about Obma who has actually lived to the age of 45 or whatever and has done no wrong! &amp;nbsp;Or is it that he has never done anything of substance one way or the other. &amp;nbsp;Biased is written all over the treatment of Hilary Clinton. &amp;nbsp;Who is really playing the race card? I agree with the statement earlier if Obma were white he would not have survived the media's scrutiny. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786615</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 00:53:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786615</guid><dc:creator>SR, Mahwah, NJ</dc:creator><description>Wow!! Great foreign affairs resume that Hillary has. &amp;nbsp;This's what she projects as being the strength against the &amp;quot;talks&amp;quot; of Senator Obama. &amp;nbsp;Please folks, don't brand this as left-wing conspiracy, and look into the truth. &amp;nbsp;I'd rather vote for a promising candidate than her with big baggage of inaction, isolation from real American people, association with only elites, etc. &amp;nbsp;Looks like the experience is portrayed as part of the win-at-any-cost strategy.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786618</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 00:53:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786618</guid><dc:creator>David Woodward   Henderson, NV.</dc:creator><description>Experience! And what exactly WAS experienced are two seperate issue's. &amp;nbsp;This goes along with someone whom has been groomed, grown, matured and educated to take a certain position in life and someone who has just been to the groomer throughout their life to appear as if they can take that position. &amp;nbsp;Unfortunately, there are a few people running in this election that have been to the groomer's but don't have the true substance to do the job. &amp;nbsp;Let's face it, we're talking about the next leader of the free WORLD here. &amp;nbsp;This IS bigger than just the U.S. &amp;nbsp;SUBSTANCE, not smoke and mirrors, think about it. Thank you. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786629</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 00:57:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786629</guid><dc:creator>GM, Oakland, Ca.</dc:creator><description>Garden parties, Tea parties, and planning state dinners do not constitute the kind of experience that Hilary has been alluding to.....much less having a parent teacher conference count as education reform. &amp;nbsp;It is not a question of whether or not Hilary was of value to her husband during his time in office, but rather the distortion and interpertation now being used.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786649</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:02:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786649</guid><dc:creator>peter ray, palm springs,ca</dc:creator><description>why the bad press,you forget that Hilary worked hard on other issues,look at our heath care now would you? you have all the answers but never seem to relay anything positive</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786655</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:03:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786655</guid><dc:creator>Sandra, Portland OR</dc:creator><description>I really don't see a great deal of &amp;quot;deep background&amp;quot; into the issue of Hillary Clinton's calendar, especially if this is all you can come up with in 8 years' worth of meetings. &amp;nbsp;If anything, this post reeks of someone trying to find something substantial and coming up with crumbs.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Note that I say this not as a Clinton supporter, but as someone who cares about the facts and newsworthy reporting. &lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786673</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:07:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786673</guid><dc:creator>John Q, Phoenix, AZ</dc:creator><description>This story implies some matters that may need further inquiry, but I do not think these findings are substantive. &amp;nbsp;While serving as First Lady, Senator Clinton may have had some meetings with important people and discussed some issues that pertain to very sensitive issues. &amp;nbsp;I am glad she did not itemize those issues in her day-timer for someone to find. &amp;nbsp;In addition, on diplomatic visits there will always be some posturing involved. &amp;nbsp;The fact that the tea parties and social gatherings took place with the spouses, while the heads of states meet on issues should not really surprise any one. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;The subpoenaed documentation did raise my eyebrows a bit. &amp;nbsp;I would like to get more information on that.&lt;br&gt;If you want to say that Senator Clinton lacks real National Security experience, say that. &amp;nbsp;Making assumptions about events you are ignorant of accomplishes nothing.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786678</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:08:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786678</guid><dc:creator>Marlece Davis, Humble, Texas</dc:creator><description>Visiting 80 countries,meeting with 3 foreign heads of state, visiting with the troops and their families, and briefings with varous Cabinet Secretaries, meeting with a variety of foreign dignataries, and with the head of the National Security Council is quite an accomplishment.Your last paragraph should have been your first...this article is misleading and the facts seem to be in the last paragraph which most people do not read.&lt;br&gt;I would imagine that Hillary would not have everything on her calendar, but the last paragraph of this article gave many solid facts, and that is really what I find to be most important, as well as, the most objective.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786679</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:09:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786679</guid><dc:creator>Susan, Santa Rosa, California</dc:creator><description>Could you please also include in your report, the right-wing group that filed a lawsuit in order for these documents to be released? &amp;nbsp;Also, will you write a report as to why the current Bush White House will not release their emails leading up to the Iraq War?</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786689</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:10:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786689</guid><dc:creator>Roger Koppy, Hood River, OR</dc:creator><description>After seven years of Bush-Cheney hyper-secrecy, the media is going to focus on a few private meetings of Senator Clinton's over a decade ago? Excuse me, but I don't see her refusing to release her calendar, citing national security issues. You find out what happened in Cheney's closed-door energy meetings and then I'll consider paying attention to your &amp;quot;investigation&amp;quot; of Mrs. Clinton's meetings. This is a non-issue.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786692</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:11:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786692</guid><dc:creator>Carolyn Smith Windsor Ontario Canada</dc:creator><description>Does Mrs. Clinton mention anything about when her husband was the Governor of Arkansaw allowing the contract for the Arkansaw prison blood plasma to be renewed, even though he was warned it should be rejected.....Many dying Canadians who received this tainted blood say that Bill Clinton knew the blood to be tainted and yet sold it to the public anway...Deputy White House Advisor Vince Foster who was allegedly murdered was tracking this information about the tainted blood when the Clintons were in their first term at the White House</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786693</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:11:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786693</guid><dc:creator>Richard, Boone, NC</dc:creator><description>It occurs to me that Hillary Clinton's potential return to the White House could be a front for Bill Clinton to resume presidential responsibilities. This has precedent (of a sort) in the rumors of Dick Cheney holding the reins of power, while Bush simply plays the role of President. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786695</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:11:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786695</guid><dc:creator>Finn MacCool</dc:creator><description>Obviously the Republicans and &amp;nbsp;certain media are afraid of Hillary. Why bring this up now? This has no bearing on current events. The war in Iraq is a quagmire , the economy is the worst in years, petroleum WILL become a luxury and MSNBC.com has sunk to the level of TMZ.com.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786699</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:12:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786699</guid><dc:creator>L. James  Washington, Missouri</dc:creator><description>I think there is little doubt that Mrs. Clinton&lt;br&gt;was in violation of the security clearances she&lt;br&gt;had in conducting some of these meetings. &amp;nbsp;Being the Presidents wife should nopt have made her privvy to things she would like us to believe she was</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786701</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:12:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786701</guid><dc:creator>Jane Chicago</dc:creator><description>Is this What Hillary Clinton call her Foreign Policy Experience? Touring and drinking tea. &amp;nbsp;We are in trouble if this is what she's calls experience. Are these the qualifications that's required to be a United States President?</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786702</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:12:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786702</guid><dc:creator>Roger Beavers Belview, MN</dc:creator><description>First of all the article states Hillary has limited foreign policy experience and then states she had many meetings with foreign heads of state gaining much needed experience. Many unexplained meetings happen every day among people with just as much leverage as Hillary and they are part of doing business and settling differences. This article is just another example of bashing Hillary.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786706</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:13:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786706</guid><dc:creator>David, Brea, California </dc:creator><description>What happened to objective news coverage? This story sounds like it was written by the obama campaign. I'm not saying that news coverage can't be critical, but it has a prosecutorial tone to it. Moreover, while the story tries to point out inconsistencies or cite the lack of evidence of Sen. Clinton's foreign policy experience, it provides no &amp;quot;Aha!&amp;quot; moments, just mere assertions that could be rebutted. &amp;nbsp;Not surprisingly, the Clinton campaign wasn't asked to respond point-by-point. And I'm not even a Clinton supporter!</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786707</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:13:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786707</guid><dc:creator>Susan lohwasser, Midpines, CA</dc:creator><description>What's the matter with you people? Do you really think you've gotten hold of some red hot news here or is this just more network Hillary bashing. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786708</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:14:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786708</guid><dc:creator>John Doe, Seattle, Wash.</dc:creator><description>This is such a non-issue. Since when did government records ever offer full disclosure? Use some common sense.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786709</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:14:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786709</guid><dc:creator>Tom Glavin, Newport News, VA</dc:creator><description>I certainly hope this becomes THEIR comeuppance. I'm surprised that the NBC folks were able to stay awake long enough to read what was left of her plainly uneventful and boring years in the White House. What was it she said about being a (yuk) housewife? Seems she was one..... </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786710</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:14:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786710</guid><dc:creator>Laura, Arkansas</dc:creator><description>I think this whole thing is bogus. Is anyone checking Obama's records? He is all rhetoric and no substance. And besides, she WAS the first lady and was required to do &amp;quot;traditional first lady fare.&amp;quot;</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786715</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:15:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786715</guid><dc:creator>Eugene Washington, Little Rock, Arkansas</dc:creator><description>So much of hillary's cooked-up 35yrs of experience to be a commander-in-chief was covered up in black ink. &amp;nbsp; </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786722</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:17:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786722</guid><dc:creator>Mary, Delaware</dc:creator><description>Well, it's not surprise that any polititian, especially the Clintons, are going to block out things that look bad or questioning and leave in anything that makes them look good.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786735</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:21:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786735</guid><dc:creator>Lisa, Palmer, Alaska</dc:creator><description>Really now, the fact that Mrs. Clinton was trusted to meet with some of these foreign officials at all speaks to her trusted authority. Is this all about stirring up controversy for the election?</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786736</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:21:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786736</guid><dc:creator>Heather, Washington DC</dc:creator><description>This is a pretty poorly written article. It aims to highlight the 'insignificant'or potentially questionable days of Hillary. Did Obama's camp also edit it for you guys? You can't have two paragraphs detailing specific times when she was not substantively involved in foreign affairs and then two bland sentences summarizing the substantive stuff. I expect journalist to either not express an overt opinion or at least give both sides of the story when they do.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786743</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:21:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786743</guid><dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator><description>Clinton shenanigans have been going on since way beyond he was the honcho in Arkansas. &amp;nbsp;Recently I read a list of people deceased who were involved with the Clintons in one way or another. &amp;nbsp;Quite lengthy and impressive. &amp;nbsp;Oh well, I guess people tend to forget what they don't want to hear.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786744</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:22:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786744</guid><dc:creator>Ed Mora</dc:creator><description>Senator Clinton clearly has the high level experience that Senator Obama does not. Senator Clinton has what it takes, she does not even need a refresher course. Senator Obama needs to get his feet wet, and there might not be any time for that, considering the wrld situation. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786750</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:22:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786750</guid><dc:creator>Patti B, Chincoteague,VA.</dc:creator><description>Oh, aren't those tea functions, walks through gardens, and lunches complete proof of the outstanding foreign &amp;amp; political experience? And I just love the detail on NAFTA that she strongly supported, but somehow in Ohio and PA she claims to have been against it. Will the lies and flip-flops ever end......No. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786756</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:24:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786756</guid><dc:creator>Kay, St. Louis, MO</dc:creator><description>I'm not Clinton supporter, but I really can't believe you're trying to use against her the fact that she left the White House for 25 minutes on a day that the entire world was enlightened of the details of her husband's sexual exploits with a 21 year old intern. &amp;nbsp;Please, Mr. Popkin, of all the things you could find, there had to be something better than that. &amp;nbsp;Maybe the poor woman needed to go for a walk. &amp;nbsp;The fact certainly doesn't make her any less qualified to be President. &amp;nbsp;What has happened with this Presidential primary? &amp;nbsp;Suddenly the candidates and the press both seem to be so focused on finding the tiniest little things that they can blow up and use to attack. &amp;nbsp;Of course, we notice, this is the environment in which Hillary seems to once again be thriving. &amp;nbsp;And THAT is why I'm not a Hillary supporter. &amp;nbsp;But don't try to beat Hillary at that old game. If this country's going to change, if Democracy is going to thrive, then we need to play by different rules. &amp;nbsp;Let's get focused on the issues again.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786757</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:24:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786757</guid><dc:creator>Jerry Baumgardner  Lacey, Washington</dc:creator><description>Good Article. &amp;nbsp;I do think you could of started with Paragraph 5 and I think that the last paragraph deserved more importance. &amp;nbsp;&amp;quot;Dozens of time throughtout her White House years, she attended White House meetings with Cabinet secretaries, was briefed by senior National Security Council officials&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;is what the voters really want to know about. &amp;nbsp;All in all a good article.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786758</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:24:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786758</guid><dc:creator>paulettelzander@gmail.com</dc:creator><description>Why isn't this level of scrutiny applied to Bush? We wouldn't be close to the 4,000 American death mark in Iraq if the media hounds applied the same standards.&lt;br&gt;Who cares where she went for 25 minutes eight years ago? &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;Paulette Zander &amp;nbsp;Niantic, CT</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786775</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:27:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786775</guid><dc:creator>primarywatcher, Sacramento, CA</dc:creator><description>Popkin, Good work! Please keep it up...would be nice to balance the painful TRUTH of Obama's relationship to Rev. Wright against the UNTRUTH of Hillary's hidden tax forms and private meetings. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm trying to imagine voting with a conscience this year as opposed to voting for the lesser of two evils.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786781</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:28:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786781</guid><dc:creator>+4548485</dc:creator><description>I am a John Edwards supporter and a proud “Populist Democrat” &amp;nbsp;so I now have no favorite dog in this race. Both Clinton and Obama are pretty much equally beholden to corporate special interests. (do you really believe 100,000 college kids gave him 32 million) &amp;nbsp;No “REAL CHANGE” can happen until there is 100% public financing for campaigns. That said, I really hope that Obama can win the General election because it looks like he will be our parties nominee and any “D” is better than any “R”. However, anyone who thinks that the debate Add is &amp;quot;negative&amp;quot; is in for a big surprise in November. Which is the part that scares me most about Obama not that he can't take the heat, it's that his supposed independent &amp;amp; cross over supporters will run for the hills once they find out what his positions are. In addition why do most of the Obama supporters on these blogs express such venom and hate for Hillary, you sound like the conservative right. You have bought into the misleading, false &amp;amp; derogatory things the GOP has been spinning for the last 15 years about the Clintons. The very things most of you say wont effect senator Obama. Don't you understand if it wasn’t for people like Bill &amp;amp; Hillary Clintons service in public life for the last 30 years Barack Obama would not even have this opportunity.&lt;br&gt;If it really is all about the new politics of HOPE &amp;amp; INCLUSION then why all the HATE &amp;amp; CONDEMNATION!&lt;br&gt;Just A Thought, Go DEMOCRATS IN 08&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786782</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:29:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786782</guid><dc:creator>Edgar R. Murrow, Greensboro, NC</dc:creator><description>Wow. &amp;nbsp;Serious non-story on a serious non-issue, littered with pointless red-herrings. &amp;nbsp;Maybe this &amp;quot;producer&amp;quot; (pronounced &amp;quot;shill&amp;quot;) should leave the reporting to the journalists and pay attention to producing substantial news, with real, conclusive information. &amp;nbsp;Pretty embarrassing display for someone that gets paid to deliver news.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm not a big fan of either candidate (McCain? funny.), nor am I a big fan of vague information being specifically framed for a purpose. &amp;nbsp;MSNBC Blogs should not be touted as real news for the benefit of MSNBC's reputation. &amp;nbsp;Using the excuse, &amp;quot;It's only a blog.&amp;quot; doesn't apply when stories like this make the Google news box on millions of google home pages. &amp;nbsp;Then, it's MSNBC distributing inferior product.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786786</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:30:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786786</guid><dc:creator>Jarred Soulth, Denver, Colorado</dc:creator><description>Wow, I'm not a Hillary supporter but it's obvious that this news source is out to get her. &amp;nbsp;Did anyone try to compare her schedule vs. other former First Ladies? &amp;nbsp;Did she engage in more policy than Mrs. Bush? &amp;nbsp;Mrs. Kennedy? &amp;nbsp;I don't think that she's ever said that she was the President, I think she has said that her experience as the first lady has given her experience to be the president. &amp;nbsp;Doesn't having private meetings with world leaders fulfill her claim? &amp;nbsp;Especially when First Ladies don't really need to do much more than decorate the White House during Christmas? &amp;nbsp;Although it's obvious this author has a bone to pick with the former First Lady, it has done nothing but allowed me to see that Hillary really does have some of that experience she claims to have, and has opened my eyes that the media really is harder on her than on Obama. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786788</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:31:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786788</guid><dc:creator>Janet, Los Angeles, CA</dc:creator><description>This article is a bit ridiculous and&lt;br&gt;apparently biased...why? Senator Clinton must be closing the campaign gap and &amp;quot;somebody&amp;quot; is desperate to discredit her. Don't you have something better to report on?</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786789</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:32:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786789</guid><dc:creator>Craig Patterson, Dallas TX</dc:creator><description>Why are we talking about this? &amp;nbsp;This is so crazy that you would bring this up when all the junk about Obama is much more important. Lets have a fair report on both and quit picking on her.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786792</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:33:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786792</guid><dc:creator>Kelvin Waters, Tampa FL</dc:creator><description>Well this is sure to open a can of worms. It seems that which ever party makes it to the White House they do themselves in eventually and the people hunger for change then vice versa. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786793</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:33:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786793</guid><dc:creator>James Johnson, Rock Hill, SC</dc:creator><description>You can't help but question whether or not Hillary is really the expert with Foreign Policy or is it really Bill? Hillary has made it a point that she's familiar with Foreign Policy, but what has she actually acheived in regards to working so hard on it? Shame Hillary, these private meetings, and these middle of the night trips arent explaining your expertise in Foreign Policy!</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786795</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:34:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786795</guid><dc:creator>Jon Baumgartner   Meridian, Id</dc:creator><description>This whole thing is really something I am not &amp;nbsp;surprised to see. It is so apparent that She and her husband are so involved with themselves and the power that really anything goes. Also where was she and the Pres. when he was being sought regarding Bin Laden?</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786796</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:34:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786796</guid><dc:creator>Avgeno,  Cleveland, Ohio</dc:creator><description>So what's the point of this artical? &amp;nbsp;Really getting over the media's constant attempt to dig up dirt where there is none, be it with Clinto, Obama or McCain. &amp;nbsp;This is just another smear with no substance.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786799</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:34:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786799</guid><dc:creator>Carol....B'ham,Al</dc:creator><description>Sounds as Senator Clinton is making her trying to make herself look good but in reality she has no real first hand experience in foreign affairs,it seems her only duties were those of a president's wife duties. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786801</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:34:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786801</guid><dc:creator>David, Florida</dc:creator><description>Insightful, yet organized to look jaded and bitter. &amp;nbsp;The title suggests this is about unknown meetings, yet the article digresses into bashing Clinton's foreign policy experience. &amp;nbsp;Looks biased. &amp;nbsp;The title should point out that the reason why Clinton's planner was released in the first place was to highlight her foreign policy experience, and that WHILE investigating this, you found other oddities.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Would read far better than it does now. &amp;nbsp;Now it just looks like a bash-fest. &amp;nbsp;Loses audience.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786803</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:35:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786803</guid><dc:creator>Jackie Pittsburgh,Pa</dc:creator><description>I wonder why MSNBC doesn't spend any time investigating Obama. It looks like he gets a free pass on &amp;nbsp;any thing he says or does,but Hillary is looked at under a microscope. Used to be an organization to be respected but not since it became the &amp;quot;Obama lovefest&amp;quot;</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786804</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:35:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786804</guid><dc:creator>Bob Lennon</dc:creator><description>Great example of political statements not equating with actual evidence.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786815</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:39:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786815</guid><dc:creator>Edith Johnson, Lakeville, Minnesota</dc:creator><description>Let's get real and stop the exaggerations, the only presidential experience that one can have is that of being president, not going on trips with or sitting in meetings with the president. &amp;nbsp;On my job, I do not get experience credit for sitting in meetings with my department heads or listening to others give speeches, etc. &amp;nbsp;Such situations do not and should not count as experiences that will enable you to &amp;nbsp;handle situations as president or in other positions. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Each of our presidents have learned on the job. &amp;nbsp;Some have done well and others have not done so well. &amp;nbsp;If you are speaking of experience for a second term president, his/her first term qualifies as presidential experience, good or bad. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Senators Clinton, McCain and Obama have congressional and possibly other experiences and should leave it at that. Presidential experience comes only from being president, not from wanting to be president. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786822</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:41:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786822</guid><dc:creator>Ed hayden  Odessa Washington</dc:creator><description>America is in a real mess. Americans rather follow a lie then seek out the truth. Following&lt;br&gt;Hillary Clinton into the White house supported by the votes from the American voters based upon her claimed expierence is like burning your own house down. She is a Canidate of very little honest substance and certianly not a leader for our times. Greeting International leaders and attending Garden parties does not make a great leader.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786823</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:42:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786823</guid><dc:creator>Patrice C, Conway, NH</dc:creator><description>So typical, today the media is transfixed with Hillary Clinton's first lady schedule from the 90's, while her opponent has on one hand, Tony Resco and the other his preacher of over 20 years, not to mention whatever else the media chooses to ignore. Shameless bias, Obama yesterday justifies his pastor and quickly turned the whole thing around so people from all walks of life somehow end up feeling guilty when it was he who supported and was inspired by this pastor, even getting the title of one of his books from this guy.&lt;br&gt;Obama is The Music Man, Professor Harold Hill, he is a salesman, a rainmaker. If Clinton does not beat him, McCain surely will in the fall. How many other surprises are to be learned about his past? Still the media finds the schedule of the first lady far more newsworthy. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786825</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:43:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786825</guid><dc:creator>Judith</dc:creator><description>When was Mrs Clinton elected to the post of offices she is said to have served in the 1990's... Is she telling us she ran the White house instead of her husband who was elected to???&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Interesting about all the meetings that list no one isn't it????&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As far as I can remember, she was in charge of the health care issue which failed big time....</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786827</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:43:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786827</guid><dc:creator>Bill Harris, Atlanta, GA</dc:creator><description>Your article indicates that as First Lady Mrs. Clinton in 1996 attended meetings with Cabinet secretaries &amp;amp; was breifed by senior NSC officals. At this time did Mrs. Clinton hold a top secret clearance in order to be breifed on national security matters. If not, those who breifed her were in violation of federal law.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786828</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:44:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786828</guid><dc:creator>Pat Albert, Dixon, Il</dc:creator><description>I thought it was the Drudge Report who broke the story about Lewinski but the author states it was the Washington Post. Is this revisionist journalism?</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786830</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:45:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786830</guid><dc:creator>Martin MacDonald, Bay St Louis, Miss</dc:creator><description>Hillary certainly has marginal leadership experience during world crisis except her vote to support the Iraq War. &lt;br&gt;The invisible &amp;quot;private or ghost meetings&amp;quot; indicate possible corruption for money in exchange for pardons. &lt;br&gt;What our country needs in a new visionary leader like Obama who is honest and direct!</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786832</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:46:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786832</guid><dc:creator>NinaK, Lakewood, Wash</dc:creator><description>Pretty sketchy, I would say. &amp;nbsp;Hillary has no Foreign Policy experience. &amp;nbsp;How was she able to be briefed by National Security Officials. &amp;nbsp;She did NOT have a national security clearance the entire time she was in the White House. &amp;nbsp;Wouldn't this be a violation of security policy??</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786840</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:48:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786840</guid><dc:creator>Veronique, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania</dc:creator><description>I understand that there is a certain public right to know that our candidates words can be backed up with documentation. &amp;nbsp;I also understand that the candidates, by seeking public office open themselves up for scrutiny, however, do we really need to account for every minute of every day in the life of Hillary? &amp;nbsp;The reason these records were handed over was to validate her experience in foreign policy, not to second-guess why we are missing 25 minutes of time on a day when her personal life was in total upheaval. &amp;nbsp;In addition, is it possible that she did not accompany her husband in some of these foreign countries due to the fact that the action would have been an insult to the traditions and acceptable behavior in that country, or is it truly because she enjoys having tea more? &amp;nbsp;These are some of the things, as intellegent, in-the-know voters, we should be questioning. &amp;nbsp;Finally, if the media is going to question where Hillary was 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, with every minute accounted for, I for one, would like to have the same exact information for Barrack Obama and John McCain. &amp;nbsp;Wouldn't that be considered fair, unbiased reporting? &amp;nbsp;Or is that asking too much? &amp;nbsp;Fortunately, I am intellegent enough to take the information I have at my fingertips about all of the candidates, do my OWN research and make my own decisions. &amp;nbsp;I just hope other voters have the sense to do the same thing as later this year when we choose our next president, it truly may make or break our country as we know it.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786841</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:48:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786841</guid><dc:creator>John, Palm Springs, CA</dc:creator><description>Excellent investigative reporting by Jim Popkin. &amp;nbsp;It appears that Hillary's docs have been redacted so much that they become practically worthless; however, the fact that they hide so much speaks volumes. &amp;nbsp;Wonder if she will redact her income tax returns too. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786843</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:49:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786843</guid><dc:creator>Bob from Chicago, Illinois</dc:creator><description>One can expect that the redactions are more important than than what is here. Where are the 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006 tax returns? That is where the influence peddlers are. It's Rezko X $1,000,000. Show us the money!!