The FBI's not-so-safehouse

Posted on Wednesday, March 26, 2008 1:59 PM ET
Filed Under:

By Jim Popkin, NBC News Senior Investigative Producer

On the FBI’s Kids’ Page Web site, young G-Men-in-training are urged to “go on an undercover assignment” to keep “Special Agent Bobby Bureau” from blowing his cover.

But on the mean streets of Washington, D.C., the FBI doesn’t always seem to practice what it preaches.

Take the house, pictured below, which is located directly across the street from the embassy of one of our former Cold War adversaries. Most of the time, the large skylights in the attic of the house appear opaque, as seen here:

Candid cameras
But in the late afternoon, when the sun sinks low, it shines through those skylights like a movie-theater searchlight. Even a 10-year-old gumshoe can see what’s hiding in the attic:


Behind the three skylights, tucked behind black fabric, are three video cameras. Their lenses are trained on the embassy across the street. Passersby on the sidewalk below can see the lenses sparkling in the sunlight, and so, presumably, can the former Cold Warriors just across the street.

It’s no surprise that there’s close surveillance of foreign embassies inside the U.S. The FBI employs hundreds of counter-intelligence agents and employees, to keep an eye on friends and foes alike. Journalists have reported on the surveillance programs for decades. Back in 1988, for example, author Ronald Kessler described in “Spy vs. Spy” how the FBI “takes photographs of everyone walking down the street in both directions in front of” selected foreign embassies to catch spies and potential traitors on camera. “Anyone walking near the embassy is on film,” Kessler wrote.

Nonetheless, you’d think the Bureau would be a little more careful about safeguarding its own safehouse, and not blowing the cover of its real-life Bobby Bureaus.

Bungled tradecraft?
How do I know it’s an FBI facility?  A simple web search confirmed it.

From my desk, I plugged the house’s street address into a commercial database that NBC and many media organizations use - legally, of course - to conduct public-records searches. In about 30 seconds, and for just about $2 in fees, I learned the names of three probable residents of the house.

One of the residents had helpfully provided his employer’s name. There it was in black and white: “Company: FBI.”

But that’s not all. Under the job-title section, this same FBI employee is described as “Clerk Really a Spy.” [I edited out his name, below.]

Holy Efrem Zimbalist, Jr!

My curiosity piqued, I called the FBI employee, a.k.a. “really a spy,” to ask about this apparent breach of basic tradecraft. He’s working now out of the FBI’s Memphis Field Office as a surveillance specialist, and didn’t seem thrilled with the call. He didn’t deny having lived at the D.C. house, but quickly passed me to his local FBI media representative. The FBI spokesman in Memphis told me he couldn’t comment, other than to inform me that the employee worked for the Bureau but not as a Special Agent.

In fairness to “really a spy,” he probably never intentionally listed his employer or his job title in the commercial database. Like most public-records databases, it likely just sucked up some application or paperwork the FBI employee had filled out years ago and now has saved it forever. Why he ever apparently joked that his job was “really a spy” is a separate issue.

The ease in identifying an FBI spyhouse and one of the Bureau’s counter-espionage employees is reminiscent of some investigative reporting done by the Chicago Tribune two years ago. Tribune reporter John Crewdson and a researcher revealed in their March 12, 2006, article that they had identified the locations of two dozen CIA safehouses and covert workplaces in the United States, plus the names of 2,600 CIA employees. Their trick? They had done a series of inexpensive, overlapping Internet searches, scooping up supposedly secret addresses from public-record databases.

The FBI would not comment on this story. But out of an abundance of caution, and on the advice of several senior U.S. officials, NBC News has decided not to reveal the address of the FBI house or to name the FBI employee. The officials caution that identifying the hapless employee and his former stakeout location could compromise future investigations. Even though many of the sources said it’s a certainty that officials at the nearby embassy “made” the FBI safehouse years ago, NBC News reasoned that we could tell this story without identifying the address, the employee or even the embassy in question.

I first made the FBI aware of this apparent tradecraft bungle more than a month ago. At last check, the G-Men hadn’t hidden the attic video cameras. And the commercial database still lists the FBI employee as “really a spy.”

