Sen. Craig receives mildest form of punishment

Posted on Wednesday, February 13, 2008 8:40 PM ET
Filed Under:

By Pete Williams, NBC News Justice Correspondent

The U.S. Senate's ethics committee seems to have been more concerned with what Senator Larry Craig did after his arrest in an airport bathroom in June 2007 than with the conduct itself that led to the arrest.

In its "Public Letter of Admonition," addressed to Sen. Craig and released Wednesday night, the committee reviewed the airport incident but did not characterize how it reflected on his Senate colleagues. Instead, the bulk of the letter dealt with what he did in response to his arrest.

The letter noted that Craig gave his business card to the policeman who began an interrogation of the senator at another location in the airport. Craig asked, "What do you think about that?" The Committee concluded that "a reasonable person ... could view your action and statement as an improper attempt by you to use your position and status as a United States Senator to receive special and favorable treatment."

The committee said it did not believe Craig's claim that he wanted to withdraw his plea because he didn't know what he was doing when he entered it. Instead, the committee said trying to withdraw his plea amounted to trying to evade the legal consequences of what he did. "It is a course that a United States Senator should not take," the letter said.

And finally, the committee noted that Sen. Craig has spent over $213,000 from his campaign funds to pay legal fees. The committee said that sort of thing can be done, but only after asking for the Senate's permission, which Craig didn't do.

This decision to admonish Sen. Craig publicly is not the least the committee could have done: it could have simply let the matter drop. But this is the mildest form of public punishment. Some senators in the past have been "severely admonished." And the committee could even have referred this to the full Senate, which can censure and even expel a senator.

"While I am disappointed and strongly disagree with the conclusions reached by the Senate Ethics Committee, from the outset I have encouraged the committee to act in a timely fashion and they have done so. I will continue to serve the people of Idaho," Craig said in a brief statement Wednesday night.

The letter ended the Ethics Committee's handling of the case. Sen. Craig is still seeking to withdraw his guilty plea, and issue that is pending in the Minnesota Court of Appeals.

Click here to see the full PDF of the committee's letter to Craig.

Comments

BEGIN IMPEACHMENT OF LARRY CRAIG -- HE HAS DISGRACED THE OFFICE OF THE U.S. SENATE
Now we know why the Senate voted for retroactive immunity for the telecoms in the warrantless wiretapping scandal:  they won't even police their own.  

It's time to start working on term limits.  Congress has become a too-cushy job rather than the service to one's country that it was intended to be by the founders of this country.  When congresspeople whine about having to work the same hours as thee and me and ignore their duty to uphold the Constitution, stand firm against lawlessness, and devolve into mere toadies for corporate interests, it's time for a change.
Senator craig should be expelled for trying to bully his way out of trouble.  That is not the kind of behavior our officials should have.
I think Sen. Craig is still not telling the truth about this ordeal.  Just think about it...if you were minding your own business in a public restroom stall and not breaking any laws, and somebody flashed a police badge under the stall divider, why would you suddenly exclaim NO! NO! as Sen. Craig did?  If you are completely innocent, then should'nt your reaction to seeing the officers badge be of a curious nature and not of a defiant nature?  Sen. Craig is playing everyone for a fool.
OMG !  He does this thing and then pays the legal fees out of his campaign funds.  That is where the special treatment begins.  Had I found myself in the same situation I could have gone broke representing myself !  The average person certainly could not afford to appeal to the state level to withdraw his guilty plea.  And c'mon,  this guy is too smart not to have known what he was doing when he entered that guilty plea.  And then there is the human issue.  Society forced this man to marry a woman.  Then the misery is spread to an innocent wife who thought she was getting a heterosexual husband.  A family with deep issues and a man who is full of self hatred,  constantly fighting against his own spirit.  Let's learn from this.  In a perfect world this man would have never married and everyone would accept and love him,  after all he is the way God made him.  The people who seem to talk about God the most seem to be able to hate and judge the most.  How ironic.  I claim no certain religion by my soul tells me to love and accept-it is what feels right, but im viewed as left. Pun intended.
I support Senator Craig and his fight to clear his name. What did the Senator do to indicate that his intent was to have sex- just becaus ehe tapped his foot, reached down and picked up paper, these are not indicators. The officer acted to soon and should of waited until there was a more clear cut proof or used video or something to record the event. Then there would be no question.
The fact that a representative of the people of the United States was caught in a criminal act did not even enter the picture. Should this admonishment at least have taken this into consideration? That even if found innocent, he should never have been in such a situation to begin with? Especially if he was on government business at the time?
Sen Craig should be honest about everything, the public is most likely to forgive him for that, but he seems to be digging a bigger hole for himself every day.
Using $ from the campain fund to cover his actions is outrages.
I apologize to all my fellow constitutents for voting for this fraud.  He is dishonest to the core.  Now paying his PERSONAL fines for his misconduct from campaign funds in my opinion is unconscionable.  He is too arrogant to consider resigning so I believe he should simply be impeached. He is a disgrace to the office of senator.  
THE SLAP ON THE WRIST TO CRAIG ID SIMILAR TO BARNEY FRANKS INCIDENT WITH AN AIDE.POLITICIANS PROTECT THEIR OWN. THEY ARE RARELY HELD ACCOUNTABLE IN COMPARISION TO REGULAR CITIZENS.
this is the old style senate politics.craig should be fired,stripped of all entitlements and this for any politician or government offical,to much dirty politics


Send a comment

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

Your name, city and state (John Doe, Seattle, Wash.): 

Your e-mail address (jdoe@msnbc.com):

Your website (it's okay if you don't have one):

Remember me? (We'll keep it private)

About the blog

Deep Background is NBC News’ investigative blog. It covers national security, terrorism, spies, Iraq, and politics, as well as government waste, fraud and abuse. It is edited by NBC News Senior Investigative Producer Jim Popkin.

Archives


Browse by topic:
Browse by date:

Add this blog to your news reader