Report: Military used harsh methods on 9/11 terror suspect

Posted on Tuesday, May 20, 2008 12:29 PM ET
Filed Under: ,

By Jim Popkin, NBC News Senior Investigative Producer

A new report by the Justice Department Inspector General details many of the harsh and intentionally humiliating techniques that the U.S. military used against Mohammed Al-Qahtani, a Saudi detainee at the Guantanamo Bay military prison who many U.S. officials believe was meant to be the 20th hijacker on Sept. 11, 2001.

The 438-page IG report focuses on the FBI's involvement in detainee interrogations in Iraq and Afghanistan. But it also provides a window into the methods used by the Defense Department and the CIA on uncooperative detainees such as Al-Qahtani.

Quoting military records and reports, the Justice Department Inspector General said that a "special projects team" of the U.S. military interrogated Al-Qahtani between November 2002 and January 2003.

Their methods included:

--tying a dog leash to Al-Qahtani's chain, "walking him around the room and leading him through a series of dog tricks."

--"repeatedly pouring water on his head"

--"stress positions"

--"20-hour interrogations"

--"forced shaving for hygienic and psychological purposes"

--"stripping him naked in the presence of a female"

--"holding him down while a female interrogator straddled the detainee"

--"women's underwear placed over his head and bra placed over his clothing"

--"female interrogator massaging his back and neck region over his clothing"

--"describing his mother and sister to him as whores"

--"showing him pictures of scantily clothed women"

--"discussing his repressed homosexual tendencies in his presence"

--"male interrogator dancing with him"

--"telling him that people would tell other detainees that he got aroused when male guards searched him"

--"forced physical training"

--"instructing him to pray to idol shrine"

--"adjusting the air conditioning to make him uncomfortable"

Hospitalization:

The IG report notes that in December 2002, during this period of intense interrogation, Al-Qahtani was hospitalized "as a result of the DOD interrogations" for hypothermia or "low blood pressure along with low body core temperature." The IG writes that while FBI agents were aware that Al-Qahtani was being subjected to intense questioning by the military, "we have no evidence that the FBI or DOJ were aware that the specific techniques described above were used on Al-Qahtani" at that time.

Qahtani has often been referred to as the 20th hijacker because of evidence that he tried to enter the United States a few days before the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks and because he was in touch with the men who became the hijackers. Al-Qahtani flew to the Orlando airport from Europe in August 2001, but was barred from entry to the U.S. Investigators later determined that Sept. 11 ringleader Mohammad Atta had been waiting to pick him up at the airport. Qahtani was captured in Afghanistan in December 2001.

Just last week, the Pentagon official in charge of war crimes cases declined to permit a case against Al-Qahtani to proceed, dismissing charges against him. The official, Susan Crawford, whose title is Convening Authority, approved death penalty charges against five other detainees in the 2001 attacks, while declining to approve charges Al-Qahtani. Crawford provided no explanation.

Her decision said the charges against Mr. Qahtani were being dismissed “without prejudice.” Later, a spokesman for military prosecutors said the government could “reinitiate charges against him at any time.”

Qahtani's defense lawyers and officials familiar with the case have said it is unlikely that Qahtani will face new charges because he was subjected to such aggressive interrogation techniques. Many of the aggressive interrogation methods used on Al-Qahtani were previously disclosed in TIME, which obtained an 84-page secret interrogation log prepared by his U.S. military captors.

--Contains background information from published reports.