</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786846</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:50:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786846</guid><dc:creator>Mary Quinlan  Sargent Texas</dc:creator><description>I would say the author does not like Senator Clinton, wouldn't you? &amp;nbsp;I really neither like or dislike her but was leaning toward Obama but when I see negative newscasting like this out of the clear blue sky about something that really isn't even news worthy I want to run to Senator Clintons side and support her. &amp;nbsp;What's funny is some of the most news worthy moments in the campaign have been regarding Rev. J. Wright. &amp;nbsp;Now this is a really negative subject, one that NBC could really attack but I have seen nothing really negative said by NBC regarding it. &amp;nbsp;I think...yes, maybe NBC is leaning towards Obama.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786848</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:51:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786848</guid><dc:creator>ricky ....atlanta, georgia</dc:creator><description>so when we elected bill clinton president...instead of the vice-president as his proxy he sent the first lady... and she holds her own private meetings. it shows that on several occasions the first lady went in his stead. so now it makes me wonder who will be running the country if hillary is elected. Private meetings and alll.....</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786849</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:52:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786849</guid><dc:creator>Adrienne Smitha, Seattle Wa.</dc:creator><description>Why spend energy on gossip? &amp;nbsp;Your article seems trite and reminds me of junior high kids looking for a scandal to create interest. &amp;nbsp;Lets focus on articles that will help the American mentality, rather than support our immature nature.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786875</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:59:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786875</guid><dc:creator>Antonio Lewis, Cincinnati, OH</dc:creator><description>And these merky, closed door private meetings and breifings prove her 'experience' with foreign policy how? What major policies on foreign issues and/or foreign crisis, did Sen. Clinton develop as First Lady?</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786876</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:59:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786876</guid><dc:creator>Brendan Miney, East Fallowfield Township, PA</dc:creator><description>While the events mentioned may be 'news', I am more interested in those events that show Mrs. Clinton gaining the experience she touts so I may make an informed decision on the right candidate. &amp;nbsp;Did you find any to support her claims?</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786879</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:59:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786879</guid><dc:creator>Jeff Kobulnick</dc:creator><description>Has it really come to this? &amp;nbsp;Must America know the full details of every minute of a First Lady's calendar, every meeting she attended and who else was present? &amp;nbsp;Is it really newsworthy material that she happened to take a 25 minute breather after learning about some disturbing news, or that she actually enjoyed a few days of vacation without any &amp;quot;official&amp;quot; events (i.e., a true &amp;quot;vacation&amp;quot;)? &amp;nbsp;I think not.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obviously, America wants to get to know as much as possible about our presidential candidates. &amp;nbsp;This however, goes beyond that and attempts to cast a dark shadow on Senator Clinton based on what appear to be rather innocent and justifiable (should SHE decide she needs to do so, which she does not) pieces of information (note, I do not call these &amp;quot;facts&amp;quot;). &amp;nbsp;The mere use of the word &amp;quot;tantalizing&amp;quot; in the headline alone sets the tone which is permeated through the article -- that &amp;quot;missing&amp;quot; details from a calendar must somehow mean she is up to something unlawful.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I note this &amp;quot;report&amp;quot; was compiled by no less than a dozen news contributors. &amp;nbsp;America, we should be smarter than this. &amp;nbsp;I'm not sure there is anything in this article which should even be categorized as newsworthy, let alone lead to a conclusion that she has done anything wrong.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786898</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:06:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786898</guid><dc:creator>Jeanne Connor Dessert, Le Roy, NY</dc:creator><description>The msnbc.com website headline was &amp;quot;NBC: tantalizing tidbits in Clinton calendar&amp;quot;. &amp;nbsp;That linked me to this &amp;quot;news story&amp;quot;. &amp;nbsp;I do not see anything tantalizing. &amp;nbsp;The conspiratorial tone of the headline I just mentioned combined with the one within this very link &amp;quot;Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings&amp;quot; is interesting to me. &amp;nbsp;If the &amp;quot;investigative journalism&amp;quot; displayed above is supposed to be indicative of &amp;quot;DEEP BACKGROUND&amp;quot; investigation, as the huge fonted pronouncement above implies, then our nation is in trouble. &amp;nbsp;Am I surpised that one date above shows Hillary Rodham Clinton unavailable for 25 whole minutes due to a private meeting? &amp;nbsp;No, not at all. &amp;nbsp;Did it happen to be a very difficult day in her life when she surely needs a few private minutes? &amp;nbsp;Sure. &amp;nbsp;So? &amp;nbsp;Even if it were any ordinary day in the White House, is she supposed to have been on videotape 24/7 or something? &amp;nbsp;It seems to me that anyone needs SOME private time. &amp;nbsp;I'm not surprised there are times listed as &amp;quot;private meeting&amp;quot;. &amp;nbsp;Business professionals all over the country use the term &amp;quot;private meeting&amp;quot; on their electronic calendars. &amp;nbsp;I guess I'm baffled as to why having had some private meetings is supposed to be &amp;quot;tantalizing&amp;quot; or, frankly, even newsworthy at all. &amp;nbsp;If that's all anyone can dig up from the just-released information, I guess I'm not sure there's much to report here. &amp;nbsp;Three specific dates are fleshed out (a tiny bit, anyway). &amp;nbsp;A short section on what foreign policy experience was gleaned during the Clinton Administration follows this (again, there's very little info here). &amp;nbsp;That's it. &amp;nbsp;I'm not sure what the point of this online article is. &amp;nbsp;It seems to be just another example of the media bending over backwards to try to sensationalize and to distort reality. &amp;nbsp;I don't count teas as experience. &amp;nbsp;Your own comments above indicate there where times where Senator Clinto did meet with various heads of state. &amp;nbsp;Again, I guess I just don't understand your point. &amp;nbsp;It seems from my vantage point like this is simply an attempt to attack Senator Clinton. &amp;nbsp;No matter what one's political convictions, I do not think attacking for the sake of attacking is good for this country. &amp;nbsp;All of the negative energy is sad. really.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786900</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:07:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786900</guid><dc:creator>Angelica</dc:creator><description>Oh btw, what foreign policy experience does Obama have, I mean aside from visiting relatives in Africa?</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786902</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:07:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786902</guid><dc:creator>George, San Francisco, California</dc:creator><description>Wow! Can the tone of this article be any more biased? How about the press give Hillary an equal or at least fair chance at the White House. Is the press going to look at Obama's daily schedule, hour for hour? Enough!</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786905</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:08:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786905</guid><dc:creator>Gillis Phoenix, Az</dc:creator><description>Doctored documnets tell no tells.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786907</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:08:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786907</guid><dc:creator>John, Tampa, FL (gianni0710@hotmail.com</dc:creator><description>With that vast array of &amp;quot;foreign policy&amp;quot; experience? you would have thought, she would have learned to actually look at the whys behind decisions to be made...such as the NIE before she voted for the war in Iraq. Give me judgement over experience, kandor over dodging facts. We are not electing a saint, that is why I will be voting for the Big &amp;quot;O&amp;quot; and possibly John over Hillary.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786912</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:11:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786912</guid><dc:creator>Ralph Liberti - Kissimme, Florida</dc:creator><description>Bill said from the beginning that he would not release and records on Hillary. Now he released some but not enough to show that she had a continuing substantive interest in foreign policy matters. It's Bill's same old, same old. It depends on what is is! Not going to work this time. The American People want to know all that Hillary has made claim to, but is not yet revealing. Including, where Bill received his money for his Historical Museum. Without her record, which is non-existant, there is not way she is going to win the Nomination.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786913</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:11:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786913</guid><dc:creator>Bill Bedard, Sebring, Fl.</dc:creator><description>Its hard to be documented on paper when either a person is not participating in crises or runs from situations that could be an embarrassement. &amp;nbsp;I have that much White House experience and background in foreign affairs</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786917</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:12:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786917</guid><dc:creator>John Doe, Seattle Wash</dc:creator><description>If Hillary Clinton was a man, her experience/qualifications would not put her within the top 100 democratic leaders.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786918</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:12:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786918</guid><dc:creator>Kathy MacDonald     Phila,  PA</dc:creator><description>I would like to see a comparison between the Clinton Calendar and Mrs. Reagan; Mrs.Ford and Mrs. Kennedy's Calendars. &lt;br&gt;I would also like to see Sen. Obama and Ms. Obama's calendars for the past two years. &lt;br&gt;I would also like to see a list of contributors to Mr. Obama's Senatorial campaign. It seems to me this request falls under equal treatment.&lt;br&gt;Thank you.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786926</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:14:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786926</guid><dc:creator>William Cataldo, Portland, ME. 04101</dc:creator><description>I can not believe that with everything that has happened in the past seven years that this admistration has refused to make public with every lie, signing statement, and unnessisary secertacy this admistration and the two preivous republican admistration have diven use you choose to still go after the Clintons. Sir, I am a very liberal democrat and am not particualy fond of the Clintons, that being said get some guts and start investigating the two Bushes and the repub lican hero, reagan, because the main strem media has never followed through on any investigation of Republicans in the past thirty years. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786931</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:15:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786931</guid><dc:creator>Blaze, Atlanta GA</dc:creator><description>For real &amp;quot;investigation&amp;quot;, you should explain why the meeting with the rabbis was controversial. &amp;nbsp;Wasn't there allegation of traving pardons from President Clinton for votes for Senator Clinton?</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786934</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:15:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786934</guid><dc:creator>Boulder City, NV</dc:creator><description>Just more bad press about a candidate that has served this country for many years under different hats-shame on the press.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786946</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:18:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786946</guid><dc:creator>Therese, Westlake, OH</dc:creator><description>It's about time Hillary released some of her First Lady calendars. We didn't elect her as vice president, and she wasn't appointed to her husband's cabinet, so exactly what is all of this experience she touts? I suspect we will find her experience is comprised of traditional First Lady duties that she has embellished in her race to the White House. I believe her calendars will show that she has overblown her &amp;quot;experience&amp;quot;. If being First Lady is such great foreign policy experience, then Laura Bush would be qualified to be president. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786957</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:20:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786957</guid><dc:creator>haylock in Los Angeles</dc:creator><description>Look at them. Doing their DAMNDEST to make sure they can smear her to death. Cant stand that your Obama boy isnt quite what you thought he would be huh? </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786967</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:25:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786967</guid><dc:creator>John in Seattle</dc:creator><description>Why do the Republicans continue to try to drum up dirt on Hillary? &amp;nbsp;Haven't they got anything better to do.....like trying to cover all the sins of McCain????</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786972</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:28:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786972</guid><dc:creator>s lucas Concord California</dc:creator><description>All the presidents used there middle name in the past, if Obama is not muslim and has nothing to hide why does he not use it. I dont want a president who is ashamed of his middle name.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786978</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:30:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786978</guid><dc:creator>Jason Martell, Kenosha, Wisconsin</dc:creator><description>Clinton is no more corrupt than Obama. &amp;nbsp;She just has more strings to pull.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786979</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:30:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786979</guid><dc:creator>MikeL Atlanta Ga</dc:creator><description>Wait a minute! &amp;nbsp;Mrs. Clinton did not even have a security clearance. &amp;nbsp;As a US Marine (with a top security clearance) it was drilled into me that for a security violation it was 10 years &amp;amp; $10,000 fine for all parties involved. &amp;nbsp;I must say that was 30 years ago. &amp;nbsp;Has security become so lax that you don't need a clearance to sit in National Security meetings.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786981</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:32:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786981</guid><dc:creator>Barbara , Sacramento</dc:creator><description>How very unfascinating, I am a professional who uses a daily calendar for meetings and such. But looking back at the end of the year it is always surprising to see what was planned and documented vs what actually happened.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786984</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:33:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786984</guid><dc:creator>Neil, Detroit, MI</dc:creator><description>Where are the Obama &amp;quot;Deep Background&amp;quot; reports? Hillary shows up twice on the front page, Obama doesn't show up at all on the first two pages... Is he really that squeaky clean? Or is he not as important as the Democratic front runner?</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786986</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:33:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786986</guid><dc:creator>Kyle Pettrie</dc:creator><description>Must have been purely a deadline in action here. For an NBC News Senior Investigative Producer to put together words to create an article with absolutely no substance . . . ya'll were reachin' with this one boys.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786988</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:35:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786988</guid><dc:creator>Scotty, Valrico, Fl</dc:creator><description>Did Hilliary Clinton breach security rules, when she involved herself in these various questionable activities? And what security clearance did she have? Can she be tried for breaching State Department business? What was recorded in the blacked out portion of her records? The Senate should call her for a hearing!</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#786995</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:39:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:786995</guid><dc:creator>Patrick Era, Houston, Texas</dc:creator><description>It shows the Clintons exagerated her role in the Bill's government - like Shakespeare said in Macbeth - &amp;quot;...full of sound and fury signifying nothing.&amp;quot; Let the Clintons point out the experiences they undeservedly claim on her behalf!!</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787001</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:41:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787001</guid><dc:creator>Julien Bashier</dc:creator><description> So if someone visits my home and my wife hosts them until I can come back does that means she's having high end meetings or just playing nice.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; The only worst thing than having another Clinton in the White House is to have a McCain and another 100 years of war.. It's about time we stop being the world police and decide to fix our own home. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; Bring the troops home and not only the ones in Iraq. Bring all of them and let them fix their own problems in the future without our help. Let's see if the UN can help them as much as we do, maybe they do, but if they don't at least they can't blame us anymore. Considering that we spend probably over $ 500 Billions every year just keeping those bases open, we could just wipe out our own debt in about 5 years.. That sounds like a plan to me, we could lower our taxes right after that in the same amount and have a much better life.. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;J.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787008</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:43:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787008</guid><dc:creator>acameron@arvig.net</dc:creator><description>It's about time some of this came to light. &amp;nbsp;Thank you for going through the logs so carefully. &amp;nbsp;Only hope this information reaches the public before this campaign goes on any further. &amp;nbsp;Angie, Detroit Lakes, MN</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787009</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:43:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787009</guid><dc:creator>Kim, Ann Arbor, MI</dc:creator><description>I'm astounded that this article refers to Mrs. Clinton's coffees and tours and teas overseas, and that she was only at Andrews AFB to console the victims and families. That is what we, the American people wanted of her, we wanted her to back off from being an active political figure, because we felt, as the President's wife, she was taking too active a role. What do you want from this woman?</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787015</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:46:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787015</guid><dc:creator>c.akrish@comcast.net</dc:creator><description>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings...What does your headline mean exactly? I do not get the point of this...working out their marriage problems should be secret from the world...don't you think?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The records do show that she was involved as she has said with foreign affairs and I am sure she and the President discussed many issues facing our country. &amp;nbsp;She is experienced!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;CarolJean, Redmond, WA</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787021</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:48:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787021</guid><dc:creator>Neil, St. Joseph, Michigan</dc:creator><description>I have to applaud NBC for putting substantial time and effort into examining Ms. Clinton's calendar entries and putting some of those entries in the context of important dates and events happening at the time, as well as other entries or the lack of entries showing noninvolvement and/or nonattendance at or following other important events. It leaves me wondering and wanting to know more. &lt;br&gt;Thank you.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787027</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:50:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787027</guid><dc:creator>Christopher</dc:creator><description>Just as I had expected.....hidden stuff that could incriminate her and no proof of her so-called experience to qualify to be commander in chief on day one. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another question....why does she need to wait until 4/15/08 to reveal her 2006 tax return? &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787034</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:52:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787034</guid><dc:creator>Janet Shelton, Scappoose Oregon</dc:creator><description>So this report is filled with innuendo. &amp;nbsp;What are you trying to imply? &amp;nbsp;Wouldn't public persona (president, vice-president, congressperson, etc.) have quite a few private meetings? &amp;nbsp;Are you saying that Clinton's experience in foreign policy be based entirely on the records of events she attended? &amp;nbsp;And okay then, how many events of any kind has Obama attended? &amp;nbsp;What was he privy to during the years those same 8 years as far as foreign policy? &amp;nbsp;Let's see, he first was elected to ANY office in 1996 (state representative), after Clinton had been in the political world since 1978. &amp;nbsp;So come on guys, is it because she is a girl? &amp;nbsp;Is it because the first lady (governor, president) really should only have been attending teas, not advising her husband???</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787049</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:59:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787049</guid><dc:creator> b.cole   tahlequah,oklahoma</dc:creator><description>it does'nt matter what ms. clinton says the press is going to eat her alive , &amp;nbsp;they &amp;nbsp;want &amp;nbsp;obama in office because he is some body that can be told what to do and when to do it.have we seen ms.clinton get a spot on tv to tell her side of any story [NO]but when we saw how mr.obama stood by and let someone talk bout the country he claims to love he gets a spot to try to make it all seem he did'nt know a thing about it.i hope our country is smart enough to &amp;nbsp;not fall for this.i don't see much difference in him and george bush and i hope when the terrorist come back to our country [and they will]i hope we have someone with the backbone to do something about it and not just cry about someone hurting his feelings.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787050</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 03:00:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787050</guid><dc:creator>Chris Dilios, Portland, ME</dc:creator><description>You'd have to be a fool to count those First Lady years as &amp;quot;experience&amp;quot;. &amp;nbsp;Would you consider Laura Bush &amp;quot;experienced&amp;quot; in the same vain? &amp;nbsp;Let's get real ...</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787056</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 03:03:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787056</guid><dc:creator>Going Solo</dc:creator><description>Looks like Hillary was trying to pull the wool over America's eyes and especially the eyes of the media. &amp;nbsp;Her experience is mostly non-existent and yet the media refused to challenge her on this point. &amp;nbsp;Unless teas in the White House with spouses of heads of state counts as experience, &amp;nbsp;Hillary has no more experience than the man in the moon. &amp;nbsp;The Clintons have tried for the longest time to keep these records from the public and now we know why. Her experience is zero. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787064</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 03:06:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787064</guid><dc:creator>Mike M., Phoenix, Arizona</dc:creator><description>I was not surprised that Hillary Clinton had many private meetings during the periods of scandal and investigation during her husband's administration. Yet the most surprising and relevant information for the current presidential campaign is squeezed into the last paragraph. I did not realize that as First Lady, Hillary Clinton had numerous meetings with foreign dignitaries and heads of state, that she met with cabinet officials, and was briefed by senior NSC officials. Why wasn't this information in the lede? I thought that it was exactly this type of Clinton's &amp;quot;experience&amp;quot; that was in question in the current campaign. Where is that analysis, fair and unbiased? How does this experience compare with other First Ladies, with other senators (e.g., Obama, McCain)? If it is thin compared to others, please explain how and why. If it is not as extensive as Clinton claims, please provide concrete examples. It does not appear that the redactions in the calendar, bear on any of these questions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Perhaps the pressure of getting something on the Internet requires all standards of quality reporting to be disregarded, but I would certainly be ashamed if I wrote such a poor piece.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787075</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 03:13:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787075</guid><dc:creator>Jackie Rawlings Riverside California</dc:creator><description>If the press had done a deep background on Bush and Cheney and the lies about Iraq we wouldn't be in the mess we're in. Look for those of us Americans who followed the Clintons years this so called background is to find dirt and talk between Hillary and Bill about Monica. The press could care less about what Hillary was doing for the Country. I noticed no one in the Press has said a word about what's Laura up to when she met her boyfriend on a so call visit overseas. &amp;nbsp;This is a witch hunt as was done with Eliot Spitzer. While the so called American Values were so up set about Spitzer with a prostitute the Media forgot to tell us about the Federal Judge Edward Nottingham with prostitutes and even the CFO of Time Warner or the Duke of England. Now the Feds have no case against the Emperior Sex Club as the Media stays silent. Hillary has spend years as a Senator and 8 years as the First Lady. Even Pakistan has elected a woman Speaker. As the US goes backward. If you want to smear Hillary and Obama with lies to the public remember we're in a recession because of the Republican White House and it will bring all Americans down, even those reporting the propaganda.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe your time would be better spent looking at John McCain's medial records and his place of birth. &amp;nbsp;Panama isn't part of the US nor is the base the US sits on. Maybe the US should have done what Canada did for the Dutch Princess and named the land extraterritorial which would had been for McCain US soil. But of course Americans weren't that smart and really never thought one day this would happen. It's strange how McCain is ready to send immigrants home and even others while he wasn't born on US soil himself. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787078</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 03:14:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787078</guid><dc:creator>Sevs,Nassau, NY</dc:creator><description>Base on what all of U have written about the review of these papers I have not read any thing of substance to justify Mrs.Clinton's foreign policy experience. By the way,was it Mrs.Clinton who was the elected president or her husband. Her proclaimed foreign policy experience as first Lady could not be of any substance because she was never elected or appointed, at any time during those years, in any position to make or take any major decision, Therefore, what is the basis for her experience and who give her the authority to make any foreign policy decision on behalf of the United States. Is she entitled by virtue of the fact that she was the wife of the President. I think we need to ask Mrs.Clinton were are the facts for her acclaimed foreign policy experience. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787139</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 03:47:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787139</guid><dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator><description>The Clinton whitewash seems to continue, and where are the tax records? Is this really change? While Hillary continues to cover things up Obama tackles disputes head on, takes responsibility for his actions and lets the voters decide. There is a simple choice this year, politics of the past or forging a new future...</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787141</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 03:48:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787141</guid><dc:creator>Carl,San Carlos,CA</dc:creator><description>It would be illustrative and educational to see your energies being devoted to Mr Cheney's private meetings too?</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787153</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 03:55:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787153</guid><dc:creator>M and R, Jasper, Georgia</dc:creator><description>THIS ARTICLE IS YET ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF HOW THE PRESS WANTS TO PREVENT A WORLD LEADER LIKE SENATOR CLINTON FROM ENTERING THE WHITE HOUSE AS PRESIDENT. &amp;nbsp;THIS IS PRIMARILY DUE TO THE FACT THAT SHE IS A WOMAN AND THIS MAKES MANY MACHO-MEN SICK TO SEE THAT A WOMAN HAS MORE AMBITION THAN THEY HAVE. &amp;nbsp;ANY WHITE HOUSE LEADER HAS LOTS OF PRIVATE MEETINGS AND TO PICK OVER THESE RECORDS IS LIKE CUTTING OFF YOUR NOSE TO SPITE YOUR FACE.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787166</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 04:01:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787166</guid><dc:creator>Chris, Dallas, TX</dc:creator><description>Just love how the media spends several paragraphs outlining a few trips that are private matters as even First Ladies have the right to privacy, and if others were present, it's her obligation of not have to reveal the names and explain what she was doing. &amp;nbsp;Then, the last paragraph finally tells of how she was having private meeting with several heads of state. &amp;nbsp;A little slanted?? &amp;nbsp;Duh.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787172</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 04:04:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787172</guid><dc:creator>Bill, Redlands, California</dc:creator><description>I'm not sure why subpoenaed documents for her law firm were at the White House. Is there a rational, reasonable explanation for this?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787251</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 04:53:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787251</guid><dc:creator>Florida man, Florida</dc:creator><description>It shows much longer list of 'substantial' political involvement than many other first ladies. If she were more involved than this, she would be barred from running for a third term in the White house, not Bill Clinton himself.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787259</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 05:01:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787259</guid><dc:creator>Mary Rand, Oskaloosa, IA</dc:creator><description>I am sure that holding private would be not all that unusual for any first lady. &amp;nbsp;Her meetings with foreign dignataries and cabinet members is somewhat unusual for first ladies and does speak to experience.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787269</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 05:08:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787269</guid><dc:creator>danny, new york, new york</dc:creator><description>I am certain that these documents would not have been released with anything too incriminating in them and though my curiosity is piqued by the private meeting entries I am more interested in her taxes. &amp;nbsp;These hum drum pages seem more like bone thrown to keep us away from the skeleton in the closet.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787274</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 05:10:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787274</guid><dc:creator>Sarah, Miami, FL</dc:creator><description>I just want the truth. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Where are the tax returns and presidential donor list? </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787287</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 05:25:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787287</guid><dc:creator>Boo Radley, Seattle, Washington</dc:creator><description>This is why the Clinton claims to having been vetted are false. &amp;nbsp;When Hillary was under scrutiny, during Bill's presidency, there was a different context. Questions surrounding Whitewater have never been answered sufficiently or credibly. &amp;nbsp;There was never sufficient evidence because Susan McDougal fell on her sword.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is it really normal practice for lawyers to bring decade old legal records under subpoena to their private residence? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Whitewater is just one of the scandals she was involved in. The press is really asleep at the wheel as far as her part in the scandals that took place during Bill's reign. She has NEVER recieved proper scrutiny for the position she's now applying.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787288</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 05:26:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787288</guid><dc:creator>San Diego, Ca</dc:creator><description>Just how deep does the rabbit hole go on her Caledar? And of course we are only seeing what she is allowing us to see. The really juicy stuff has long been removed, everyone knows that. When does she release her taxes?</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787292</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 05:29:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787292</guid><dc:creator>Judy Blue, State College, PA</dc:creator><description>I'm still an undecided voter, but it seems like Hillary is darned if she does and darned if she doesn't... &amp;nbsp; At the time she was first lady, she was widely criticized for having too much of a role in Bill's presidency. &amp;nbsp;Now it's implied that we should be disappointed that she wasn't doing enough - that she wasn't acting as co-president at the time she was first lady. &amp;nbsp;This simply seems unfair. &amp;nbsp;Even if she only had coffee in those 80 countries she visited, she still is incredibly experienced in both legal and political matters. &amp;nbsp;Also, I can't conclude that a private meeting has to indicate conspiracy or scandal.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787294</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 05:29:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787294</guid><dc:creator>Jerry Fox, Tamarac, FL</dc:creator><description>I am no Hillary fan by any means but I think I know bias when I see it.