All images in this post are courtesy of NBC News.

Comments

Our tax dollars at work.
Nice work.  You probably just uncovered one the exact locations they wanted you to uncover.  They are probably laughing their Azzes off right now at this article.

The only thing you found is exactly what they wanted you to find.

Funny!
I thought this was very funny.
Several years ago, the FBI was conducting anti-drug surveilance from my father's rural farm.  Imagine this:  An obvious gov't car parked in a 5 acre field and a guy in a suit crouched behind a fence and looking through binoculars across the highway.  Not too subtle as he was visible from the highway.  They also attempted to put a dummy electric transformer, containing a camera, on a power pole but messed up another neighbors driveway.  When accosted by the neighbor, who wanted the "power company" to fix the damage, they first attempted to drive away and then sheepishly identified themselves as fbi.

And then we wonder why terrorists beat our systems and defenses. The truth is that the agents are just people who do the same job day after day, no different than any other person. Tell me that you don't become lackadaisical in your day to day job. We expect the federal government and specifically FBI/CIA to be super human and not fall into the pitfalls of "normal man".
Didn't the FBI report to AG Alberto Gonzalez and now Michael Mukasey? Don't they report to W. Bush?

Regardless how good rank and file are, organizations are run top down and reflect the attributes of their bosses such as incompetence, arrogance, dishonesty, etc. Should we say more? if not for that your report and that of the Chicago Tribune would never have been possible.
that is really cool
No wonder why NBc ghas the lowest ratings of any network for news.  People don't like traitors.
These people are either naturally stupid, or their brains got hijacked!!!These people(FBI) are supposed to protect us???? Yeah,sure!!!!
The obvious cameras / Safe-house are simply a diversion for the actual surveillance. One would have to asume~
Mr. Popkin: Thanks for your somewhat enlightening but mostly humorous article here.  Don't be surprised if your house is soon decorated with such cameras sprouting from a neighbor's home or perhaps a parked van with blacked out windows! Back in the early 1980s my wife was trailed by the same 4 men in a taxi wherever she went in Pinochet's Chile. The use of visible spies is meant to threaten and harass, not to really gain any secret information.  I have no reason to believe that Pinochet's thugs hadn't been trained by J.Edgar Hoover's FBI.  
What good does telling this story to the country do?  Fine, do some investigating and inform these agancies of the information found, but informing the rest of society is not necessary.  Leave it to the liberal media to inform our enemies of our every move and any weakness our country may have.  Sure, it may not have been to hard to find with a little research, but why annouce any findings to the world?
That the U.S. government has surveillance cameras trained on foreign embassies is certainly NOT secret to anyone, including the subject embassy.  It is the very intention of the FBI for the cameras to be noticed.

The FBI would not conduct surveillance from a safehouse.  Quite probably the author doesn't know what the term implies.  How this article qualifies as newsworthy is obviously questionable.
What is the best way to hide.  In veiw of everyone.  When your looking at that house with the camras, thsy could be behind you, looking at you.   Hmmmmm ?
That's hilarious.  No wonder the Russian mafia and other assorted terrorist organizations laugh at our "justice system".  To them we are nothing more than the Keystone Kops
in plain sight, cameras appear to be late 80's
early 90's models. they may not even work.
although funny im sure the real stuff is well
hidden.
Ya know? for the past few years, I've seen reports like this, and others detailing troop deployment to hot spots around the world, exposes of Cia houses, and FBI operations.. etc etc etc..

If this was WWII, you and your company would be in really hot water right now.

Whether or not the embassy in question knew it, I'm sure that if they didn't, (even though doubtfull that it didn't), THEY DO NOW!!!

And the poor scmuck that did the "really a spy thing", is probably in rather warm if not very hot water now.

Good job MSNBC...   NOT!!!!

Whatever happened to real patriotism??
You DON'T give away american secrets, even if a simple internet search and a couple of dollars will give you that info anyway.

I just don't understand how a lot of so called Americans think any more.