Comments

The treatment was unpleasant due in part because of his religious beliefs about women. Too bad...Although I don't believe it is okay to torture anyone regardless of what they have done or you believe they have done. This is not harsh. He has probably treated women in his life worse than this.
The sad truth is that many of the detainees and renditioned people are innocent, having been "sold" to our government by Afghan & Iraqi warlords either for the cash or as retribution.  "Innocent until proven guilty" is the American way - not torture.  Picture this being done to your mother, and then make your comments.
Do whatever needs to be done to protect my fellow americans. All the winey people or groups who think he got such bad treatment, try telling some of these kids that their mom and dads died just because they showed up for work!!! I have no sympathy for killers of the innocent.
Another thought, I'm sorry. That NBC news would present this "scandalous expose" as an indictment of our military or counter-terrorism interrogation techniques makes me want to lose my lunch. These people(?) brought this to my country, we cannot allow that.
He is not entitled to any rights, he is a prisoner of war....He is responsible for 1000's of deaths and we want to let him go free.  The terrorist laugh at us, if they had an American in the same circumstance they would behead him for the world to see.  These tactics are nothing compared to what Americans have had to endure
we are no better than they if we condon this type of interrogation.  this is AMERICA and it became AMERICA because we don't treat others, even our enemies, this way. the terrorists were allowed to do what they did because our protectors didn't do their jobs.  we invaded a country on false premises and kill many innocent civilians based on a need for oil. how are we different?
this is a free country, one where we are allowed to do as we please. your rights stop where mine begin. you can do whatever you want as long as you do not infringe on my freedoms and liberties. when the terrorists do what they do, they infringe on our rights, thus resigning their own. their lack of obedience to law and common sense means, to me, that if they don't have to abide by laws, then neither do we when it comes to their "freedoms" . who decides that they get "rights" after they have taken, without mercy, the rights of others? who is so stupid to defend these creatures??? whoever would like to say that the rights of terrorists should be protected should be tried for treason. hang them with the very filth they defend! i'm thankful each and every day for our military that protects us...all of us...even those who sympathize with the enemy. get off their backs. they're the reason we are free to have ridiculous opinions without retribution.
Well isn't this just great. America the land of the free and home of the brave; except continue to allow terror suspects to go free and you will no longer be free and it takes a brave person to do whatis necessary to maintain that freedom. I love this country but most of it's citizens make me sick to my stomach. I thought 9/11 woould finally allow the weak complacient American to see the light; looks like they want their country to be turned over to those who would change it into other than a democratic society. Well I hope I willnot be around to see it; unfortunately my children will. WHAT A WASTE
Notwithstanding all but one of the comments above, there are Americans who do not operate on the basis of bloodlust and seek to have the US conform to its legal obligations.  

In particular, those are our uniformed Judge Advocate Generals who consistently objected to these methods being used as they violate the Geneva Conventions and other international and domestic US law such as the Uniform Code of Military Justice.  The United States has undertaken that either as POW's, security detainees or civilians these persons are not to be treated in this way when captured.  

The sarcasm of many of the comments really does a disservice to nearly 150 years of military law history from the Lieber Code created under Lincoln in the civil war and other efforts around the world to make sure that persons who are captured are not tortured or treated cruelly, inhumanely or in a degrading manner.  This is an important ethos for the military - a guy here in Ohio just got his Purple Heart for being downed in WWII in Austria - the guy who saved him from the Austrian lynch mob was a Nazi soldier applying the laws of war.

No one is asking that we love our enemies, but rather that we act like the civilized nation we profess to be.  Otherwise, we are barbarians.

Plain and simple: these are war crimes when committed on any detainees by any detaining authority and we should prosecute the lawyers (Yoo, Addington, Haynes, Bybee and the rest of them) who put this in place and the National Security Principals who authorized this.

Did anyone notice how the list was almost identical to what we saw in the pictures from Abu Ghraib?  This was an official and illegal policy and criminal to have happen.  Shame on us for not living up to our standards.  Keep our honor clean.
One writer above states,"No doubt that terrorism is a horrible darkness".  That much is obvious.  Comments by the cheerleaders for inhumane, cruel and unusual punishment make it equally obvious that we as a nation have been sucked into that darkness.  To the degree that we approve of torture and espouse fear and hate; to that same degree have the "terrorists" won.

When career FBI agents turn away from "interrogations" in disgust, that ought to give you a clue that something is indeed very wrong.

I have killed enemy soldiers "in service to my country". I have had enemy POW's under my control. I have been wounded in combat and I have been covered in the blood of my dead friends.  None of these experiences justifies torturing or treating another human being as sub-human, no matter what his crime.

