CIA reveals more on waterboarding

Posted on Tuesday, February 05, 2008 1:22 PM ET
By Pete Williams, NBC News Justice Correspondent


The director of the CIA today gave the most extensive public accounting yet of the use of coercive interrogation methods, including waterboarding, and strongly urged Congress not to limit the range of methods available to U.S. intelligence agencies.

CIA director Michael Hayden told a Senate hearing that fewer than 100 people have been held by the CIA in its terrorist detention program. And of those, fewer than one-third were subjected to enhanced interrogation methods, he said.

Waterboarding admissions:
As for the controversial practice of waterboarding, Hayden told the senators it was used on only three people more than five years ago. For the first time, he named them in public - Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Abu Zubaydah, and Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, all accused of being al-Qaida leaders.

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, known to the intelligence community as "KSM," was one of the main architects of the Sept. 11 terror attacks. Abu Zubaydah was believed to have been al-Qaida's top military strategist. And Al-Nashiri is believed to have been the main planner of the USS Cole bombing and al-Qaida's head of operations in the Persian Gulf.

Hayden says waterboarding was used "because of the circumstances of the time - the belief that additional catastrophic attacks were imminent at a time when the US had limited knowledge of how al-Qaida worked." All three of the men who were waterboarded are currently imprisoned at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

If additional limits are placed on the CIA's interrogation rules, Hayden said, "We will play to the edges of the box that the political process gives us.  Otherwise, we wouldn't be protecting America, though we may be protecting ourselves."
 
But whatever restrictions are imposed, he said, "We should not expect our operatives in the field to play outside the box when we enter a new period of threat.  There will be no exceptions.  There's no wink and a nod here." Hayden's own view, he said, is that the CIA should not be further limited in what interrogation techniques are permitted.

Congress is considering a bill that would restrict the CIA to only those methods authorized by the U.S. Army's field manual for interrogation. Hayden said that would make no sense.  The Army's interrogators are young people with limited training, while the CIA's interrogators are highly trained. The Army interrogates a broad range of people, while the CIA's program is tailored to a specific group of terrorists, he said. It would make no more sense to apply the Army's interrogation manual to the CIA than it would to apply the Army's grooming standards or its rules on sexual orientation, Hayden said.

Worldwide threat:
Though al-Qaida remains a worldwide threat, its global image is beginning to lose some of its luster, Director of National Intelligence, Mike McConnell, also said Tuesday at the intelligence community's annual threat assessment to the Senate. Nonetheless, McConnell said that "as we inflict significant damage on al-Qaida in Iraq, it may shift resources to mounting more attacks outside Iraq." So far, its terror export attempts are modest: Fewer than 100 terrorists from Iraq have left the country to establish cells elsewhere, he added.

On Iran, McConnell said the U.S. remains concerned about Iran's nuclear intentions.  The intelligence community assesses "with moderate-to-high confidence that Tehran at a minimum is keeping open the option to develop nuclear weapons," he said. It's still working on enriching uranium and developing ballistic missiles, both of which would be useful if it decides to move ahead on nuclear weapons. The earliest Iran would be technically capable of producing enough highly enriched uranium for a weapon is late 2009, but that's very unlikely, McConnell said. More likely that date would be sometime between 2010 and 2015, he added.

Both McConnell and military intelligence officials said that despite the death or capture of three top leaders of the Taliban last year, its insurgent forces have expanded into previously peaceful areas of the west and around Kabul.

Comments

It does not matter that waterboarding is effective, or that our enemies will do the same & worse to us.  What matters is that waterboarding is wrong.  If we use this technique to gain information, we do not deserve the victory we seek over our enemies.  God is not on our side when we choose the path of evil just because it is effective.  What goes around comes around, sometimes with a vengeance.
I have mixed thoughts and feelings about water boarding (or other types) to gain information. For instance, under physical duress, would a person admit to just about anything being asked in order to subdue the pain? The answer would obviously be a yes. So what would be the net gain?
When you torture, you show no regard for human life!  

If you're all caught up in the fear/hysteria/security thing, then nobody can change your mind.  

If not then pay close attention.  If Americans tortures the world, then the world has the right to torture Americans.

It is plain and simple, no debate.  

