The FBI's not-so-safehouse

Posted on Wednesday, March 26, 2008 1:59 PM ET
Filed Under:

By Jim Popkin, NBC News Senior Investigative Producer

On the FBI’s Kids’ Page Web site, young G-Men-in-training are urged to “go on an undercover assignment” to keep “Special Agent Bobby Bureau” from blowing his cover.

But on the mean streets of Washington, D.C., the FBI doesn’t always seem to practice what it preaches.

Take the house, pictured below, which is located directly across the street from the embassy of one of our former Cold War adversaries. Most of the time, the large skylights in the attic of the house appear opaque, as seen here:

Candid cameras
But in the late afternoon, when the sun sinks low, it shines through those skylights like a movie-theater searchlight. Even a 10-year-old gumshoe can see what’s hiding in the attic:


Behind the three skylights, tucked behind black fabric, are three video cameras. Their lenses are trained on the embassy across the street. Passersby on the sidewalk below can see the lenses sparkling in the sunlight, and so, presumably, can the former Cold Warriors just across the street.

It’s no surprise that there’s close surveillance of foreign embassies inside the U.S. The FBI employs hundreds of counter-intelligence agents and employees, to keep an eye on friends and foes alike. Journalists have reported on the surveillance programs for decades. Back in 1988, for example, author Ronald Kessler described in “Spy vs. Spy” how the FBI “takes photographs of everyone walking down the street in both directions in front of” selected foreign embassies to catch spies and potential traitors on camera. “Anyone walking near the embassy is on film,” Kessler wrote.

Nonetheless, you’d think the Bureau would be a little more careful about safeguarding its own safehouse, and not blowing the cover of its real-life Bobby Bureaus.

Bungled tradecraft?
How do I know it’s an FBI facility?  A simple web search confirmed it.

From my desk, I plugged the house’s street address into a commercial database that NBC and many media organizations use - legally, of course - to conduct public-records searches. In about 30 seconds, and for just about $2 in fees, I learned the names of three probable residents of the house.

One of the residents had helpfully provided his employer’s name. There it was in black and white: “Company: FBI.”

But that’s not all. Under the job-title section, this same FBI employee is described as “Clerk Really a Spy.” [I edited out his name, below.]

Holy Efrem Zimbalist, Jr!

My curiosity piqued, I called the FBI employee, a.k.a. “really a spy,” to ask about this apparent breach of basic tradecraft. He’s working now out of the FBI’s Memphis Field Office as a surveillance specialist, and didn’t seem thrilled with the call. He didn’t deny having lived at the D.C. house, but quickly passed me to his local FBI media representative. The FBI spokesman in Memphis told me he couldn’t comment, other than to inform me that the employee worked for the Bureau but not as a Special Agent.

In fairness to “really a spy,” he probably never intentionally listed his employer or his job title in the commercial database. Like most public-records databases, it likely just sucked up some application or paperwork the FBI employee had filled out years ago and now has saved it forever. Why he ever apparently joked that his job was “really a spy” is a separate issue.

The ease in identifying an FBI spyhouse and one of the Bureau’s counter-espionage employees is reminiscent of some investigative reporting done by the Chicago Tribune two years ago. Tribune reporter John Crewdson and a researcher revealed in their March 12, 2006, article that they had identified the locations of two dozen CIA safehouses and covert workplaces in the United States, plus the names of 2,600 CIA employees. Their trick? They had done a series of inexpensive, overlapping Internet searches, scooping up supposedly secret addresses from public-record databases.

The FBI would not comment on this story. But out of an abundance of caution, and on the advice of several senior U.S. officials, NBC News has decided not to reveal the address of the FBI house or to name the FBI employee. The officials caution that identifying the hapless employee and his former stakeout location could compromise future investigations. Even though many of the sources said it’s a certainty that officials at the nearby embassy “made” the FBI safehouse years ago, NBC News reasoned that we could tell this story without identifying the address, the employee or even the embassy in question.

I first made the FBI aware of this apparent tradecraft bungle more than a month ago. At last check, the G-Men hadn’t hidden the attic video cameras. And the commercial database still lists the FBI employee as “really a spy.”

All images in this post are courtesy of NBC News.

Comments

Oh, for crying out loud!  Rather than expound Doomsday theories about how the "liberal media" is killing Americans, how about we fire up both of those brain cells and think a moment.  

Cameras in attic skylight = danger to PFC Jones in Kabul.  HUH?  Let's see that logical link, pal!

While we're busy pointing fingers, let's point some at the US Navy for admitting that our subs used to tap into Soviet undersea telephone cables.  And the USAF for admitting the existence of the B-2 and F-117.  Now THERE'S a bunch of liberal traitors for ya!