Plain and simple:  The "interrogators" at GITMO and elsewhere, and those that authorize and condone their actions, are criminals and unworthy to wear the uniform of my country or to hold public office in the United States. Their actions reflect the ugliest, darkest side of mankind.

This is supposed to be America. For the love of God (that's right) what have we become?
So whats the problem?
The base idiocy and lack of analytical thought that plagues the American mind is evident in the responses to this article. The fact of the matter is that he is not a terrorist until he is proven so in a court of law after something that we call DUE PROCESS. You got that?? Or does the validity and importance of the Constitution not register with the majority of people posting on this site?? The bottom line is that with private military tribunals, no due process, lack of proper defense and discovery processes, they could make Mother Theresa look like a shill for Al-Qaeda.  I guess it doesnt matter that our detainees see as much fair justice as our soldiers would have under Saddam. . . unreal.
I don;t care what anyone one has done, all should be treated with respect.  Let him who is without sin cast the first stone.  God bless
We spend months on end at sea to protect those reporters rights, along with the rights of all Americans.  If a terrorist is put out for being uncomfortable due to his beliefs then he should not even consider coming to this country.  We look out for each other and if the general public had their way he would never make it back to his home country except in a body bag and deposited from 10,000 feet.  Give them to us as there is tardition that included keel hauling.  Lets see which they prefer, a little water on their heads or being drug under the hull of a ship they would like to destroy.
Who cares what the military does to these animals. Just get the info we need to protect America.  They would cut off any Americans head if given the chance. Even the tree huggers that want to protect them.
What has this world come to?  You assist in killing thousands of people. Yet, you still have the right to complain about how those you victimized treat you? It's as if he's looking for justice from the people, that he was looking forward to eliminating.  I say let him walk the streets of America with a shirt that says "I helped kill your family in 2001"  Lets see what type of things he'll be complaining about.  Reap what you sow.
He has no U. S. rights. He is a terrorist, they deserve all and more of what they appear to have happen to them. Don't you think that bin laden would do the same to US citizens givin the chance.  
There people capture our military or innocent civilians and just chop their heads off and dump the bodies...
I say slap him around with a pound bacon!  Do what ever needs to be done to protect the U.S.
I don't think I saw were he was complaining about how he was interrogated. It said that, that was what was done. I really don't care what they did to him, the thing is that it doesn't work. Experts have said over and over again it doesn't work. I didn't see in this story that they got any information from him, probably just did it for their own amusement. If you want to protect me do something that works. The reason the interrogators use these tactics is they are sadistic. They enjoy torturing people, and a lot of my fellow Americans enjoy hearing about it. Boy, oh boy aren't we just so proud of our Government.
Are you people serious? Don't you realize that no human being is to be treated that way, no matter what they have done. Don't let anger, sadness and revenge turn you into an animal. I am not saying that what he is ACCUSED of doing is right, but come on people! Have a heart!
I know it does not sound too bad to us.
I am hoping it was totally against what he belived in, and felt like punishment.
He is after all what?
Oh yes a terrorist!  
This is nothing compared to what
Sadaam Hussein did to people he disagreed with.
He gassed whole villages , hung people up by
meat-hooks, and gang-raped wives in front of husbands.

Granted, this treatment isn't very nice, but
(1) these aren't nice people
(2) these people operate with a very different
"justice system" and set of values than we do.


