Controversial general scolds NBC in new book

Posted on Wednesday, August 13, 2008 4:41 PM ET
Filed Under: ,

By Aram Roston, NBC News Producer

Note: Feel free to discuss this story on Aram Roston's Newsvine column.

In the fall of 2003, NBC News broke the story of an American special forces general, in charge of a secretive Pentagon unit, who had made unusual and divisive remarks about religion and politics. The story caught fire around the world, as the outrage grew over a high-ranking uniformed officer, the Deputy Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence, making comments that seemed to disparage Islam.

His name was Lt. General  William “Jerry” Boykin, and he was a legendary soldier who was a founding member of the Army’s storied Delta Force. He headed a task force hunting Colombian drug lord Pablo Escobar and he had served in hotspots from Vietnam to Panama to Mogadishu. In his new memoir, "Never Surrender," the now retired general takes NBC News to task for that story. In particular, he calls me out for my role in the story. Lisa Myers was the correspondent for the story, which appeared on October 15, 2003 on the “NBC Nightly News with Tom Brokaw,” and I was one of the producers (and the only journalist to have interviewed Boykin at that time.)

Our story “stunned” Boykin, he writes in his book. He said, of the NBC report and subsequent coverage, that “the media was using the faith that had been my anchor to club me over the head.”

In particular, my interaction with him seems to have left an impact, and he tries to recreate every word verbatim over several pages. I had called him before the story ever broke, to get his side.
 
"'General Boykin, I'm Aram Roston from NBC,'" he quotes me as having said. "'You know, you're a controversial character,'" Boykin says I said. He claims I then said, "‘they’ve chosen you to go after these high-profile Islamic figures and you have a track record of hating Islam.'"

I’ve checked my notes for that call, and I'm certain I never said he had a track record of “hating Islam.”

Boykin quotes more from our conversation. He says I said, “'You've made a statement to a Somali warlord that your God was bigger than his.'"

Eventually, he said, he asked me to call the Pentagon's public affairs office, and, although I agreed, he describes how I "would keep agreeing to talk to public affairs but would then ask another question."

And when our story aired the next day, and Senior Investigative Correspondent Lisa Myers reported our findings, Boykin complains, "Aram Roston hadn't listened to a word I'd said." 

He was wrong. I had listened closely.

NBC's report:
Here is part of our script from that NBC Nightly News story. It describes how General Boykin, in church speeches that used slides to punctuate his points, outlined that Satan was the true enemy of America:

LISA MYERS: In a half dozen video and audiotapes obtained by NBC News, Boykin says America's true enemy is not Osama bin Laden.

Gen. BOYKIN: Well, is he the enemy? (Picture of Osama bin Laden shown)

BOYKIN: Next slide, Ron. (Picture of Saddam Hussein shown)

BOYKIN: Or is this man the enemy? The enemy is none of these people I have showed you here. The enemy is a spiritual enemy. He's called the principality of darkness, and the enemy is a guy called Satan.

MYERS: Boykin recalls a Muslim fighter in Somalia, who bragged on television the Americans would never get him because his god, Allah, would protect him.

BOYKIN (Beginning of clip from audiotape) Well, you know what? I knew that my God was bigger than his. Audience: (In unison) Amen.

BOYKIN: I knew that my God was a real God and his was an idol.

General Boykin also talked politics in his church speeches, inferring that President George W. Bush was installed by God to help America fight in the war against terror. On videotape, Boykin was shown saying: "Why is this man in the White House? The majority of Americans did not vote for him. Why is he there? And I tell you this morning he's in the White House because God put him there for such a time as this.”

In our story, Lisa Myers referred to my phone interview with Boykin:

MYERS: In a phone conversation, Boykin tells NBC he respects Muslims and believes the radicals who attack America are not true followers of Islam.

Boykin also questions this reference in his book. "When did I say that?" he writes, in italics. He seems to feel strongly that I had not listened.

What my notes reveal:
But notes of that interview show a different conversation than the one he remembers. (I had typed them up immediately.) Here's what I wrote about the key point: "Says he made it clear in Fort Dix [one of his speeches] that the radicals who attack America are not true followers of Islam. He says he honestly believes that the people who attacked the trade towers are no more representative of Islam than white supremacists are representative of Christianity." And that is why we cited him saying it.

In his book, Boykin writes that he told me, “‘I respect the right of everyone including Muslims to worship as they choose,’ I told Roston. “'I’ve spent thirty three years defending those rights.