Is this the work of a "Senior Investigative Producer"? (yawn)...zzzzzz...news business must really be slow.  How 'bout turning that "steel trap" investigative mind and resource base on identifying the local crack houses, meth labs, opium parlors, etal.  If you're going to 'make noise', how 'bout making a contribution with it!
That is the oldest trick in the book. I mean didn't you guys ever even watch Columbo. But then again you are journalists and to quote one of your own.

"We journalists make it a point to know very little about an extremely wide variety of topics; this is how we stay objective."---Dave Barry

Objective is one word, ignorance is a better one.
Well... Give it 6 months and his job description will probably be finally updated. It should read something along the lines of... Clerk... really a janitor now.
That Washington D.C. house, in all likelihood, is conducting video surveillance of the embassy, not providing a "safe house" for someone who needs to be hidden for awhile.

Safe houses are more likely to be located in suburbs or remote areas with little public access, not on Embassy Row.

Besides cameras, there is probably electronic remote tapping and targeted sound gathering.  Much more goes on during intelligence gathering than is visible or known to the public.

Of course embassy security personnel know the game and have multiple devices to try to block FBI efforts. Jim Popkin, the article's author, certainly did not reveal anything unknown to diplomatic personnel and staff.  

Remember that many of the embassy employees also have a mission to collect useful information about us, our economy, politics, and elected or selected public figures, etc.  

Remember:  Intelligence (spying) is the world's second oldest profession.
Unreal.. hostile, silly people. I cannot imagine what it must be like to walk around being so paranoid and bitter. I'll bet you see so many things everyday that make you angry. "Liberal media", "traitors". Plots all around you. Why don't you gather up the family and move down to your fallout shelter. Good lord.
As a once long time resident of the DC area, it's "common knowlege" that the areas around the embasies, specifically the one cited in the article, are under constant heavy and obvious survailance... The residents of the area and the Embasy being watched know it and have for decades, Doesn't anyone remember when this same embasy was discovered to be infested with all manner of "bugs"??? and I don't mean roaches!  A maxum of survailance is let them see what you want them to see but keep hidden what you desire hidden... anyone think deeper into what is not as obvious as cameras in an attic??  Perhaps the FBI is not so clumsy as depicted...
Grow up, nobody gave away any secrets, no new information was revealed, and to the idiot who said the cameras were late 80's or early 90's, get out of your mom's basement and get a job, you don't know that.  It has been common knowledge for 30 years that we watch our friends and enemies.  If you were to stupid to pick up a newspaper in the last 3 decades and read about it, then your just plain ignorant.
yea right..sheeeshhh

the people in/of the "embassy of one of our former Cold War adversaries"... knew about this stuff probably before it was installed...

DOH..

The government at work, nothing new.
"Whatever happened to real patriotism??
You DON'T give away american secrets, even if a simple internet search and a couple of dollars will give you that info anyway.

I just don't understand how a lot of so called Americans think any more. "

I completely agree, and even as a "liberal" who is a little skeptical of certain agencies, just throwing info like this out for the petty sake of a news story is just ridiculous! and in no way warrants any appraise. Even if it is publicly accessible doesn't mean most people here should be informed about it. Whether it was a front or the real thing, I am sure there was a reason why the public wasn't aware of it, and if someone of the public were to find out about it alone, then let them find out about it alone we don't need news stories like this haha. This is just as important to the public and just as stupid as some magazine believing that the public "just has to know!" where Lindsay Lohan was drinking last night, sheesh! That's the problem we "don't think" anymore, the media became irrelevant and not worthy back when journalists and reporters started trying to become stars instead of just journalists and reporters.
In 1966 I visited the Russian Embassy in DC to obtain visas for a group of journalists visiting Moscow. Two months later I was called to FBI headquarters in DC for questioning. The FBI had traced my car license plate but contacted me at my office in the Department of Commerce. They then tried to recruit me as an agent!

Old news.
For some people, who don't think the government is responsible for some imagined conspiracy, this is good news. The FBI is as human as the people who work there and they screw up things about as often as the rest of us humans. If things seem "too weird to be true" they probably aren't.
Got to laugh at the collective of IDIOTS who blame NBC for uncovering what wasn't "hidden" all that well.

