Secret documents released in Rosenberg spy case

Posted on Thursday, September 11, 2008 4:15 PM ET
Filed Under:

By John Rutherford and Jim Popkin, NBC News

Ethel Rosenberg refused to tell a grand jury in 1950 whether she and her husband Julius were Soviet spies, but it didn't make much difference because she was done in anyway by her sister-in-law.

The testimony of Ruth Greenglass, the wife of Ethel's brother David, helped lead to the indictment, conviction and execution of the Rosenbergs for passing atomic secrets to the Soviet Union.

Transcripts of the grand jury testimony of Ethel Rosenberg and Ruth Greenglass were released today by the National Archives, as a result of a lawsuit filed by historians and the nongovernmental National Security Archive in Washington. It's the first time the grand-jury documents have seen the light of day in more than half a century.

According to several historians who reviewed the documents, the most striking new evidence comes from the grand jury testimony of Ruth Greenglass, sister-in-law of Ethel Rosenberg.  In contradiction to Ruth Greenglass’s later trial testimony, her grand jury testimony does not mention Ethel Rosenberg’s typing any of the information being passed to the Soviets about the U.S. atomic program. In fact, the grand jury testimony describes that information being passed in Ruth’s own longhand.

Ronald Radosh, co-author of The Rosenberg File and one of the experts who filed affidavits in the case, commented, “The grand jury documents cast significant doubt on the key prosecution charge used to convict Ethel Rosenberg at the trial and sentence her to death.”

The secret testimony:
In the grand jury documents released today, Ethel Rosenberg repeatedly pleads the 5th.

"I decline to answer that question on the grounds that this might tend to incriminate me," she said over and over again in testimony before a New York grand jury on Aug. 11, 1950.

Ruth, her sister-in-law, was much more talkative.

Question: "Do you know, of your own knowledge, whether Julius Rosenberg is a card-carrying Communist?"
Ruth: "Well, I never saw the card, but I always assumed he was a Communist ..."
Question: "Now, do you know whether Ethel Rosenberg was a card-carrying Communist?"
Ruth: "Well, as I said in Julius' case, I never saw the card, but I believe she was."

Ruth Greenglass described for the grand jury how Julius Rosenberg asked her in November 1944 to convince her husband, David, who was working at the atomic laboratory in Los Alamos, N.M., to pass atomic secrets to the Russians through Julius and other Soviet agents.

Ruth: "He [Julius] had been trying for two years to get in touch with people in - I guess it's the Soviet underground, that he could work more directly to help Russia ... He felt there was not a direct exchange of scientific information among the Allies and that it would be only fair for Russia to have the information, too ..."
Question: "And did she [Ethel] take part in the conversation?"
Ruth: "Well, she urged me to talk to David."

Ruth said her husband agreed to join the spy ring and smuggle atomic secrets out of Los Alamos. David later left the Army and moved back to New York. In May 1950, with the FBI closing in on them, Julius urged the Greenglasses to flee.

Ruth: "He said, 'You have to go,' and I said, 'Where are we going?' and he said, 'You are going to the D.S.U.,' and I said, 'What is that?' and he said, 'To the Soviet Union.'"

Julius told Ruth that he and Ethel would be leaving, too, but not at the same time.

Ruth: "I said, 'Is Ethel happy about leaving?' He said, 'Well, she is disturbed; her ties are here, but of course she realizes it is a thing we have to do.'"

Ruth said she and David decided to stay put.

Ruth: "But my husband felt if we told Julius that we would not leave he would consider this dangerous to himself, and that some physical harm might befall myself or my children ..."
Question: "Did you ask him [Julius] what you were going to do if and when you got to the Soviet Union?"
Ruth: "I always assumed we would be shot when we got to the Soviet Union."

Ruth's grand jury testimony ended there.

On June 19, 1953, Julius and Ethel Rosenberg were electrocuted at Ossining, N.Y. David Greenglass served 10 years in prison and then resumed married life with Ruth. Ruth, who was never charged, died on April 7 at the age of 83. David, 86, is still living.

The National Security Archive, an independent research institute at George Washington University, successfully sued to allow the National Archives and Records Administration to unseal the grand-jury records. The Archive, along with historians and journalists, filed a petition in January 2008 seeking the release of grand jury records from the 1951 indictment of the Rosenbergs, arguing that public interest outweighed privacy and national security concerns.

Comments

Ethel was innocent.  Ruth perjured to save her hubby's ass.  And her own.  The Russians have stated that they received worthless information, nothing that could've built a bomb.  The fastest trial and conviction of one innocent scapegoat and her egomaniacal husband.
Joe McCarthy was the one who was anti american,
and should have been executed for crimes against
the constitution
The Rosenburgs according to KBG files were given medals as Heros of the Solviet Republic, the highest awards that can be given to a civilian
I agree with the conclusions of Louis Nizer in his book "THE IMPLOSION CONSPIRICY"
The Rosenbergs were indeed guilty, but the sentence of death was inappropriate.
The death sentence has not been subsiquently utilized, even in spying cases of greater severity.
The unadulterated arrogance and foolishness represented in these comments has been extremely entertaining.  Thank you.  I am, however, extremely disturbed by the lack of spelling and grammar skills displayed here.  

A couple of those responding mention the Venona Intercepts. I think the rest of them should be decrypted (deciphered?) for additional information on the shadow wars of the 1940s. I think Julius was guilty; I'm less certain about his wife. What seems to be certain is that many of those who conducted high level espionage went unpunished. I wonder how many of them were under suspicion but never bothered?
Well, the main fact missing here is that 12 honest men/women acting in good faith decided that the evidence against was enough to warrant a guilty verdict.  If they were or weren't really isn't up for use to decide, a Jury of their peers heard the evidence presented, and heard the defense, and decided their guilt.

I will admit, the Rosenberg case was gone before I was born and other than the history books I don't know anything about it or the McCarthy era, but at the time there was a 'clear and present danger' to our nation by a nation that had sworn to eradicate anyone who did not think the same way they did.  

And at the time the USSR prohibited all forms of religion so saying that the Rosenberg's were singled out because of being Jewish (as one person tried to say) doesn't really hold anything more than opinion.  


Send a comment

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

Your name, city and state (John Doe, Seattle, Wash.): 

Your e-mail address (jdoe@msnbc.com):

Your website (it's okay if you don't have one):

Remember me? (We'll keep it private)

About the blog

Deep Background is NBC News’ investigative blog. It covers national security, terrorism, spies, Iraq, and politics, as well as government waste, fraud and abuse. It is edited by NBC News Senior Investigative Producer Jim Popkin.

Archives


Browse by topic:

Add this blog to your news reader