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787301</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 05:34:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787301</guid><dc:creator>Jim  Chicago,IL</dc:creator><description>It is unprecendented for us to look at a First Layd's daily activities in such a way. &amp;nbsp;Let's put everything in to context. &amp;nbsp;This is a special case. &amp;nbsp;Let's quit the &amp;quot;witch hunting&amp;quot; and focus on the issues we are facing as a country. &amp;nbsp;We cannot condone this endless process of digging through recorded tapes of ministers, calendars etc. &amp;nbsp;Let's get back to the issues.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787312</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 05:43:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787312</guid><dc:creator>Ruth, Indianapolis, IN</dc:creator><description>NO surprise, is it, that the key times that might explain the scandalous days of Bill Clinton's administration are all blacked out? That's why they had to keep them undisclosed for so long...to take out incriminating pieces. They have been masters of that for their entire time in public office. Will the media excuse them once more?</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787313</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 05:45:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787313</guid><dc:creator>Peshawer, Pakistan</dc:creator><description>Mrs Clinton has more question marks against her name than Mr Obama could ever hope to garner in his entire political career..Starting from Arkansas to her current campaign trail,its one murky mess and the Clintons are known for their coverups their brazen and cavalier attitude towards what other people would consider ordinary values instilled in decent people from the cradle..they have lied ,cheated,stolen and denied sordid facts throughout their political careers and i see nothing strange in blacked-out entries in her schedule,in fact it is entirely in keeping with their character as we have seen it till today.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787332</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 06:12:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787332</guid><dc:creator>Isaac, Harford, Connecticut</dc:creator><description>This goes to show what I had expected all along: lies, secrecy, and most of all, that she does not have any more experience that Barack Obama. Come on people this lady was at Martha's vinyard after the terrorist bombing in KenyA. HER EXPERIENCE IS THE BIGGEST FAIRYTAIL OF THIS CAMPAIGN!!!</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787344</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 06:24:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787344</guid><dc:creator>Zach, PA</dc:creator><description>Well this sure ain't no full disclosure then is it? If they just black out all the improper meetings then what's the point? Clearly this just proves that they have much to hide.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787347</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 06:26:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787347</guid><dc:creator>Richard S'Chevalier</dc:creator><description>What are people thinking when desiring to elect Hillary R. Clinton to the Office of the Presidency, when she told a Grand Jury questioning her, &amp;quot;I do not recall&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;I can't remember&amp;quot; 58 times? &amp;nbsp;How much intellence is necessary to actually realize that should Hillary R. Clinton be elected President of the United States, we will have a disbarred and impeached first husband sitting in the White House who will be there influencing his wife's every decissions? Important needed documents regarding the Clintons always appear suddenly having been lost, yet the news media has little to say about it. &amp;nbsp;When to think of the Clintons, there also comes to mind, &amp;quot;something very evil this way cometh.&amp;quot;</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787462</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 09:04:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787462</guid><dc:creator>MD Carpenter, Asheville, NC</dc:creator><description>I think that it is strange that you spend so much of your article on the few dates that she may have not been involved, but you only have one tiny paragraph at the bottom trying to sum up a good 8 years of experiance. How about reporting something worthy of reading. I'm sure that there are days as a journalist that these contributing reporters have been off the job, but nevertheless, they call themselves experienced.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And furthermore, I don't expect to know every little detail of her life as the First Lady. I value my personal privicy &amp;amp; a true American should respect her privacy. Did anyone one consider that during a &amp;quot;closed meeting&amp;quot; that she may be having a visit from her OB/GYN. Now is the press so concerned with this issue that they are going to give us all the details of that too?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Good grief, Charlie Brown!</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787465</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 09:17:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787465</guid><dc:creator>John G. Spillman, Tempe, Arizona</dc:creator><description>That might explain why she released these records now. I know that Hillary is not ignorant, but she can be stupid at times. Maybe, she thought that these records will not be paid close attention by the public in light of Sen. Obama's fight to explain his relationship with the Rev. Wright. In all honestly, I think she was correct in her assumption. Many people are busy with Sen. Obama than to pay attention to her Hillary. In fact, the people know that she released the records, but are not questioning why she finally released them or what it entails.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787478</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 09:57:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787478</guid><dc:creator>Murty, Hyderabad, India</dc:creator><description>Every first lady in every country will have personal knowledge of some or many foreign policy matters which are precccupying her husband. She would contribute to his thought process also to ease the preoccupation. However, that doesn't qualify her to claim that experience to be elected next Head of State. If it does, it will be a perpetual dynasty like the Nehrus of India or the Bhuttos of Pakistan. ( Current Gandhi family at the helm are Nehru's descendents).</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787499</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 10:33:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787499</guid><dc:creator>Larry, Wisconsin</dc:creator><description>Why are you and the media (The NY Times, NBC and MNSBC and other liberal outlets using their time and resources to unfairly attack Clinton and keep proping up O'bama to stear this election in his favor? Where is the objective reporting? What would be wrong with letting people decide for themselves who to vote for? All of you spin doctors need to leave your personal point of view at home. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787500</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 10:33:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787500</guid><dc:creator>rich hincha</dc:creator><description>No wonder Hillary wanted to keep these records out of the public view. &amp;nbsp;They completely undercut her claim that her White House years provided her with vast experience. &amp;nbsp;By and large, she did what every First Lady did. &amp;nbsp;Nothing more. &amp;nbsp;Once again, there isn't a lie she won't tell in order to win.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787530</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:00:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787530</guid><dc:creator>Mare Dunlop, Minden Nebraska</dc:creator><description>Thru out her campaign Mrs. Clinton has stretched her version of &amp;quot;experience&amp;quot; . Mrs Clinton has some experience but not to the extent that she would like us to believe. The biggest factor for me is that I do not feel she can be trusted to give us the truth on any matter. She paints her version of it and then expects us to buy it. If her campaign was run with the utmost honesty and integrity and courage then I believe people would trust . There are too many details on too many subjects that she witholds in her best interest. We cannot afford another president who puts his best interest first. She is part of the old political machine whose self interest comes first at any price. I believe Mrs Clinton does have experience, however I believe it is not the kind that would be beneficial to this country. &amp;quot;Closed Meetings&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;Undisclosed People&amp;quot; do not produce a lot of trust. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787539</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:07:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787539</guid><dc:creator>Sharon Sarver, Marietta, Mississippi</dc:creator><description>Hillary Clinton was and acted as a First Lady while her husband was president. &amp;nbsp;Her teas, tours of gardens and meetings with other First Ladies are all First Lady acts, not those giving her experience in foreign affairs. &amp;nbsp;Secret meetings, blacked out information and billings of her attorney practice being in her office at the White House while those billings were searched for by investigators are as shady as her taking credit for problems solved by others. &amp;nbsp;I am disappointed in her actions, her accusations, her &amp;quot;dropped&amp;quot; hints against Barack Obama. As a woman, as a human being, as an honest citizen of the United States of America, I would NEVER be a part of the dark dealings she has and is putting forth. &amp;nbsp;It's back to the &amp;quot;she will do anything to win&amp;quot;. &amp;nbsp;Anything. &amp;nbsp;That behavior would be carried into the position of presidency, should she win. &amp;nbsp;That is the behavior that so many of us see in our current administration under and including Bush. &amp;nbsp;Very distasteful, very nasty, totally without concern for responsibility of the position of president.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787544</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:14:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787544</guid><dc:creator>Ralph, Washingotn, DC</dc:creator><description>If she did get involved with national security issues as First Lady, not only did she break the law, but her husband and both their staffs did as well for the simple reason that she DID NOT hold a security clearance.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787569</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:42:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787569</guid><dc:creator>paula, mpls, mn</dc:creator><description>This non-worthy news article reads like talk radio. Private meetings are private and no explanation is needed.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787604</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:08:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787604</guid><dc:creator>T. R. Janes, St. Louis, MO</dc:creator><description>Regarding the lack of decision making at &amp;quot;3am&amp;quot;, since when was someone as spouse to the president a constitutionally elected member of the government. &amp;nbsp;When she tried to help back a health care plan she caught flack, and when she is not acting president -in-first-lady, she catches the same. &amp;nbsp;Pick a side.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787618</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:17:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787618</guid><dc:creator>Hugh, Silverhill AL</dc:creator><description>Thank you for posting this review of documentation.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787624</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:23:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787624</guid><dc:creator>SC Thompson, Fairfax, VA</dc:creator><description>Just as thinking people have known all along - HRC has inflated her station as First Lady. &amp;nbsp;I guess if the White House gardens need tending or if a travel guide for the rich and famous are needed, Mrs. Clinton will be the first one to call. &amp;nbsp;Even if she did occasionally meet with world leaders, where is the evidence that these meetings were pertinent? &amp;nbsp;Could it be that the people she met with were simply extending a courtesy to the First Lady of the United States of America? &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787637</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:32:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787637</guid><dc:creator>mykle evans, blountville, tennessee</dc:creator><description>i wonder what high level meetings senator obama was having in 1993? (english lit. class?) and how many heads of state, and other important dignitaries he met with 15 years ago. &amp;nbsp;like it or not, she does have the experience she claims to have. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787642</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:34:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787642</guid><dc:creator>Mary, Silver Spring, Maryland</dc:creator><description>I have done extensive research on presidential papers of several administrations. &amp;nbsp;Do your readers understand that the truly substantive papers of even the Carter administration are still classified??? &amp;nbsp;You have an obligation to describe how this classification process works and how the Bush administration has worked to ensure the maintenance of classification rather than release of papers. &amp;nbsp;This is not a Clinton conspiracy. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, while there may be certain things of interest revealed by calendars and schedules, they are usually not worth plumbing for substance. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Please move on. &amp;nbsp;This is not worth too much scrutiny. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787643</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:34:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787643</guid><dc:creator>Jim Bowersox,Jasper,Ga.</dc:creator><description>Articles such as these are no better than the run of the mill supermarket tabloid and an attempt by our news media to control the outcome of the democratic primaries. You should put it all out in front of the people like where was the other candidate on those dates? Oh maybe he was visiting his white grandparents! How ironic, that certainly parallels his voting record and his position on key issues now doesn't it - middle of the road.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787644</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:35:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787644</guid><dc:creator>MikeL Atlanta Ga</dc:creator><description>Wait a minute! &amp;nbsp;Mrs. Clinton did not even have a security clearance. &amp;nbsp;As a US Marine (with a top security clearance) it was drilled into me that for a security violation it was 10 years &amp;amp; $10,000 fine for all parties involved. &amp;nbsp;I must say that was 30 years ago. &amp;nbsp;Has security become so lax that you don't need a clearance to sit in National Security meetings.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787652</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:38:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787652</guid><dc:creator>Steve, Rumuson, NJ</dc:creator><description>Had Hillary been actively engaged in foreign policy as is her claim, these records would have been released months ago. &amp;nbsp;Once again her &amp;quot;say anything, do anything&amp;quot; self-serving policy to get the nomination is obvious.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787654</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:39:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787654</guid><dc:creator>Graham Cameron, Vero Beach, Florida.</dc:creator><description>What exactly were these &amp;quot;private meetings&amp;quot;? Did Hillary hold any swy in commuting the sentences of the four Hassidic men convicted of fraud and conspiracy?&lt;br&gt;But the puzzling question for me is where was she when Bill was interacting with Lewinsky?&lt;br&gt;Apparently in the White House. This requires further scrutiny.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787677</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:52:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787677</guid><dc:creator>raamplex@msn.com</dc:creator><description>The contents of these calendars are no surprise. It points to more spin by the Clinton campaign that alledges experience by association not backed by facts.&lt;br&gt;One can only assume that we will hear more of unspecified experience in the guise of a &amp;quot;guide&amp;quot; by Mr. Carson. One can only hope that this so called previous experience by Mrs. Clinton will quickly be debunked so we are not drilled by sound bites every day. One can only hope!&lt;br&gt;R.Abramshe&lt;br&gt;Worcester, MA.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787689</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:55:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787689</guid><dc:creator>Kelvin Waters, Tampa FL</dc:creator><description>Hillary is in the position she is in soley because of her marriage to Bill. She claims his experiences as her own. I am more interested in Johnny Chung visting the Clinton White House on 49 separate occasions! Chung later plead guilty and indicated that he was financed by Chinese military intelligence! It's also obvious that the Clinton's had private domestic issues I don't feel that warrants another White House term.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787693</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:56:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787693</guid><dc:creator>Catharina Summers, Belleville, Ontario, Canada</dc:creator><description>Unexplained private meetings...that is media's focus, and that will be fodder for the Republican campaign against Hillary Clinton should she become the Democrat nominee. The Monica Lewinsky affair will resurface and basically make it impossible for the Clintons to reclaim the White House.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787712</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:05:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787712</guid><dc:creator>Kilroy, Venice, FL</dc:creator><description>If Hillary can't solve the Democratic Party's nomination problems she sure won't be able to fix the country.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787728</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:10:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787728</guid><dc:creator>Karla, Jacksonville, Forida</dc:creator><description>This is a start to very interesting and important issues that should be discussed by your political commentators with the public. &amp;nbsp;Instead your shows continue to waste air time discussing Barack Obama's Preacher. &amp;nbsp;Please disclose and open this issue up for discussion. &amp;nbsp;Question the more tax returns and phone logs... when will they be disclosed? &amp;nbsp;Why will it take so long to disclose this information to the American voters???&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787729</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:10:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787729</guid><dc:creator>kay</dc:creator><description>NOW IT IS TIME FOR YOU TO ASK FOR OBAMA'S RECORDS AS ILLINOIS SEN.If don't do a complete search of his past,then you have not done your job.You have given him a free pass and keep drinking the kool ade.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787737</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:13:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787737</guid><dc:creator>Eduwmn, Atlanta, GA</dc:creator><description>Maybe I'm missing something because based on what I just read it seems that Senator Hillary Clinton doesn't have very much foreign policy experience. &amp;nbsp;Otherwise, I feel she and her campaign advisors would have her calendar plastered all over the internet for the world to see her vast experience in this area. &amp;nbsp;I did realize that all her meetings would not be revealed to the public. &amp;nbsp;However, what was released doesn't seem to amount to a lot of solid experience.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am very disappointed as a Hillary supporter that she can't produce more information to support her claim as having an abundance of foreign policy experience. &amp;nbsp;I was really hoping this would quell the rising argument that she would beat Obama in the Fall. &amp;nbsp;Now, I feel this will make people start to look at she candidacy as a very weak opponent against McCain. And whether or not she will be truthfully with the American people </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787768</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:22:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787768</guid><dc:creator>Steve, Wisconsin</dc:creator><description>I would expect some element of privacy acceptable. In all due respect to many of these cultures our first lady would be expected to honor the female counterparts in these foreign countries and attend a tea or garden tour...it is pretty ridiculous to think otherwise. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787775</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:23:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787775</guid><dc:creator>DPGreenwood Commerce Township, MI</dc:creator><description>I've watched pro football quarterbacks run a pro football team for years, but I'd be a fool to believe this gives me experience to be a pro quarterback. &amp;nbsp;She watched her husband function as President and deal with foreign affairs. &amp;nbsp;She's as qualified as I am to be a pro quarterback</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787780</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:24:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787780</guid><dc:creator>jennieBean, NYC</dc:creator><description>Where are the tax returns and the contributors to the Library?</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787782</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:25:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787782</guid><dc:creator>Zendar, Chicago</dc:creator><description>This day by day scurtiny of Mrs. Clinton is of no value and give an unfair advantage to Obama. It would be interesting if a side by side comparison of what Mr. Obama was doing on the days you picked. &amp;nbsp;What about highlight all the key votes Mr. Obama missed while in the Senate and also the time he voted present while in the Illinois Senate?</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787787</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:25:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787787</guid><dc:creator>Had Enough</dc:creator><description>The media is taking Mrs. Clinton's lack of presence at official meetings during crisis a bit too far here. She was first lady, not the president! However, as first lady, she could have had first hand information of events and how they were handled through discussions with her husband. Any couple who communicates well, often has more information that the average person on details of their spouses jobs. Spending eight years as first lady no doubt gave her some insight as to how critical situations were handled, what worked and what didn't. The media really needs to work on finding noteworthy news rather than nitpicking candidates to death. Hopefully the majority of the American public can see past this harrassment of all the candidates and make an educated choice in November. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787806</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:28:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787806</guid><dc:creator>Habon, Falls Church Virginia</dc:creator><description>Mrs. Clinton performed her duties as First Lady no different than other Presidnets' Wives. When she tired to single herself out with the health care issue, she failed. My suggestion is that she drop out of the race and continue her work as a Senator of NY-a job she has been doing well. She is a great Senator but would not make a great President in my opinion.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787823</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:30:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787823</guid><dc:creator>JNZ in Michigan</dc:creator><description>this iece is very biased. You make a huge deal over a 25 minute period on the day a woman found out her husband's affair was made public. Her public service and real contributions are diminified at the end of the article. Now take out the negative spins...Note that the early years (1992-4) were spent on the routine duties of First Lady. After GAINING EXPERIENCE (1996), it looks like she was trusted with affairs of state. &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I voted for Hillary- but apparently that doesn't count </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787830</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:32:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787830</guid><dc:creator>Todd,  Tulsa, Oklahoma</dc:creator><description>These records while irrelevant really in the broad scope of things, show that HRC cannot claim them as &amp;quot;experience&amp;quot; as she has done. &amp;nbsp;She has the same expierience the Bush ladies or any other first lady. &amp;nbsp;She drank a lot of tea, and did attended a lot of dinners that had nothing to do with gaining &amp;quot;experience&amp;quot;.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787870</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:39:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787870</guid><dc:creator>Jules Millogo</dc:creator><description>The case for HRC's experience is weak. Nobody would pretend that the wife/husband of a surgeon is qualified automatically to perform surgery just by sharing the same bedroom or living near the hospital. I hope this intelligent woman will find something more substansive to make her case </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787883</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:41:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787883</guid><dc:creator>Micah,  Bloomington, IL</dc:creator><description>Oh, the Baggage! And people question Obama's electability. &amp;nbsp;What, the Republicans arn't going to beat her to death with THIS kind of stuff? &amp;nbsp;Please! &amp;nbsp;They're dying for her to win. &amp;nbsp;Rush told people to go vote for her in Texas (which she didn't win by the way). &amp;nbsp;Should tell ya something... &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787943</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:54:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787943</guid><dc:creator>Heidi Kansas City, Missouri</dc:creator><description>Okay so what do we get to know about those items marked private? &amp;nbsp;I think this is where the meat is. &amp;nbsp;Maybe if we can find about those, &amp;nbsp;Americans will really know her policies in regards to those 80 countries that she visited and how she is ready to be commander and chief on day one.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#787974</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:59:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:787974</guid><dc:creator>Allem Murray</dc:creator><description>Hillary Clinton made no policy decisions, did not negotiate any treaties, and did not act as a shadow secretary of state.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;These records will prove her role was ceremonial, not substantive, and will finally prove that the Clintons will claim any fame to get what they want</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#788023</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:08:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:788023</guid><dc:creator>Chris, Hazleton, PA</dc:creator><description>I think this report is a pretty fair report, but I'd also like to mention that if you were to check the daily schedule of any President, you would see just about the same mix of important meetings, such as cabinet &amp;amp; national security, as well as meetings with basketball teams, and garden events, and photo ops.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#788030</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:09:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:788030</guid><dc:creator>Jordan, Pine Bush, NY</dc:creator><description>I am becoming more content that the news media is questioning more directly Mrs. Clinton's heralded &amp;quot;experience.&amp;quot; She's waved that flag her whole campaign, without it being warranted. Since 2006, it was assumed that she would be an extension of Bill Clinton's term, which would get her both the Democratic nomination, and a November win. It is satisfying when the people get their voice heard, and that voice is not preordained. Obama has more political experience than Lincoln, Wilson, Roosevelt, and even Reagan when they took office, just to name a few. None of them were condemned for their lack of experience before or during or after their terms.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#788093</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:19:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:788093</guid><dc:creator>Gloria, Birmingham, AL</dc:creator><description>Why are we not hearing about Hillary Clinton White House papers on TV, they should be talking about this all day the same way they have talked about Obama I think this is news worthy</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#788177</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:35:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:788177</guid><dc:creator>Looey Munn  Roundup, MT</dc:creator><description>Ms. Clinton might have been better off to have inadvertantly &amp;quot;lost&amp;quot; such records!! &amp;nbsp;The gaps and having sometimes named names and other times not makes me very suspicious as to who and what was going on.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't think that she sounds like Presidential material in these records. &amp;nbsp;Not at all. &amp;nbsp;Sounds like a secretive wheeler-dealer, with both wheels and deals to hide.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#788200</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:39:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:788200</guid><dc:creator>Barb Cornwal Ontario</dc:creator><description>Why is the first lady of the US being briefed by the NSC? &amp;nbsp;Why is she meeting with foreign heads of state in private meetings? &amp;nbsp;What kind of security clearance does a first lady need? &amp;nbsp;Is this the same clearance that Laura Bush or Barbara Bush has? &amp;nbsp;She wasn't elected and had no business being involved in anyway with foreign policy decisions or vetting security information.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#788225</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:44:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:788225</guid><dc:creator>Bernard Filner,M.D.</dc:creator><description>How did Sen Clinton receive national security council briefings when she didn't have a security clearance??</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#788236</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:45:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:788236</guid><dc:creator>Tom Kennedy, San Francisco, CA</dc:creator><description>The scrubbing clean of any controversial data not only explains why Hillary took so long to release&lt;br&gt;these records, but also puts her in great presidential company, along with the Cheney deleted emails and the Nixon erased tapes. Yes, she IS more presidential, isn't she?</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#788252</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:48:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:788252</guid><dc:creator>Chris Miller, Bay Minette, Alabama</dc:creator><description>How about a little investigative journalism on Obama. &amp;nbsp;There is likely very much there (reference Mr. Rezko or how a Community Organizer can afford a large mansion). &amp;nbsp;I am a supporter of McCain, but I can tell you that the treatment Ms. Clinto has received from the media (print, online, and television) is absolutely horrible and shameful. &amp;nbsp;The problem is that nothing hard has been sent his way in terms of tough questions while nothing but hard edged reports have been made on her. &amp;nbsp;These things about Clinton are likely true, but it seems odd that now they come out when the Obama encounters a little hiccup. &amp;nbsp; Remember you are supposed to be objective as a journalist, right!</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#788258</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:50:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:788258</guid><dc:creator>Mary L.,  Houston, Tx.</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;Indeed, on overseas trips in 1996, Mrs. Clinton held &amp;quot;private&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;closed&amp;quot; meetings with foreign heads of state in Greece, Turkey, and Bosnia--without the president's attendance. And on dozens of times throughout her White House years, she attended White House meetings with Cabinet secretaries, was briefed by senior National Security Council officials and met with foreign dignitaries from around the world.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is this standard operating procedure for first ladies? &amp;nbsp;Meeting in private with heads of state, being briefed by NSC, attending White House meetings? &amp;nbsp;I never heard of another one beside Nancy Reagan and I'm not sure how much she did.&lt;br&gt;I don't remember authorizing a co-presidency as a citizen voter.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#788273</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:52:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:788273</guid><dc:creator>Peter G. Ballas II, MD;; Boca Raaton, FL</dc:creator><description>I would like to know as to what was revealed during the many weeks she spent with Ira Magaziner, working on healthcare issues. &amp;nbsp;Mr. Magaziner was ensconced in a suite at the Ritz-Carlton (paid by me and other tax payers),and Mrs. Clinton had no physicians on her committee. &amp;nbsp;That was absurd. I faxed Mrs. Clinton at the White House demanding to know as to whom was on her committee and why no doctors. &amp;nbsp;Never had a response. &amp;nbsp;I must have faxed her 7 or 8 times. The cloak of secrecy was quite appalling.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#788294</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:55:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:788294</guid><dc:creator>Carl Morgan,Rochester, NY.</dc:creator><description>Can some one tell me the foreign policy advice that Mrs Clinton gave to her husband during the Rwanda genocide in Africa. Or this talk of Foreign Policy experience and the 3 am call is another FAIRLY TALE? </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#788330</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:01:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:788330</guid><dc:creator>jack3341keur@yahoo.com</dc:creator><description>Interesting that Ms. Clinton's files from the White House Days are being released at this time. I seem to recall that the Clinton's have previously stated the earliest possible release date as being sometime after the Convention. &amp;nbsp;Is this release a desparation move?? Jack Carter, Linden Tennessee.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#788338</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:03:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:788338</guid><dc:creator>Irv G, Marlton, NJ</dc:creator><description>Once again, Hillary's exaggerated statements do not reflect the facts. &amp;nbsp;There are too many inconsistencies and blanked out pages to demonstrate she had any real foreign leadership experience. &amp;nbsp;I suspect the blanks conceal the real truth. &amp;nbsp;Just because she was first lady does not automatically qualify her for office of the president. &amp;nbsp;That's like saying if you are the personal secretary to a CEO, you are qualified to take over his duties. &amp;nbsp;She is absolutley wrong!</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#788381</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:11:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:788381</guid><dc:creator>Ruthie, El Paso, TX</dc:creator><description>I think she just did a First Lady's job. If she has the experience she proclaims to have why she does not release all her documents without deleting any events. We know she does not have any experience as President of the U.S, or foreign policy experience at all. As usual the Clintons think we the people are unwise and we do not remember all the wrong things they did during their term in the White House.