Report: Military used harsh methods on 9/11 terror suspect

Posted on Tuesday, May 20, 2008 12:29 PM ET
Filed Under: ,

By Jim Popkin, NBC News Senior Investigative Producer

A new report by the Justice Department Inspector General details many of the harsh and intentionally humiliating techniques that the U.S. military used against Mohammed Al-Qahtani, a Saudi detainee at the Guantanamo Bay military prison who many U.S. officials believe was meant to be the 20th hijacker on Sept. 11, 2001.

The 438-page IG report focuses on the FBI's involvement in detainee interrogations in Iraq and Afghanistan. But it also provides a window into the methods used by the Defense Department and the CIA on uncooperative detainees such as Al-Qahtani.

Quoting military records and reports, the Justice Department Inspector General said that a "special projects team" of the U.S. military interrogated Al-Qahtani between November 2002 and January 2003.

Their methods included:

--tying a dog leash to Al-Qahtani's chain, "walking him around the room and leading him through a series of dog tricks."

--"repeatedly pouring water on his head"

--"stress positions"

--"20-hour interrogations"

--"forced shaving for hygienic and psychological purposes"

--"stripping him naked in the presence of a female"

--"holding him down while a female interrogator straddled the detainee"

--"women's underwear placed over his head and bra placed over his clothing"

--"female interrogator massaging his back and neck region over his clothing"

--"describing his mother and sister to him as whores"

--"showing him pictures of scantily clothed women"

--"discussing his repressed homosexual tendencies in his presence"

--"male interrogator dancing with him"

--"telling him that people would tell other detainees that he got aroused when male guards searched him"

--"forced physical training"

--"instructing him to pray to idol shrine"

--"adjusting the air conditioning to make him uncomfortable"

Hospitalization:

The IG report notes that in December 2002, during this period of intense interrogation, Al-Qahtani was hospitalized "as a result of the DOD interrogations" for hypothermia or "low blood pressure along with low body core temperature." The IG writes that while FBI agents were aware that Al-Qahtani was being subjected to intense questioning by the military, "we have no evidence that the FBI or DOJ were aware that the specific techniques described above were used on Al-Qahtani" at that time.

Qahtani has often been referred to as the 20th hijacker because of evidence that he tried to enter the United States a few days before the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks and because he was in touch with the men who became the hijackers. Al-Qahtani flew to the Orlando airport from Europe in August 2001, but was barred from entry to the U.S. Investigators later determined that Sept. 11 ringleader Mohammad Atta had been waiting to pick him up at the airport. Qahtani was captured in Afghanistan in December 2001.

Just last week, the Pentagon official in charge of war crimes cases declined to permit a case against Al-Qahtani to proceed, dismissing charges against him. The official, Susan Crawford, whose title is Convening Authority, approved death penalty charges against five other detainees in the 2001 attacks, while declining to approve charges Al-Qahtani. Crawford provided no explanation.

Her decision said the charges against Mr. Qahtani were being dismissed “without prejudice.” Later, a spokesman for military prosecutors said the government could “reinitiate charges against him at any time.”

Qahtani's defense lawyers and officials familiar with the case have said it is unlikely that Qahtani will face new charges because he was subjected to such aggressive interrogation techniques. Many of the aggressive interrogation methods used on Al-Qahtani were previously disclosed in TIME, which obtained an 84-page secret interrogation log prepared by his U.S. military captors.

--Contains background information from published reports.

Comments

Civilians will never understand the extent the military goes to protect them.  They prefer instead to criticize and complain about how the freedom they enjoy was granted to them.  And that's their right.  That's why we protect this country the way we do.  That's what we protect.
I hope some of these tactics worked, none of this appears to be anywhere near the terrible deaths suffered by innocents in the Twin Towers
And this is how we represent freedom, equality and the American way?  I am ashamed.  No doubt that terrorism is a horrible darkness, but this only further justifies their cause in their own eyes.    
So What??? He is a killer. Your going to tell me if it was your family on the line and all you had to do was pour water over his head and tie a leash to him you wouldn't... To save 1000s of people.

Like these killers treat our military like this when  they capture them.

The only problem with articles like this, is that you post this information to the public.