To coin the phrase of a friend of mine,
"black to negative and red to positive!"
I can't believe these comments...this man WASN'T CHARGED WITH ANYTHING. An American court determined that he wasn't connected and didn't charge him, just held him for four years. How can you say he deserved what happened to him? This isn't justice.
It's fine for them to chop of the heads of Americans in their country. What's a dog leash?
At least his head is still attached.
Shame on you journalists -and all of you liberals who think this was improper treatment! He was humiliated -So what!!! Nothing we did, or could do, would ever justify the way animals like this guy treat our soldiers, or the way they killed innocent people on 9/11. I'd gladly do this - and worse- to any terrorist! Kill em all and let God sort em out!
The millitary does this to many people to ensure that american lives remain safe. We should really just admit that we do torture people rather then pretend that these things dont happen, its something that america (and other countries) have always done and likely always will. People should take their heads out of the clouds to realize the cost of national security that has always been present. My only complaint is that the torture was less, pardon the expression, "gay" and more pyschically oriented. That way americans didn't look so disgraceful and immoral when called on their methods. I think the world would think less of a black eye and a broken bone, then of a pair of womens underwear on a naked mans head.
I continue to be stunned and fascinated by the level of savagery in the American heart.  So many people parade around like saints and lust for blood.  Give them a good reason to kill, and they'll take it.  Firstly, this man has never been convicted of anything and secondly, if this is a civilized country, then due process should be allowed in all matters to determine guilt.  If a convening body feels threatened by the prospect of following due process, then it is a mob.  It seeks mob justice.  Is that what we're about in this country?  Many people would say no, yet many of those people would still insist on killing first and letting god sort them out.  This country is full of hypocrites who have no idea how to approach information or situations with enlightenment.  You can't puff your chest out and brag about our democratic way of life and then say certain people are exempted from fair treatment.  That's pure idiocy.
What bothers me is that these techniques are being used on an ALLEGED terrorist.  If he were proven to be a criminal and a terrorist, that's one thing, but if the government can simply claim that they believe some person (including you or me) is a terrorist, or supports a terrorist organization, and that gives them the ability legally to detain indefinitely, and to interrogate using these and similar methods, I'd have to question whether we are actually any longer the "Land of the Free".
The courts need to read these comments!  They are the ones who are providing so-called, "justice" to the killers and their accomplices.  Our justice should be reserved for OUR citizens who follow OUR laws - not for the killers of our citizens, or those planning to kill us!  TAKE OUT THE LOOPHOLES and LET US DO WHAT IT TAKES TO GAIN INTELLIGENCE!  ...AND DON'T TELL US EVERYTHING!!!
Tell this terroist supporting Journalist. Ask him How Eugene Armstrong felt as they cut his head off while he was alive.
To bad if he feels like he was treated harshly.  I agree that what he did was wrong and am proud to see everyone saying so.  But on the flip side I know that it won't change anything.  I stand up and shout my support everyday for what our men and women in uniform do to protect our freedom and am proud of it.  To bad all the news cares to share is the bad.  Stand up AMERICA and be proud of these men and women in uniform.
I was always taught that you reap what you sow.  He deserves anything and everything he gets!  Rock on!!
Showing utter lack of respect for a religion shows the stupidity and ignorance of our military. As far as he being a killer, 9/11 killed 3000 civilians, absolutely horrible, Bush has murdered 300,000 civilians, unfathomable. When will the American sheep wake up and smell the oil money?
We should have televised this to be honost. Probly could have made lots of cash on PPV.
It is time that we stand up and say SO WHAT. We have been pushed and shoved enough. Answer me this, " How many of there captives or detainees did we publicly be head?" We need to be sorry we need to be ashamed?  I THINK NOT!
The ends justify the means? I am not sure. A german citizen was kidnapped off the streets of Germany by undercover (though not very bright)CIA officials and flown to a nearby country that has no laws against torture, the man was tortured beyond belief and then returned to his home country. all without notifying the authorities in germany. the man lost everything, and he was not a terrorist, just a man with a similar name... these interrogation techniques are used by uncreative, unintelligent, sick investigators. it is Un-American to support such techniques as it violates every basic right guaranteed to every American. how sad we have fallen so far. what is needed is new leadership in developing better investigative approaches to finding the truth. We are not animals, let us prove it to the rest of the world.
No intelligent life in here, I see.
Maybe some of his "harsh treatment" supporters should have had family that died in 9-11! Wonder if they would change their liberal whining?
Situation dictates procedure.  What works to get the information required from terrorists is what works; if roles were reversed they would do WORSE!
Waa waa waa!  Iragi terrorists BEHEADED American hostages (some who weren't even militarty) and SENT US THE VIDEOS!!  He got a massage and a little water poured on his head??!!
remember the guy is only "suspect"
And people think they are our friends and would do less to one of people.....militart keep up the good work--as for me and my family--we support you.
Reading these comments is truly scary at best! If they are supposed to represent the "American Way" then no wonder that the world at large looks at the US with disdain.