There really is not much discrepancy on this point. As my notes have it, he said, "Let me assure you that I spent almost thirty two year defending the first Amendment."

My notes also show that Boykin was very pleasant. And my notes have him saying, "I don’t want to be controversial," and "I don't want to come across as a right wing radical."

In August 2004, the Pentagon's Inspector General largely cleared Boykin of  wrongdoing regarding his numerous church-based speeches. The IG did conclude, however, that Boykin violated some Pentagon regulations. And the investigators confirmed that Boykin repeatedly said that Bin Laden and Saddam Hussein were not the enemy but that "the true enemy is a spritual one: 'the principality of darkness'; 'a guy named Satan.'"

In the end, I don’t think Boykin puts forward a strong objection to our story. He admits I tried to get an interview with him on camera, and says he would have agreed had I done things differently. He speculates that I was playing “an old reporters’ game: put in a couple of calls, but don’t take the steps that would actually result in a real interview.” It was not a game; I tried hard to get him on camera.

To many, Boykin is a hero and an extraordinary man with an extraordinary service record. Our story was only about his speeches. 

Ultimately, even he seems to concede the larger point. In his book he writes, “As I thought more about the way things unfolded, I saw that some of my statements, when taken out of context could easily have been misunderstood.”

This time, again, I tried to reach General Boykin by phone to seek his comment. His publicist "politely" declined.

Join the Newsvine discussion on this story.