I have no doubt that they THOUGHT they were "covered" , but didn't THINK about it.  Typical gummint mentality We don't CARE - we DON'T NEED TO.

Typical response by some - "SHOOT THE MESSENGER!!"
Sounds like business as usual at any govenment agency. Just do the task, in this case spying, don't worry about the quality of work if any work is being done at all. Do we even know if the tapes were even looked at? I would guess NO!
Now this is a funny story!  To the Super-Patriots out there this story is not from a traitor, but from someone reporting an interesting article that was informative. Yelling traitor at a newsperson is a way you all try and censor freedom of the press. Think about it commies (returns the name calling).
I love just reading the comments on the article.  So, everyone here watches a few crime drama's and they are all suddenly experts on the FBI and CIA?  "Safe houses are more likely to be located in suburbs or remote areas with little public access, not on Embassy Row." Really?  How many of you have actually worked for the FBI or CIA? . . . I'm betting none of you. The best comment had to be "The only thing you found is exactly what they wanted you to find."  Ohhh, does that give anyone else chills?  Didn't think so.  

I think this article was written to be amusing and also to poke fun at the Spooks.  We all need a laugh at their expense once in a while right?  So, everyone, just lighten up a bit.  And what's with this guy? "People don't like traitors."  Maybe that was supposed to be funny . . . Ha ha
First of all you really don't give the FBI credit.  If I was going to spy on another country or possibly weed out the spies and traders I would use a decoy house/building, conceal its purpose and technology to a point were the obvious is gone. Once they think they found our hiding spot facing the front door they begin to feel safe going in the side door because they know the cameras we have up can see them.  Now you setup your real high-tech surveillance in the direction they feel more comfortable and lax.
Dumb...dumb...dumb...dumb...(think Dragnet, or some other spy theme)
I really worry about the state of our union when voters are so naïve that they believe our politicians haven’t been spying on everyone since the 50’s. The only time we are actually informed about the spy technology our government uses is when it has been retired and newer technology has replaced it. We were told about the U-2 after it was replaced by the SR-71, and then informed about the SR-71 when it was replaced by newer stealth technology. If something is so oblivious that people walking by can see it then they must want people to know, otherwise it would still be a well kept secret.
My point is that since the cameras were visible to the foreign embassy and everyone else passing by, and the information was available to anyone with an internet connection, nothing was “outed” by this article, unlike the “outing” of Valerie Plame!
Aye comrade, suppress your press and talk down anyone who dares to bring attention to government stupidity, corruption, ignorance or shame and we shall reward you with your very own dacha by the great salt lake in Utah when we take over your corrupt institutions of Amerika.  
"Leave it to the liberal media to inform our enemies of our every move and any weakness our country may have.  Sure, it may not have been to hard to find with a little research, but why annouce any findings to the world? "

Oh yeah, our "enemies" (despire the fact they have embassies in this country) are so stupid they couldn't or wouldn't figure this out.

There are two points in releasing this information.  1) Ratings.  That's how ALL news generates revenue...  2) Because had they simply informed the government, it's most likely that nothing would have been for at least 10 years.

Not to mention that putting a news story about such a thing and calling the reporters traitors is like saying Lou Dobbs is a traitor for his "Broken Border" series.