As a side issue - if there is a "liberal media", then logically it implies the existence of a "non-liberal media".  What would that be?  "Non-liberal" = "conservative"...oh, I know!  "Conservative media"!  That would be Rush Limbaugh inciting voter fraud and encouraging criminal behavior (in between handfuls of his false-prescription, illegally obtained drugs), right?  

Can't ya'll stop being bipedal parrots and at least THINK before you start mouthing off buzzwords?
Great story.  Ignore the negative comments.  Journalists should do more stories like this that expose failures of the government.
You're ALL lost in the fabled "wilderness of mirrors", as James Angleton once said of the counterintelligence field. Just Google "Robert Philip Hanssen" - you'll see what I mean.
I know this really a spy, he's an idiot and his ego will cost many lives not to mention the reality of his traderdom...just another wananbe...reality, it took an idiot to hire really a spy...
When I worked in Russia, I knew where all their cameras were.
Those a HUGE clunky old cameras, with the technology available now, cameras are so small they cant barely be seen. Im positive they want these cameras seen, they probably arent on, its only obvious they want people to see the camera, the man who wrote this article needs to do some real reporting. This is a waste!
like the embassy didn't know they were under surveillance.this is humor. do you really think a spy would show up at the embassy? one would naturally assume the embassy phones were listened to, office was bugged, traffic was monitored. its been going on a long time. lighten up.
From the beginning of time in both the animal kingdom and human societies fear has been used to control and motivate the respective societies members.  Tribal, religious and political leaders subsequently discovered that lying to and about their enemies AND members of their own societal group was highly effective in achieving this goal.

For the many of you who just fell off of the turnip truck here's the 411:

Governments and politicians lie.  

Freedom of the press surpasses the Governments rights to perpetuate any conspiracy.

Having a common enemy (imagined or not) only temporarily detracts attention from the flaws already existing.

The truth shall set you free.
There is no such thing as common sense anymore.  The media and the PC police have made common sense
a thing of the past, Sadly
There's some of us out here that are glad the FBI guys/gals are out there.  We appreciate the work they do - most of the time without recognition.  They only seem to be noticed when they don't do everything perfectly.
I often amaze friends and family with the amount of personal information I can find on them online.  Mortgages, divorces, births, bankruptcies, etc.  It's out there if you learn how to creatively search.  There's no special skill involved.  Now I want to go to Live to see if I can find the place, hahaha.  
WHO YOU GONNA CALL?............................

not the FBI
To Mark: Obviously never been in hostile situations/areas? Sir,your assumptions have a lot in common with an alligator's mouth and a blue jay's a**. I for one would rather stand for the constitution than for any person. I believe that is what true patriotism is about.
What is really outrageous is the use of DOT (dept. of transportation) cameras along highways, freeways, bridges, traffic signals, etc. to track the movement of "suspicious persons" or other people that have working surveillance tracking their every move.  What's to say that someone, somewhere isn't tracking my movements - OR YOURS?!?!  (I better be careful what I type, after all BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING!)
Sounds to me like they're just collecting "just in case" intelligence. I'm guessing they are just streaming the footage elsewhere or have a couple of non-agent employees there to compile a timelog on movements into and out of the embassy.

I would hope that we have 24/7 footage on all foreign embassies as part of our intelligence/counter-intelligence efforts.
I'm having a hard time reading all these complaints (no it's not that I cannot read) it's the fact that if it was so easy for a reporter to get this info, to think our "enemies" are too stupid to obtain this same info and then some is really sticking your head in the sand. But, at the end of it all, if these safe houses have been so easy to find...then the people that are using those houses are the ones that pay when they are found...maybe something more should be done on the government level...as I said if a news reporter was easily able to get this info legally what can our "enemies" do illegally...After 9-11, I think it shows our "enemies" don't play by the rules
Nothing is perfect...government, citizens, employees and/or other people. Whatever view you have on the article, be happy you are able to read it, safely and without persecution for doing so. Be grateful you can express your opinion here. Make an effort to be respectful to and for those who are willing to lose everything so you may continue to enjoy the life you have. Think you can do better? Go after the job to protect people you'll never truly know and some you'll never meet. Run for office. At the very least vote.
This is sooo obvious. They have a real camera inside the fake camera. And they photograph people who are looking up, searching for cameras. There's your spies.
I like how the "commercial database that NBC and many media organizations use" includes SSN information.  Why are reporters entitled to have SSN's for anyone they choose for $2 per search?  

I don't know about those skylights, but some of the shingles on that roof could use some work...
Why report on this? Is it not the medias job to filter what they publish when in the interest of the security of our nation? Seems like the media, no matter who or where should find other stories.
"...possibly place an American in harms way by reporting our weaknesses..." Funny, very funny. Cold war funny.
As if this story was the first warning that the govt has heard. If someone won't listen to your whispers of warning, you need to shout. That's what NBC did, and they got ratings (and profit) out of it too. I bet you think that NBC's intelligence gathering is better than the government's enemies.
people, People, PEOPLE.  Please learn to proofread!
Cameras doing double duty - cheap deterrence. From what I've read, there are no secrets within the spy industry.
I find the logic employed by some of you "stupid liberal media" objectors to be laughably shortsighted and one-dimensional.