Comments

I am no fan of Gen Boykin but this attempt at rectifying the record of phone calls and notes is a low form of journalism. NBC should send its producers back to journalism class if this is all they have to waste people's time with and valuable text space online. Simply childish and definately not NEWSWORTHY!!!
Who do you believe ? I personally would believe someone who fights for a living rather than someone who writes for a living.
Reporters are responsible for establishing context.  The views expressed by Gen. Bykin are very consistent with the views of the majority of American Christians less than 50 years ago, and are an orthodox Christian worldview held by almost all of the founding fathers.  Why does the media insist in "reporting" news with an implied  position that majority view of normalcy equals acceptable, and controversy is wrong.  If there is truth, then majority belief is more accurate?  The liberal believes everyone is entitled to a religious belief, as long as it does not result in actions or public words that reflect it as truth that rules their reality and ethics.
As someone who has been interviewed by both male & female journalists, from small town newspapers to the AP,...never has any one of them gotten what I said 100% correct.  Reporters are looking for a story and an angle which they have already decided they want to use.  Anything you say will be used in an "edited" fashion regardless of the spirit in which it was expressed.  If it is not sports or the weather you can be they are pushing their own agenda.  I miss Walter Chronkite who gave the news and seldom expressed an opinion.  When he did it was one in which he placed a lot of thought and weight prior to opening his mouth.  May the truth rest in peace.
Given the hatchet job you did on him in this article, I am not surprised that General Boykin's publicist declined your inverview or that journalists in general have a credibility gap second only to the US Congress.  
In a society such as ours the tree of truth will always bear fruit. Hence we have freedom of religion and the press in the USA thanks to people who sacrafice for all here to use it. I too miss Walter Cronkite and support his opinion about Dubba Bush's War as well. Long live Pinko Cronkite as Archie Bunker called him he will be 90 years young on November 4th. He feels the same about Iraq as he did about Vietnam we don't belong there. When one sacrifices freedoms for security they deserve neither !
So exactly what, if anything, did Gen. Boykin do or say which was "wrong"? He may have violated some Department of Defense policies by speaking in such a way while in uniform or as an official representative, but that is NOT to his shame...but rather to the shame of the authors of those regulations. Gen. Boykin is able to stand up and boldly proclaim his Christian beliefs, he can back them up in accordance with the Bible, and for that he should be applauded.
What is this reporter/producer trying to say? It sounds like a bunch of whiny assertions that just because he typed his notes right away, we're to believe that HIS take on the conversation was the right one. Boykin's easily understood statement that Extremists that hide behind the veil of Islam are to blame should be an inarguable point. He can call it Satan, he can call it lack of moral pulchritude, he can call it being neing white prison trash, it's all the same thing. Myers and Aram must not have had anything better to do than try and portray a true patriot as a snake-bearing, speaking-in-tongues nutcase. Any idiot knows that if you're Army, you're rear better be worshipping your Commander-In-Chief at least publicly because declaring a dissenting opinion is a multi-pronged form of career and social suicide. In other words, go find a story and quit whining like a Casper Milquetoast. I almost feel bad for Boykin that he felt duped. Poor chap must not have had much prior exposure to Satan- Oops- I mean liberal-leaning, yellow-tinted journalists...
As a reporter who takes his job seriously and makes every attempt to report the news both accurately and in proper context, it sounds to me like NBC did its homework and reported the story accurately. I always bristle when news is sensationalized, especially on TV (local TV news can be especially bad at this, but for the most part network news is better). Sometimes in short TV reports there is not enough time to give proper context that could be seen in a complete, 20-plus-inch-long newspaper story.
I didn't watch this TV report from 2003 so I can't say if it was too sensational or painted the whole picture of the situation. As a journalist I always strive to get every possible angle and a full report in my stories, but it can be frustrating when sources choose not to comment or are hesitant to go into much detail, often making themselves look worse for a "no comment," which many equate with "guilty" or are so guarded they don't truly tell their side of the story.
I also served in the military and have friends fighting in Iraq and Afganistan, and know that the national media doesn't always understand or depict the life and death struggles and complexities faced by troops, and reporting of war crimes and stories like this often fail to truly explain the situation facing the troops. This isn't a football game and sometimes the troops and their leaders aren't going to be PC in a war zone.
Since the business of reporting about war, warriors and hate is doing so well I'd think the next step in advancing reality is to draft all media personnel and put them where it will give them the perspective we hate but know to be necessary, on the front lines. Attitudes change very quickly there or you risk complacency and death. Adopting a higher power to place trust in only makes a man more capable. Lets' all see what capacity these media types have when they are subject to their own twisted scrutiny. What value does an article like this have?
General Boykin put his life on the line many times for you and our Nation. What have you done lately for your country? Maybe it is you that is lying. After all you said ,:I did not say,etc' Most journalist do distort the truth in order to sell an article.
You might as well hear it from me that I believe almost nothing you all print or say, and know that material can even be edited to slant the way of the reporter even in an aired TV (so-called) "live" interview.  You have no sympathy from me.
I have NEVER and NEVER will TRUST a reporter. I have seen the way they will turn everyword around until it sounds like America hates the world. I have traveled all over the world and most people of all religions respect the US. Just once try to tell some all the truth!
 The media has a way of twisting things the wat they think people want to hear it for ratings or whatever ......therfore i trust anything the news has to say as about as far as i can toss a aircraft carrier
Go do your job, investigate on real news and report on a really important social
issues. Such as who's is behind the financing and organizing of the largest ethnic-religious based genocides since the Hitler that's going on right now in North Africa by Muslims against...Christians. Or why Westerners can't emigrate to Middle Eastern country's in this day and age yet Muslims can emigrate to any Western country without fear of kidnapping or worse... No keep complaining/reporting about a few negative comments made by some old guy who no one really cares about. Perhaps thats the master plan, to yell loudly about trivial transgressions such as these in order to hide/deflect everyones attention from all the uglyness. What moral, ethical and journalistic hypocricy!!!
Your article smacks of attempting to weaken this man's credibility. You seem to have caught him in his errors, but in trying too hard and focusing on minutae, it only serves to weaken your own.
We all know how vindictive, "bought-out", one-sided, and corrupt journalists and the media as a whole is, so this little temper tantrum for getting caught is nothing new.  I quit working in the industry because I was tired of being asked to falsify documents, falsify photos, and edit out opposing viewpoints and the truth of the article from both print and video.  So Aram, talk to the hand because I don't believe you even if you are telling the truth.