Want to feed them steak and a little HD TV to get them to talk...go ahead see how far you get.
Keep up the good work.  Maybe having him dance with female dog who is in heat?
These methods are considered "harsh"?  Good grief.  Not my cup of tea, but some people pay good money for this kind of treatment.
If he is a terrorist he has no rights.
He took the rights away from the people he helped kill, and that should automatically take his away.
What he needs on top of the already supposed tortures is some Texas fire ants and 5 horses tied to his appendiges and shoot a shot gun off.
These people have been trying to scare us and it is taking a mental strain on this country and some of us are tired of it and feel a little old time justice is deserved.
Fraternity hazing is worse.  You "investigating" journalists really need to get a life.  Your self-righteous b.s. is not only annoying but dangerous.
Are we supposed to be concerned about the benign mistreatment of someone who would kill anyone of us Americans if given a chance?
Hey, when can I sign up for this? Some of the inconvenience this poor fellow endured could be marketed as an adolecents' fantasy experience. My last vacation to New York wasn't half as much fun. And still, I had to endure an unwelcome leg massage from the fat guy sitting next to me on the plane ride back to Sarasota.  Life's tuff all over.
Not the nicest things but if you really want "harsh" research the treatment of POW's by the Japanese after WWII!!!!
Are you kidding me? This is harsh punishment? They were coming here to try and kill my family, friends and fellow citizens. I don't think it was harsh enough. These men have taken an oath to protect the constitution and our country. Let them do their job, by whatever means necessary.  
Are you kidding me? This is harsh punishment? They were coming here to try and kill my family, friends and fellow citizens. I don't think it was harsh enough. These men have taken an oath to protect the constitution and our country. Let them do their job, by whatever means necessary.  
Hmm. Let's see. On one side we have 3400 mothers and fathers, sons and daughters, husbands and wives, sisters and brothers, aunts and uncles, cousins, grandparents, granchildren, nieces, nephews, etc. perished on Sept. 11th.
On the flip side, we have some mild torture and humiliation.
Compared to that, it sounds like Qahtani got off easy.
Not the nicest things but if you really want "harsh" research the treatment of POW's by the Japanese during WWII!!!!
...and what did he do to us? At least HE'S still alive. Sounds like pretty good treatment considering what he did!!
Who cares?  As long as we get the information to protect us, use the most effective methodology.
And we would care because why??  They killed thousands of americans, and we are supposed to care that he was treated poorly.  Round them all up and send them back to the caves, be done with it and bring our people home!
Let me see if I get this...he's complaing over the following:

--tying a dog leash to his chain, "walking him around the room and leading him through a series of dog tricks."

--"forced shaving for hygienic and psychological purposes"

--"stripping him naked in the presence of a female"

--"holding him down while a female interrogator straddled the detainee"

--"women's underwear placed over his head and bra placed over his clothing"

--"female interrogator massaging his back and neck region over his clothing"

--"showing him pictures of scantily clothed women"

--"forced physical training"




I usually have to pay several hundred dollars for this...and he got it for free!  Quit yer cryin!
The FBI interrogators and those who responded to this article disgust me.  You are the reason the world is in such bad shape.
It is unfortunate but necessary to be harsh during interrogation of suspected terrorists.  I feel bad for them, but then I think of the innocent Americans who died in 9/11.  Did the terrorists feel bad when they caused all that death and destruction?  I think not!  PAYBACK!!!
The only problem here is the fact that these strategies has been released to the public.  
Top Secret investigations should be handled according to "need to know", and civilians do not have the ability understand techniques to question terrorists, nor, dictate means or methods to extract information that could save the live of thousands of innocent human lives.
This is highly embarrassing. It is even more embarrassing that some patriots here enjoy this terrorist's treatment not realizing that this is the way we will be treated when we are caught.

The military was not told to act like this; they obviously misinterpreted instructions.I do not think the military is to blame but we should not continue doing it.

I pray we do not need to act like this again.
It is really disappointing to read all of your comments.  it makes me sad as an American to have you as my fellow countrymen and countrywomen.  This is about basic human dignity, and certain rules that all humans agree to.  This is not how we act.  Our founding fathers would lump you all in with the Church/State Apparatus that we fled from initially when we founded this country.  But just because you all are in power, you have no problems relaxing rules that don't affect you.  But at one time we were subject to such kangaroo court sheenanigans and endless torture in the name of the Church/King of England.   Freedom has a high cost,  and we should look at the total cost (not just dollars, but erosions of basic liberties (habeas corpus anyone?), total loss of human life, loss of world standing et al) and compare it and seriously ask ourselves is freedom worth 3000+ lives.  I do not advocate allowing these people to go free, but the fact that we have wasted away 200+ yrs of experience, wisdom, and reserve to get caught up in propoganda inspired fear, well it is sad, and truly UN-American.  America is about dissent, and about standing up for all people, not just the ones we like.  Never forget that if you don't speak up now, no one will be left to speak up for you.  Study your history, learn its lessons and try not to repeat its mistakes.  We should know better, and shame on all of you.
These things are "harsh"??? Give me a break. If they had purpose, I see nothing wrong with any of them. Have we lost our minds and perspective?
there is such a thing called the geneva convention that prevents war crimes. this makes the united states military just as bad as the poeple that they are claiming to liberate.
For everyone who has responded with the attitude that this is ok just remember what is meant by terrorism.  We are no less terrorists than those we claim are terrorists.  If your head was screwed on straight, we would not be in this mess.
Technically, he didn't kill thousands of Americans.  They could never prove there were any legitimate ties to the terrorist cell that committed 9/11 people.  You would throw all of your hatred and bitterness toward a man that could very well be innocent just because the government says he was supposed to be the 20th man?  