Whatever happened to the high MORAL standards we all claim to have set for ourselves? Did they all disappear and were replaced by standards that - at best - are unfit for "human consumption"?

Time to do some soul-searching!
Terrorism is a crime of mass murder. Not an act of war, or an act that takes place during a war.

It is a crime, of mass murder. The "war" on terrorism can only be won through effective, preventive use of law enforcement, and covert military action when necessary. [Aztec Silence]

Keep in mind this man is still a suspect. Wile the evidence MAY be VERY vast and he MAY be very dangerous, he has not EVER been found guilty in ANY court of ANY charge relating to attacking the United States. We do not have trials in courts to protect the guilty, but to prevent INJUSTICE to the innocent. As well as to provide a means of payment to the depth of wrong and harm wrought upon our society by the person guilty.

Do not be ignorant or arrogant, the U.S. Government was able to prevent over 200+ acts of terrorism inside the United States prior to 9/11. Without EVER harming a single SUSPECT to get them to confess. Look up "MIPT.org" and "GTD1 and GTD2"

Praise the courageous and honorable actions of the FBI agents who did not take part in these acts. They must have had "brass ones" to have been there and not take part in this.
Possibly some of these people need to go to a history 101 refresher or better yet talk to any of the pow's from vietnam???
No matter what this man apparently or allegedly did or tried to do, the interrogations were wrong and illegal. I'm skeptical these interrogations even led to any information. We shouldn't assume anything valuable came out of these interrogations.
There are other methods that are effective, legal, and defensible to extract information. During World War II, interrogators got Nazis to provide information without tortuting them.

Moreover, there's a risk in getting the wrong information from people who will tell the interrogator whatever they want to hear just to avoid the abuse.
Thank you for an informative article. It is distressing to me that I am apparently living in a nation of barbarians who not only condone but encourage the torture of suspects. I wonder how many of them would be willing to be the subjects of such torture?
It would be nice to see 80% of our news service- all of the bleeding liberals, go thru this pseudo-torture. Unfortunately, several of them would enjoy it and maybe ask for more. I understand that this man's religious background may have suffered. But anyone that practices religion which promotes mass murder of all but those who practice their radical chauvinist beliefs, and believes that 69 virgins await him if he dies in the process of blowing himself up, doesn't deserve much consideration. He is not a U.S. citizen and does not have a Bill of Rights to cover him. This was done outside of the U.S., and was far more humane than the treatment our citizens receive when captured by his radical  coherts.
It's whining about "mistreatment" of terrorists, and convicted murderers and their like, that will be the eventual downfall of our free democratic republic. Does anyone imagine that perhaps had we given him a five minute timeout, instead of such horrible "humiliation" that he might have felt bad enough to tell us any terrorist plans he knew about? Or that if we coddled him enough and then let him go home that he wouldn't immediately run and plan again to kill more innocent americans? What do you imagine happens to our men who are "captured" POW's? There aren't any, becasue they KILL THEM and TORTURE THEM TO DEATH!!! And people here dare to complain about the humiliation we cause the enemy? maybe we should apologize and allow him to sue for millions too???? WAKE UP. We are at war, even though most of us don't even realize it yet......
There is no such thing as "mild torture".  One wrong does not fix another.  Don't get me wrong, I don't want these guys coming here and killing people, but any accused deserves to face his accusers and either be charged with a crime, or released.  Why aren't we charging these people with crimes and dealing with them properly according to international law?  If we break all the laws, we are just as bad as the terrorists.  No-one is above the law, and that includes "them" and "us".


Send a comment

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

Your name, city and state (John Doe, Seattle, Wash.): 

Your e-mail address (jdoe@msnbc.com):

Your website (it's okay if you don't have one):

Remember me? (We'll keep it private)

About the blog

Deep Background is NBC News’ investigative blog. It covers national security, terrorism, spies, Iraq, and politics, as well as government waste, fraud and abuse. It is edited by NBC News Senior Investigative Producer Jim Popkin.

Archives


Browse by topic:

Add this blog to your news reader