So when the next American is beheaded after being tortured for a month, don't get upset.  Just say to yourself "all is fair in love and war".
Just remember, there might be children somewhere in the world who might know something. Shouldn't we let bush torture them to death to make sure they tell us everything? If he doesn't torture them to death, maybe there was something they didn't tell us. Yes, Bush needs the right to kill innocent men, women and children all over the world so he can feel safe. Doesn't that make him safer after all?
Water boarding was a common training technique used by the military.  I was water boarded in 1977 during NAVY SERE training. If you hate Bush and the CIA then demand they be tried, I will be the first to press charges against Jimmy Carter for allowing me to be tortured by the US Government.  Jimmy Carter is a WAR Criminal just like Bush! Jimmy Carter relished torturing me. Prosecute the war criminal Carter. I'm sure it happened under the Clinton's too! Hang all of the War criminals. Get Real, the people in the CIA are doing the best they can under extremely difficult circumstances and you haters ought to move to France or learn the truth before you cast stones!  
Lies, lies, and more lies. Our government tells us we don't torture. Now it admits we do. How come this article doesn't emphasize or even point out the discrepancy/hypocrisy? So, now we are to believe they are coming completely clean, that it was only three and all done several years ago? What about those subjected, such as the innocent Canadian, to illegal renditions to other countries, where we outsourced the despicable acts we didn't wish to be associated with? What is the basis for trust, since it has clearly not been earned?

For those whose testosterone overload and/or overblown fears impair rational, objective thought, it should be pointed out that--contrary to Hayden's assertions--a number of highly skilled and trained interrogators from different branches of government all agree that torture is not only immoral, but counter-productive to intelligence gathering, as well as to furthering our ideals and goals. It should also be obvious that condoning, tolerating, or committing such atrocities has the net effect of decreasing everyone's security.

Moreover, there is never any absolute guarantee of security--that is only an illusion the current administration seeks to fabricate with their fear-mongering. That disingenuous Chicken Little gambit is used mostly as a means to gain political advantage, putting us all at greater risk, and should be rejected outright.