Come on.  They have to justify his torture to us in some way, but if they really had charges, he would not have been set free, no matter what. Think about that a little bit before you rush in to declare he deserved it.  
We need to put our priorities in the right place
If u could cut of the funds of the defence people there would be lots less crying.. Put any of them in a decision of if there sons or daughters were in trouble with the law listen to them cry.. Money is the only reason most attorneys do anything.
Let them so and defend our service men in captivity and see what they get..
They enfidels too and will be treated the same as any other when the terrorist get to them
Dear "Eternal Mercenary,"

And just what is that you are fighting for?  The use of "harsh interrogation techniques" (aka torture) has been proven time and again to be an ineffective method of intelligence gathering, does nothing to deter future attacks, and puts our own military personnel at high risk of treatment-in-kind if captured on foreign soil.  

Ask yourself what your uniform represents.  

We do not misunderstand the sacrefices made by military personnel.  We do and will always loudly question policy decisions made by the present US regime that do nothing but place our military personnel in harm's way, limit our diplomatic efficacy, and break the laws of this land.  

Patriotism does not consist of blindly following orders.  Your comment is patronizing to every American and presumes that criticism of our government is impossible without criticizing our men and women in uniform.  You simply could not be more wrong.
I would think that the American government would be above these acts. They should be given the same treatment that Americans in prison receive for committing similar acts. The article mentions he is a detainee--did he have a trial and was he convicted?
Wow you people are horrible human beings if you're ok with this.

1st he's a "suspected" terrorist, keep that in mind, "suspected" - not "convicted".

2nd torture doesn't work, experts have make this clear time and time again, it does not work. If, IF, he was the 20th hijacker why would he have any knowledge of other future plans by whatever group he belonged to. That's why these groups operate in cells, so they don't know what each other are doing.

All of you applauding this behavior can blame yourselves when the next attack comes. Two wrongs don't make a right. You're nothing but a group of uncivilized morons condoning the type of behavior you hypocritically say your against.
I know we have had soldiers in the past who have suffered much worse--and I'm glad to see that other Americans are acknowledging that.  If these methods get him to talk, then so be it.
There are 3 basic types of people on this earth.  Sheep, shepards and wolves.  The law of survival ditates that shepards must destroy wolves to protect the sheep. We must remember that terrorists intend to slaughter us as sheep.  Let the shepards do their job.
For crying out loud!!!  I am so sick of hearing about how "harsh" we treated those terrorist prisoners.  I think the military personel that were reprimanded and/or lost their jobs (along with their pension-I'm sure) were treated much more harshly than this second rate person.  How do you think our troops are treated when they are captured over there?  We have the opportunity to watch them behead our troops when the video tape it to send us a message.  And we think that pouring water over their heads and manipulating the thermostat is too harsh.  I know alot of people think if we resort to their type of interrogation, we are just as bad, but I seem to remember a passage saying something about "an eye for an eye"  and because of our brave military personnel, I have a right to believe that and actually say it out loud!!!!
The one thing that makes "us" good guys and "them" bad guys is that we respect human life and follow the rules. If "we" start acting just like "them" then "we" are no better than "they" are.
I am amazed at how many Americans simply have situational amnesia about the horrific acts performed on US citizens and soldiers by our enemies. William Buckley was tortured to death, video of beheadings of US soldiers have been posted on the internet, journalist Daniel Pearl murdered on video are only some of the examples. There is absolutely no proportionality of criticism for the conduct of our enemies.
Am I attacking the comments of others if I say that most of these comments make me ashamed to be an American?  
WOW - so many idiotic comments.

As an ex-Marine, I sometimes hang my head in shame at what this administration had done to our reputation.

When those Blackwater employees were beheaded, burned and defiled in Iraq - for the wolrd to see - were you not repulsed?

Can't you see that by condoning the types of things we have done - including murdering detainees - that we become no better than that which we repudiate?