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#788434</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:18:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:788434</guid><dc:creator>JV, Atlanta, GA</dc:creator><description>Didn't think that it would prove or disprove anything. &amp;nbsp;It just allow's them to continue to make unsubstantiated claims of experience.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#788679</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:50:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:788679</guid><dc:creator>Debbie,Trenton NJ</dc:creator><description>I don't understand why there isn't more coverage from the Political leaders who worked with the Clinton administration. &amp;nbsp;Some of them have come forth and acknowledged that Hillary did not operate in the capacity she said she did when President Clinton was in office. &amp;nbsp;They were at these meetings and talks she claims to have to so much in. &amp;nbsp;Her husbands affair should not be part of this investigation. &amp;nbsp;Why is the media spending time on that. &amp;nbsp;Talk to the sources to validate her statements. &amp;nbsp;Let her answer to their statements.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#788682</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:50:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:788682</guid><dc:creator>Sandra Joel Moscow, PA</dc:creator><description>The question asked on all of the cable news networks today...Did you ever wonder what Hillary was doing 12 years ago while Bill was getting it on with Monika?...This is what you ask out of over 11,000 pages of Hillary years in the White House?...The answer is NO I never wondered, just as I never wondered what Michelle was doing 12 years ago while Barack was listening to The Rev. Wright or What Cindy was doing while John was taking care of business in the Senate....What I really want to know is what Hillary, Barack or John is going to do about the job market downsizing (or is it right sizing) or what are they going to do about education, health insurance, fuel gouging, or letting Iraq take care of there own problems. The candidates have enough to do in the U.S.A. to take care of...Lets get back to the publics lives not the private lives of these candidates. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#788697</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:52:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:788697</guid><dc:creator>Rhonda Weaver, Little Rock, AR</dc:creator><description>I am so tired of the Hillary Clinton &amp;quot;beatings.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;Hillary is a brillant person and would be a beneficial President and serve this great country well. It is painfully obvious to me that rational people love to focus on issues that are intended to &amp;quot;beat&amp;quot; a person's character down to shreds instead of recognizing the person's true abilities. &amp;nbsp;It is easier for people to make their point by &amp;quot;pointing&amp;quot; out insifinicant and unneccesary garbage. I guess Hillary must be doing somehting right because she has people running to try to find any dirt on her-- inorder for them to feel justified. Why can't these people just simply be honest and confess that it is all because she is a woman. &amp;nbsp;When will people be able to overlook a person's gender and race in this country and see what that person can offer? &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;When will we live in a time when women are treated as equally as men? &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#788775</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:05:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:788775</guid><dc:creator>Bell, Raleigh, NC</dc:creator><description>As First Lady, I feel Mrs. Clinton should associate with other First Ladies. &amp;nbsp;I also feel that President Clinton would have discussed things with his wife. The Bible says something to the fact that when a man marries, he and his wife become one. &amp;nbsp;First, and foremost, the President and First Lady are human beings; and, like others, would discuss issues with each other. &amp;nbsp;Surely, I, as a lay person, could not tell you who, what, why, when of every minute of my life, much less someone as important as a First Lady being able to do so. &amp;nbsp;There are a lot of discussions that go on in the White House and other official offices that the general public should not know all the details. &amp;nbsp;Too much information being given out could lead to possible terrorist attacks on the US. &amp;nbsp;Surely, we do not want another 9-11. &amp;nbsp;I do not agree with the ideas of Rev. Wright that we, as a nation, deserved 9-11. &amp;nbsp;I would never stay in a congregation just because I've been there a long time and there's a lot of members when the leader of that congregation is teaching what Mr. Wright is teaching. &amp;nbsp;I, likewise, think that Obama should be checked out much more thoroughty. &amp;nbsp;He puts on quite a good show and talks the talk, but what is he really made of? &amp;nbsp;His heritage, his beliefs, his foreign affairs experience. What will happen to the US if he is elected? &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#788841</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:15:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:788841</guid><dc:creator>M.Babaian,Houston, Texas</dc:creator><description>1. Where are Obama's records? Financial and senate voting record. Everyone is entitled to &amp;quot;private&amp;quot; time-even for 25 min. Especially when your husband is about to be impeached.May I remind you that Hillary Clinton is also a lawyer.&lt;br&gt;2. When congress voted for preemptive strike in Iraq, where was Obama? He was not in the Senate, receiving the so-called intelligence reports that were handed down by this administration. Congress had to make a decision based on the information at the time. Hindsight does not preclude better judgment. If Hillary Clinton is to be chastized for this vote, so does Colin Powell et al(congress) who were all duped. Abstract ideas of unity, hope, and belief are great sound bites,but the events of this last week, unfortunately negate their positive aura. The American people need substance-concrete answers for the economy,healthcare, war in Iraq, education, our image in the world, and yes, a healing for the divide that exists not only with race; but also with gender, religion,age,political affiliation,money,ethnicity etc. We have all been inspired, but what we need now is someone who will deliver on those promises.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#788897</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:22:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:788897</guid><dc:creator>Steve Sherburne, Portland, Oregon</dc:creator><description>Hillary Clinton is just a new version of Roslyn Carter. Has the President's ear, trusted advisor, and met important people. &amp;nbsp;Hmmmm, so did the Nixon daughters. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There are no dress rehearsals for being President, and every ex-President has stated nothing that they did previously prepared them for what they encountered... oh, but a first lady did... it just lacks credibility. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#788907</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:23:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:788907</guid><dc:creator>Geri Khan, Suitland, MD</dc:creator><description>If Hillary believed so strongly that's it's un-american to discount the delegates in Michigan and Florida, why did she agree with the DNC when the rules were made. &amp;nbsp;When I listen to her public comments about Sen McCain's years of experience v. Sen Obama's and the sudden concern for the voters in Michigan and Florida I feel she's inciting voters to elect another republican unless she's the democratic nominee. &amp;nbsp;Has she forgotten the bigger picture--a democrat in the white house or is she intentionally stabbing the party in the back. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#789009</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:33:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789009</guid><dc:creator>Dostra, Oakland, California</dc:creator><description>You would think with floods, hurricanes and tornados wrecking havoc on America's land and shores, we'd all try to be a little bit nicer rather than picking to the bones a woman who has done nothing but devote her time and energy to improving the lives of others. I hope all the aggradizment of Obama does not in the end leave us all with &amp;quot;fool's gold.&amp;quot; Please, you in the media, knock it off; you are sickening with your endless fawning, using black male &amp;quot;talking heads&amp;quot; to promote your deviltry. Folks should be focusing on things that really matter at this point in time. &amp;nbsp;What pleasure does it gives anyone to rehash an era of &amp;quot;the good, the bad and the ugly?&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;Only bad and ugly folks want to revisit it. Neither Clinton or Obama have bucket loads of experience, but I would trust my fate to her any day. &amp;nbsp;So please give it a rest - burn the damn papers and get on with what's happening today, in the moment!!!!!!!!!!!</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#789067</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:42:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789067</guid><dc:creator>Fred Willson, Springfield MA</dc:creator><description>Where are the details about those items taken from the White House when the Clintons left (like gifts from other countries given to the United States, not to Bill &amp;amp; Hillary)? What about those last minute pardons during Bill's final month in office? What about all the Library donators expecting quid pro quo? &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;Okay, the last 8 years may not have been that great, but did they erase our collective memories of the 8 years before them? Can we seriously imagine putting those two back in the White House? Time for a reality check: &amp;nbsp;her claim is of her 'valid experience'; these documents prove that there was none; &amp;nbsp;yet another lie, gee what a surprise...</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#789076</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:43:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789076</guid><dc:creator>Barb Columbus, Oh</dc:creator><description>It is clear to me. as american citizen, yet baffling, &amp;nbsp;as to how you expect to oversee a nation in distress economically and foreign policy wise, when you cannot attend to the numerous extra-marital affairs within in your own house. &amp;nbsp;No person would calmly stand by any spouse who repeatedly has affairs, unless the true marriage is a farce, only with a political agenda at any cost. &amp;nbsp;As, for health care do not sit there and speak to the american people on how you will get national health care, when you had a golden opportunity and eight years of so-called vast experience in the White House that amounted to nothing. &amp;nbsp;You are a part of the old boys club, tell me how you are going to enact different measures to aid americans, yet fail to succeed. I AM WOMEN IN HER 50'S AND A STAUNCH DEMOCRATIC BUT IF HILLARY CLINTON WINS THE NOMINATION THROUGH YET ANOTHER CONTROVERSIAL ELECTION, I WOULD VOTE FOR McCAIN.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#789124</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:50:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789124</guid><dc:creator>Laurene, CT</dc:creator><description>Did everyone skip over the first few lines of the subpoened missing Whitewater information? &amp;quot;That's the same day that one of the First Lady's aides discovered a stack of Mrs. Clinton's law-firm billing records in the private quarters of the White House. Whitewater investigators had been searching for the subpoenaed documents for months.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;EXCUSE ME? &amp;nbsp;Isn't obstructing a federal investigation at least a FELONY? &amp;nbsp;Shouldn't this launch an immediate investigation by the Justice Dept? &amp;nbsp;Why aren't you HRC supporters commenting on THAT? &amp;nbsp;Reporters, I certainly hope I see that plastered all over the news for the next 5-6 days!</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#789162</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:54:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789162</guid><dc:creator>Storm, USA</dc:creator><description>And what foreign policy experience does Obama have...NONE!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At least with Hillary, she met with Heads of States while being First Lady, the only people Obama has met with is Rezko &amp;amp; that looney Pastor.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why don't you do your job, and get a full disclosure of all transactions with Obama and Rezko, so far all we have is Obama's words and no paper trail...hmmm, sounds suspicious to me.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#789164</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:54:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789164</guid><dc:creator>Sheila, Olympia Fields, IL</dc:creator><description>Does anyone recall that one of Bill and Hillary Clinton's closest friends in the Whitewater deal committed suicide? &amp;nbsp;That means this man had a secret so terrible that he did not want to come to light - he was willing to take his life. &amp;nbsp;A person does not do this unless they have something to hide.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why hasn't Hillary Clinton released their income tax statements? &amp;nbsp;Could it be that she initially thought the primary race would be over by now - and no one would be paying attention to that fact. &amp;nbsp;Unfortunately, that is not how things turned out. &amp;nbsp;Also, who are the donors to the Bill Clinton foundation? &amp;nbsp;This is information that should be made public. &amp;nbsp;And last, if Hillary Clinto were such an integral part of policy making, where are the official documents where she was meeting with the Heads of State? &amp;nbsp;What treaties did she help to negotiate? &amp;nbsp;Anyone can take trips with their husbands as the role of First Lady, but where are the solid credentials showing her leaderships, that she is using as her platform for the Presidency? &amp;nbsp;Can we all just take a deep breath, and demand answeers to these questions.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#789371</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:21:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789371</guid><dc:creator>Bob on RandR</dc:creator><description>Just reading the comments posted here shows how bias clouds judgment. Clinton supporters take a blind eye to all her failings and lack of information and stretching-truths, and directly place blame on Obama in her kitchen-sink attacks. I see one side polarizing the community and Hilary's people should be ashamed. I completely support a woman to become president, but if this is the method and manor that she'll take office in I say Democrats can expect disgrace. There is lots of ammunition that Obama can use against Hilary, but he doesn't. The Republicans will not hold their restraint. She will have to prove her 3AM experience and her roles in Ireland and Bosnia. If there is one stretched-truth or lie she'll be labeled as such. Obama has taken head-on the race card that was thrown at him with honor. It shows how he'll perform under a 3AM circumstance. I have yet to see Hilary perform gracefully under pressure. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#789394</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:24:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789394</guid><dc:creator>Martin Ervin, Chesapeake</dc:creator><description>You’re kidding, are American's foolish enough to believe that photo opts count as experience, please. Senator Clinton should campaign on her own accomplishments regardless if she has no foreign policy experience. Wake up America</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#789399</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:24:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789399</guid><dc:creator>rodney, Jeanerette, LA</dc:creator><description>As you all know, the life of a politician is under constant scrutiny. &amp;nbsp;Once those papers were released from the Clinton Library, we all knew that they would be put under the &amp;quot;media microscope.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;However, I must agree that nothing substantive will be found in the documents. &amp;nbsp;We all know how shrewd the Clinton spin machine is, and they will not release anything that can be damaging to her candidacy. &amp;nbsp;If there is nothing substantive in &amp;nbsp;these documents then we must as question, &amp;quot;What was First Lady Clinton doing for eight years that would lead her to tout her foreign policy experience in this campaign?&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp; </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#789400</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:24:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789400</guid><dc:creator>akoyster@msn.com</dc:creator><description>The Clinton's have many unexplained happenings in their last terms in the White House. I would like to know what happened to the White House Furniture(purschased with tax dollars) when they departed.&lt;br&gt;If I am correct I believe they took it with them. &amp;nbsp;Was this aproprieate? Or was it an indecation of how little they care about the American people and how their tax dollars are spent? </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#789460</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:33:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789460</guid><dc:creator>Paul, Lansdale PA</dc:creator><description>No one would care if hillary had NOT claimed she has experience, and is ready on day 1. since she had not position andn o clearance in Bill's white house &amp;nbsp;but is citing her EXPERIENCE as a reason to elect her president, we have a right to know what this experience is. The blanked outspots seem to be morea reason to avoid another 4 years of clinton deception and half truths.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#789470</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:34:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789470</guid><dc:creator>suzy, san francisco</dc:creator><description>WHY ISN'T ANYONE ASKING THE QUESTION...&lt;br&gt;WHAT HAS OBAMA DONE?&lt;br&gt;Has he even BEEN to Iraq???? &amp;nbsp;She has - 3 times.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's a simple question to ask - and if his only answer is &amp;quot;I opposed this war from the beginning&amp;quot; - well, please ask him again for a different answer because I am sick to death of hearing that. And he really can't play the judgement card any more can he.&lt;br&gt;Make him answer What is your foreign policy experience?......&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary was NOT the president, but she certainly didn't sit on the sidelines - and as someone else mentioned - that's good enough for me too! &amp;nbsp;Her strength is what I admire most.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#789483</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:36:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789483</guid><dc:creator>Carolyn, Birmingham, Alabama</dc:creator><description>My father was a minister. I researched and typed his sermons for at least 10 years. &amp;nbsp;This does not make me qualified to be a minister. Senator Clinton appears to be a smart person, her personal accomplishments should speak for her. I personally would not want to ride on my husband's coat tail.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#789503</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:38:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789503</guid><dc:creator>Ron MacGeorge</dc:creator><description>Hilary's daily logs? what about the oil in iraq that has been pumped and stored away in other locations right under your noses? How much would that amount to now, in five years? Your muck raking job is far to easy and and you don't have the courage to go after anything that truly matters.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#789566</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:44:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789566</guid><dc:creator>S Ann, Aventura, FL</dc:creator><description>I would be more interested in the tax returns she refuses to release until after she is the party nominee. &amp;nbsp;That alone makes me totally distrust her. &amp;nbsp;What is she hiding. &amp;nbsp;Why is it such a battle to get any disclosure from the Clintons? &amp;nbsp;If you have nothing to hide, release them already and stop putting conditions on it. The secrecy only makes me more suspicious and if I don't trust you, I certainly won't vote for you. &amp;nbsp;You obviously are afraid of any in depth scrutiny or you would not have edited the calendars to such an extend and why you are not allowing the voters to see your tax returns.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#789571</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:44:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789571</guid><dc:creator>Rick Baird, Vienna, VA</dc:creator><description>This just further proves that neither candidate has the experience needed to run this country.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#789585</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:46:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789585</guid><dc:creator>Suzanne Jo 2429 W 129 Street Burnsville, MN 55337</dc:creator><description>Hillary is the one who touted her experience as First Lady is important experience for running the country as President of the USA. &amp;nbsp;Of course her &amp;quot;experience&amp;quot; should be viewed. &amp;nbsp;Not much of substance there, eh? &amp;nbsp;Why blame the media for reporting follow/up to her own expansive statements? &amp;nbsp;Now, where did the $5 million come from? &amp;nbsp;I don't think our public officials make this kind of money. &amp;nbsp;But I guess they do?</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#789633</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:50:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789633</guid><dc:creator>Earl, Tn</dc:creator><description>Bias? &amp;nbsp;I see no bias in this article. It is a newspersons responsibility to bring to light questionable behavior. &amp;nbsp;It is the READERS choice to decide on credibility. &amp;nbsp;Personally, I am more concerned why it is that 80% of America (the working class) hold only 16% of the net worth in this country while the top 20% (the rich) hold 84% of the wealth? &amp;nbsp;To me, the answers are obvious. &amp;nbsp;Teary eyed Hillary does not fool me in the least. &amp;nbsp;Nor does Obama claiming to change the world. &amp;nbsp;These people are all politicians. Do you really believe they care about your life? </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#789676</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:54:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789676</guid><dc:creator>David Goldsmith, Chatham, Ontario</dc:creator><description>I continue to be perplexed that Hillary has not chosen Ricky Nelson's &amp;quot;I went to a garden party&amp;quot; as her campaign theme song. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, I totally disagree with those who say she has no previous experience. Let's see: there's Whitewater, her subpoenaed business files, &amp;quot;lost&amp;quot; in the White House, Travel Department firings, her serendipitous cattle futures windfall, her health care proposal fiasco. The list goes on and on. How can anyone say she has no experience?</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#789761</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:02:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789761</guid><dc:creator>Diane, Richmond,d VA</dc:creator><description>Why do you continue to write negative comments and media coverage about Hillary? &amp;nbsp;She is a great woman who is running for President. &amp;nbsp;She is the most intelligent person &amp;nbsp;running but the media continues to make her seem so small. &amp;nbsp;As First Lady she did meet with very important Heads of State, attend meetings, etc. &amp;nbsp;There are more important issues to deal with then this. &amp;nbsp;If this continues - the bickering between the media and the democratic candidates, we will have another Republican White House and God help us. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#789845</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:13:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789845</guid><dc:creator>David Slye, Greencastle, PA</dc:creator><description> &amp;nbsp;Senator Clinton is by far the most intelligent individual running for the Presidency and already has a proven record in the Senate of working with the other party. &amp;nbsp;So her record has some things blacked out, I wonder what Obama's looks like. Doubtfully, and most likely no better.&lt;br&gt;She definitely the person for the job.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#789886</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:17:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789886</guid><dc:creator>Beanal, Arlington, Virginia</dc:creator><description>Being &amp;quot;First Lady&amp;quot; in not a strong credential for being President, never has been and never will be. This case is no exception no matter how you spin it and this aricle and the referenced documents just supports this position. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In this particular case &amp;quot;being First Lady&amp;quot; did bring a lot of &amp;quot;baggage&amp;quot; with the candidate (HRC) and a lot of it &amp;nbsp;is negative (e.g.,all the &amp;quot;...gates&amp;quot;, especially &amp;quot;Monica-gate&amp;quot; falsely blaming the &amp;quot;...vast right-wing conspiracy&amp;quot;...). &amp;nbsp;Right or wrong, this baggage will severely limit both her electibility and her eventual effectiveness as President if elected. &amp;nbsp;I strongly believe about half of the electorate and US Congress would not forget or put aside this &amp;quot;baggage&amp;quot; and it would remain an extremely strong impediment to any significant progress in her administration. &amp;nbsp;That is why I remain an &amp;quot;ABC&amp;quot; voter, &amp;quot;Anybody But Clinton&amp;quot;. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama may have some baggage to, but not nearly as significant or debilitating. &amp;nbsp;His messge and spirit of melding diverse groups is far more credible than the divisive history and baggage of HRC. &amp;nbsp;As President she can not and will not be as effective as Obama and that alone is sufficent to be an &amp;quot;ABC&amp;quot; voter, in both the primary election and the general election.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#789926</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:23:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789926</guid><dc:creator>tcskms@hotmail.com</dc:creator><description>Why does anyone think they should have any acess to the exact transcripts of Hillary&amp;amp;Bills conversations during there troubling personal times? &amp;nbsp;Also anyone knows that there are few secrets &amp;nbsp;between husband and wife. Nat. Sec. things that were discussed between them most likely wuold not and shouldn't be a part of any archieves.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#789946</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:25:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789946</guid><dc:creator>Tom, Winfield, PA</dc:creator><description>Many of my &amp;quot;white&amp;quot; coworkers are very sympathetic for Obama due to his speech or race. &amp;nbsp;It is amazing to me that we are sympathetic towards a MAN that is black, but we are unsympathetic for a WOMAN who has also had to fight for equal treatment.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#789965</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:29:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789965</guid><dc:creator>Van Nguyen, Staten Island, New York</dc:creator><description>Now, I just ask you to do this. Put Senator Hillary Clinton's experiences and Senator Barack Obama's on a scale and you are the judge. Beside her experiences during the time as a First Lady, she has people around her with many projects, one of which is new transportation system and more. Please, talk to her.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#789978</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:31:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:789978</guid><dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator><description>Experience is learning from your past history and mistakes. Since Senator Obama has been portrayed as a &amp;nbsp;messiah and an &amp;quot;innocent&amp;quot;, he really hasn't been able to learn form his past history, because he has never made any mistakes and is perfect. What a joke! Hillary Clinton a strong candidate &amp;nbsp;for the Presidency. What I would like to see now is &amp;quot;exeperience&amp;quot; from the Obama side. Goodluck if you can find much. Obama will need to introduce himself to the American People and then to the rest of the world before we can actually solve our problems. Unfortunately, we don't have the time of luxury for training wheels right now. We need someone who will take charge on the very 1st day.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#790017</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:37:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790017</guid><dc:creator>Jeff Knight, Miami, FL</dc:creator><description>Maybe Sen. Clinton envisioned herself as the next Eleanor Roosevelt. &amp;nbsp;She had some kind of sway in diplomatic circles before and after FDR died. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#790029</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:39:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790029</guid><dc:creator>Jennifer, Seattle, WA</dc:creator><description>It is time the news reported on all the things the Clintons have managed to hide and cover up. Do we really ever need any more of their shenanigans? If she gets in the White House again, what else will she walk off with when she leaves??? I don't ever remember voting for her or seeing her name on the ballot when her husband was elected President, but she managed to nose into State Affairs, and it was always hidden. What was not covered up ended up being a mess and handled ignorantly. (remember the medical coverage fiasco)</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#790058</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:42:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790058</guid><dc:creator>Theresa, Clearwater, FL</dc:creator><description>Just please stop the biased reporting against Hillary and the Monica thing. Those involved have already suffered the consquences of their actions. Please move on. &amp;nbsp;This country is in trouble and we need Hillary experience. She will be the one in charge and &amp;quot;the buck stops here&amp;quot; (with her)attitude. &lt;br&gt; </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#790060</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:42:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790060</guid><dc:creator>GREG KLINE, HARRIMAN, NY</dc:creator><description>How is it, that Hillary touts in her own book how great an accomplishment NAFTA is, but voters and the media seem to buy her current denouncement of it. I understand that Clinton's White House records indicate that Hillary was involved in several NAFTA meetings, and on 11/10/1993, she officiated a NAFTA briefing organized entirely around her participation. Two attendees of the meeting, not affiliated with any campaign, state that Hillary's remarks were uneqivocally totally pro-NAFTA, and that she stated how great it would be for the economy. They further state that Hillary pressed for their help and support &amp;nbsp;to pass NAFTA, and they are now incredulous to see Hillary distance herself from this.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#790092</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:47:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790092</guid><dc:creator>Kurt, Honolulu HI</dc:creator><description>President Clinton was our leader for almost 3,000 days. &amp;nbsp;How can a few teas and mystery meetings be construed as significant foreign policy experience? &amp;nbsp;I don't remember voting for her.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#790143</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:53:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790143</guid><dc:creator>John E. Baker, Dixon, Illinois</dc:creator><description>The most important role the President has is as a leader and communicator. &amp;nbsp;If Mr. Obama has demonstrated anything it is that he can perform that function far better than Mrs. Clinton. &amp;nbsp;He continues to deliver on the campaign trail a message about hope and possibilities that has resonated with so many that have heard him. &amp;nbsp;Isn't that what we want and need rather than the message of the last decade or more that says I disagree with you, therefore I hate you and so should everyone else? &amp;nbsp;The Senator from New York has mostly shown herself to continue that divisive message both in the White House and the Senate, as did her husband and the Republicans that opposed them and followed after them. &amp;nbsp;If experience is important, shouldn't we also judge the value (or success) of that experience? &amp;nbsp;Let's look back to Mrs. Clinton's first big public policy role as First Lady-chairing the President's Task Force on Heath Care Reform. &amp;nbsp;She was roundly criticized for conducting closed door meetings on the issue; the plan devised under her leadership couldn't even garner enough votes to get to the floor of either the House or the Senate despite Democratic majorities in both; and many pollsters cite the plan as a major reason for the Republican Party retaking control of both houses of Congress in 1994. &amp;nbsp;The remainder of her time as First Lady was devoted to issues that almost everyone could get behind-or at least find hard to oppose-fighting violence against women and promoting child care. &amp;nbsp;Mr. Obama, like Mrs. Clinton, has been a successful lawyer. &amp;nbsp;He has served admirably in the Illinois legislature, and like Mrs. Clinton, is a United States Senator, albeit with less experience. &amp;nbsp;Speaking of experience, I'm not sure that there is any experience that can prepare someone for the Presidency. &amp;nbsp;However, there is at least one former President whose experience closely mirrors that of Mr. Obama. &amp;nbsp;This President grew up in poverty but eventually became a lawyer. &amp;nbsp;He was elected to his state legislature, but his only national political experience comes from a single two-year term in the U.S. House of Representatives, and as a prominent voice in his party. &amp;nbsp;That President was Abraham Lincoln and he courageously led this country through its darkest hours. &amp;nbsp;I can't say that Mr. Obama is the next Lincoln, but of the three candidates looking to November I sincerely believe he has the greatest potential to see us through these dark times. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#790170</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:56:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790170</guid><dc:creator>misybust@bellsouth.net</dc:creator><description>Too many undislosures for Hillary. We need new fresh blood and a new untainted past. Six years in the white house with too many baggage issues does not help the American people at all. Clintons have had plenty of time to do the work for the american people. What we got from the Clintons then is what we will get from the Clintons now. Let's get new blood in the White House and new ideas in a new era. What can we loose? We have everything to gain. CHANGE is how growth is made. Shirley,Palm Beach,FL</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#790262</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:04:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790262</guid><dc:creator>Shaun, Columbia, SC</dc:creator><description>Horrible article, what was Obama doing at this time? More importantly, what is Obama and his campaign doing now? Let's report on why the Obama campaign does not want to let voters in Michigan and Florida have their say. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#790329</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:12:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790329</guid><dc:creator>Randee Silberfed, Mt. Sinai, NY </dc:creator><description>Why are people so interested in Hillary Clinton's &amp;quot;private meetings&amp;quot; while she was first lady? &amp;nbsp;She was not an elected official, unlike George Bush who won't release a list of his visitors to the White House over the the past 8 years. People are always looking for conspiracies and corruption with the Clintons. &amp;nbsp;Maybe we should ask Kenneth Starr to conduct another 40 million investigation? &amp;nbsp;That would certainly distract us from the war and failing economy.