We can courageously stand up for what is moral and right, accepting the accompanying risks as our illustrious forefathers have done, or we can cowardly forfeit our integrity, and follow Bush and Co. down the dark path into hell. Your choice.
Have you forgotten?
All those who oppose aggressive tactics to save American lives and soldiers should be allowed to go over, have tea, and discuss it with those who have this "dislike" for our culture.
Each time someone says that torture in any form is wrong, they should be shown a picture of the four contractors who were hanged on the bridge in Bagdad and burned!  The thing we need to do is STOP CASTRATING the American male in every sense of th word, and raise up some warriers.  If we keep apologizing for everything, we are going to be the ones protesting our own maltreatment.  Simper Fi, WHO-HA!!!
The problem is, government as we know it distorts the very fabric that separates the human race from the rest of the animals on earth. All animals fight, but only humans can choose there destiny.
send all the tree hugging librals over to live and exprience what our troops are going through and seeing and see how their oppinions change. When the vehicle your friends and fellow soldiers' were in is nothing but a frame and a egine block, see what you think.
There are several people who allude to "other ways to get the information" without torture.  Please illucidate what those techniques might be and how effective you think they would be against a hardened terrorist that would like to cut your head off.  Slightly more effective than waterboarding would be forcing them to spend a month in a confined cell with Hillary....Oh, I guess that would be torture, too.
To all you liberal cry babies who think that we are playing some kind of game with terrorizm.  Please move to some pacifist country where critizing our goverment is common place until, of course, you need our protection and the blood of our sisters and brothers to free you from tyranny.  You should be ashamed to call yourself an American!
It amazes me the terminology used to sanitize what people do. Enhanced interrogation, is nothing more than a sanitized term for torture. Torture is wrong for many reasons, one of them being...it doesn't work! If you are being tortured, you will say what ever it takes to stop it. A good example is the tortured confession of the Auschwitz commandant Hoess, he confessed to the murder of 4.1 million, he confessed to the manufacture of human soap, human lampshades, and many other tales, which have now been proven without a doubt to be false. Torture is wrong...period. If you are one that thinks it's ok, you better hope it doesn't happen to you.
excuse me "i'm right yet wrong," are you comparing american vet's to terrorists?
Have any of you against this waterboarding technique forgetting that we are doing this to the terrorists who attacked our country and killed thousands? Have you forgotten we are doing this to the terrorists our country is fighting against out in the middle east? Are you forgetting that we are doing this to terrorists who would do so much worse in return, and have (example: beheading).
In a normal war, one country against another, at least following the Geneva Conventions, then it would be wrong...but this is SO different.
I am boggled as to how some cannot see that!!!!! THINK ABOUT ITTTTTTTT....if the information is keeping thousands..maybe hundreds of thousands, hell, the whole country safe from evil harm, then so BE IT!
The problem is, government as we know it distorts the very fabric that separates the human race from the rest of the animals on earth. All animals fight, but only humans can choose their destiny.
You tree hugging liberals make me sick, you would give this country away in a New York minute.  I love my country and have served my country for over 20 years in the military.  If we require information from known terrorists to  protect our homeland then let it be so.  I don't care if we have to pull fingernails, chop of fingers and whatever else, if that will protect my country and my loved ones then let's do it.
I'm in the column that believes this is war and we need to do whatever it takes to win.  The age of civility in warfare is long past, witness our own Revolution.  There is no such thing as a "Nice" war.  The object is to win, period, to stamp out Islamic Fascism utterly and finally. We ought to do whatever is necessary to make sure we do so because our enemy certainly will, and our very survival is at stake.  All this high minded crap reminds me of that nonsense my mother told me as a kid, "Don't stoop to their level."  A lot of good that did me when my eye was blackened.
Sorry,but I can't find a smidgeon of sympathy for these animals..fruuunkus..
I read all these comments and I can't help but wonder, what our nation would be like if we allowed other nations to rule our country. Picture this people your wife or daughter goes to the store and forgets to cover her hair, so she is stoned to death, or it's hot and they have on a tank top so they are arrested for showing too much skin in public. That is a reality for women in the middle-east. Think before you speak, we as AMERICANS are the luckiest poeple in the world our freedom comes at a price.
Hey Fili, in Utah...We are NOT rabbits!
how naive and gullible to the malarky thats oozes from the real criminal element in America and promulgated by the news agencies...America has been exporting terrorism and torture for years, along with the other international criminals, just a few to mention; China, Israel, the former South American dictatorships (weren't they trained by the CIA & Cuban exiles-namely the school in Panama, so much for JFK's image, South Africa, France, etc, etc. etc. The reason why they are so "open" about waterboarding?... because they got away with it and will now and in the future. Habeas corpus out the window, torture now can be done out of the closet. Wake up America before its too late, tomorrow it will be me and you and they'll be another rationalization.
Which of the two statements carries more or less value? We're honest American's because we do everything possible to keep our citizens safe(Waterboarding)?

Or, are we honest American's because we let terrorists hold "possible time-sensitive" information that could kill our citizens or troops because we're afraid of being dishonest with ourselves?

The definitive word is honesty. How honest are we if we let terrorists plot against us? The obvious pro-active, pre-emptive and honest move to protect our citizens is waterboarding. Nonetheless, waterboarding is a typical government decision. Very many, if not all, government decisions are not "honest". Typically, the decisions that are made at the government level are "lesser of two evil type decisions".