As far as the FBI being discreet, please.  Back in 1995, I used to go Crystal City Mall to attend 2600 Club meetings.  It really didn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that the "mall shoppers" with dark glasses and hats and wigs flashing pictures with miniature cameras were the FBI.  
FBI is a joke. I called Boston field office months ago and began conversation by saying I had truly hard evidence about 2001 anthrax attack. FBI receptionist cut me off, said I could not possibly have such information, and hung up on me. I had hardly said a word. I called NYC anti-terrorist phone line. Same result. This is how FBI fights terrorism?
I am a retired military member who has studied and lectured on the subjects of SIGSEC (Signals Security and COMSEC (Communications Security). Our mission was to inform servicemembers and at times family members (unclassifed versions)of the importance of not disclosing ANY information that had the POTENTIAL of revealing unit movements, strengths,weaknesses...etc. This is to deny our enemies any piece to the puzzle. Thanks for handing over a piece. I'm sure your conscience is clear. What say you make yourself really useful and locate Bin Laden or other major players in the terror network and help the rest of the world out???.....OH my Bad...it's easier to help them and not place yourself in danger, but rather possibly place an American in harms way by reporting our weaknesses. Thanks  
wow so many upset people.  if it is really that easy to find out info then it should be printed.  and if it is that easy for a reporter to find out that info then don't you think a terrorist organization or another government would have better tools to find the info.  i like this republican brand of thinking.  anything negative that is said or printed about this country comes from someone who is a traitor and unpatriotic.  hey maybe the reported loves this country so much he is trying to expose problems so they can be fixed.  anyone ever think of that
To "Not a spy":  You lost your bet.  At least one of the posters above IS or HAS BEEN a spy of a government agency. His/her info is NOT from crime dramas, but real spy life.  This poster obviously does not identify him/herself as being "in the business" because he/she knows how to be discreet.  

Intelligence officers love to read articles about their tradecraft, so this article and blog is certainly being read by them... and laughed at for the writer's ignorance or humor.
I am laughing harder at those who comment how revealing flaws in our government system is unamerican and how NBC news is a bunch of traitors than at the findings themselves.
All you people complaining about "liberal media" and their exposing all our little secrect really need to pull their head out. I mean really, since when did we become a police state? Boo hooo your giving the ememy things to use against us. Grow up, get a brain and perhaps even use it. I think there still is freedom of speech left in our country. I wish they would publish more, about all our corrupt government, torture and corporate scams that seem to be going on. All I see is the freaks saying crap like this "Whatever happened to real patriotism??
You DON'T give away american secrets, even if a simple internet search and a couple of dollars will give you that info anyway."
Being a patriot is not that, it is caring for your country, and that includes speaking out against wrongs.
exactly, i mean come on
if they really didnt want you to see it then you would not be able to see it
this was clearly ment to be found
I'm not saying revealing information is "unamerican". I'm saying that common sense needs to come into play when "exposing" flaws. I'm positive that those who have commented that it's basically "OK" to give up Info that can potentially place those who work to keep our nation and it's citizens safe (military,FBI,CIA...) obviously have never been in hostile situations/areas and don't really care about their safety.
yeah of course you guys don't put up my last spread because I pointed the media out on things like this.  Keep your mouths shut.
To Someone, Somewhere....
You obviously have not spent a lot of time with your eyes open recently. American citizens are being detained, when moving from one piece of American soil to another piece, through American waters, by the U.S. Border Patrol, questioned, and made to provide identification, and to give reason for their travels. Does that sound like Nazi Germany to you? Look into it... Washington State ferry systems are doing this now. Not to mention the limitless wiretaps, data incursions, and packet sniffing going on under the guise of Homeland Security.  
Sounds like a tongue in cheek joke between the employees at the Embassy ad the FBI .... give me a break.. they would not use a damn camera pointed at such an angle ... whats it supposed to catch ... whatever happens to be in the line of sight?
What do you really gain by posting this story. So you can see the camera, big deal. There are a lot of other important stories worth printing. Why try and disrupt the lives of hard working Americans trying to keep the country safe from those trying to steal our secrets and harm the United States. Now granted the guy is an idiot for putting "really a spy" on anything. This guy is in the wrong line of work. They teach you discretion from day one in this type of work and this guy did not get the memo. I think sending him to Memphis is worse then firing him. That place is horrible.


Send a comment

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

Your name, city and state (John Doe, Seattle, Wash.): 

Your e-mail address (jdoe@msnbc.com):

Your website (it's okay if you don't have one):

Remember me? (We'll keep it private)

About the blog

Deep Background is NBC News’ investigative blog. It covers national security, terrorism, spies, Iraq, and politics, as well as government waste, fraud and abuse. It is edited by NBC News Senior Investigative Producer Jim Popkin.

Archives


Browse by topic:

Add this blog to your news reader