If I was misrepresented as seriously as Roston was by Boykin in his book, I would want to defend myself. I interpreted this piece to be more of an "op-ed" rather than a true news story... thus deeming attacks on journalism as a whole unnecessary. (No, I'm not a journalist... and in fact I have also been misquoted multiple times in newspapers.) For Boykin to write the interview "verbatim" instead of correctly identifying it in his book as "the way he remembers it" was a mistake on his part- especially since Roston had notes, scripts, audio tapes,(and undoubtedly the actual television report with Lisa Myers) that can prove Boykin is incorrect. I very much support the members of our armed forces, and I respect the religious rights of everyone (okay... so I make fun of Scientologists all the time, but I still respect their rights!)... but to have such a high ranking military man making such controversial remarks about religion while we're involved in a war in which our enemies blame their terrorist acts on their religious beliefs... well... no matter how strong Boykin's faith is or how pleasant Roston found him to be, I think the revered 1st amendment (which also protects the rights of journalists!) implies our public officials should remain secular when not in their own houses of worship.
I used to think my opinion of Muslims was really low, until I read "River War" written by Winstin Churchill in 1898.  And I realize Muslims haven't changed a bit since then.
Maybe if journalists had done a little more to expose the lies of George Bush instead of dutifully printing his every deliberate falsehood as unassailable fact, they might have a bit more credibility and the country wouldn't be in the shape it's in.  Like it or not, you media folks are as guilty as the current administration and it is going to be a LONG time before anyone finds you believable again.  And rest assured you will never completely win back the trust you so carelessly threw away.  Journalism comes with some amount of responsibility and none was exhibited during the run-up to the invasion of Iraq.  Boykin is probably a bit of a loose cannon but it's the military that ended up fighting and dying in the war the media helped Goerge Bush sell to the public and you folks owe us for that.
This is not a news worthy story. Sounds to me like the reporter made his bed and now doesn't wish to lay in it. This is a he said, she said and I suspect the truth is somewhere in the middle. Personally I have more respect for the general based off this story, and I haven't even read his book.
Out of context and innaccurate journalism has been the plague of free press-yellow journalism,  during my lifetime from Cuba, Vietnam, Africa, and the Middle East conflicts. "Satan" is as real to the Muslim world as it is to Christians, and main stream people of both religions recognize this. Remarks by General Bykin reflected the   basic beliefs and values upon which the American Declaration of Independence and the Constitution are based and on which the United States was built. A terrorist is just that-abhored by both sides and a pariah. I watch Russian news for accuracy, as the US and European news services inaccurate interpretative reporting of actual on the ground events is often distorted opinion and unsubstantiated.  Accountability is a vice.  
So because it is in a reporters notes we are to believe that this is the be all, end all of accurate record keeping?  Give me a break. A reporter can put anything in his notes.  If you want to convice me then produce a tape recording of the conversation.  Besides, the general was right in his speech in the church.  Since when are re required to believe that everyone's religion is equal.  There is a difference between respecting someone's opinion, no matter how wrong it may be, and accepting it as equal to your own.  While I respect people's right to believe whatever they like about religion, that doesn't change my opinion that some people are wrong about it and I shouldn't have to agree with them for the sake of political correctness. Pretty soon no one's opinion will be heard because we will all be to afraid of (God forbid) offending someone.  
One of the things which makes this country great is the concept of Freedom of the Press.  Without it, some very bad people would have gotten away with some awful things.  Take Nixon for example.  I am not saying that you should believe everything that you hear from the Press.  I think the idea is to listen to all parties and then make up your mind.  If I had been this General's superior and heard him making public statements like those mentioned in this article, I would have FIRED him.  I think we should expect General officers in our military to have enough brains to keep such opinions to themselves.  When they leave the military, they can say and do what they please.  However, while wearing the uniform, they are expected to follow the rules laid down for the military.  I believe the General's speeches stepped over the line.  Is Osama bin Laden our enemy?  YES.  Just ask the General's Commander-in-Chief.  In our system, the military does not make policy.  I think the General has forgotten that.
So many of you seem to either hate, dislike, or distrust "THE MEDIA" ('liberals' hate FOX, 'conservatives' hate the rest).
So why are you even wasting your time reading these stories in the first place, when you've pretty much already made up your mind to have a problem with it?  Seems like the mindset of someone who's *looking* for a fight, if you ask me...
Boykin is a tool. Yes, journalists seem to be d-bags as a rule but Boykin is a moron. All of you Christians standing up for this kind of behavior are idiots as well. You fools trust a member of Congress more than a reporter? You are insane!!! This is also a fairly plain indictment of how the 4th estate has really failed us all. This story is not about opinion. If the General said these things, he is an idiot. Just like all of you nationalistic zealots.
Wake up people!! Journalism isn't about facts or truth - it's a business, plain and simple! A journalist's job is to sell his 'story' and he/she will twist the facts, and even blatently make things up just to sell papers!! That is their business!! No different than a used car salesman, except that used car salesmen aren't as arrogant pompous!! Do you really think a journalist, with all the power of the media will admit that they twisted things around to make themselves look good??!! C'mon... I'm not saying that there is NO chance that the General would exagerate in his book - anything is possible, but power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely... and the journalists and media companies have absolute power over what you are told!! The whole purpose of this blog entry was not to clear the air, but to clear this journalist's name - how self centered is that??!!
Boykin is a legendary warrior with gaping personal flaws. He is a zealot. You believe in his Jesus his way, or you deserve the hell he gives you. Great combat leadership, too comfortable with death.
I too Have bee missquoted by my home town news paper reporters seem to print what they think they hear and when you call them on it they retract it of page 6 of the back of the paper I will belive the General
I do not have a comment regarding the General. I do object to the news media in general for belaboring some stories to death. A topic will be hashed over by every program on the TV - usually a topic about a "celebrity".  I do not care to even watch TV any more. If there is not "gossip", that is "juicy" or controversial - the media does not devote much time at all. I understand the media needs "ratings", and I wonder if our citizens really appreciate some of the garbage that is broadcast over and over again?? "Good people and/or incidents" are overlooked for the most part. If you do something wrong, it is beat to death on every channel - this is not just NBC, it is all the networks.
What a hatchet job by NBC News.  Your political bias is evident: if someone wears a military uniform and believes in a higher power, than there must be something wrong with him.  I want back the valuable minutes of my life that I wasted reading this article.
To explain my comment better - I point out the Anna Nicole Smith reporting for one - went on for weeks.  John Edwards indiscretion has been aired and commented by every one who thinks they are some one whose opinion matters, until I am sick of hearing it. I won't bore every one with more examples. I am sure most folks understand my point all too well.
I just want to mention I don't think most of us are morons, nor insane, nor nationalistic zealots.
Maybe a few idiots though from what I have read.
Did I leave anything out??  Oh yes journalists are d-bags (whatever that is). Name calling just doesn't seem to be necessary.  Journalists are accountable to the editors of their particular media as I understand things. So, I don't think the blame lies totally on their shoulders.
As a past member of one of his teams I belive the Gen.
And I think that as a reporter that you are you should do something for America like, enlist or are you scared?
I BELEIVE THE GENERAL NOT THE REPORTER. REPORTERS WILL BEND THE TRUTH TO SELL A STORY
Why is everyone so quick to throw this reporter under the bus? What I see is someone reporting on the behavior of a flag officer that is clearly against DoD policy and Army regulations.