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#790363</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:15:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790363</guid><dc:creator>Polly Dalton, Wiscasset, Maine</dc:creator><description>Were you better off when the Clintons were in the White House. I sure was. They have spent MILLIONS of our tax dollars trying to get something on the Clintons when there were in office and did'nt succeed. Let's stop this nonsense, picking on Hillary or you will let another Republican slide right back into the White House and have another four years of Bush policies. Hey! Just think about it, if Hillary gets in the country gets two for the price of one. How much better can it get. Plus their personal life is just that. People should stop casting stones at the Clintons. Some do it out of jealousy, and some out of fear of a woman leader. Men haven't done so well running this country, so let's give a woman a try like other countries have. I think the media has given Obama a &amp;quot;good&amp;quot; free card while they dwell on slamming Hillary.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#790487</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:32:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790487</guid><dc:creator>Patricia Rich</dc:creator><description>Either she played a key role in policy-making (unlike other first ladies) or she can't claim 'experience' that prepares her for the presidency. That's like saying if you're a good student you will be a good teacher. They're completely different skills. This is not insignificant at all. This person has some slight chance of being the next president, so it's fair to ask what she's done. &lt;br&gt;You can compare to Obama all you want and make more racist comments (he's blaming whites!?!?) but this isn't about him. It's about her claims.&lt;br&gt;Obama claims he has judgment. He doesn't claim to have years of experience influencing policy decisions.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#790494</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:34:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790494</guid><dc:creator>Mo Mann, Mdchanicsburg, PA</dc:creator><description>I find it very sad and discouraging that women like the respondent Melinda Arcadia choose to tear down Senator Obama in order to justly point out the nit-picking over Senator Clinton's records as first lady. Ms Arcadia comes across as an angry feminist who thinks Senator Clinton should just be coronated as the democratic nominee and Senator Obama is an outrageous upstart with no right to be in this campaign. The real culprit in all of this is the hypocritical media that has from the beginning injected both race and gender into the democratic primary. We viewers have over the course of the democratic primaries suffered through endless analyses from media talking heads dissecting election results by demographics and then emphasizing Gender and Racial differences and how each candidate must pander to each demographic group in order to be successful. Other examples are the constant over replaying of the Reverend Wright You Tube video and over blowing Geraldine Ferraro's comments about Senator's Obama. It is the media's reporting style that inflamed racial issues and emphasized differences instead of promoting what we all have in common. I am then stunned to hear these same talking heads complain about a lack of discussion of the &amp;quot;real issues&amp;quot; facing the American electorate. It is as if the Media seems more interested in creating news for ratings or enhancing the moderator’s status than reporting news and encouraging discussions of the issues that are really important in this election. The behavior of the media has harmed both candidates and reduced the level of debate to a low common denominator of gender verses race, anger, and resentment. Will African Americans stay home if Senator Clinton becomes the nominee or White and Hispanic Americans out of resentment vote for Senator McCain? This election is too important to get distracted by egos or be defined by the narcissist agenda of the media or supporters of the status quo.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#790506</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:35:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790506</guid><dc:creator>Hortencia Perez-Garcia </dc:creator><description>Please,can we just get back to the real issues that are confronting our Country. &amp;nbsp;I think we've had enough of the racial comparisons and wanting to know about Mrs. Clintons calendar when her husband was in offic. We need solutions so our citizens can thrive and keep our Nation strong.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#790531</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:40:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790531</guid><dc:creator>T  popick</dc:creator><description>Obamas' speech about race was eloquent but certainly missed the point of Rev. Wrights' hate mongering of America. &amp;nbsp;Is this the message he wants our children to hear to bring about change? He obviously wanted that for his children. &amp;nbsp;He needs to address the real issue with tough questions asked by our media, not a speech about race.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#790623</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:54:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790623</guid><dc:creator>Suzann Jones, Billings MT</dc:creator><description>Come on America, aren't you sick and tired of lies, deceit and coverups. &amp;nbsp;Haven't we had enough of that with the Bush administration. &amp;nbsp;Do we really want to let the Clintons back in the White House? I appreciate Obama's so called in-experience. &amp;nbsp;It tells me that he is the least corrupt at this point. I think we need a fresh new viewpoint. If we every want to get away from politics as usual, Obama is our best hope. &amp;nbsp;Get involved America, tell Washington we have had it with the status quo. Let's unite and heal this country. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#790630</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:55:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790630</guid><dc:creator>Marlon, Connecticut</dc:creator><description>I thought the article was great, It just goes to prove her 'real experience', 35 plus years, Experience that you can count on ??? Someone that can answer the call at 3am. &amp;nbsp;Well, that person Certainly isnt Hillary. What can we count on in a crisis?? Vacations and luncheons and Social teas and Parties involving crumpets. &amp;nbsp;We can count on 'blacked out' policies. She visited 80 countries and she did nothing but vacationed there. She need to stop lying to the american public. She decided no policies, she signed no treaties, she made no foreign policies decisions. Yes, she may have met leaders, but, that was about it.... &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#790642</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:56:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790642</guid><dc:creator>KFAlex, Virginia USA</dc:creator><description>I don't think that it is anyones business what really goes on in private with our president and his wife. What ever role Mrs. Clinton had when she was first lady should not be brought up now. She is running for the presidencey not as a first lady. She has taken a lot of flax from all sides and I think we as a country and as an individual should stop requesting her to prove herself when we haven't asked Mr.Obama to do the same. What has he done for this country as a senator? My question is what will he do for us as a country as for us as individuals. I saw a picture where he was at a place where they were do the Pledge of Alligence and he did not have his hand over his heart. That doesn't seem very American to me. Mrs. Clinton loves being an American and has the American future in her heart and best intrest. I think she should get a fair and honest chance of being the President of this country we all call home.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#790649</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:57:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790649</guid><dc:creator>K. Schmidt, Issaquah, WA</dc:creator><description>Obama is a two faced, slick talking candidate who shouldn't be entrusted to the most important position in our country (and the world). &amp;nbsp;He states (in our voter's pamphlet) under question of family: wife, children, and Trinity Church. No other candidate lists their church in the voter's pamphlet. He's first extremely tight with the Reverend, now backstroking. At first calls himself the black candidate, now in distancing w/church says he's also white. He'll do or say anything for the vote without regard for honesty.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#790660</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:59:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790660</guid><dc:creator>Just Annoyed, DC</dc:creator><description>Oh come on. Everyone knows why they are probing. She said that she had 30years of experience? In what areas exactly does she have expertise has been the question since day one. That's the reason for the article! It was poorly written but geeze...not irrelevent. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#790706</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 20:05:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790706</guid><dc:creator>Nadine Thompson, Anchorage, Alaska</dc:creator><description>In watching the NBC Nightly News on Wed 3/19, On the Clinton files that have just been released and video of Monica Lewinsky is shown and Mr Williams makes a comment there are questions about what was released during this time period that were blacked out. Tell what this has to do with her experience while her husband was President. &amp;nbsp;If has nothing to do with the economy or gobal issues or healtcare. &amp;nbsp;Which is why everyone wanted these files opened. Seems to me NBC and I am sure others are just looking for dirt to dig up that is an old issue that was between Mrs Clinton &amp;amp; her husband and we no longer have any business knowing about and has nothing to do with the experience she received while her husband was President &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#790740</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 20:11:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790740</guid><dc:creator>Taz Me,Seattle,Wash</dc:creator><description>This really is amazing.. All the Hillary Bashing thats been going on, I remeber when the Clinton were in office.. I had a paycheck that would actually stretch to the next one, Have not seen that in the last eight years.... Don't go to figure how we can talk of only the bad and never bring up any of the good. Sounds kind of Bias to me.........</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#790743</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 20:11:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790743</guid><dc:creator>Marlene Sirianni, Hornell, NY</dc:creator><description>I can't believe how many people still want to crucify the Clintons! &amp;nbsp;The entire time they were in the white house, someone tried to prove they had pulled something illegal, but Ken Star couldn't prove it! Why aren't Dick Cheney and George Bush being haunted in the same way? &amp;nbsp;There's more there that isn't being brought to the surface. &amp;nbsp;Also, I agree with others that Obama's stuff should be scrutinized also. &amp;nbsp;Why wasn't the video of his pastor brought out sooner? &amp;nbsp;That's because Mrs. Clinton is trying hard to run the campaign based on her true experience, not just smearing others!</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#790753</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 20:12:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790753</guid><dc:creator>GENE ODEAR, NEW OFFENBURG, MO. 63670</dc:creator><description>I WOULD MUCH RATHER SEE HILLARY IN AS PRESIDENT THAN OBAHMA BUT MY PICK IS JOHN MCCAIN. BUT OBAHMA IS ONE WE DON'T KNOW NEAR ENOUGH ABOUT. HE HAS VERY LITTLE EXPERIENCE JUST A GOOD SPEAKER USING JUST &amp;quot;WORDS&amp;quot; .WE SHOULD LOOK HARD AT THESE CANDIDATES AND MAKE A FINAL DECISION WHEN WE WEIGH THE FACTS. TO ME THATS &amp;quot;JOHN MCCAIN&amp;quot;.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#790757</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 20:14:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790757</guid><dc:creator>bill, milwaukee. wisconsin</dc:creator><description>Just imagine what Mc Cain will do to clinton if she were the nominee after reading her papers...She said she has all this experience. &amp;nbsp;She flat out lied!!!! I can see the ad that Mc Cain will put out. &amp;nbsp;It will show some of these pages and ask the question, where is the experience billary? &amp;nbsp;A presidential person doesnt out right lie to the American people.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#790762</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 20:14:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790762</guid><dc:creator>Ann, Charlotte, NC</dc:creator><description>We are talking about this because Hillary touts her First Lady experience in her campaign, an idea that is quite controversial. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As a matter of fact, the idea that her experience will make her a better leader is the cornerstone of her campaign. It is to be expected that the records of her time as First Lady would be scrutinized to understand how she can claim that the time she spent in that position might make her more qualified to be President.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#790846</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 20:28:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790846</guid><dc:creator>Jen F. Usher</dc:creator><description>The evidence of &amp;quot;Blacked Out&amp;quot; meetings appearing on HRC calender during WJC Presiendency in my mind lends credence to HRC's cliams, as well as her Campaign staffs statment she has extensive Foreign Policy experience.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Comparaing HRC with Obama, hands down HRC is better suited to be America's next Leader.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regradless of what Obama states, he is a Novice just like Carter and look what little Carter was able to do while President.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Though I voted for RMN, GRF, JC, I can not in Clear conscience vote for Obama. &amp;nbsp;Obama is too much of an unknown. &amp;nbsp;He has questionable fund-raising prowess,questionable ethics-just from where I sit, way to many potential ties to unsrupulous benefactors.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Furthermore, HRC on the other hand, is on record for being percieved as being prone to conducting business on the QT. &amp;nbsp;That being said, HRC is better positioned, to garner my vote-if I were Democrat. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#790857</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 20:29:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790857</guid><dc:creator>Citizen-Denver</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;Indeed, on overseas trips in 1996, Mrs. Clinton held &amp;quot;private&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;closed&amp;quot; meetings with foreign heads of state in Greece, Turkey, and Bosnia--without the president's attendance. And on dozens of times throughout her White House years, she attended White House meetings with Cabinet secretaries, was briefed by senior National Security Council officials and met with foreign dignitaries from around the world.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;Mrs. Clinton does not have Security Clearance and briefed by senior National Security officials?, that is a Federal Crime. You cannot access National Security documents without Security clearance credentials. The FBI must investigate Mrs. Clinton and the former president Bill Clinton. &lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#790930</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 20:41:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790930</guid><dc:creator>dave med</dc:creator><description>You all should read the facts surrounding &amp;quot;Travelgate&amp;quot;, Whitewater and the Impeachment Proceedings. &amp;nbsp;Do we want government to be bogged down again with Clintonian scandals with a &amp;quot;government-by-proxy&amp;quot; ie: husband Bill Clinton? I should say not! You all forget how government was ineffective during those times! &amp;nbsp;America could have moved forward towards greatness but the Presidency of the United States was disgraced for all the world to see! &amp;nbsp;So let us dig deep into those files and see those untruths for what they are. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#790964</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 20:47:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:790964</guid><dc:creator>V, Kansas City</dc:creator><description>Why is is SO hard for teh Clinton's to release information about themselves? Thnis concerns me. We are trying to elect a President. I don't want to elect Sen. Clinton to learn that what she was hiding was someting that could have made me choose differently. What are all the secrets about? This is one of the reasons she does not have my support. I like honesty regardless if you do something wrong or right. I don't trust that she will be honest. Before and after the last debate, she said she was working to release information ASAP. Its been weeks and all we get is documents with missing information and black outs. It shouldn't be hard to pull documents from archives for review. You just get them and give them. Secrets means lies and I don;t want to be lied to &amp;quot;deliberately&amp;quot;!</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#791006</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 20:55:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:791006</guid><dc:creator>Jay, Minneapolis, MN</dc:creator><description>At a time of war, do we want a junior Senator with two years of experience leading this country, or do we want someone that has had exposure as well as experience. Remember Jimmy Carter? No experience and a disaster in foreign policy. At least Senator Clinton has been in the White House and has a vast array of experienced advisors to choose from. If Obama gets the nomination, I'm voting for McCain!</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#791030</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 21:00:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:791030</guid><dc:creator>Joyce, Rochester, NY</dc:creator><description>Hillary's calendar showed that she only has experience as a former first lady but not the commander-in chief experience. First lady experience is not the same as the excutive experience as the President. Hillary also had a big failure experience in failling to pass her so called universal health care bill. Because she could not unite both Democrates and Republicans to reform the system. So big failure plus minor first lady experience does not equal to her claimed foreign policy experience. Hillary Camp, stop fooling the voters. We can not afford to give Hillary another chance to play around the system. Reporters use facts and their brain not just emotion to write news. I am ready to elect a woman President, but this person is definitely not Hillary. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Joyce</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#791064</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 21:11:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:791064</guid><dc:creator>Steve Fernandez, Phoenix AZ</dc:creator><description>If Mrs. Clinton has to use black ink to blot out her activities then perhaps this should be taken as proof that she cannot be trusted to run this country. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;I certainly would like to know the relationship between the New York Rabbi, the leader of the convicted criminals her husband pardoned, and her run for the New York senatorial seat? (She won with overwhelming support from the jewish sector-remember, even though she was not even a resident of New York prior to this meeting?)&lt;br&gt;There are so many other questions of merrit around this issue alone.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#791090</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 21:18:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:791090</guid><dc:creator>Dardie Bonilla, Walnut Ca.</dc:creator><description>Whoever this Jim Popkin is shame on you...Give me information about improving our economy, health reforms, social security, and not in any order of preference world peace..... Bring our troops home..&lt;br&gt;Haven't you personally had enough of this &amp;quot;gossip&amp;quot; about all the candidates???</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#791131</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 21:27:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:791131</guid><dc:creator>NBB/CHARLESTON WV</dc:creator><description>Which is it....DID SHE HAVE TOO MUCH POWER OR NONE AT ALL??????.I WOULD LOVE TO SEE THE DAILEY LOGS OF OBAMA AND HIS ILIN. CONGRESIONAL LOGS.All about REZCO AND HIS ATTENTANCE AT HIS CHURCH.I find it appaling that as usual the CLINTONS are being over scrutinized while OBAMA records are not released.I think it is time that AMERICA wakes up and votes for a leader not a motivational speaker.The polls are finally showing that this happening,which is a welcome change.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#791169</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 21:38:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:791169</guid><dc:creator>Jill Buckman, South Carolina</dc:creator><description>I'm so discouraged by our democratic choices and honestly don't have any confidence in either of them. &amp;nbsp;Whether he's honest about it or not Obama has been influenced by TWENTY years of hateful divisive Black Theology. &amp;nbsp;And like it or not, that's definitely going to skewer his decisions about who he places in powerful positions to lead our country. &amp;nbsp;I love Oprah but seriously, what was she thinking backing this man??? &amp;nbsp;What goes in is what comes out so now there's no way I'll vote for him. &amp;nbsp;I'm really glad we were made aware of this BEFORE the election. &amp;nbsp;and Hillary...well although i'd love to vote for a woman, point blank, she does NOT have the appropriate experience or political wisdom to be our commander and chief. &amp;nbsp;My vote's going to be for the democrat in republican clothing..John McCain. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#791246</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 22:07:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:791246</guid><dc:creator>Ken, MN</dc:creator><description>As First Lady, Hillary Clinton was given domestic and foreign assignments, which, as far as we know, she carried out to the satisfaction of the administration. That’s “experience” that will help her “hit the ground running” when we elect her. It would take years for Senator Obama to learn what Senator Clinton already knows.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#791263</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 22:13:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:791263</guid><dc:creator>Jane Doe, Long Beach, CA</dc:creator><description>Hillary Clinton did not have a security clearance when she was first lady. &amp;nbsp;How could she have been briefed on issues of national security? &amp;nbsp;If I broke the law in this manner I would be fired, I might get 5 years in jail and I would never be allowed to hold a job that required a clearance again.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;And on dozens of times throughout her White House years, she attended White House meetings with Cabinet secretaries, was briefed by senior National Security Council officials and met with foreign dignitaries from around the world.&amp;quot;</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#791332</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 22:38:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:791332</guid><dc:creator>glass girl, florida</dc:creator><description>PLEASE!!! You cant find anything bad on her so you start bringing out irrevelant things. Now thw Monica L. case. GIVE IT A BREAK. She is a good person and will be a great President. My vote is for her. Obama... He speaks well... what else does he have going for him???</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#791399</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 23:01:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:791399</guid><dc:creator>S. J. Pocono Mts. PA</dc:creator><description>After listening to all of the bobble head news commentators and political analysts on the news cable networks it is obvious the black preachers throughout the country got on the pulpit every Sunday for the past year and preached ‘Get out and register and vote for Barack Obama’. I have to wonder what the popular vote and delegate vote would have been if all the Methodist preachers got on the pulpit every Sunday for the last year and preached ‘Get out and register and vote for Hillary Clinton’ &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#791541</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 23:54:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:791541</guid><dc:creator>tonya pennington, woodbridge, va</dc:creator><description>This article is about Clinton.. why do you all feel the need to bash Sen. Obama. &amp;nbsp;If you do not feel the need to vote for him that is your choice but obviously who you have wasted your vote on in the past is the reason our economy or foreign relations, armed forces, etc.. are in the state they are in..If your reason for going against Obama is because he wants to offer change than maybe our country is still in its negative state of denial which continues to feed hate, hate, hate. &amp;nbsp;Our children need a choice, a fresh start a true leader. &amp;nbsp;Think about that every time you bash Sen. Obama for his ability to move a crowd and interest those who could have cared less before NOW...</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#791542</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 23:54:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:791542</guid><dc:creator>Pablo, Denver, CO</dc:creator><description>I would like to be provided with a detailed account of Obama's daily tasks ten or more years ago. &amp;nbsp;And while we are at it, I would like the records of all the Obama supportors and Clinton critics........come on folks, Obama could not remember a conversation/meeting he had with Rezko that took place not long ago and in Obama's new house!</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#791596</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 00:17:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:791596</guid><dc:creator>Cheryl from Seattle</dc:creator><description>It's important because Hillary's basing her entire campaign on her &amp;quot;extensive experience,&amp;quot; which we've come to find out is just another one of her fabrications.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#791632</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 00:31:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:791632</guid><dc:creator>pureza,royal palm beach florida</dc:creator><description>how many times do the Clintons have to be investigated. who cares about that 25 minutes.it's easy for us to find faults,how about finding the gold in these candidates?I can assure you that HILLARY CLINTON has more than Obama.Her accomplishments as a mother, wife,first lady and senator,just to name a few.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#791746</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 01:24:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:791746</guid><dc:creator>Roja</dc:creator><description>For over a dozen years my spouse was a Director and then a VP and then a Senior VP of Human Resources for several corporations. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;During that time I attended numerous functions with officers and directors of major corporations present.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We discussd corporate policies and industry standards, etc at many conventions and dinner meetings.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yet, if I applied for a Senior VP of Human Resources job at even the smallest corporation and listed those functions as &amp;quot;experience&amp;quot; on my resume, I would be laughed out of the room.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We should do the same when the HRC Campaign touts her &amp;quot;experience&amp;quot;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Next time one of her advisers says that she spent 8 years in the White House like I heard her say on one of the Sunday Talking Head shows I would love to hear a reporter respond with &amp;quot;Well, so did Socks the Cat&amp;quot;. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#791770</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 01:37:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:791770</guid><dc:creator>James Grenzbach West Orange, New Jersey</dc:creator><description>Why did she have National Security briefings? There should be an investigation into this.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#791790</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 01:46:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:791790</guid><dc:creator>J Matthews</dc:creator><description>Hillary released these records because she knew that they would show nothing and anything important was listed as a private meeting. &amp;nbsp;Now she could say she has been open and above board. &amp;nbsp;She does not want her phone records reviewed and is fighting to have them hidden for the next few years. &amp;nbsp;She should release all her records and her income tax statements. &amp;nbsp;She has nothing to hide, right? &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#791797</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 01:53:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:791797</guid><dc:creator>Ted, Fort Worth, TX</dc:creator><description>Interesting that the Hillary papers are out while LilBush has managed to keep the illegal activities of the Reagan/Bush Sr administrations under wrap for years after their required release under the law. I can only imagine that the Bush/Cheney/Rove paper shredders are already hard at work 24/7 to cover up the most secretive, unconstitutuional regime's activities that has contributed to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocents and will be viewed by history as the cause of bringing the world to the brink of extinction.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#791862</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 02:25:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:791862</guid><dc:creator>Martin Jackson, New Orleans LA</dc:creator><description>I find it hilarious that Black people feel a direct (hes one of us!)connection with Obama, when he has more in common with white slave owners than black slaves. &amp;nbsp;His father is from Kenya and other than skin tone, genetically quite different from black slaves brought to the Americas from the African continent.For all we know given the fact that blacks sold their own people to make a profit in Africa, its very possible Obama's ancestors were slave salesmen!? I guess we can only speculate until this group of NBC reporters actually do some real investigative journalism. &amp;nbsp;He has nothing in common with American blacks. &amp;nbsp;That being said I hate to think we would elect Obama just to say finally a black president. As if Bush hasnt done enough things wrong, lets put one more incompetent person in the top position for 4years and hope for the best. &amp;nbsp;For me McCain or Clinton will do much better than Obama could do at this point in his life. &amp;nbsp;At Least Hillary spent 8years in the white house I am sure she learned a thing or two. Including dealing with scandals.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#791877</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 02:32:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:791877</guid><dc:creator>Georgie,  Mt. Sterling, Ohio</dc:creator><description>Great experience for a first lady ! She certainly must of Learned alot &amp;amp; Left great impressions over the span of 80 countries. Looks Like Hillary could step right into being President &amp;amp; start gettings straight from day 1 to me. I seriously think Michelle Obama couldn't gracrously, or intelligently handle the tasks that Hillary did.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#791921</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 02:47:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:791921</guid><dc:creator>Deb, Olympia, Washington</dc:creator><description>Geez Jim have you ever been married? Hillary probably knows more about what our foreign policy actually was during those years she was first lady. I would venture to say that Bill shared more information with his wife than with the Vice President. Does your bosses wife know things about you yet she doesn't work in your office? Hmmm this isn't a real stretch of the imagination. At the very least she knows the names of the foreign diplomats and which nation they represent. We can't say that about the current administration.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#791973</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 03:09:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:791973</guid><dc:creator>John Allen, Sedalia MO&amp;gt;</dc:creator><description>This story realy is a yawn!Her schedule at that time interval is un-important as far as qualification to head up U.S. policy or be commander-in-chief of this great nation etc.etc. What does her voting record in New York reveal? I would advise any freedom loving registered voter to &amp;quot;look at the record&amp;quot; if you want the real picture. Does that record offer an alternative to what is present now in the oval office? Is that what you realy want? Who does appear to offer acceptable alternatives? Wake up america, freedom aint free and comes with responsibility to participate. DO we want a hostess or a leader for president? I prefer a leader! </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#792034</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 03:42:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:792034</guid><dc:creator>Fed-up</dc:creator><description>Where are Obama's files regarding his Rezko ties.. Why aren't you persuing this, or this something you are waiting to spring on us after the election?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have been a lifelong Democrat, but this biased reporting is making me shift gears and turn to McCain..this is on your head!</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#792037</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 03:43:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:792037</guid><dc:creator>Euegene Pfennig</dc:creator><description>I have attended many churches in many states and I have never been subjected to venimous attacks by any pastor nor would I have even considered being in a church service that invoked church and state in its sermon, yet Monica keeps surfacing as a legacy of the Clinton era of the white house as if that was more important than ventings of a un-american church that preaches hate and animosity towards fellow Americans. Let s look at the quality of life that the Clintons provided all Americans by there years spent in the White House. Oh please give me a balanced budget again, give me a country that is strong on defence and not wasting taxpayer Dollars on a vision of unifing a culture that has been at odds since bibical times, lets once again take up the issue of health insurance for every American a battle that Mrs. Clinton knows all to well. Lets vote for change from the viewpoint of a non-biased human being and thru the eyes of some one who knows the true meaning of bringing life into this world and standing by those she loves even when the waters are murky. And most important of all let the press begin to give her the same coverage as her opponent reieves.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#792072</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 04:03:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:792072</guid><dc:creator>mary, hamilton,il</dc:creator><description> &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;I must say that Hillary has some devoted supporters. I don't think they are going to allow any form of truth or document get in their way. &amp;nbsp;I really don't need this information either, because I have watched the campaign tactics she and her husband use over and over again. Some people drool after people with power, no matter how dishonest. &amp;nbsp;Sadly, enough, not enough people really care about the state our country is in. &amp;nbsp;It's like Obama said--It's up to us. &amp;nbsp;I do not think the average American has the courage to try for real change. &amp;nbsp;It's so much easier to keep the status quo. &amp;nbsp;Hillary makes her supporters feel secure, because she will bring America more of the same. There will be no surprises with Hillary. &amp;nbsp;She's got your number folks. &amp;nbsp;She plays you like a fiddle.