Consequently, waterboarding is a no-brainer and I would prefer America staying a competitive nation than a nation that doesn't stay on a competitive level with our adversaries it it keeps American citizens way ahead of danger. How honest can we be if we let terrorists off the hook?
FOR THOSE PEOPLE WHO ARE ASHAMED TO BE AMERCIAN MOVE OUT TO ANOTHER COUNTRY!!!!!!
KSM orchestrtes attacks that kill 3000 Americans and there is such an uproar about waterboarding 3 people?  Give me a break!
You can not negotiate with terrorists, extremists, radicals, or fanatics.  I spent over 30 years with Military Intelligence.  These terrorists do not play by any rules.  There are no rules of engagement for them.  What happended at Abu Ghraib was nothing more than embarassment...there was no torture.  Waterboarding is an evil necessity that must be done in order to save lives.  Stop being panty-waisted pansies and wake up to the world of reality.  This is war, not a Sunday picnic.  Our military is doing the best they can, considering the politicians tie their hands.  Give them a break and support them in their endeavors.  I did one tour of Iraq myself.
I just read all the comments and all I can say is that no one seems to noticed that the US Constitution is being eroded by allowing any of this to happen at all. Restore the balance of power. Where is habeas corpus in all this.
Folks, I hate to break the news, but the experts have weighed in on this-statistically, torture does not work! After a time, people will say just about ANYTHING to get the torture to stop. The reliability of the information extracted is highly questionable. Occassionally, they might get some truth out, but much more can be obtained through more subtle coercsion (oh, yeah, right. I forgot-Bush & Dick Cheney "don't do subtle"). Another point all you right-wing nuts forget:Al-Qaida was not neccessarily cutting off the heads of their captives to try to get any information out of them. That was solely for the purpose of shocking us all. I'm sure even al-Qaida realizes there are more effective ways of getting info from someone and they don't all involve waterboarding or beheading. However, make no mistake: they may still do it for the sheer "fun" of it.
We tortured because we want information to save lives. We do not torture because we wanted to inflict pain. In contrast, they killed because they want us to suffer. No, we do not become terrorists if we torture the terrorist to extract info to protect ourselves. Is the info reliable? Maybe, maybe not. But we can always verify. CIA is not stupid. After 911, a lot of government agencies got blamed for not doing enough to protect our country. Well, when the memory faded, the liberal left is now saying that the government and CIA are doing too much in the name of protecting the country. For those who argued that they will torture our vets, well, I say that whatever we do, torture or not, doesn’t have any effect on what they will do. To try to reason with them and expect that they think the same way as we do is naïve beyond believe. This is not a moral issue. We are dealing with evil.

What’s going to happen in the next few years is that the left will try to strip all the tools that our agencies have to fight terrorism and the attack will happen, and then they will blame those agencies for not doing enough to protect the country. Sound familiar? That was what lead to 911 and we are repeating the history as we see it.

If you are willing to die to defend the right of the terrorist, in the name of humanity, be my guest. But don’t say that I am a terrorist simply because I endorse my government’s action to protect myself and my family.
first choice in war is to kill the enemy, but there are times you win by taking a prisoner and getting much needed intell, Last I looked, all of our enemies have used violent techniques against our pows, all which were much more painful than the relativley benign waterboarding. It is very effective in most cases. Actually, if we have a top Al-Qeida prisoner,there is nothing too painful
no matter what you say the gov will not take it to consideration so whats the point?
Wake up Americans and join the real world!  If we are at war with another country, and they are at war with us, what do you think its going to be like?  The other side isnt going to play by our rules.  The CIA and our military is as a professional organization as anyone is going to find in this world, they dont just result to torture because they want to, and I am sure that they dont enjoy torturing people unlike the other-side who cuts off peoples heads and video tapes it to psychologically torture our families.  If the leaders of this country that are on the front lines think that its necessary and wants to use methods like waterboarding that dont leave any long lasting physical damage to the enemy combatant then thats what they should do.  Our enemies have a choice when they are caught in combat and have information that would help us save American lives, they could just cooperate and give us the information or we can allow our men to do what needs to be done.  They want to kill us, our country, and our God, and we are worried about weather or not its inhumane.  Thank God for the brave men and women who are defending our nation and that its not these delusional few.
The terrorists have no mercy for their victims , why should we ? We should not be afraid of what SCUM has to say about it ! Let the CIA do what is neccessary to preserve our liberty. Stoop to the terrorists level ? Let them step up to ours and conduct themselves in a civilized manner !
So these people that say the CIA is the same as Al Qaeda are they ignorant or simply lying? Waterboard while not pleasant is not have an power drill applied to your joints, it's not subjecting people to electric shock, and it definitely not beheading people. There should be an argument on how far we, as a country, want our intelligence services to go, but let's be adults and not lie to each other about the realities of the world.
Some people think terrorists would give false information if they are waterboarded.  So far that has not been shown to be the case in the very few times it has even been used.  Even if it were to happen, once you find out its false you merely waterboard them yet again--I bet they don't do it twice.  Even the most recalcitrant prisoner has give up info.   What makes you think that if you don't waterboard them, that they are not going to give false information?   Giving a terrorist candy has never worked.
Thank God the CIA used any means necessary to protect Americans from the murderous plots of these maniacs. The fanatic idealist that say mass murderers have the same rights as innocent civilians need to be sent to the medieval Islamic realm of the tribal areas of Pakistan for a little dose of what they are shoveling. Thank God for the CIA and President Bush, and shame on the envious haters of the United States of America.
I beleive that torture,like waterbording,shocking,heating and freeezing bodies,strong light is wrong,you can get all the information you want by drugging,it has no side effect if used very proper by trained people.abuse this way and you have a zombie,i do beleive its just better to kill them and that in its self is sufficient.thats right kill the whole nation-wipe them out if they the enemy.,i beleive this is just cruel to  torture any one or aminials.
I believe that our intelligence, military, and law enforcement officers should have the flexibility to utilize a variety of methods to interrogate prisoners, consistent with the crimes involved. I further believe that extreme methods, like waterboarding, should only be used as a last resort, or when speed is imperative for overarching reasons.