Let me tell you all, I have served for over 13 years, including a tour in Iraq. We received so many briefings on what not to do that it can't possibly be forgotten. Apparently General Boykin never got those briefings.

Abraham Lincoln fired general after general when they tried to dictate policy to him. President Truman fired General MacArthur when he tried to circumvent his commander in chief by writing directly to congress.

Apparently breaking regs and DoD policy are no longer fireable offenses. If the Bush administration won't hold these christian right-wing nut jobs accountable, then its up to the press to make it public. At least someone is doing their job.
how is this a story? this is another attempt to paint the US and a particular military member in bad light...

when Islam is the majority in the US, this reporter won't be doing much so-called reporting...

one only need look at the UN where they just made it illegal to criticize Islam and sharia law...Fairness Doctrine about to be revived

nbc should be reporting on real issues not he said/she said non-sense
All men and women in uniform should have a General Order to never risk their life or the lives of their fellow military personnel to protect ANY newsman!I'll bet reporting becomes more accurate immediately.A 2X Viet Marine
From reading these posts it is obvious most have never suffered an interview with the media. They will manipulate the interview not to get the truth but to get the sensational. Misquotes are a staple. I am not taking up for the general and I do not espouse some of his beliefs but they are his and he has the right to air them. He should have known better than to trust any media person. This includes O'Reily, Cronkite, Larry King, Hannity Moyer, adnauseum. I will not grant interviews or even talk casually with any reporter. I learned the hard way and the General has too.
I think Boykin was wrong. The enemy is not Islam.
The enemy is demon news reporters, who wilfully vilify our leaders while at the same time promoting the terrorists.


Send a comment

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

Your name, city and state (John Doe, Seattle, Wash.): 

Your e-mail address (jdoe@msnbc.com):

Your website (it's okay if you don't have one):

Remember me? (We'll keep it private)

About the blog

Deep Background is NBC News’ investigative blog. It covers national security, terrorism, spies, Iraq, and politics, as well as government waste, fraud and abuse. It is edited by NBC News Senior Investigative Producer Jim Popkin.

Archives


Browse by topic:

Add this blog to your news reader