Shouldn't the title of this article be changed to "Military Exercised Restraint on 9-11 Terror Suspect"
Check out the ignorant comments from so many people.
You basically throw your morals out the windows and feel its better to drag the US to the same level as the terrorists than to fight a smart war thats winnable.
Shame on you.
Let's see Daniel Pearl cilvian , beheaded, Nick
Berg, cilivian, beheaded, four Americans burned
and hung from a bridge. Missing military personnel
and you think I should feel sorry about the treatment this murder received, I don't think so.

J Leech
USMC 1966-1970  
And we know he's guilty how?  I must have missed that trial!

I don't care what we do with him after he's convicted, but until then, we have no business abusing captives.  America is better than that!
Sounds like a Sunday School class to me.  I can't understand why the military treated this guy so leniently.  What happened to old-fashioned water boarding?  If I had been in charge of this guy, you better believe he'd have received a real torture session.  Hell, when I was in the military in the 50's, we tortured the Hungarian soldiers that enlisted in the army after the Hungarian Revolution, a lot worse than this.
I am disappointed with the positive response to the methods used by the FBI interrogators.
The ends justify the means.  

It's all about getting results.  
Wow.  With all the retribution bloodlust being vented here, it seems as if almost everyone is missing the real point:

Al-Qahtani is only *suspected* of being the 20th hijacker.  There is no proof he had anything to do with it.  But, since he is merely considered to be a terrorist, he has no rights and the administration is free to subject him to whatever treatment they'd like, for however long they please... and there is nothing anyone can do about it.

This is how the "bad guys" treat their prisoners.

As a nation, we are supposed to be better than this.

Unfortunately, what many seem to forget is that this treatment by our government is not limited to people of Muslim descent.  The President could take anyone -- U.S. citizens, good ol' hard-working Americans -- and say "I consider that person an enemy combatant."  POOF.  That person would disappear, whisked away to one of our many secret prisons, treated harshly, tortured,  with no hope of release, no recourse of law (no writ of habeas corpus), no word to their family what's become of them, nothing.  

This is something that, under present law, can happen TODAY.

And if you say, "Well, I don't do anything wrong -- I'm no terrorist.  I've got nothing to worry about," you're missing the point.  First of all, how can you consider yourself an American if you support such un-Democratic policy?  

Second, you don't NEED to have done anything wrong -- after all, there's no crime needed other than (for whatever reason) your being classified as an enemy combatant... and there's NO legal recourse through which you'll get the chance to prove your innocence.  All you can do is wait and hope for your release.

We need to make things right.  Arbitrarily punishing people because they "look" or "seem" like terrorists merely puts more blood on our hands, but it goes nowhere toward solving the problem or delivering justice.  

Under the current system, LOTS of punishment is being meted out... but we have no idea if any justice is being served.  Nor will we until we re-embrace the Geneva Conventions.
If there is evidence to link him to a crime, any crime, then charge him and prosecute him.  That's how our justice system works! Trying to humiliate him or others in this manner is un-american and unhumane, even if that makes us feel good about it.
Let us pay attention to facts, people. Fact: He did nothing wrong. Fact: All "evidence" in this case is circumstantial at best. Fact: This man was arrested and TERRORIZED by US on superstition, NOT based on hard evidence.

If your best friend murders someone, and you went to say hello to him earlier that day, does that make you a murderer as well? Use your common sense and your brain, folks, don't let fear and the unknown control you.

What we did to this man and the country he represents, with his morals, ethics, values, etc., is incredibly wrong.

I am ashamed to be an American, and I have been since George W. Bush came into office. Anyone who backs this act of terrorism from their own Nation should be ashamed as well. You are no better than those on the plane who blew up the Twin Towers.

It is all in the eye of the beholder.
What seems to be missing is the fact that these prisoners of war are not the people that attacked the twin towers.  Our soldiers are in harms way where ever they are deployed when we practice geneva convention violations.  We are suppose to be better then the people that we call savages.  We are not a leach mob country.  These kinds of thing make other country's hate us.  Stop buying into the somebody has to pay mind set.  This information came from the same intelligence that said they had weapons of mass destruction.


Send a comment

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

Your name, city and state (John Doe, Seattle, Wash.): 

Your e-mail address (jdoe@msnbc.com):

Your website (it's okay if you don't have one):

Remember me? (We'll keep it private)

About the blog

Deep Background is NBC News’ investigative blog. It covers national security, terrorism, spies, Iraq, and politics, as well as government waste, fraud and abuse. It is edited by NBC News Senior Investigative Producer Jim Popkin.

Archives


Browse by topic:

Add this blog to your news reader