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#792089</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 04:10:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:792089</guid><dc:creator>RCS Austin, Texas</dc:creator><description>This is a little off topic, but why isn't anyone upset that we would even consider electing someone who admits to the amount of drug abuse that Sen. Obama admits to. So he admits it, and that makes it alright? I grew up in the 60s and 70s and as a teenager I feared the day when ex-drug abusers would be running our country. Now that day is upon us and I fear this even more. I never gave into peer pressure, and I never experimented with drugs. I don't think admitting to drug abuse due to peer pressure makes it forgivable. I feel he is sending the wrong message to our youth. “It's ok to try drugs as long as you don't get arrested for them and you openly admit to doing so,” As long as you don't have a criminal record, you can even run for President of the USA and win. How many of Sen. Obama’s supporters would hire someone to work for them who has just admitted to a past drug abuse history? I’m not saying this past makes him a bad person, but I feel it should definitely exclude anyone from running for President. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#792134</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 04:41:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:792134</guid><dc:creator>Angelica</dc:creator><description>Where are Obama's phone logs and e-mails to Rezko, and where are his prior foreign policy expertise papers? I don't see them, nor can anyone bring them to light. &amp;nbsp;How about being fair and unbiased..oops I forgot this is MSNBiasedC.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#792138</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 04:42:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:792138</guid><dc:creator>Eric, Seattle, WA</dc:creator><description>Eight paragraphs carefully crafted to show that she was a First Lady with no political experience and finally one paragragh, again, carefully crafted to make as little as possible of her true political experience. &amp;nbsp;It looks like the end of the article was designed to give it the appearance of journalistic neutrality. &amp;nbsp;This page should be listed as an op-ed page not investigative reporting.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#792143</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 04:49:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:792143</guid><dc:creator>Brian, New York, NY</dc:creator><description>This article is a good start. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Senator Clinton is the one who repeatedly talks about what a huge amount of experience she has... given this claim, the voters have the right to see evidence to back that up. &amp;nbsp;It's puzzling to me that some people think it's unfair to hold her to account, especially if she's going to continue her vain (and at this point two meanings of that word apply) attempt to win the nomination, even if she has to destroy the Democratic party along the way...</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#792144</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 04:49:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:792144</guid><dc:creator>Jerry Souther,Sherman,Texas</dc:creator><description>Just because a person has a drivers license,does't make tmem a good driver.What happened before September 11,2001 is history.Our enemy became the AL-Qaida in Afghanistan.A mission we have yet accomplished.Iraq should have been after securing Afghanistan government with solid control.Plus all the foreign heads of state have changed.Who has kept those meetings with the new ones and the changes that have occurred?It'not the same world before 2001.Not the same United States of America.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#792150</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 04:54:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:792150</guid><dc:creator>Eric, Seattle, WA</dc:creator><description>I am curious, many people claim that SHE broke the law by attending meetings without proper security clearance. &amp;nbsp;I guess I missed the part where it is against the law to attend any government meeting without a security clearance. &amp;nbsp;If anyone talked about things that required special clearances to be told about THEY violated the law by allowing her to be involved - not her. &amp;nbsp;I do wonder, though, if the president has the right to allow anyone access to classified information?</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#792158</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 05:02:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:792158</guid><dc:creator>Ally Tang, Toronto, Ontario</dc:creator><description>I took the time to read through all the comments and was heartened to see that the greater percentage of readers see through the vicious and prejudicial tone that is predominant in media coverage of Clinton. Certainly, she has made concessions to stay in the game but on the whole, her record reflects nothing but truth, integrity and a dedication to making change - not only speaking of it. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#792165</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 05:09:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:792165</guid><dc:creator>sadrac  GA</dc:creator><description>I use to be hillary's fan, i voted for Bill in the 90's, i have nothing against hillary as a Derms, but the fact she lies so much and gone so negative in her campaign just turn me off.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#792179</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 05:22:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:792179</guid><dc:creator>halstead@writeme.com, NY.</dc:creator><description>Whats with the media? attacking Hilary on what? nothing? This is just a ploy to get enough sympathy for her but never giving any really damaging story about her. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The public is duped once again. Obama only gets this kind of news when it is really damaging to him.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Come on we weren't born yeasterday. If the media was really out to get Hilary, they would have done it may times over by now. She has worse skeletons in her wardrobe than the public is made to know.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Stop fooling us we know whos side you really on and its not Obama!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#792180</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 05:23:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:792180</guid><dc:creator>Wordsmith, Cleveland, OH</dc:creator><description>This information was forced out of Sen Clinton by the filing of a Freedom of Information Act request, not because she wanted the world to know why she, and not Vice President Al Gore, was involved in our foreign policy for which she had no national security clearance. Perhaps Sen Clinton thinks that if we are sufficiently bored with more than 11,000 pages of her first lady calendar, we won't pay attention to the fact that her tax returns don't deal with the millions of dollars paid to the former president's foundation to broker foreign meetings on the sale of uranium to his associates. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I find it curious that the former president has ordered the National Archives not to release certain information about his wife and his administration until 2012. Maybe he thinks that by 2012, it will be too late for the truth to do any damage to a 1st and 2nd term for his wife, especially on NAFTA.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#792206</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 05:48:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:792206</guid><dc:creator>R. Harbert TX</dc:creator><description>It is clear that those who support the Clintons cant stand that the facts are finally coming out. For years, the Clintons have evaded questions the American public have wanted answers to. They seem to think they are above the law. Their arrogance sicken me. Absolutely we need some changes but not more of the Clintons giving up the very pricipals that America was founded on. Think about it America, this is a very serious election.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#792224</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 06:10:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:792224</guid><dc:creator>V.Johnson,Atl,Georgia</dc:creator><description>As a concern citizen;this article really obvious is not design to inform the public of some important newsworthy but design to stirs,implies that the first lady did something wrong.I don't see any other purposed to this than to smear someone.Plainly this is bad press.How sad the media become. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#792257</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 06:57:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:792257</guid><dc:creator>Allen Feeney, San Antonio, TX</dc:creator><description>Carolyn Smith from Canada and Ben's comments on 3/19 have brought up some very unsettling and unresolved issues pertaining to the Clinton's dark history and in-the-closet legacy. &amp;nbsp;Too many apparent cover-ups to suit my taste. &amp;nbsp;Never trust a lawyer.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#792271</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 07:15:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:792271</guid><dc:creator>babubhai patel ,woods cross,utah</dc:creator><description>instead of going thru 17000+ pages of unnecessary past ( nbc'smotive ??????),nbc could have looked into why iraq was invaded instead of Iran. &lt;br&gt;or why china insists that dalai lama recognize Taiwan as part of China, when china can easily have north Korea president recognize &amp;nbsp;Ausralia Japan and Hawaii as pparts of china !!!!&lt;br&gt;see ? there are more interesting things happening inthe world, besides thse, HOmany pages again ???</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#792276</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 07:31:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:792276</guid><dc:creator>m.bennett chattanooga,tn.</dc:creator><description>WKE UP AMERICA! HILLARY HAS RUN THE MOST NEGATIVE CAMPAIGN AND GOTTON ALL THE BREAKS. THIS ARTICLE DIDN'T EVEN TOUCH ON TRAVELGATE, WHITEWATER WITH HILLARY's MISSING PAPERS, SUICIDES, ETC. THIS IS THE CLINTONS. THEY WANT POWER AND DON'T CARE IF THEY DESTROY THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY TO DO IT. EVEN IF SHE GETS ELECTED, SHE IS SO DEVISIVE THAT NOTHING WOULD GET PASSED. SHE CANNOT REACH ACROSS PARTY LINES. HER CAMPAIGN IS DIGUSTING AND HAS CLEALY GIVEN THE REPUBLICANS A CLEAR LEAD. REMEMBER AMERICA THIS IS THE CLINTONS. THE PRESIDENT THAT LIED UNDER OATH. THEY WILL CHATRY TO CHANGE THE RULES TO THEIR BENEFIT. THEY ARE SNEAKY AND POWER HUNGRY, THE CLINTONS-PLEASE REMEMBER, STARTING IN ARKANSAS.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#792289</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 07:57:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:792289</guid><dc:creator>Kevin Chambers, Denver</dc:creator><description>It is amazing to me that this calendar is released from the archieves to be used to support Mrs. Clinton, but that it cuts out so much information. &amp;nbsp;If she is claiming to have been an agent of the US government, then the information on her calendar is public information, not private. &amp;nbsp;Can't have it both ways!</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#792292</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 08:09:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:792292</guid><dc:creator>Debra Deane</dc:creator><description>Hillary Clinton is an admirable woman however, her '35-years of experience' are overblown..over the top...just like this entire campaign year!&lt;br&gt;Truth be told, Barack Obama has more legislative experience than the NEW Senator from New York...a state she moved to just so she could run for political office, and won on the coattails of a populus that felt sorry for her and also admired her for her guts when the entire world got to experience the shock and awe of her husband's (the president) adultery with his intern. &amp;nbsp;Let's face it, she's a bright lady, who has known for decades of her husband's philanderings with women.&lt;br&gt;Does that qualify her to be President? &amp;nbsp;Does speaking to a few leaders of foriegn countries, sitting in on some policy meetings? &lt;br&gt;There are larger issues out there. &amp;nbsp;Why is she so adamant about not disclosing her income tax statements? &amp;nbsp;Peel back the layers of that and see what's really under all of the bravado. Did everyone directly involved in the Whitewater Scandal really die within a short time? &amp;nbsp;Most voters are ready for the campaign mudslinging we usually witness during elections. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#792347</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 10:59:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:792347</guid><dc:creator>lucille colbert</dc:creator><description>i know clinton has lied about little things what would she do with bigger things.can you really trust a lier.she hiding something. i hope they find out what it is before she becomes president</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#792379</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 11:45:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:792379</guid><dc:creator>Ronald M. Bishop, San Antonio, Texas</dc:creator><description>Both Clintons are liars and cheats. &amp;nbsp;Look at their bank accounts from the time the entered the White House to the time they left.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#792391</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 12:00:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:792391</guid><dc:creator>john, Hull Quebec</dc:creator><description>its too bad that i dont actually live in the USA and therefore dont really care happens there, despite the apparent opinion that happenings there shake the world.&lt;br&gt;If i did i ask questions like &amp;quot;what experience? examples please..&amp;quot; or &amp;quot; wonder why islam doesnt hate obama?&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;why are the secrets necessary, what are they worried about people finding?&amp;quot;.&lt;br&gt;Given that i dont.. i dont.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#792394</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 12:03:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:792394</guid><dc:creator>ever seattle</dc:creator><description>the fact is that all the candidates are going to face all kinds of steps to the white house and this is just another step.what i see here is simple if you where never a president you dont have any experience period!mccain is going to come back from his tax payers paid trip and then claim his has experience ! the reality is that you all know the truth the one who becomes president is the one who will be president!think about it! </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#792413</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 12:24:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:792413</guid><dc:creator>thayds @hotmail.com</dc:creator><description>remember she got there where she is now cause she is capable of doing it .everything. experience? she has it dont under estimate her. i ll vote for her but mccain has my vote already. and i am not gonna change my mind.i am sure she is good .but i am afraid tax will go up </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#792421</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 12:31:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:792421</guid><dc:creator>poodle3211@hotmail.com</dc:creator><description>WAKE UP AMERICA, DO YOU THINK THIS IS OUR ELECTION? The media is electing our President not the voter. Our vote means nothing with the brain washing the media does and what's SAD the voters buy it. I can understand the big money in politics, however the media is more powerful than the money.Make a list: Hillary and Obamha side by side on issues and experience, give fair and equal coverage. I have voted for 60 years, I will not vote this year, because I am sadden why what I see happening in our great country. GO Hillary. Hillary supporters if she doesn't make it, GO Indepentent....Dessie from Portland,Oregon</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#792441</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 12:52:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:792441</guid><dc:creator>J. Sims, Crane,Tx</dc:creator><description>When I think about all the things that come out in a political game, I can't get past the comment made by Mrs. Obama where she said that for the first time in her life, she was proud of the United States,because Obama was running for President. What is her background? Do we need to fear her influence on her husband's beliefs and actions? What is in that closet?</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#792444</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 12:54:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:792444</guid><dc:creator>larry houma ,la</dc:creator><description>I beleive we as americans need to stand up for what we believe in.I was in the navy when kennedy was president and still remember how the people were afraid of electing him because he was catholic and that would give the pope to much power.obama is our next kennedy.this isnt about (can he do the job)this is about electing a leader that will bring not only this country togather but the world togather.president bush along with the people he surrounded himself with has left this country in shambles.his retoric along with the christian right wing has been (lets attack, kill the leaders,take thier country,give contracs to the rich)the rich get richer and the poor get poorer.fox tv is so tainted that its become a propaganda station.they seem to have used thier swift boat ads early this election cycle</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#792448</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 12:55:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:792448</guid><dc:creator>joanne_albany@msn.com</dc:creator><description>Being there--is credit for what? HRC has used and continues to use her position as a wife to a president as leverage for experience. I am not impressed, nor do I fill as a women, she would be the right candidate to address the mess this country finds itself in. &amp;nbsp;This is not her hour or time.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#792455</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 13:00:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:792455</guid><dc:creator>Roger Beaulieu Castroville TX</dc:creator><description>Being the first lady does not qualify her to be the president.We need a change in the white house,I think we had enough of the clintons and the Bush's.Especialy the bush's.If Hillary becomes the nomminee she will lose and we will have a bush white house again gor 4 more years and the country can't afford it.We need somebody like Obama with a Brain.We have not had any brains in th white house for the last eight years.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#792485</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 13:16:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:792485</guid><dc:creator>Sandy,Atlanta, GA</dc:creator><description>NBC is no longer my news source. &amp;nbsp;Pathetic, petty, and absolutely rediculous....what &amp;quot;wing&amp;quot; are you hanging you hat in? &amp;nbsp;Why not delve into things that really matter. &amp;nbsp;I'm still so astounded about Obama's Pastor Wright that it is really hard to focus on anything petty. &amp;nbsp;I've never heard anything so race based and frighting in my life and I've lived a long time. &amp;nbsp;Always been a Democrat but if Obama becomes the Party's choice, John McCain will be my candidate. &amp;nbsp;I'm really saddened that I feel this way but too much could fall out of the woodwork that will really tear at this country in the aftermath of an Obama presidency. &amp;nbsp;Yes, we need a change but we need to be careful where we look for it. &amp;nbsp;I think the biggest problem for a lot of people with respect to Hillary is that she is a woman. &amp;nbsp;They are afraid of having a woman as president. &amp;nbsp;Sure looks like discrimination to me. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#792504</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 13:24:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:792504</guid><dc:creator>sandra edger elmira, new york</dc:creator><description>the reason that this is important goes to a issue of credibility when you are dealing with a master of double speak and parcing words personally i would like to know all about the meeting with the rabbi &amp;nbsp;and the 4 hassidic men that got there sentences commuted.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#792553</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 13:38:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:792553</guid><dc:creator>Gina, Macomb,IL</dc:creator><description>Blogs and the Media are very good entertainment but, I do wish people would do some research into the Clinton's for themselves! You read this junk and believe whatever the media writes and that's a shame, but that's exactly what they want you to do. Research the Clinton Chronicles! We need someone who loves our Country, has knowledge of War and knows how to deal with the serious issues we're facing. Obama, no experience, research him. This is truly not hard to figure out folks, It just takes Common Sense! If you're really interested in what happens in the future to our Country, do yourself a favor, do alittle research and supply yourselves with the necessary information, then your decisions won't be hard to make at all. I see alot of very mis-informed people and that's what the media attempts to do. Always make sure that the information you review is from credible sources, not just blogs and the media. &amp;nbsp;Please help yourselves and in doing so, you'll be helping our Country and all of our futures. I would hate to think that millions of people are going to vote for our next President, relying on Blogs and the Media, and if that's the case, OUR COUNTRY IS IN SERIOUS TROUBLE!</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#792573</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 13:40:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:792573</guid><dc:creator>Wendy</dc:creator><description>So what? I don't see how any of this matters. Why do Clinton and Obama try so hard to make each other look bad? Have they forgotten they're members of the same party and they are only hurting themselves? I wish they'd try to build each other up a little more instead or at a minimum ignore each other. I'd rather not have another Republican in the White House! Who is hanging out McCain's dirty laundry? We all have secrets in our closets. How about we leave them alone?</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#792588</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 13:43:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:792588</guid><dc:creator>Geri Hirshey</dc:creator><description>Just a few questions come to mind -- did Hillary have security clearance for her meetings with dignataries? &amp;nbsp;Was she attending these meetings because Bill was too involved in his flings with younger women? &amp;nbsp;Voting Hillary in is just voting Bill back in -- if she ran the show while he was President -- maybe it's his turn to run it while she's in that position. &amp;nbsp;Wake up, America!</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#792592</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 13:43:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:792592</guid><dc:creator>Geri Hirshey</dc:creator><description>Just a few questions come to mind -- did Hillary have security clearance for her meetings with dignataries? &amp;nbsp;Was she attending these meetings because Bill was too involved in his flings with younger women? &amp;nbsp;Voting Hillary in is just voting Bill back in -- if she ran the show while he was President -- maybe it's his turn to run it while she's in that position. &amp;nbsp;Wake up, America!</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#792648</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 13:54:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:792648</guid><dc:creator>Francis Previe, Manchester, N.H.</dc:creator><description>Now everyone is going to start blaming the Obama compaing for all of this. Let us not forget who started this,with remarks about de segagration was allof the president that was in office at that time having maore todo with it ,instead of Martin aLuthor King ,Jr. It was Hillary Clinton in one of her speeches to a crowd of people,that started her on her losing streak. So do not think that the bashing is only on her. It ha gone both ways, but her campaignhas nothing to do with it. How come the Clintone=s have not releaseed all of their income tax records,like Barack Obama has? What can they be hiding from all of us voters. I am not a Hillary supporter and I am not for John Macain.I am an independent.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#792658</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 13:55:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:792658</guid><dc:creator>Renee, sioux city, iowa</dc:creator><description>This is just another way for Obama to shift focus off himself and onto something else about someone else and the media does a good job of helping him do it. If Hillary were in a church and her minister was preaching against blacks she wouldn't have been given a chance to give a speech the press would have crushed her and she would have been asked to step down. Reverse racism is overlooked in this country - we have to tread lightly when its a minority spouting racial hatered. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#792665</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 13:58:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:792665</guid><dc:creator>Eyes Wide Open in NY</dc:creator><description>This whole thing is a no brainer. Her lack of experience in ability didn't need any help from this report. The way she had to use her own money to support her own campaign, her ability to keep her husband happy enough to not ever stray, All her ribbon cuttings she has done here in the state of NY and done nothing other than to show up to keep her face in the papers, the promise of jobs that has failed here in NY and instantly blamed because she thought Al Gore was going to get elected and didn't.&lt;br&gt;All I see and hear from this woman is failure, smoke and mirrors, and passing the buck for her own lack of true abilty. The woman has more baggage than you can load on a 747. And the trail of the people that no longer exist because of Whitewater and to allow what she considered a friend named McDougal to die with her secrets in a cell she should have been in is exactly the kind of style and grace she wants to bestow upon us in the whitehouse. Her health care plan will never get passed by congress (thank god) and all she has ever wanted is power. To vote for this woman is next to voting for the failure of this country and to allow her go down in history books as only one thing...The First Woman President. The fact is she will never accomplish nothing. 300,000,000 people in this country and only 3 to chose from to run the county and hold up its high standards above the rest of the world. What a sorry picture and future for our children. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#792785</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 14:19:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:792785</guid><dc:creator>james jones pawnee oklahoma</dc:creator><description>The bottom line, is the fact that we do not pay attention to politics until the elections. Then it becomes a feeding frenzy. What we should be focused on is the abuse that goes on in the system that created careers for many of our elected officials.As tax payers why should we provide up to 15,000 a month in retirement benefits to someone that is supposedly elected to promote our best interest.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is evidence of problems with her calendar of events such as billing records being found in her private space. The real question is what is the true motivation for those that want to be career politicians.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#792833</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 14:27:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:792833</guid><dc:creator>Peter F, Albany, NY</dc:creator><description>I guess the issue we all should be debating is who is the lesser ot the two evils. &amp;nbsp;Apparently, both Clinton and Obama have made mistakes in their pasts, but what voters have to decide is to elect the Clinton we know or the Obama we have yet to find out about. &amp;nbsp;The revelation of Obama's long time affiliation to an anti-America pastor and his recent rantings of how America deserved what it got from the Muslims alarms me more than a few missing names from a First Lady's pre- 9/11 social calendar. &amp;nbsp;The country did not think the same way back in the 90'as it does today. &amp;nbsp;My question to America is wasn't life much better in the 90's than it is today? &amp;nbsp;Vote with your brain and don't be brain-washed by the media. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#793003</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 14:52:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:793003</guid><dc:creator>Anthony, Herndon, Virginia</dc:creator><description>This is just plain silly. This news article is supposed to point out some form of dubious behavior exhibited by the &amp;quot;then First Lady&amp;quot; and current Presidential candidate?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What is this garbage attempting to accomplish? To overshadow her campaign with doubt and uncertainty? Everyone has skeletons in their closet. Just because we keep them there does not mean they are evil.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When I accomplish something, I pat myself on the back and move on to my next goal. I don't look for the media to gloss up my accomplishments. Why should she?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The First Lady is expected to keep up appearances. She's not supposed to be begging to attend every single meeting of great importance. Bill Clinton was President. He didn't and doesn't need his wife to make decisions for him any more than she needs his help.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Further, she doesn't have to answer all of her personal conferences, meetings, etc. to the public. LOL, she was in Martha's Vineyard on the day the US retaliated. So what? Probably safer than sitting around in the White House with a big target painted all over it.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#793068</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 15:02:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:793068</guid><dc:creator>Jason, South Dakota</dc:creator><description>Since when does being married to a baker make you an experienced baker? Is a cop's wife's experience in law enforcement the same thing as the cop's experience? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Never in my life have I heard someone claiming so openly that their spouses' experiences in life are theirs. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Come on Hillary. You were in the White House, but you weren't the President any more than the guy waxing the floors. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Husbands and wives talk, even Presidents and first ladies. But, that hardly equates as experience that qualifies someone to take a 3am phone call. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let's be honest. If it's 3am and that red phone rings, do we really want someone in office who had &amp;quot;teas and coffee&amp;quot; while traveling overseas? Or do we want someone who has the judgement and the integrity to oppose a war before it starts? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for you loonies who say that Obama's record on Iraq spending is the same as Hillary's since his time in the Senata... well, duh... are you suggesting that he not support our troops? Is it the troops fault that there's a war and they're stuck in it? No, so he's voted, to keep them prepared. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary and Bill are NO DIFFERENT than McCain or Bush. They're scandal forged professionally focused career politicians. Their job is to win and to smear the other side. Period. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vote for Hillary and you vote for a third term of Bush and the Status Quo. Vote for Barrack and maybe we have a chance at something new. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#793131</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 15:11:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:793131</guid><dc:creator>Jason, South Dakota</dc:creator><description>Please people! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All of the women out there who are voting for Hillary just because she is a woman... like a person's genitals make them a better leader... ok. Guess I missed that day of school. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let's be honest, voting for or against someone because of their skin color or gender alone is about as intelligent as all those gray uniformed buttheads that tried to wreck the world in WWII. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let's be blunt... vote for who'll be the best leader... not for who wears the same type of underwear as you!!</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#793228</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 15:23:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:793228</guid><dc:creator>gerchan ,boynton beach fla</dc:creator><description>Senator Clinton will be a good hard working president,she will work hard to make a good change for America, any one who speaks too charming may have their mind on pleasing a person or persons,while a person who works on the issues will make it happen.Obama would make a good preacher ,he also woul make a good vice president who will charm international ,and business to work with the presdent and business people to help the working people and eldler ,hopefullly for a better world for all, we also need more postive thoughts ,less negative thoughts to help the younger generation and stimulate them that there is more for them to work towards.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#793624</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 16:32:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:793624</guid><dc:creator>mrpat47@msn.com</dc:creator><description>I am curious to the secret meetings she had relating to health care that she abandoned after it was disclosed that she was acting without any authority and in a secretive manner.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Pat Feehan, Farmingville NY</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#793690</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 16:46:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:793690</guid><dc:creator>Mary Dale; Clinton, Iowa</dc:creator><description>It is articles like this, both in print and on TV that has turned me off from MSNBC. &amp;nbsp;For TV, there are too many hours a day to report on politics especially when all the shows talk about the same topic and use the same old experts (Pat Buchanan, Tucker Carlson, etc). &amp;nbsp;There is nothing in this article of substance at all and after reading a lot of the comments I see others feel the same. &amp;nbsp;I want MSNBC to investigate the Bush/CHeney years with as much vigor - I think the blind masses would curl up and die if they found out just what these criminals have been up to the past 7 1/2 years. &amp;nbsp;And now would be a great time to start an investigative report on election irregularities, bring it to the forefront now so the Republican know that we are all aware of the dirty tricks they have played since 2000 and maybe they will step back and let there actually be a real election. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#794319</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 18:37:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:794319</guid><dc:creator>Mave, San Jose CA</dc:creator><description>Hillary Clinton is obviously intelligent. &amp;nbsp;But then again, so I Barack Obama. &amp;nbsp;Policy-wise, there aren't many differences. &amp;nbsp;But I don't buy Hillary's 3am experience line. &amp;nbsp;If my husband is an aerospace engineer, does that mean I should be able to build planes? &amp;nbsp;NO! &amp;nbsp;And all the &amp;quot;junk&amp;quot; about Obama IS more important - look at how graceful and humble he is under pressure. &amp;nbsp;Look at how he calls us to stop with the divisive racial politics and unite! &amp;nbsp;No whining, just a call to unify. &amp;nbsp;What have we gotten from HRC since she started losing? &amp;nbsp;Divide and conquer. &amp;nbsp;Just watch us Democrats snatch DEFEAT from the jaws of victory because of this infighting. &amp;nbsp;It's a shame. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#795617</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 22:55:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:795617</guid><dc:creator>Bob Nowak, Sahuarita, AZ</dc:creator><description>Jim:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Come on now...on the day the Lewinsky scandal broke, Mrs. Clinton's calendar had an unexplained, private meeting at 7:25 pm. Is this news? Is this shoking or unreasonable? What is your point? Of course she had an unexplained, private meeting. If you found out about some possible infidelity on your wife's part, would it not be reasonable that your daily log/calendar might have some unaccounted time? Is it a law that she has to account for all her time? Is she compensated or receiving a salary as a federal govt employee? Why don't you tell us something we don't know. This is investigative reporting?</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#796421</link><pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 02:18:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:796421</guid><dc:creator>Tenney Naumer, Vitoria da Conquista, Bahia</dc:creator><description>I looked at her calendars and saw that she met with senators, representatives, cabinet ministers, CEOs, executives of all types, and even Alan Greenspan, for crying out loud.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, and I am sure she was not sitting there politely with these people and just handing them a cup of tea, oh no! &amp;nbsp;She was asking in depth pointed questions, and actually learning something.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She's fabulously ready!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#796427</link><pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 02:20:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:796427</guid><dc:creator>Gary Wilde, Los Altos, CA</dc:creator><description>Terri Goodman - women have been held back as much as &amp;nbsp;blacks? Who are you kidding? White women did NOT come chained and drenched in their own excrement and/or vomit. White women were NOT stripped and raped regularly on the ship's deck by the commander. &amp;nbsp;And white women DON'T cause people to cross the street for fear of being mugged! I don't know what planet you are on, but obviously you're picked up the Clintons' expertise in twisting and chewing up words at whim.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#796970</link><pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 10:12:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:796970</guid><dc:creator>Janis,Renton Wash.</dc:creator><description>I for one am sick and tired of the Hillary Clinton bashings.She could use a break from this and deserves a lot of credit for trying to become the first woman President of the United States.Obama is another man like all the rest. For Hillary to become President would be much more special and&lt;br&gt;historic than to have Obama because aside from his skin color he is a man.Hillary is even smarter than&lt;br&gt;the other candidates.Obama can't talk in depth about the issues.He talks about his Grandma,his &lt;br&gt;mother and father,his race,his childhood,who raised him ect. and hardly anything about important issues,he skirts them,he avoids them.So tell me,&lt;br&gt;how in the world can he be electable ? Thats just&lt;br&gt;crazy.I'm sick of listening to him because he&lt;br&gt;doesn't really say anything.He just opens his mouth.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#797204</link><pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 14:33:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:797204</guid><dc:creator>GLO  Woodstock N&amp;gt;Y&amp;gt;</dc:creator><description>Get REAL you people and report about the serious issues like job loes ,cheneuys' private meeting with his OIL CRONIES aqnd the price of OIL afecting EVERYTHING from heating our homes to the FOOD we eat.Get off Hillary' back! Your losing viewers.Wake up to what people really care about!</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#798696</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 01:24:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:798696</guid><dc:creator>Like It Is - Hobart, IN</dc:creator><description>I should have known who would be the stinking dirt diggers, MSNBC you have no shame. I could imagine you peeking thru keyholes trying to dig up dirt.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#798713</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 01:33:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:798713</guid><dc:creator>Lisa, Colorado</dc:creator><description>I'm absolutely amazed at how adept the Clintons are at spinning...she has spun all of her experience, which those of us who actually pay attention, knew long before these documents came out. She is now also spinning that she can actually win the nomination, which is totally impossible. she spun that now Michigan and Florida should be counted, and that she didn't agree with party rules from the outset. Thos eof you voting for Clinton still...think about the message you're sending your children...it's okay to firmly abide by rules at the beginning...but if you don't like them when they don't go your way...lie/spin to get around it...just like Bill did on National TV...&amp;quot;I didn;t have sex with that woman&amp;quot;</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#798744</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 01:47:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:798744</guid><dc:creator>John Doe, Cincinnati, Ohio</dc:creator><description>This is just one more example of Clinton bashing despite her clearly superior foreign policy experience. &amp;nbsp;Why spin a story that tries to disparage her experience, when the record clearly shows that she was frequently involved in serious discussions with foreign leaders? &amp;nbsp;Sounds like someone had to justify why they spent so much time reviewing the Clinton papers while coming up with so little to show for it!</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#798750</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 01:49:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:798750</guid><dc:creator>GALE   OCALA  FL</dc:creator><description> &amp;nbsp;I WONDER WHAT THE BLOGGERS HAVE IN THEIR CLOSETS.. LIKE--WHO CARES WHERE YOU GO TO LUNCH AND WITH WHO??&lt;br&gt;I BET A LOT OF CALENDARS OUT THERE IN COMPU SPACE HAVE PLENTY OF &amp;nbsp;UNACCOUNTED FOR ADVENTURES ON THEM. LETS JUST GET ON WITH IT.. LOTS TO LEARN IN THE NEXT SEVEN MONTHS. WE BETTER LOOK AT OUR OWN PAST PERFORMANCES. EE GADS!! LIGHTEN UP PEOPLE.. EASY DOES IT. BE GLAD THAT YOU AREN'T UNDER THE MICROSCOPE.. MUCH MORE ON THE HORIZON &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#798752</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 01:50:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:798752</guid><dc:creator>Jeff Houseknecht, Rochester New York</dc:creator><description>This message is in response to Terry Goodman. I feel that the media is doing an excellent job in representing the Presidential campaign. Mrs. Clinton should not boast about her experience in Washington, when in fact Washington is broken and needs change. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#798755</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 01:51:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:798755</guid><dc:creator>Mike, Tampa, Florida..........</dc:creator><description>Look everyone, i have spent the last 2 decades in the US Military, first of all, you need a security clearance to attend certain meetings. Some blogger was right, if she held or chaired meetings without the proper clearance, thats criminal. Also, she should not be in the room, if a high level meeting is going on. Maybe, Bill felt bad and choose to let her participate because of guilt! It's still crimnal. This lady cannot ride on the coat tails of her husband, you are simply wrong if you think she has any experience. GO OBAMA...MIKE From Florida! </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#798759</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 01:52:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:798759</guid><dc:creator>Dorothy Rodriguez, Granton, WI</dc:creator><description>I believe the so called record speeks for itself. She has no idea of what she is going to do on day one. No one does unless they have been Pres. before. Let the day one go already:)</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#798765</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 01:54:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:798765</guid><dc:creator>Mike,St.Louis,Mo.</dc:creator><description>I knew this all along. She has NO experience like she claims. No surprise here.&lt;br&gt;she can't use her husbands resume to get elected.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#798770</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 02:00:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:798770</guid><dc:creator>Maria, Atlanta, GA</dc:creator><description>I love this report because and we need more reports like this about the Clintons. &amp;nbsp;Hillary is one of the most corrupt and scandalous figures in politics today and she will do and say anything to win. &amp;nbsp;She needs to be revealed for what she is. &amp;nbsp;A Liar! &amp;nbsp;Barack for President, please, please, please!!!!!! &amp;nbsp;I don't care what Rev. Wright said, I am not voting Rev. Wright for President or for Hillary! &amp;nbsp;I am voting for Barack Obama!!!!!!!</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#798799</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 02:15:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:798799</guid><dc:creator>Penny   Pleasant City, Ohio</dc:creator><description>Thia is just another way of putting Hillary down. &amp;nbsp;Maybe we should ask for records on news reporters. What did you want to see on the day she found out her husband had an affair? I have watched NBC reporters laugh at her, put her down, try to figure out how she can be beaten. I think this is just men afraid that a woman could do a better job than any man has done. If reporters dont look into Obama (no MAN is this perfect) we will have his minister staying in the White House. Oh by the way has Obama given all his records and his wifes records over when he was dealing with Resko? I think it is time that news reporters report the news and dont give us their biased opinion. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#798805</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 02:19:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:798805</guid><dc:creator>CAROLLE JACQUES  QUEENS, NEW YORK</dc:creator><description>I WILL NOT VOTE FOR HILLARY IF SHE IS THE DEMOCRATIC NOMENIE BECAUSE I FIELD OBAMA IS MORE ELECTABLE THE CLINTON MACHINE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR RACE TO BE USED IN THE CAMPAIGNE BILL WANT TO BE PRESIDENT AND RETURN TO THE WHITE HOUSE &amp;nbsp;IA AM SICK AN TIRED OF THE CLINTON WE NEED CHANGE WITH A NEW GENERATION &amp;nbsp;I AM VOTING FOR OBAMA &amp;nbsp;FOR MY GRANKIDS FUTURE. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#798814</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 02:25:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:798814</guid><dc:creator>Ramona, Cleveland, Ohio</dc:creator><description>Why are people always trying to find dirt? &amp;nbsp;All I can say about the reports, showing experience and showing a lot of fluff, is so what? &amp;nbsp;I also wonder why when something like this comes about about Hilary people are always asking about Obama and Obama alone? &amp;nbsp;What about McCain? &amp;nbsp;One viewer even asked why can't we find dirt on Obama and suggests that the lack of dirt proves there is dirt. &amp;nbsp;Come on folks, put your brains in gear and get this country moving away from these distractions and on to real stuff of substance. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#798821</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 02:27:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:798821</guid><dc:creator>gilbert edmunds waupun wi. gibsandy@centurytel.net</dc:creator><description>How can we trust her on running our nation, when she didn:t have brains enough to know what was going on in the other room with her man ???????</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#798826</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 02:30:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:798826</guid><dc:creator>Barbara Harney, Roseburg, OR</dc:creator><description>I am trying to read between the lines here. So Hillary has been to 80 countries, so have many other people. As a Gov.'s wife, then a President's, I suppose a she could accompany him on his trips. Most likely to keep an eye on him and try to keep him out of other women's beds, which he was well known for while Gov. of Arkansas. What about her law firm where rumors started, unfortunately most involved ended up in 'accidents' or 'suicides', she walked away. I can't trust her, too many occasions off kilter.&lt;br&gt;I don't want her as Commander in Chief! She cannot be trusted in my opinion. She voted for the war, but tries to cover her quite large rear on that. We need CHANGE-NOT more Clinton rhetoric.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#798835</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 02:35:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:798835</guid><dc:creator>Christy Elmasri, Carter Lake, Iowa</dc:creator><description>The current media bashing of Clinton began over a year ago; the media is biased and trying to sway the elections in the direction that they want. &amp;nbsp;News is hardly ever news; there are too many so-called &amp;quot;experts&amp;quot; who maybe wrote a book or read a few books on something and now they are given expert credo. &amp;nbsp;Hillary has the experience she claimed to have, period. &amp;nbsp;I find it laughable that so many people who do not like her or support her (Obama and the Republicans) find it necessary to continue going after the Clinton's and their continuous references to the sex scandals and White Water and Vince Foster being &amp;quot;murdered&amp;quot; that the only thing transparent is the wish to get Hillary, no matter the cost! &amp;nbsp;Do Obama and the rest of the Republican party not have a life? &amp;nbsp;What with the racial divide now happening under Obama, he can no longer lay claim to being a &amp;quot;uniter.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;The news media dislikes Hillary because she does not pander to them in the fashion that they want; it is too bad that the media chooses to ignore the real news, just like they did in Bush's lead up to the war in Iraq. &amp;nbsp;I see nothing but bias on the behalf of this report; how about a little more information on Obama but that is not spoon fed by Obama or his wife!</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#798852</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 02:43:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:798852</guid><dc:creator>Sandy in Albuquerque New Mexico</dc:creator><description>It has been an interesting read going through the posts - the positive and negative posts about this blog. It always amazes me how blind the Hillary supporters are. Wanting a woman to be president is a constructive goal, just not this woman. First you people knock the media and accuse them of bias coverage - my God, people, what planet do you live on? The news has been full of Rev. Wright!! You Hillary supporters have had a field day at Senator Obama's expense but somehow the press is biased towards Hillary? And what about Rezko? Perhaps there is no media coverage about him simply because there is no story there. Several things are quite clear among the hub-bub surrounding the release of these library papers - Hillary has NO foreign policy experience which she has been touting since day one, she attended meetings and briefings that were illegal as she did not have top security clearance as is required by law, she and Bill took furniture and other White House trimmings when they left office - all at taxpayers expense, Whitewater has never been explained, the Clinton's &amp;quot;good friend&amp;quot; committed suicide when the powers that be started circling his wagon - why?, these &amp;quot;papers&amp;quot; have been gone through with a fine tooth comb and leaves viewers with black spots and blank pages which leaves room for misinterpretation - and whose fault is that? Senator Obama has released his income tax returns - where are the Clinton's? Where is the donor list for the Clinton library? &lt;br&gt;Where, why, what, when, how? Unanswered questions a mile long about the Clinton's plus a trail of scandals, lies, half-truths, and only God knows what more. Yet some of you blindly follow Hillary for nothing more then electing a woman president. Hillary has acomplished no more then Senator Obama or Senator McCain yet you hold her up on some kind of pedastel. Her health care plan was a disaster, her &amp;quot;planned jobs&amp;quot; for people in New York was a disaster, she has lied about her &amp;quot;foreign policy experience,&amp;quot; she took items from the White House that did not belong to her so she is a thief, she attended security meetings without security clearance and escaped a felony charge that would have put Joe Shmoe behind bars, etc., etc., etc., Your response is why does the press not scrutinize Senator Obama and Senator McCain the same way - perhaps because there is nothing to scrutinize.If there is, it will surface in time. Hillary agreed to the rules in Michigan and Florida and now wants to change the rules that SHE agreed to. Reniging on her agreement is not a character value people can respect. No wonder educated people support Senator Obama in large numbers - they have critical thinking skills and can sort the smoke screens from reality. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#798861</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 02:50:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:798861</guid><dc:creator>Christy Elmasri, Carter Lake, Iowa</dc:creator><description>I want more info on Obama; I do not believe that Obama is a Muslim but neither is he of African descent, but of Arab descent. &amp;nbsp;His Father was Kenyan, but of the Sunni Tribe, The Muhaddi Army; his name in its entirety is Arab. &amp;nbsp;I think the people of the United States are being mis-led in who Obama really is and I dislike anyone who has to resort to hiding or backing away from the truth. &amp;nbsp;The real news is what we are not getting from the news media. &amp;nbsp;This report is a sad attempt to ressurrect old news and scandals in order to change the subject from Obama and the racist scandal that rocks the Obama campaign. &amp;nbsp;Quit being so one sided!</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#798900</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 03:17:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:798900</guid><dc:creator>Charles Sowell, Valdosta, Georgia</dc:creator><description>To me, many Americans on both sides of the aisle are hypocrits. &amp;nbsp;Listen to me carefully, no one running for president has experience as president... PERIOD! &amp;nbsp;What we have to understand here s that people are going to believe what they want to. &amp;nbsp;We say this and that about each other, then want to run and hide when the boomerang returns to us. &amp;nbsp;Senators Clinton and Obama need to focus on their campaigns and what they intend to do for the American people, not all of the petty squabling and political mumbo jumbo! &amp;nbsp;How do you intend to lead this country out of this abyss and how do you intend to unite a very ununited country that the politicians and media are dividing by race and gender? &amp;nbsp;These are the real issues, not what a former pastor or a political advisor has to say. &amp;nbsp;And yes, I do support Senator Obama, and the fact that I do is because he is not doing all of the mud slinging and the political nonsense like Senator Clinton and Senator McKay are doing. &amp;nbsp;I know that in politics you are supposed to use negatives to your advantage, but all of these people are running on a non-politics as usual platform, but if we continue to do so, how can we ever look our children in the eye and tell them to be honest and strive for peace? &amp;nbsp;Our country is on the brink of self destruction, and we need someone that can unite and lead us into a new age. &amp;nbsp;An age where we are no longer considered by the color of our skin, but by the integrity in our hearts. &amp;nbsp;An age that says we all have made mistakes, but our mistakes are not to be hidden, but to be learned from. &amp;nbsp;Where is the love, and where are the adults? &amp;nbsp;Lets stop being petty about everything that these people do and say. &amp;nbsp;We are not perfect and neither are they. &amp;nbsp;We lie, steal, cheat and so on and so forth, but for some reason we portray ourselves as perfect when we look down our noses at politicians. &amp;nbsp;Lets get real for once! &amp;nbsp;Politicians lie, steal, cheat and fornicate and commit adultery the same as everyone else, but we hold them to some imaginary level of perfection that we ourselves will never, ever achieve. &amp;nbsp;Lets get back to the issues at hand; unemployment, credit card and bank issues, home foreclosures, health insurance and the lack thereof, racial and gender profiling, the glass ceiling, the weak American dollar, tax breaks to American companies that close shop in America and take their jobs overseas; these are only a few of the issues that we need to focus on, not he's black and she's a woman, and he's an ex-P.O.W. &amp;nbsp;American needs a leader that is going to stand up for small businesses that are being crushed from high taxes, and someone that will stand up and defend all of its citizens regardless of race, religion and creed when a foreign dignitary speaks ill against them unlike when President Bush did nothing when Mexican President Fox critisized African Americans. &amp;nbsp;Listen, we are a country of many people that form a united people, and American people that are proud and courageous and strong! &amp;nbsp;A people that stand together and roll up their sleeves and pull the boot straps tight when one of our brothers or sisters need us. &amp;nbsp;Please, lets get back to the issues and stop the mud slinging. &amp;nbsp;America, the proud. &amp;nbsp;Lets get back to being the great country of dreams and freedoms that we used to be, my fellow Americans!</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#798906</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 03:22:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:798906</guid><dc:creator>A Miller, Queens NY</dc:creator><description>Bill's past matters to me more than anything. He's been public outed as an adultered, and accused of sexual assault, pardoned the rich from prison, etc. &amp;nbsp;People, if our spouses had that public history, we wouldn't stand a chance to obtain a security clearance for a goverment job, actually you'd be screened out from civil service employment, cause employers don't want to babysit. &amp;nbsp;Hold these Clintons to the same standards, we're looking to hire a professional not a BS artist running on the &amp;quot;I have 3am experience&amp;quot;. &amp;nbsp;Nobody can claim they have prerequisite for the job of US president. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#798918</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 03:27:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:798918</guid><dc:creator>ellen bekoski , bessemer, pa. </dc:creator><description>come on people, enough is enough. let it go..&lt;br&gt;this stuff is years old and i do not blame anyone for not wanting to re-visit old wounds. the media just won't give up on trying to make dirt up on the Clintons. i was not paying $3.50 a gallon for gas when Bill Clinton was in office and the stock market wat not tumbling daily..We need a change alright, maybe a woman is what we need, i support Hillary on every account. And one other thing why is it that Obama has embraced the black community so much, is it not a fact that he has a white grandmother and mother. I'm sick to death of this race card that he is playing w/his minister who should not be using the pulpit to spew hatred, take it outside, not in the house of God..&lt;br&gt;e.b. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#798931</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 03:33:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:798931</guid><dc:creator>DAS Columbia, Tn</dc:creator><description>Could someone ask the candidates to turn over their passport records. I'd like to see who has been where in the last 20 years. Thanks</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#798936</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 03:35:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:798936</guid><dc:creator>Charles_BCCA@yahoo.com</dc:creator><description>She has played, race card against Obama, gender card for herself, fear card, then race card, now the patriotism card, thrown mud at Obama, with many more months to go, she will come with something more dirty, but none will stick, as Obama inspires hope with his message of reconciliation. &amp;nbsp;Hillary is a mean old woman, who like a woman scorned will destroy the Democratic Party. She has no shame, like her husband who went on to sexually use and abuse those he had used and stood by him as he lied and she directly demonised them, including Monica, just a bit older than her own daughter then. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#798947</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 03:40:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:798947</guid><dc:creator>McWiser, Long Island &amp;amp; NY</dc:creator><description>Lou Dobbs and Candy Crowley have been promoting and overemphasizing Mrs. Clinton's experience when she actually did nothing other than lobbying to deny Monica Lewinski settlements for Bill Clinton's sexual abuse. If Mrs. Clinton's outings were unaccountable, no wonder Bill Clinton had all time to mess around. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#798961</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 03:47:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:798961</guid><dc:creator>Chris, Daleville, AL</dc:creator><description>The Clintons have a ton of experience. Just check out their stellar accomplishments:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance &lt;br&gt;- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates &lt;br&gt;- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation &lt;br&gt;- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify &lt;br&gt;- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly &lt;br&gt;- First president sued for sexual harassment. &lt;br&gt;- First president accused of rape. &lt;br&gt;- First first lady to come under criminal investigation&lt;br&gt;- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case&lt;br&gt;- First president to establish a legal defense fund.&lt;br&gt;- First president to be held in contempt of court&lt;br&gt;- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions &lt;br&gt;- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad&lt;br&gt;- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court &lt;br&gt;-As we speak, the Clintons are being sued MILLIONS of dollars for FRAUD in a California court (To verify this go to www.lasuperiorcourt.org, Civil Case Summaries, Case Number BC304174 )...and the media has YET to report this!</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#798991</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 04:00:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:798991</guid><dc:creator>Russ, Ogden, Utah</dc:creator><description>It seems Hillary will recieve the sharp end of the inquisitor stick again by the press. Hillary was given a job as First Lady and carried it off better than most. &amp;nbsp;I don't fault her for anything she may have done duing that time or since.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Senator Oboma on the other hand has shown his true colors in siding with his mentor. &amp;nbsp;He has learned the art of demogogury from one of the best around. &amp;nbsp;Besides his opposition to the war in Irag, what other major stances has he taken? &amp;nbsp;Why hasn't he been at the forefront in the fight for healthcare, better wages, balancing the budget, renegotiating trade treaties, immigration or other important issues? &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;This guy has no history.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#799032</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 04:17:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:799032</guid><dc:creator>Leah, Clackamas, Oreegon</dc:creator><description>I laugh at all the &amp;quot;Change&amp;quot; stuff. &amp;nbsp;Are Americans so ignorant as to think the President really has the power to CHANGE anything? &amp;nbsp;It is our Congress, Legislators,&amp;amp; Senators that draft, write, vote and pass it on to the President. &amp;nbsp;Although the President can &amp;quot;VETO&amp;quot; and request things to be done they really don't do anything else. &amp;nbsp;So, YOU WANT CHANGE? &amp;nbsp;Then pay attention to who you vote for in your State because they are the ones who REALLY can make a CHANGE.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#799048</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 04:29:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:799048</guid><dc:creator>rasil</dc:creator><description>To: +4548485 &lt;br&gt;You are obviously an uniformed and uneducated person. &amp;nbsp;Whatever it is you state that Bill and Hillary services in public life for the last thirty years have given &amp;nbsp;Senator Obama his current opportunity to run for president...you are very wrong. &amp;nbsp;What Clinton has done to Black people is immoral to say the least. &amp;nbsp;Here is his political agenda against African Americans and Latinos. &amp;nbsp;He has caused African Americans to lose 2 generations with his 3 strikes you're out laws, crack cocaine laws, welfare reform, the prison complex industry, eliminating education in prisons, was prez when a near genocide was committed in Rwanda and did nada to stop it, had a pharmaceutical plant in Sudan destroyed claiming it was used for terrorist to construct bombs (no evidence was found),etc., etc. &amp;nbsp;The Clintonista government did nothing to help any grass roots people only corporations etc. &amp;nbsp;Get your facts straight and try not to contribute to the dialogue when you do not know what you are talking about. &amp;nbsp;You need to research, critically think, and then consider writing an informed factual commentary. &amp;nbsp;Otherwise refrain. &amp;nbsp;Perhaps it makes you feel good about yourself when you create misrepresentations, but consider being honest. The Clintons have no responsibility in Senator Obama's or any other person of color's success. He is no friend to this group of people!</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#799090</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 05:12:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:799090</guid><dc:creator>raymar3@cox.net</dc:creator><description>Comparing the plight of women to that of blacks? &amp;nbsp;Come on. &amp;nbsp;Your head is in the sand.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Marcia Sachs&lt;br&gt;San Diego, CA </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#799091</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 05:14:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:799091</guid><dc:creator>gary gale  saybrook, il</dc:creator><description>This is just a sampling of how dirty American politics are. These people who have shamefully gotten into powerful positions take advantage of anyone they can to get what they want. By any means necessary. Until the poor American decides he has had enough of politics and the media, this will continue on and on. This country needs a civil war. Not people against people, but people against lousy stinking government. Our forefathers never intended for the average American to be a pauper in this country. That is why they came here. To get away from the tyranny. And yet we have become what we fought so hard to escape from. Ironic to say the least....dont you think??? &lt;br&gt;Would you preach to the world flawed ideas? I think not. We should rise up and fight back. This greed culture that has obsessed America has got to be driven out of society. By any means necessary. By any way possible. The sad thing is...is the government has so many ways of stifling the average person that it has become nearly impossible to speak freely or act in a way that wont be construed as some type of terrorist or anti-American belief. What ever happened to us?? We have given up and allowed Big Brother to lead us....(the sheep) to do as they say. We dont have the intestinal fortitude to stand up for what is right. America is in big, big trouble. And to think that Obama, Clinton or McCain can lead us is like the blind leading the blind. IMPOSSIBLE</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#799094</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 05:17:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:799094</guid><dc:creator>David</dc:creator><description>The Clinton's will do anything and have done so in the past to win. Why should we expect anything else now??</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#799106</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 05:26:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:799106</guid><dc:creator>Linda, Florida</dc:creator><description>She just does NOT have experience, she claims.&lt;br&gt;She does NOT.&lt;br&gt;It is time to take facts, but not False statements, which Clintons used to use AGAINST all of us.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#799110</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 05:32:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:799110</guid><dc:creator>Robert, Louisville, KY</dc:creator><description>17,500 pages. The whole point of delaying as long as possible on this stuff was to give people as little time as possible to dig into it. This is likely just the first that will come to light - I really hope we'll get the time and media scrutiny this deserves. If anyone thinks EXAMINING what the oft-repeated claims of '35 years of experience' actually means is, well, mean... you've got to be kidding. It's Hillary's main argument. About time it got vetted.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#799146</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 06:00:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:799146</guid><dc:creator>Robert Caccia, Tucson, AZ</dc:creator><description>I visted 12 countries while in the AirForce. I had drinks with citizens and military folks in each of those countries. I even had tea with such people in England. I believe that I am qualified to be Secretary of State, at least.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#799147</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 06:01:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:799147</guid><dc:creator>Bill Mulig</dc:creator><description>Everyday people can be terminated from their employment for pumping up resumes...FIRE HILLARY!</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#799148</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 06:03:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:799148</guid><dc:creator>Jesse Hart, Seattle, Wash.</dc:creator><description>The media has been piling on Obama for the last several weeks. Meanwhile McCain and Hillary have been getting a free pass. Are the Hillary supporters really so eager to keep the mud machine aimed at Obama now? When will people realize that Hillary has a better chance of ensuring a victory for McCain than she does of winning the nomination? This story does nothing to change that. So please stop whining about a media bias against Hillary, and start paying attention to who is really walking away untouched, JOHN MCCAIN!!! </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#799170</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 06:25:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:799170</guid><dc:creator>Lee Simmons, San Francisco, CA</dc:creator><description>So Bill says to Hillary, &amp;quot;Hey, if we get two more terms in the White House, we should have Chelsea come live with us. That way she can run next, and we can say she has 16 years of experience!