No credible intelligence predicting a terror attack

Posted on Wednesday, October 08, 2008 2:03 PM ET
Filed Under:

By Robert Windrem and Jim Popkin, NBC News

Is this an opportune time for a terrorist attack? Could Al-Qaida use the current financial distress and political uncertainty in the U.S. to magnify its power?

U.S. intelligence officials say no. They suggest that while Al-Qaida may want to be "part of the conversation" in the U.S. presidential election, there is no "specific or extraordinary" threat information, nothing to indicate that terrorists are capable of taking advantage of the current situation.

"They attack when they can, when they have an opportunity," said one intelligence official, adding that terrorists have wanted to attack the U.S. but have tried and failed on several occasions since Sept. 11. "For whatever reason, they have not seen the conditions they need to succeed," said the official.

Indeed, NBC News has obtained a "note" by the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security that debunks recent Internet reports predicting a terror strike inside the United States prior to the elections or the inauguration. The note was distributed yesterday to thousands of U.S. law-enforcement officials, and authored by the Extremism and Radicalization Branch of the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI's Threat Analysis Unit.

The unclassified note said: "A privately-run U.S. website that comments on Homeland security issues on 24 September posted an article describing an alleged 2 August posting to an Arabic language Internet forum suggesting that a large-scale attack against the U.S. Homeland would be forthcoming in early October. Subsequently, the same U.S. website warned that the threat window could be anytime from the present into early November. Further fueling speculation, a former FBI counterterrorism analyst predicted in an interview with an Internet news website that al-Qa‘ida or affiliated groups would attack the United States in the months after the election or inauguration in order to influence the new administration and its policies. These and similar Internet reports cite the recent terror attacks in Yemen and Pakistan as indicators of stepped-up efforts by al-Qa‘ida and its affiliates to implement an 'October surprise.'"

No credible intelligence to suggest an imminent threat
But the note added: "DHS/I&A, the FBI, and JRIC have no credible, specific intelligence to suggest an imminent threat to the Homeland and assess these election-related threats to be non-credible. Nothing in the purported Arabic-language message is unique among the hundreds of vague threats posted online each day. Moreover, it is unlikely that al-Qa‘ida or its affiliates would provide specifics regarding the time, dates, or locations of proposed attacks."

Terrorism experts agree. Michael Sheehan, former counterterrorism ambassador at the State Department, said it is a myth that terrorists wait for an opportune time to attack. "They don't wait. They attack when they're ready," said Sheehan, who is now an NBC News terrorism expert.

Messages yes, attacks no
A second U.S. intelligence official noted, however, that analysts still expect to see "an uptick" in threat reporting all the way up to the Inauguration on January 20. In fact, the FBI and Department of Homeland Security issued a separate bulletin this past weekend predicting more messages from Al-Qaida in the coming weeks. "We expect Al-Qaida to release additional messages before the election" for U.S. president," the FBI/DHS notice said.

"They certainly want to be a topic of the election campaign," added the second official, noting that Osama Bin Laden appeared in a videotape just four days before the presidential election in 2004. Sen. John Kerry has said he believes the video heightened the fear of terrorism--and swayed enough voters to stay with President Bush. 

"At a minimum, we would expect to see a message as we did in 2004 and what have seen this weekend with Adam Gadahn," said the first official, referring to a video from Gadahn, the American terrorist who this past weekend criticized the U.S. government and the newly installed government in Pakistan.

The second official also noted that there has indeed been an increase in English-language messages in recent weeks, first by al Qaeda's No 2., Ayman al Zawahiri and then Gadahn. While some of the uptick can be attributed to Al-Qaida's desire to stoke discontent and motivate homegrown western terrorists, officials believe the real target is English-speaking dissidents in Pakistan. (It's also an attempt, both officials note, to increase the likelihood that their message will be broadcast since they are using English. Al-Qaida has not been getting a lot of airtime lately, the officials agree.)

The intelligence officials added that Al-Qaida has shown no preference for either candidate in the presidential election. "Their hatred goes far deeper," said the first official. "It doesn't matter to them who's president."

Comments

Sheehan is right in my opion. "They don't wait. They attack when they're ready,". September 11th had no special meaning when they attacked. They planned and plotted, trained and when they were ready they attacked. They wouldnt warn of a date they plan to attack, that would lower their chance of suscess.

Some people like to put out fake warnings, to joke around, pull the fire alarm at school for fun... but that is entirely diffrent from people who just like to watch the world burn.
call me a cynic.  But, just as we saw in 2004, I expect a "recent" video from one of those bad guys to surface just before the election.  How convenient or McCain, huh?
Why should they do anything?  They can just sit back and watch us implode all on our own.