Try and follow basic, common sense logic a bit more down the line, past FBI secrets + news = liberal treason.  

Postulate that a group of terrorists are preparing for an attack on the United States.  These operations are not carefree, spur of the moment operations. The attacks on 9-11 were not instantly carried out.  Planning, document falsification, and HEAVY SITE RESEARCH were carried out.

The point of highlighting such intelligence weaknesses is that if a simple, low-intensity search by a curious citizen can unveil weaknesses, a determined scouring by a committed and well-funded militant certainly will as well.

True patriotism is analyzing weaknesses in government and working to repair and/or change them, not blinding feeing off the White House's droppings and jumping down the throat of anyone who points out that America's security infrastructure is hardly perfect.

Try thinking critically, instead of doing critically little thinking.

There is a line that should not be crossed when it comes to free speech.  If you give information that can be used by our enemies against us, you are a traitor.  This article provided information that may have not been previously considered by our muslim extremist brethren.  Mr. Popkin should be publicly flogged.
"loose lips sink ships"
Could be a mistake, could be real. has anyone ever heard of Counter-Intelligence?
Many Americans confuse patriotism with complicity. Citizens have a right to know if those in charge of natonal security are being complacent.
First:  the watched embassy most certainly knows about the "cameras"--and did before this article--as many have already stated.

Second:  the FBI intended for that embassy, or anyone else who noticed, to see the "cameras"--which as someone already said is old tech and probably non-operational.

Third:  those who have written comments about the liberal media and who have accused the author of giving away American secrets have failed to use their brains for something other than sitting on.  The FBI probably paid the author very well to publish this story.
They make me so confident in their Agency.  I feel so safe now.  Really.  lol
I just like looking at all of the grammatical errors people make when they get really upset. It kind of undermines people's arguments when they can't even speak their own language.
Most everyone, including the writer, seems to have missed the real story.

The real story is that in the age of the internet and public records databases, keeping information hidden or presenting a cover story is becoming more difficult all the time.

Spies have long had access to search this type of data, now reporters can as well.
Do all these people really believe our government is this inept? The best way to get a clean profile of someones face is to place a camera in the opposite direction so they will turn to face the real camera. If they were really crafty they would make this camera semi visible just to appear stupid. Get real, they are exposing exactly what they want seen and using an unwitting media to perpetuate the myth of incompetence and inform everyone they want to photograph to keep their backs to the stupid American spy cameras. Quit over thinking something that should be obvious to anyone who understands basic diversionary tactics and slight of hand. Regarding the medias patriotism, they are doing their part in disseminating disinformation for the FBI at no cost to the tax payers. Thanks Guys, keep up the good work!
What kills me here is that so many of you can not effectively speak or write. While you're spouting hatred, you cannot even write grammatically correctly. I see "to" in lieu of "too" and "your" when it should be "you're". And the spelling is atrocious. Get yourselves into an English class before you start spouting hatred in writing.
Whatever....I doubt they were trying to hide anything...why would they care if anyone knew they were keeping watch. You unveiled no secret,
oh yeah, the "enemies" check out msnbc daily, to get info...lol
I doubht this article help or hurt anyone. and I do believe our FBI is better than that. perhaps, it wasn't too important to be hidden, so they left it quite obvious.
Shhhhh.  Good Americans don't ask questions.
A company that I once worked for was the subject of an FBI surveillance. I knew because the FBI were driving standard issue unmarked cop cars stuffed with agents wearing the same cheap suits and sunglasses. Rather than hang back, they would follow in close proximity, occasionally coming up to the side and peering in when we hit traffic. I would turn to look at them, and they would quickly turn away their gaze. It was like playing hide-and-seek with a 3 year old. Absolute amateur hour.
You people should all get a life!!
If Everybody in America would mind their own danged business it would be a better place.
All of you  are looking for YOUR 15 minutes of fame and should do something constructive with your life,ME-I,m going to work!!
Love the comments.  I really hope this article was meant to be humerous.  Had to laugh at the "don't reveal our secrets" comments.  Also had to laugh at the author's "discovery".  I think the point of the cameras under the glass is to make them asthetically pleasing more than hidden.  Cameras on poles would clutter the neighborhood.  Hey Jim, next time you're at a gas station, look up.  You might find some "secret" cameras to report there too ;)
Completely useless information - again - Please stop treating the general public this poorly.  We understand the requirement for security.  We understand the flaws that occur with the scope and scale of maintaining that security.  Please provide meaningful data; not perceived sensationalism.  The time is coming (and moving at a more brisk pace than media conglomerates wish) where these current journalistic tactics will be completely rejected.  The resultant monetary implosion will finally force an information presentation based upon factual & unbiased information.  
HAHAHA- that is so bloody funny!!!!!! if you did the same thing in England, for example, it wouldn't have
Name: Joe Bloggs
Title: Spy
Company: MI5
it would be more like
Name: Joe Bloggs
Title: Manager
Company: Bob's Minicabs
and they would even have evidence of the cover story, e.g. they would use an actual private hire taxi, and it would make the cover story seem credible. But the FBI wont do that- they want the world to know who they are!!!!!!!!!
Loose lips sink ships, loose liberal leftist media destroy countries.  You liberal anti-American's wonder why our inttelligence services can't provide good intelligence?  Because every time the intel operations are compromised, the enemy makes changes or kills the agents recruited by US intel.  Why do you think it is so hard to get HUMINT sources in foreign countries, would you if you knew the US leftist/liberal media would give your name, address,phone number etc. to your enemies?
I can neither confirm nor deny that this surveillance is probably standard procedure since the "cold war" it is just a deterent to those liberal/leftist/terrorist within our country from sharing our senstive information with those countries.  Intelligence is a hard enough job, without letting the average "Joe" knowing everything.  Used to be classified info was on a "need to know" basis, however now adays due to people that wish to do us harm and liberal news groups and the Democrats force the agencies to expose operations.  You people that were in support of this exposing of a security facility, need to look at the bigger picture other than your "game boy".  One piece of the puzzle adds to the other pieces and before long hostile intelligence agents have the whole picture.  I after having my life dissected from the age of 18 and again every 5 to 7 yrs am the biggest privacy advocate, but, there are things that go on behind the scenes that the public does not have "the need to know".  contact the agency involved first and ask if they are aware of errors and get the story vetted before releasing it.  Chances are the idiot that wwrote the article would have been given a go ahead to release the story after the agency made changes or moved ops.