Our defenders must have the tools they need to do their jobs.
The tactics that are being used is only questioned by those that haven't served the front line.

We live in a world with walls that must be guarded against terrorist. Who's gonna do it? You?
Our troops and agents have more responsibility than most can fathom. (Keeping you safe and secure) You weep for those who have been waterboarded and curse the very soldiers that stand the line to protect you. This existence, while grotesque to some, saves lives!
We sit here and depend on these men and women to safe guard this country yet we continue to crucify the tactics that are used. Was your loved ones' neck cut from ear to ear? Was it broadcasted on the internet and repeatedly discussed on the nightly news?

Maybe you should pick up a gun and stand a post!

Sincerely,
The Forgotten Soldiers
The question is, is waterboarding torture? So we made three men have the sniffles for a few days. They directly led to death and torture of thousands of innocent people. So they had the sniffles for a few days. Kaleed Sheik Mohhamed personally severed the head off of a non-military civilian human-being. So he has the sniffles for a few days. Who cares? He's still alive...which is more than I can say for that young Danny Pearl, whose life was brutally taken from him at a very young age. Which would YOU rather have done to you... the sniffles game... or the head-chopping-off thing??? Take your pick, right now. I opt for a little water poured in my nose any day than to have my head slowly sawed and hacked off and filmed for all my family to see. But what people are failing to understand is that THIS is the very same technique that we employ on even our own people that we want to LIVE. If this is that bad to do to somebody, why ARE we afraid to do it to 3 people who want to kill us, but we ARE NOT AFRAID to do it to our own U.S. soldiers??? Am I hearing you right?? (Waterboarding is safer than binge drinking, yet thousands of college students across America every weekend, willingly subject themselves to that!)  Read this previous post: "..I was water boarded in 1970 during SERE trainig prior to going to Okinawa and flying mission off of Viet Nam.
Retired Navy, Volcano, Ca (Tuesday, February 05, 2008 3:26 PM)"
As Americans we all try to live and let live and for some reason we think the rest of the world is playing by those rules. While I may like to think we wouldn't have to resort to torturing someone to get information, in certain circumstances it may be necessary. People, please lets not forget that we're dealing with extremists that happily give their lives for whatever their particular causes are. Extremists don't care or respect how we live and our live and let live attitudes. Their attitudes in turn are of oppression and control. You simply cannot compete with that with "please sir, give me the information". I say to you all, extremists must be dealt with in extreme ways. And don't forget, we were all hear at home minding our own business when it was THEY who decided to come knocking on OUR doors. Well now that they have our attention its our responsibility to unleash every tool at our disposal to deal with these extremists.
The point that is often missed is that torture and harsh interrogation methods fail to produce executable intelligence. Trained interrogators will find it hard to argue with that.
These are some of the most wanted, violent criminals who have been trained to sacrifice themselves in suicide bombings.  If they are prepared and trained for this kind of violent horrible death, what is a little bit of waterboarding going to do?  I would think these tactics would be a cakewalk for any terrorist whom is trained to endure this kind of tourture anyway.  The thing is,I don't want any innocent people being tortured.  That would be a crime.
From the Muslim playbook:

Qur'an 8:12 "I shall terrorize the infidels. So wound their bodies and incapacitate them because they oppose Allah and His Apostle."

