CIA reveals more on waterboarding

Posted on Tuesday, February 05, 2008 1:22 PM ET
By Pete Williams, NBC News Justice Correspondent


The director of the CIA today gave the most extensive public accounting yet of the use of coercive interrogation methods, including waterboarding, and strongly urged Congress not to limit the range of methods available to U.S. intelligence agencies.

CIA director Michael Hayden told a Senate hearing that fewer than 100 people have been held by the CIA in its terrorist detention program. And of those, fewer than one-third were subjected to enhanced interrogation methods, he said.

Waterboarding admissions:
As for the controversial practice of waterboarding, Hayden told the senators it was used on only three people more than five years ago. For the first time, he named them in public - Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Abu Zubaydah, and Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, all accused of being al-Qaida leaders.

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, known to the intelligence community as "KSM," was one of the main architects of the Sept. 11 terror attacks. Abu Zubaydah was believed to have been al-Qaida's top military strategist. And Al-Nashiri is believed to have been the main planner of the USS Cole bombing and al-Qaida's head of operations in the Persian Gulf.

Hayden says waterboarding was used "because of the circumstances of the time - the belief that additional catastrophic attacks were imminent at a time when the US had limited knowledge of how al-Qaida worked." All three of the men who were waterboarded are currently imprisoned at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

If additional limits are placed on the CIA's interrogation rules, Hayden said, "We will play to the edges of the box that the political process gives us.  Otherwise, we wouldn't be protecting America, though we may be protecting ourselves."
 
But whatever restrictions are imposed, he said, "We should not expect our operatives in the field to play outside the box when we enter a new period of threat.  There will be no exceptions.  There's no wink and a nod here." Hayden's own view, he said, is that the CIA should not be further limited in what interrogation techniques are permitted.

Congress is considering a bill that would restrict the CIA to only those methods authorized by the U.S. Army's field manual for interrogation. Hayden said that would make no sense.  The Army's interrogators are young people with limited training, while the CIA's interrogators are highly trained. The Army interrogates a broad range of people, while the CIA's program is tailored to a specific group of terrorists, he said. It would make no more sense to apply the Army's interrogation manual to the CIA than it would to apply the Army's grooming standards or its rules on sexual orientation, Hayden said.

Worldwide threat:
Though al-Qaida remains a worldwide threat, its global image is beginning to lose some of its luster, Director of National Intelligence, Mike McConnell, also said Tuesday at the intelligence community's annual threat assessment to the Senate. Nonetheless, McConnell said that "as we inflict significant damage on al-Qaida in Iraq, it may shift resources to mounting more attacks outside Iraq." So far, its terror export attempts are modest: Fewer than 100 terrorists from Iraq have left the country to establish cells elsewhere, he added.

On Iran, McConnell said the U.S. remains concerned about Iran's nuclear intentions.  The intelligence community assesses "with moderate-to-high confidence that Tehran at a minimum is keeping open the option to develop nuclear weapons," he said. It's still working on enriching uranium and developing ballistic missiles, both of which would be useful if it decides to move ahead on nuclear weapons. The earliest Iran would be technically capable of producing enough highly enriched uranium for a weapon is late 2009, but that's very unlikely, McConnell said. More likely that date would be sometime between 2010 and 2015, he added.

Both McConnell and military intelligence officials said that despite the death or capture of three top leaders of the Taliban last year, its insurgent forces have expanded into previously peaceful areas of the west and around Kabul.