Maybe a story about the illegals(criminals) & terrorists crossing our borders, destroying our neighborhoods and weaking our country, would be better use of band width.
What's newsworthy about this story? I mean, apart from its clumsy attempt at "gotcha" journalism? There was no incident that precipitated it, so the sole intent of the story appears to be attacking the FBI and revealing information about the agency's operations to the general public.
This is "clubbing baby seals" type journalism.  Try doing something useful and informative for the community for once.  I agree with "Chris" from the posting yesterday; Find out the locations of some of the crack houses here in DC.  Expose some drug dealers, gang members, etc.
Give us an investigation that we can use.
Dear Sir,
You sir I consider a Tratior. You call yourself an American and yet you call out the FBI in the national news. I for one will now be taking NBC links off of my WIndows Vita side panel and will be sure to avoid NBC on the T.V. from now on.
the comments from everyone are much more entertaining that the actual story - thanks all
I found the article entertaining but it does concern me as to which side your on. The article didn’t reveal any new worthy information, other than to let everyone know that your willing to do about anything for a story.   Is this the first time that spy cameras outside an embassy was breaking news?  Did you stop to wonder for a moment why the cameras were placed there?  I’m not an investigative journalist, but I would have waited and continued to investigate to find out WHY the cameras were there rather than writing a new report that stated the obvious.  
This has got to be the most idiotic news story ever.
My, my, my.  It would appear that the Nixon era mentality is still with us.  As well as the J. Edgar mentality.  IE: dont't tell anyone what you know--because if you do you're un-American and a traitor.  Give it a break.  This is the US of A and we do still have freedom of the press.  And the press has better sense than to do what some White House officials' staff members have done--the press does NOT reveal names of active assets of Central Intelligence, nor the names of employees, other than those whose names are a matter of public record.  IDing a "spy house" is no big deal, nor is it a breach of any kind of trust.  If you want to get upset about something, then get upset about a White House that told a pack of lies to start another VietNam instead being bent out of shape about NBC and what stories they choose to publish.
Come on!  The US didn't win the cold war by employing idiotic tactics.  It should be obvious, even to reporters and the news media, that something we don't have the facts to evaluate is going on.
Amusing article.  Hopefully the cameras were meant to be seen but spooks being people who can say?  Based on chat room behavior I bet there's a good chance one or more of the "real life spies" posting is a cheeto eatin Tom Clancy reading nerd.


Send a comment

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

Your name, city and state (John Doe, Seattle, Wash.): 

Your e-mail address (jdoe@msnbc.com):

Your website (it's okay if you don't have one):

Remember me? (We'll keep it private)

About the blog

Deep Background is NBC News’ investigative blog. It covers national security, terrorism, spies, Iraq, and politics, as well as government waste, fraud and abuse. It is edited by NBC News Senior Investigative Producer Jim Popkin.

Archives


Browse by topic:

Add this blog to your news reader