Ishaq:315 "It was so criminal, men could hardly imagine it. Muhammad was ennobled because of the bloody fighting. I swear we shall never lack soldiers, nor army leaders. Driving before us infidels until we subdue them with a halter above their noses and a branding iron. We will drive them to the ends of the earth. We will pursue them on horse and on foot. We will never deviate from fighting in our cause. We will bring upon the infidels the fate of the Ad and Jurhum. Any people that disobey Muhammad will pay for it. If you do not surrender to Islam, then you will live to regret it. You will be shamed in Hell, forced to wear a garment of molten pitch forever!"

*Lots* more where that came from.  Do these sound like reasonable people?  Terrorism is torture for the sake of torture, death, and cowing of the survivors.  Waterboarding is usually non-lethal and administered for the sake of acquiring useful information such as regarding potential "imminent catastrophic attacks."  If just one attack was even potentially averted, then I can't buy the argument that the comfort of a few terrorists is worth more than potentially thousands of American lives.

 I know trashing Bush is all the rage right now, but war is, unfortunately, war and a terrorist attack beats moral sciolism at the Administration's expense every time.

 If Qaeda decides to torture you bastions of liberty or your families like they've done Mr. Pearl and countless others, then before you die take comfort in knowing you did your part in preventing it by defending Qaeda's right not to be waterboarded.

 Go CIA!

E
One who tortures people is essentially no better than the terrorists one says to fight against.
This is not just about waterboarding...Your government is responsible for the death of one million Iraqis...not just about three people waterboarded.Many under occupation were subject to torture, humiliation, sexual assaults and murder.How can you call yourselves the greatest supporters of democracy in the world when Iraq is under occupation for 5 years and you support a dictatorship of Pakistan?
Frankly, your government acts in the best self-centred interests of the America.

Your gov's actions can be summarised below:-

Iraq = oil
Pakistan = musharaf to protect the nukes
Iran = stable government is a threat to Israel's existence, so throw hell at them

Isn't that what you are doing?
do not refer to a terrorist as an "architect" of anything. bad metaphor.
Those of you who are compelled to sound off about our moral highground, what are YOU doing to keep me and my family safe? You should be thanking your lucky stars I am not leading this country. I would look under every unturned rock, crawl in every hole in the ground, look behind every bush, tree to search, waterboard, and completely destroy each of these individuals. We are at WAR, I TAKE NO PRISONERS, it's either them or us. You who believe we must be CIVIL on this matter,  live and breathe in a fantasy world. Why should I even carry a dialogue with people who do not have a grasp of reality? GW, keep up the good work!
Bill Bailey of Walla Walla, WA posted "Whether or not you call waterboarding torture, it's practiced only by the most evil beings, not by Christians, or any reasonable people."

Could you please define reasonable people? Under the circumstances, I seem to think that these few instances of waterboarding is completely reasonable. This mild "torture" may be considered irrational to you, but if it saves one American life so be it.

 I do not mean to insult anyone, for these are simply my beliefs.
Will the Senate investigate the CIA and the Military to determine how long waterboarding has gone on. Probably back to the days of FDR (he who rounded up Americans (japanese decent), Truman of the Atom bomb or JFK who covered up his failed overthrow of CUBA with a litte wag of the tail in Viet Nam which cost the United States 58000 lives and 350000 casualties. It also resulted in between one and two million Vietnamese deaths. Carter lost 100's of lifes in a failed rescue of the Iranian hostages. We waterboarded 3 terrorists. Big Deal. I would personally donate the bullet, gun and pull the trigger on all three of them. In fact, lets close Gitmo (I will dispose of the terrorists personnally). It is the only thing these thugs understand. If Hillary or B. Hussein Obama want to stop it then let them get into office. For now - GO CIA!


Send a comment

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

Your name, city and state (John Doe, Seattle, Wash.): 

Your e-mail address (jdoe@msnbc.com):

Your website (it's okay if you don't have one):

Remember me? (We'll keep it private)

About the blog

Deep Background is NBC News’ investigative blog. It covers national security, terrorism, spies, Iraq, and politics, as well as government waste, fraud and abuse. It is edited by NBC News Senior Investigative Producer Jim Popkin.

Archives


Browse by topic:

Add this blog to your news reader