&amp;quot;</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#799180</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 06:34:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:799180</guid><dc:creator>Ellen Owings, Vancouver Washington: Ken@msn.com</dc:creator><description>This is such an important Presidental race this&lt;br&gt;year. Our country has to correct so many problems&lt;br&gt;that the current administration unleashed, by&lt;br&gt;being uncaring, not following the constitution,&lt;br&gt;illegal wiretaps on law abiding citizens. I am&lt;br&gt;a Democrat, and I find it alarming that Senator&lt;br&gt;Clinton was attending private meeting when her&lt;br&gt;husband was President, you must under the law,&lt;br&gt;have security clearence. This is the first time&lt;br&gt;since 1960, that we know of, that a first lady&lt;br&gt;was allowed to sit in on a meeting. Then it is&lt;br&gt;not logged in her agenda book. My logical guess&lt;br&gt;would be, because it was illegal it was not listed. Another alarming factor, I thought the&lt;br&gt;impeachment hearing of President Clinton because&lt;br&gt;of Monaca were a waste of tax payers money, it is&lt;br&gt;not written in the Presidental Oath when they take&lt;br&gt;office. Yes, he lied about the affair, but they&lt;br&gt;should not have asked as it was not relevent, under the law. What alarms me is this, the First&lt;br&gt;Lady knows the law very well, as she was an&lt;br&gt;attorney. She was a corporate attorney, President&lt;br&gt;Clinton was not a corporate attorney. The First&lt;br&gt;Lady was involved in Whitewater, she knew she&lt;br&gt;was had an obligation to turn over the documents&lt;br&gt;pertaining to billing from her legal firm. That&lt;br&gt;it is against the law when you have received a&lt;br&gt;supeona to deliver them. Yet she kept them hidden&lt;br&gt;in the White House in her little office there.&lt;br&gt;And she had no great role than Laura Bush had,&lt;br&gt;Laura Bush was a governor wife too, big deal. She&lt;br&gt;also is a first lady, again big deal, they have&lt;br&gt;not exactly added dignity,a caring attitude when&lt;br&gt;Katernia, and the people are still suffering today. Obama has proven he is honorable, he was&lt;br&gt;a civil rights attorney. He has a caring for&lt;br&gt;our Country attitude. I listened to his speeches&lt;br&gt;and feel he can turn the financial situation&lt;br&gt;around, return needed jobs back to the US, and&lt;br&gt;create new ones, so the unempoyed have a way&lt;br&gt;to support their families. I believe firmly he&lt;br&gt;will keep his promises, and sees the need for&lt;br&gt;action right from the start to turn our country&lt;br&gt;around. Safety from terror, the financial ruin&lt;br&gt;we are facing, if something is not done, and&lt;br&gt;health insurance for our citizens. Sorry I do&lt;br&gt;not feel Senator Clinton is honest, and has&lt;br&gt;proven she is not. She seems to have her own&lt;br&gt;agenda, and not what is best for the United States&lt;br&gt;I am voting for Obama</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#799221</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 08:00:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:799221</guid><dc:creator>Susan, Santa Rosa, California</dc:creator><description>It's amazing to me that the media continues to berate Senator Clinton. &amp;nbsp;She was the first First Lady with a law degree, and the first to have an office in the West Wing of the White House. &amp;nbsp;She has a &amp;quot;front row seat&amp;quot; as to what was going on during the Clinton/Gore years. &amp;nbsp;She was very much involved in many government agencies in order to gather the information for her health plan. &amp;nbsp;She was also an attorney for the Watergate investigation. &amp;nbsp;Why can't the media (mainly male members) find out where the missing emails are from the Bush/Cheney investigation that Congress has been requesting? &amp;nbsp;Why don't you investigate the loss of billions of dollars in the Iraq War? &amp;nbsp;Why not report on the mudslinging of the Obama campaign members? &amp;nbsp;Why don't you report on why John McCain survived the Keating scandal, or why he flies on corporate jets? &amp;nbsp;Why is there sexism in the media?</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#799249</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 09:12:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:799249</guid><dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator><description>I am an american businessman living abroad. I actually do not remember exactly, but I believe I have travelled to close to 80 countries. I have met many politicians of various levels in various countries, although by no means, does my work involve politics. Although I have travelled a lot, and have met a lot of people, it certainly does not make me qualified to be President of the USA. Certainly the fact that Mrs. Clinton was close to the Presidency, does not qualify her to be President. I am sure there are many other people on President Clinton's staff who travelled to a lot of countries and met a lot of people, they too are not qualified to be President. As such, I am simply shocked that Mrs. Clinton is not being called on the fact that all of her experience as the wife of the President simply does not mean anything.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#799259</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 10:04:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:799259</guid><dc:creator>RD NYC</dc:creator><description>That is all you can find in pages and pages? Come on there is more in there then the selections you have noted. Get real. At least she never says she sat there for 20 years and did NOT listen. She had on the job training so what is wrong with that? We have used that method for years and generations of workers and crafts.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#799295</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 12:03:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:799295</guid><dc:creator>Sam O'Neal</dc:creator><description>It amazes me that MNBC has chosen to publish this new article, but why not, as a news outlet it is obvious that you are bias. &amp;nbsp;Everyone thinks BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA WALKS ON WATER. &amp;nbsp;EVERYONE WHO VOTES FOR HIM WILL GET WHAT THEY DESERVE A SNEAKY LIAR WHO IS AN ANTI-AMERICAN. &amp;nbsp;His cabinet will be filled with Rev. Wright type &amp;quot;typical black men&amp;quot;, who feel that they are entitled to so much because over 100 years ago they were brought over here and made slaves. &amp;nbsp;My desendants did not bring them over here, why do I have to continue to pay for other's mistakes that I have had nothing to do with. &amp;nbsp;If they hate it here so much go back to Africa Obama and free your people like MOSES did if you are such a GOD.like man.... oh, yea right, you couldn't get as far as you have in Africa because you are not given hand outs over there because you think you are entitled. &amp;nbsp;you would have to work like everyone else to get ahead</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#799300</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 12:16:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:799300</guid><dc:creator>Marguerite Haynes</dc:creator><description> &amp;nbsp;For those of you who claim Senator Obama is all speech and no substance, do you think Senator Clinton has &amp;quot;substance&amp;quot;? All I see is someone who is willing to tear &amp;quot;her&amp;quot; party apart and indeed tear at the delicate fabric of race relations in our country in order to get what she wants, power.&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp; As a life long Democrat I am finding her and her husband repulsive. They wil say anything,personally I think they are angry at the African American support for Obama, to get what they want, indeed they are campaigning for McCain on a daily basis. Their arrogance is astounding, and, hindsight is 20/20. They did more harm to the middle class than good. Think about it. I would rather have someone with courage and passion than power grubbing &amp;quot;substance&amp;quot; having spinmeisters.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#799304</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 12:21:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:799304</guid><dc:creator>WILDWONDERFUL07@hotmail.com</dc:creator><description>She spent four years in the govenors mansion along side her husband helping to make crucial decicions for her state and then move to the white house where for eight years she was involved with heads of state, dignitaries and leaders of our country. Laura Bush &amp;nbsp;ready on day ONE WILDWONDERFUL &amp;nbsp;OKC OKC</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#799326</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 12:49:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:799326</guid><dc:creator>Eileen Williams, Carnegie PA</dc:creator><description>Senaroe Clinton performed her duties as first ladies in addition she made a step at universal health care (much reviled at the time and she took much heat for that), she also worked at health care for children, and was confident of her husband. &amp;nbsp;I would like to compare her to Eleanor Roosevelt ( who I would also feel would be qualified to be a president). &amp;nbsp;By the way Women's history Month is coming up- is the media going to give us some coverage. &amp;nbsp;Tired of the slanted media.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#799346</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 13:05:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:799346</guid><dc:creator>S. Harris</dc:creator><description>To Terry Goodman and other like-minded individuals -&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This article attempts to substantiate Senator Clinton's main argument that she is &amp;quot;ready to lead on day one&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;because she is the most experienced. She points to her years in the White House as a key part of her experience. We should all want to examine these years.&lt;br&gt;In contrast, Senator Obama asserts that he has the best &amp;quot;judgement&amp;quot;. &lt;br&gt;What is most disturbing about your comments, however, is that sexism is worse than racism and that Obama blames everything on race. The latter is patently false and the former I'm sure is conjecture on your part. I don't support Senator Clinton but even I can offer much better reasons to support her candidacy. I suspect you have absolutely no evidence to support your claim that sexism is worse than racism. It's insulting. Are you arguing that America is more sexist than racist, therefore vote for Hillary. Clearly we are smart enough to know whenever one minority focuses on another the hate mongers win. Are you arguing that the reason we should vote for Hillary is because the powerful have not been racist enough. Is America more racist that sexist? Who has suffered the most? Which &amp;quot;ism&amp;quot; is more brutal? &amp;nbsp;You will lose that argument.But it's not the right argument. You do your candidate a disservice. Might I suggest that your candidate who has suffered from discrimination stop using racist ethnic baiting tactics to win. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#799364</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 13:32:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:799364</guid><dc:creator>Linda McCarron Pittsburgh PA</dc:creator><description>Could you please stick to the issues at hand and give the Hillary bashing a rest. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#799379</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 13:49:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:799379</guid><dc:creator>Robert Moten,  Detroit, Michigan</dc:creator><description>Look white folks of course she's going to travel around the World and meet all different kind of people, SHE WAS THE PRESIDENT'S WIFE! WHAT ELSE IS SHE GOING TO DO FOR 8 YEARS! #2 All the white people who have this overwhelming fear of Obama being President and 'Blacks' and 'Islam' 'getting you back' some how look and sound like Middle age Whistle blowers screaming Witch, the unexplainable anger or racism you have for a PEOPLE who have done NOTHING BUT IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF LIFE FOR WHITE PEOPLE SINCE YOUR FOREFATHERS brought us here. From FREE Labor and Sex to Rock N'Roll itself. YET after 400 years of only protest, NEVER WAR AGAINST WHITE PEOPLE, YALL ARE SCARED OF US!!! HOW INSANE IS THAT!? What are black people suppose to talk about discrimination in the comfort of their own home FOR 400 YEARS!! Give me a break White people. For those of you who have it, Racism has transcend into a Mental disease for you. Really. You exhibit all the same symptoms, Denial, regression, transference, So get some Help. Everybody else, Bet on Black. &amp;nbsp; </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#799383</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 13:54:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:799383</guid><dc:creator>Marti, Hollywood, FL</dc:creator><description>As a Mother of a new voter for the first time this year my daughter has asked me a question that leads me to write this comment: &amp;nbsp;my daugdhter has followed these contest and has read everything on all the candidants, because this is her first election and is concerned for her future. &amp;nbsp;She asked &amp;quot;with everything I have read why is ti that when it comes to race Mr. Obama can with one speech able to wipe the slate clean and the news states that the churches are changing there surmons pronounce equality but yet Ms. Clinton is being held accountable for every minute of her life. &amp;nbsp;Have women today with all that they been accomplished still not come from the ashes of male dominance.&amp;quot; case in point look who wrote the article. &amp;nbsp;If your going to scrutinize a candidate our housshold would like to get the dirt on all candidates involved. &amp;nbsp;And as for myself I am PROUD american regardless of where I or my family stand in life. &amp;nbsp;Not like Michelle Obama is now realizes that she is now a proud american. &amp;nbsp;Where was she before her husband was running for president. &amp;nbsp;I didnt know that a priviage that we are born with she can turn on an off like a light switch. &amp;nbsp;This is our COUNTRY and we must embrace it unconditionally, and try to move forward not back to the dark ages. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#799400</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 14:04:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:799400</guid><dc:creator>Mary Kay  Clermont, FL</dc:creator><description>This news organization is going down the toilet, fast. &amp;nbsp;MSNBC... All Obama, all the time.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#799462</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 14:55:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:799462</guid><dc:creator>Di</dc:creator><description>Hillary's claim of meaningful foreign policy experience is profoundly exaggerated. We cannot blame the journalists for this. She is running on a platform that she has the experience to answer an emergency 3am phone call. There is no evidence here that she does. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#799478</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 15:09:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:799478</guid><dc:creator>Anthony , Birmingham, Alabama</dc:creator><description>This is just amazing to me! As a former resident of New York state I know first hand the politics of Mrs. Clinton. She is not to be trusted! As for her experience; Well, everyone needs to look at the fact that the old (so called experienced) way of thinking is what has this country in the shambles we are in right now! Maybe it is truly time for a different perspective on things. Maybe! </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#799482</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 15:15:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:799482</guid><dc:creator>Tami, NW Iowa</dc:creator><description>for those of you that keep insisting the media is biased in thrashing on Hillary, well it's NOT that Obama has done no wrong, its that HE spilled his own closet BEFORE the media could! Perhaps Hillary should take some lessons! When someone comes clean on their own pple are way more forgiving than when you have to dig the answers out!</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#799488</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 15:24:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:799488</guid><dc:creator>Dustin, Necedah, WI</dc:creator><description>I cant understand why it was such a big deal that she went and visited troops and families after the bombings. ISNT THAT MORE THAN OUR PRESIDENT HAS DONE NOW. Come on lets hear something worth reading. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#799517</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 15:46:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:799517</guid><dc:creator>Bill Cilintonovy, NYC, NY</dc:creator><description>Ok, so we all know that the Clinton's. of which I have no famly ties in any manner, did have some shady dealings, both prior and while they had their White House tenure, BIG-DEAL, LOOK AT VP.CHENEY and his &amp;quot;oil crew manuvers&amp;quot;, IRAQ? All about the &amp;quot; OIL&amp;quot;, the PREZ. Bush, an IDIOT, although he was good for Texas as the Guv', BUT, Presidential material, NOT! nobody can really ascertain &amp;quot;who is right and who is wrong, during election times, prior, it is &amp;quot;all smoke and mirrors&amp;quot; on the campaign trail! I think however, that Sen. Obama, just may do our USA some good in actuality, for the guy is NOT &amp;quot;that jaded yet, and NOT a political hacK, give him a break&amp;quot;, and he mIght just surprise us all positively! &amp;nbsp;Hillary? Give her the door, she had had eight years in the Whuite House, enough is enough, and &amp;quot;you cannot teach an old doggy new tricks&amp;quot; , BUT, witH Sen. Obama, I think the man will learn some good new productve tricks over all, and will be good for the country and all of us in it. True, my comments are simplistic, but the old adage of &amp;quot;keep it simple stupid&amp;quot;, or, &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;KISS&amp;quot; , always seems to work, with anyone whom has half a brain! </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#799523</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 15:52:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:799523</guid><dc:creator>lspencer, Alexandria, VA</dc:creator><description>Enough! &amp;nbsp;Why is the media bashing the Clinton's? Specifically, Hillary? She did a lot more as First Lady than Laura Bush would ever think of doing. Also, why is the media giving Obama a blank check to say and do whatever he wants to without anyone checking further? &amp;nbsp;He uses his race to further his political aspirations; however, if Hillary even dared to use her gender, she would be torn apart by the media. &amp;nbsp;So much for &amp;nbsp;balanced reporting. &amp;nbsp;The media is certainly helping the GOP - again, by not reporting all sides in a fair manner. &amp;nbsp;Start asking more direct and difficult questions to all of the candidates. &amp;nbsp;Hillary has been vetted; what about the other candidates? </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#799536</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 15:58:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:799536</guid><dc:creator>Ttishi Alexander</dc:creator><description>Americans have a right to know about Hillary Clintons expeirence especially since she touts it so much! We have a right to know all the skeletons in the closet as she and advisors want to make an issue of every one of Mr. Obama's it's only fair. &amp;nbsp;It's also fair at this time to HC's tax returns, Presidential notes that tell the real story of her involvement. &amp;nbsp;No one wants to discredit her but we have her to reveal who and what she says she is is really true. &amp;nbsp;A first lady does not a president make. &amp;nbsp;She is a former first lady running for president on her &amp;quot;record&amp;quot; so lets see it, all of it. &amp;nbsp;No one out to &amp;quot;get&amp;quot; HC.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#799556</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 16:18:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:799556</guid><dc:creator>AJ Rome, NY</dc:creator><description>You do nothing but PICK PICK PICK...Meeting victims and their families to console them was a wonderful thing to do --- where was Obama and what did he do? Where is his calendar? Public disclosure of the minutes of the days, days of the weeks - still not enough be cause she is after all, a woman. And we all know that women better be twice as good and three times as accountable. You people are so shallow. Fact folks: Hillary Rodham Clinton has more experience - foreign, domestic and economic. Obama is a light weight who was busy playing with Rezko and Wright to shore up his policital advantage. But we will overlook that because thats what men ARE SUPPOSED TO DO. Double standard - no matter what this woman did you would find something to PICK about.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#799567</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 16:28:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:799567</guid><dc:creator>babalu , Denver,Colorado</dc:creator><description>To all of You, who are doing everything to destroy Hillary Clinton!!!&lt;br&gt; She was &amp;nbsp;Wife of Bill Clinton-THE PRESIDENT, She was more involve in polithics, than any other wifes of &amp;nbsp;Presidents of USA!!!, 20 former Generals are supporting Hillary, because they know HER more then anyone of US!!!Onl once in 1993 She seid, that NAFTA is working, Bush Senior is responsible for Nafta, they lied to Clinton and the rest of US, as &amp;nbsp;allways..., remeber Silverado collapse in 80s it was another Bush. Hillary She is THE BEST, and not for shure Obama Husein Barak, or McCain, John Kerry, or cheef of N.Mexico, Rumny etc...!!!,&lt;br&gt;None of them. He just proved to US, that He is &amp;nbsp;an ignorant toward white people, and people of color!!! He spend 20 years in a church, witch is teaching : hate, discrimination!!! He enjojed so much, He didnt mined &amp;nbsp;His Mentor remarks!!!. I have black Friends, and they are so angry with OBAMA too. CNN is obsest with Obama, quietly accusing Hillary od spying on Passports records, giving Hillary maybe 2 minutes a day in lat 7 days, &amp;nbsp;and the rest for Obama!!!. Defending &amp;nbsp;Obama and portraying Him as Idol. It is stupid and anfare. Seams, like He can't defend Himself, like He can't do anything wrong!!!.&lt;br&gt;You, People, who are supporting Obama, are so blind and anfare for Hillary. Yes , if He win nomination, I will vote for Obama, because I will not &amp;nbsp;vote again for Republicans. Because of Hillary, I switch to Democratic Party. She prove, that She is very loyal, and Her words &amp;nbsp;meanings &amp;nbsp;&amp;quot; I will deliver&amp;quot;&amp;lt; taht is all I need!!! Obama with His last remarks and actions, and Speaches, prof , that He is not that Obama, who unite US, He just start deviding US. He disrespect His Mother, and His white Grandparents, colling &amp;quot;tipical white PEOPLE&amp;quot;!!! Obama is not ready to be a President of USA, not YET!!!</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#799580</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 16:37:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:799580</guid><dc:creator>babalu , Denver,Colorado</dc:creator><description>absolutely... bias against Hillary is a &amp;quot;MONSTER&amp;quot;, She was not a President, but She WAS there. She was involved in helping ALL people since &amp;nbsp;She was young woman, and student. What is the rocord of Obama, His records??. Did He ever help any one of color, those poor people are not only Afro-american. He do not have &amp;nbsp;in pass , that His family ever were &amp;nbsp;slaves, He grow up as anyone else in Hawaii, were most people are dark skin. He needs to mature, He do not look as Presidential as He is &amp;nbsp;telling US, yes, He makes &amp;nbsp;great speaches.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#799582</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 16:41:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:799582</guid><dc:creator>babalu , Denver,Colorado</dc:creator><description>Seams, like Hillary is on Trial!!!&lt;br&gt;Is time, to gets all records, not only Obama, but McCain, who was POW&amp;lt; His Father was an Admiral, douring Vietnam War, I heard, that was treated differently-better, then others, because of His Father &amp;nbsp;rank. Anyone know about???</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#799592</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 16:55:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:799592</guid><dc:creator>babalu , Denver,Colorado</dc:creator><description>for the record... all politicians are &amp;nbsp;the same, if Obama things, that He is different then Hillary,, or John Kerry, or Maccain, than He is very &amp;nbsp;naive. Once You get in this , political machine, You are like the rest, and He is like the rest allready!!! Change is only word, action is real, Solutions is real. If Obama thinks, that if He became President of USA, and everybody will lay flat in front &amp;nbsp;of Him, then He is dreaming.&lt;br&gt;In 4-8 years He will be ready, but not YET, He is a rookie, and &amp;nbsp;has a lot to learn!!! Speaches are not that important, not enough experience &amp;nbsp;not good for mass We will face in 2009</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#799598</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 16:58:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:799598</guid><dc:creator>wdeyle@verizon.net</dc:creator><description>Guess I am way out of the mainstream in that I don't believe media necessarily has a right to pick apart the meeting calendar of officials and question what a given meeting was about, who said what to whom, etc. And I'm not even a Clinton supporter. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#799648</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 17:49:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:799648</guid><dc:creator>Chuck, NY</dc:creator><description>Amerca wise up and be realisatic. Forget about Clinton's memoir of tea and garden tours, these are no experiences. Bring the un-finished aspirations of JFK to actualisation through OBAMA.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#800012</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 01:58:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:800012</guid><dc:creator>Steve Melczer, Dyer, Indiana</dc:creator><description>She is a fake. Only cares about her climb up any ladder, kanda like monica climber bills. I wouldn't trust or believe anything that came out of her mouth. Look at the omnibus health care bill she wanted to get through. Thank GOD someone read it and just didn't pass it. She cited Canada's health care system...well they are taxed heavy for it, half their pay checks go to taxes for that. WAKE UP and see that carpet bagger for what she is. A LIAR in denial, another discrace to this country.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#800024</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 02:13:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:800024</guid><dc:creator>diane charlotte northcarolina</dc:creator><description>i think that if you are going threw the files of evrybody else in this thing let bush and his wife tell what they got to hide i am sure it is alot more than the clinton family like the oil he dont have to worry about oil when he gets out hell he owns it and is going to live off it when he get out of there i think that he will make money off the usa cause he owns oil so ha we are the ones suffering not the past future president they have it made.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#800164</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 07:16:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:800164</guid><dc:creator>victoria mackenzie, san antonio, tx</dc:creator><description>Anyone interested should check out &amp;quot;Hillary the Movie&amp;quot; you can goggle to find it. &amp;nbsp;I remember a lot of those headlines during the clinton years. Beleive that we would be in for more of the scandles if she were prez.check out the movie very interesting.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#800780</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 15:32:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:800780</guid><dc:creator>LUCIA WORTHINGTON, ALEXANDRIA VA</dc:creator><description>It’s a shameful inflation by Hillary to claim her social, wifely support role as foreign relations experience.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As a conservative, I prefer to think that someone who worked for social causes – in the trenches- &amp;nbsp;such as Obama has done has a better understanding of what is needed in the world today.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Many of our problems at home and around the world originate in economic hopelessness. Let’s fix those things first at home and abroad. Obama has my vote! &amp;nbsp;I am a conservative middle-aged “white” female and his strategy makes most sense to me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hillary’s fluffy lies have damaged us enough already!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#800823</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 15:46:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:800823</guid><dc:creator>Scott Leete, Hamilton, Montana</dc:creator><description>After reading this article and recalling the endless domino effect of questionable events involving the Clintons for the past 16 years, then taking a good look at Mr. Obama &amp;nbsp;who is absent of any accomplishment, and by recent discovery of events and associations is questionable himself...objectively, I would bet the DNC is wishing it had two candidates with different names.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#800982</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 16:30:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:800982</guid><dc:creator>Mary Sue, Anchorage, AK</dc:creator><description>I appreciate that someone has actually taken the time to point out HRC's area of experience as a First Lady. I'm so tired of her claiming to have the experience needed to be President, when she in fact, was not President at the time her &amp;quot;experience&amp;quot; was gained.&lt;br&gt;She was the First Lady, and as such, was expected to be under the public eye at all times. The mere idea that so many pages had to be blacked out is atrocious, and I'd like to know who selected which areas would be omitted. Such knowledge would greatly enhance this article.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#802104</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 20:22:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:802104</guid><dc:creator>Penny Leonard, Sacramento, California</dc:creator><description>WHY doesn't CNN televise, everyday, Hillary EXAGERATING her Bosnia experience and show the Video tapes of her actual arrival in Bosnia, and her clear diatrabe about bullets over her head, etc., just like Cnn keeps playing the /Rev Wright tape? &amp;nbsp;AND where is John Glasgow the Chief Financial Officer AND Contractor to the Clinton Presidential Library during the audit of the Library?His car and wallet were found in a Park but no Glasgow 1-28-08. Similar situation of Vince Foster, his dead body was found in a &lt;br&gt;Washington DC Park by a Ranger with NO &amp;nbsp;BLOOD EVIDENCE to suicide?? Within &amp;nbsp;2 hours, Fosters Legal files were taken out BEFORE investigators went to his office, and 2 years later a Clinton Aide &amp;quot;discovered&amp;quot; those files in the private Clinton quarters of the White House! Which brings us back to that nagging question.. &amp;nbsp;Where are the Clinton Tax Returns????I will CONTINUE to email this diatrabe to ALL the major NEWS MEDIA daily....At least the Huffington Post reports NEW Information daily and CNN doesn't even keep up like the Huffington Post, Cafferty keeps up the TRUTH but his files are not shown during the evening &amp;nbsp;time when People need to hear about the Bosnia lie. &lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#803818</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 13:39:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:803818</guid><dc:creator>Ken. Alexandria, La</dc:creator><description>I'm sorry, but the &amp;quot;I have experience because I watched my husband do it&amp;quot; is the same as me saying &amp;quot;I can perform surgery because I watched EVERY EPISODE of E.R.&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt;Also, everyone is saying &amp;quot;Why didn't Bush get this treatment?&amp;quot; He did. It cost Dan Rather his job, remember?</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#804143</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 14:39:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:804143</guid><dc:creator>Joanne reno nevada</dc:creator><description>Is this supposed to be important news?? &amp;nbsp;Or is this an attempt to take the spotlight from the Obama debacle?? &amp;nbsp;Oh, and by the way, can we expect him to release the same kind of information as to his whereabouts during the same time frame???</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#804258</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:01:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:804258</guid><dc:creator>J. Osorio, Dallas, TX</dc:creator><description>What a short memory people have. At the beginning of the campaign, Hillary presented herself as the presumptive candidate. When faced with an opponent who did the homework and groundwork and won the majority of popular votes, she went from the &amp;quot;Natural&amp;quot; candidate to playing the &amp;quot;victim&amp;quot;. Initially she welcomed the media attention, then, when things went south, she resented it claiming that the media was &amp;quot;picking&amp;quot; on her. Subsequently, her campaign's attempts to shift the focus from her to Barack have boomeranged, drawing attention to her &amp;quot;kitchen sink&amp;quot; tactics. Hillary behaves too much like George W. Never wrong. Can't admit to her own shortcomings. And she wants to be &amp;quot;The Decider&amp;quot;. I prefer a candidate who can weather the storm and remain poised and focused on the issues that face this country. Someone who refuses to become mired in the traditional muckraking and mudslinging that has been an accepted practice in American politics. Say what you will about Barack Obama, &amp;quot;empty suit&amp;quot; and all, but it is undeniable that he has the 3 Cs, Character, Charisma, and most of all , CLASS.</description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#805356</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 17:49:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:805356</guid><dc:creator>Kelli Akron, OH</dc:creator><description>I don't believe that the media has taken a harsh look at Hilliary Clinton any more than any other candidate. &amp;nbsp;I believe that Hillary just expected for DEMS to accept her with open arms no questions asked and it has ben quite an eye opener for her. &amp;nbsp;I was a huge Bill Clinton fan and think Hillary is a brilliant woman. &amp;nbsp;However, her bitterness, her entitlement attitude and per choices her campaign has made has pretty much sealed her fate for me. &amp;nbsp;I don't want my President to ask why are they picking on me...I don't feel I need to defend my President with accusations that the press is being too mean. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#805578</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:15:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:805578</guid><dc:creator>withdignity2@aol.com</dc:creator><description>The clintons have always imbelished the truth.&lt;br&gt;Obama however disclosed his schedules before they had their last debate, when they were still asking for &amp;nbsp;Hillary's. He has also disclosed his 2007 tax returns. Where is Hillary's? &amp;nbsp;I just wonder why there were so many pages,of her schedule unavailable to the public. I suppose it will be an exciting election this fall. I can hardly wait. </description></item><item><title>Clinton calendars full of unexplained private meetings</title><link>http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/19/786127.aspx#831171</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 03:14:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:831171</guid><dc:creator>Wake up America, USA, USA</dc:creator><description>Why do people fall so easily for Clinton's nonsense. Who cares wheter she flew to other countries, met with leaders or not? This doesn't make anyone fit to do anything except travel for free and talk with people. We all qualify based on that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would travel all over the planet as well if I had airforce 2 and an army of caregivers to pamper my every minute.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The fact is we need fresh blood, not the same ole politicians we always have. We are so used to nothing getting done, and so scared of some made up possible negative that we can't see straight!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We've had good presidents, we've had lackluster presidents, and we've had bad presidents. Life went on. Try something new when you can't get out of the rut.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Stop following what Clinton says is important in a president (always the things she can twist her way) and start thinking for yourself. &amp;nbsp;</description></item></channel></rss>