The Islamic Terrorists will not attack now since it would reflect badly on Obama.  They want him elected.  So, no they will not attack.
We will choose our leaders.
Al Quaida are sub human dogs.
Dogs don't get a say in our elections.
I do not believe we have any thing to worry about until after January. Then they will try to send a message to the new administration, who ever it is!
Don't be surprised if it's some type of attack. Might not be major. A lot of people refused to look at the congressional hearings when Cynthia McKinney questioned Rumsfield about military missions during 9-11. Politicians/Govt will do anything to pass policy and or to get elected. U.S. citizens just don't know.
we should be more much more concerned i think, since al qaida has attacked just prior to elections in spain and elsewhere that produced their intended result of getting the liberal and dovish person elected in that country.  
These people are cowards, and you can be sure that they will strike as "undercover" as possible. Sure, some may be suicide bombers, but that's all part of their sick, sick culture. They will ALWAYS hate non-Muslums, and no matter what we do are say to change that, it will never, ever happen. America has lost over 4100 young men and women for NO REAL REASON! WHERE IS BIN LADIN??
Too many years ago, the people in our government (probably mostly CIA) who should have known did not understand how much the Iranian citizens hated Shah, and because the US propped up his "throne," how much the Iranis hated the US, especially the folks in the Embassy.

The CIA actually sent a retired agent into the Embassy several days before everything blew up.  When Shah reached the point where his death was imminent, the Embassy should have been evacuated.

The Iranis knew that the six "missing" US Embassy employees were hiding in the Canadian Embassy, but they had no quarrel with the Canadians and didn't choose to pick a fight there. (I was young and didn't work in DC or with lobbyists or lawyers. Despite being a kid with no government contacts, I knew in less than 72 hours that the six Americans were in the Canadian Embassy. I'm not foolish enough to think I was--or am--smarter than the Iranis who lived in the city where the uprising occurred.

It is a mistake to assume that since the world is having a financial meltdown, the fringe elements in the Islamic world will decide now is not a good time to unleash their next major terror attack. They work on their own schedule, not ours.
I believe that Al-Qaida would prefer the election of John McCain because of his willingness to endlessly continue bush's endless war and the video of him singing bomb, bomb, bomb,Iran. These two things would make it so much easier for them to recruit foot soldiers for their wicked cause.  And as far as intelligence of another attack, have the FBI and such gotten that much better since missing all of those clues leading up to 9-11?
It's ignorant to think world events, including the doings of Al Quaida, have no influence on voters in the US. A person's perceptions shape their opinions which in turn are manifested at the polls. I believe Al Quaida would rather see BO in the Whitehouse than McCain. And it looks like they'll get their wish.
9/11 helped Bush. Remember all the "chatter, videos, and terror levels"  just before Bush's reelection?  What happened to them after he got reelected?  Everything stopped!  Expect some new "chatter, videos and ratcheted up terror levels just before the election.
It works every time.  It's the only card the neocons have left.

In 2004, a video from Bin Ladne mysteriously surfaced just before the election, giving it to baby Bush.  Sounds like the terrorists (or whoever actually released the video) wants to keep incompetent Republicans in office; not elect competent Democrats!
The likelihood of a terrorist attack is kind of like hurricanes - sometimes there's an indication in advance; sometimes there's not very much advance notice.

Which suggests that, if you live in a low-lying hurricane-prone location, it's not a bad idea to lay in a week's worth of supplies and keep your Weather Alert radio cranked up.

But no need to get leaky armpits either.
I agree that they will attack when they are ready and not before.  However, I feel they will wait if it is politically expedient if they are ready and they do not feel the op is in jeopardy.  They hate us all, but Obama is the preference of the muslim world. An attack would swing many voters to the McCain camp as he is recognized in polls as the stronger of the two on national security.  Have no doubt, the terrorists are dialed into our political process in a big way.
I hear that Osama is sexually disfunctional(stories from his early days in Lebanon). Thats why he likes to play with bombs & claim he has a cause.
"No credible intelligence?" That describes the Bush Administration to a tee. Hey, don't expect bin Laden to speak up; he's been dead for a while. Rather than attempting to look into the counter-terrorist crystal ball to predict the next attack, we need to avoid the recurrent military mistakes, killing innocents, and helping to recruit the next wave of jihadis. Let al-Qaida lose the war for the hearts and minds of Muslims as they have in Anbar and are doing in NW Pakistan.
everyone's worried about terrorist but there not the ones that are destroying our country, big companies that are getting rich while we suffer are the ones. open your eyes people, oh yeah i know a little something about terrorists i just spent 15 months killing the bastards
The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. but under the name of Liberalism they  adopt every fragment of the Socialist program until one day America will be a Socialist Nation without knowing how it ever happened. --Norman Thomas Six time Socialist party presidential Candidate and one of the founders of the ACLU.

So, this is how gullible the ACLU thinks America is?

We invite, comment refutal rebuttal or just plain comment


Send a comment

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

Your name, city and state (John Doe, Seattle, Wash.): 

Your e-mail address (jdoe@msnbc.com):

Your website (it's okay if you don't have one):

Remember me? (We'll keep it private)

About the blog

Deep Background is NBC News’ investigative blog. It covers national security, terrorism, spies, Iraq, and politics, as well as government waste, fraud and abuse. It is edited by NBC News Senior Investigative Producer Jim Popkin.

Archives


Browse by topic:

Add this blog to your news reader