Comments

This is a tough subject.  We want to protect the country, but we also want our actions to reflect our values.  The latter holds more sway for me.  Some might ask, "so you would let everybody be in harm's way for the sake of your values?"  My answer is that if we stopped policing the world and imposing ourselves on it, it's highly unlikely that we'd be in this situation.
CIA OBVIOUSLY USES THE SAME TACTICS AS AL-QAIDA.  MAYBE THEY LEARNED THEM FROM THE CIA.
TORTURE IS UNACCEPTBLE.  STOP EXCUSES.  DO NOT THINK THE PEOPLE WE TORTURE ARE NOT GOING TO RETURN THE "GET INFORMATION FROM ANYONE WE SURMISE IS DOING WHAT WE ALSO DO".....EXCUSES.
To torture or not?  Is this the thorny question alone?  Although I agree that from a national security perspective it may be necessary to give the latitude sought by Hayden and agree that our "secret warriors" may need to be far freer to act than would our Army, it still overlooks the dire need for clear guidelines, proper oversight and true accountability at all levels.  As a democracy, we must have this debate and settle it, what moral limits do we impose on ourself even at the cost of American lives and our security?  This seems still missing in the issue.  In the heat of battle or crisis, as Hayden pointed out, waterboarding appeared appropriate because it would get results.  However, what price did we pay ultimately?  How did the intelligence gained outweigh the fact that America violated a moral threshold we may have been viewed as above.  Those are real issues that none seem wanting to tackle because they are quite messy.  What muddies these waters is the fact that CIA destroyed evidence and the chain of responsibility is only now being revealed.  Hardly the basis to give unfettered latitude to CIA to behave without clear policy guidelines and oversight.  If CIA was authorized to use waterboarding then fine, who authorized it and why, and that person or persons must now respond.  In hindsight it may be a great or an awful decision, but it will be best judged in the light of day and once weighed upon will guide the future.  I don't know when "torture" is appropriate for America to employ but it should not be left to the shadows, for if so, then we quickly lose the moral authority that must be our fiercest weapon in the war on terror.
Have we come to the point that we actually think that just because we only employ professional torture experts at the CIA that torture is acceptiable?  This is the type of talk that I would imagine Germany and Japan used to their citizens to justify their acts of torture!  It would seem that this administration has no moral compass to guide it in its actions!
Torture works. Period. Semper FI ! ! !
Whether or not you call waterboarding torture, it's practiced only by the most evil beings, not by Christians, or any reasonable people.
Why would anyone be against interagation methods?  Does anyone really believe that if they were in the hands of the terrorists, and they wanted to get information, that they would hold to the Geneva Convention?  Get real.  Why should we give terrorists rights that they would never uphold if the situation was reversed.  Do you call sawing off the heads of reporters a humane act that is allowed?  How about showing the video of the act on the internet?  Keep up the good work CIA, waterboard away.
This is not a surprise.  It was always clear that these sorts of torture methods were being used by the US.  What this reveals is that the American people have been mislead again by this Administration.  Throughout the past 7 years we've been told whatever the Bush Administration deemed to be necessary for the public to hear.  The US has always been held at a much higher standard than the rest of the world.  Through these torture methods, we have shown the world that we should not be held at a higher standard.  We don't tell out people the truth and our Administration does things that are shameful.
all fine & good. Jack Bauer saves the day.
however, we must remember, that other countries will do the same to our citizens - we shouldn't complain
I'AM A VIETNAM VET(67-69).IF WATERBOARDING GETS THE RESULTS THAT THE CIA NEEDS SO BE IT.WAR IS NOT A GAME SO YOU DO WHAT EVER IT TAKES.IF YOU IN THE WAY TO BAD.THAT'S WHAT WRONG WITH THE UNITED STATES WE TRY TO PLEASE EVERYONE,AND WE THE ONES THAT GET SCREWED.I LOVE THIS COUNTRY WITH ALL MY HEART AND WOULD GIVE MY LIFE TO PROTECT IT.SO PLEASE DO WHAT IS GOOD FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND FORGET ALL THE LIBERALS IN THE WORLD.THANKS.
Interesting timing about this revelation; what would have the repercussions if the public knew about this in 2004, 2006, or before the primaries and debates began?? After all, the President has been claiming for 5 years that we don't engage in torture.

As for any limitations to the Army field manual. If I understand this correctly, the CIA should be excused because they are trained to do torture better?? Or is it because the ends always justify the means??
If his lips are moving he is lying. Are they ever going to catch Osama Bin Laden??? If Texas had been attacked on 9-11 Bin Laden would have been killed by now
Well I think it's a shame we have stricter penalties for abuse to animals then we do for human beings.

It sounds to me like we are yet again overanalyzing something without action.  

I feel that we keep giving the enemy the upperhand.  While we are arguing about what we should and shouldn't do they are plotting more and more evil.
I have no pity on terrorists. If these are the methods needed to obtain information to keep our people safe then I guess that is what needs to be done. If you don't associate with sick people then I  you'll never have anything to worry about.
Maybe we should let all the terror suspects and enemy combatants go and give them their own reality TV shows.
Let's face it. All bets are off - we are at war with an enemy that doesn't care about fairness. Show me a "manual for interrogation" which will deter the next 911 type attack. The USA needs to let the intelligence community do, in private, all that's necessary to "be in the game".  
An interrogation to the al-Qaida is just the same as the death penalty. You scale it up with certain individuals based on their situation. Since their not just spitting in our face why should we just be shaking our finger at them…America is the best location to be punished, you receive complimentary care for the worst offense while the working party struggles to pay for it and lives in misery.
Are people genuinely concerned with what we did to these terrorists in order to extract info.???
Are they afraid that these tactics would also be used on them?? Are the concerned terrorists?? We as Americans have a duty, to America!! To protect against terrorists and the people who help them. BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY!!! Waterboarding is not pretty, but neither was the videos of all the victims being beheaded. If waterboarding is the worst we do, they should consider themselves lucky.
this is America, poeple....do not put us down as a terrorist country.   BUSH, CHENEY torture , Americans do not.    they are war criminals
let me share this tale

once upon a time
A gang of elefants pass across the corn field, the corn fiel was a mess.
the lion king asked to the bear police to find the elefants to get punished
after a while the bear police was unable to catch the elefants, all the animals where asking to the lion king for justice.
the lion king asked to the bear plice to find the elefants quikly.
The bear police got a rabitt and the interrogation begin
Police Bear.- are you the elefant?
The Rabitt answer, no I am a rabitt
Police bear said, apply waterbording to him
for a second time the police bear ask
Are you the elefant
The rabitt, said no I am a rabit
Waterbording said the police bear
Again the rabitt head was into the water
After four times of the same treatment
the police bear asked to the rabitt
Are you the elefant?
The rabitt said no I am a rabitt
Waterbording said the police bear
the wise rabitt said hold, hold hold
I am the elefant, I pass over the field, I kill the president JFK, and I was the pilot of the planes in Ney York in 911, did I forget something?

!please dont give to me more water!

Fili Ledezma
Provo UT



This administration makes me sick and sad to be an American.
I am so ashamed that this was done in my name - I used to be proud to be an American.  And yes, I have 30+ years of military and federal service.
Mr. Bush has bankrupt America, financially and morally.
What is the issue here.  This is a very effective means to gain information.  Much nicer alternative to what our enemy will do to us.

Water boarding was a common training technique used by the military.  I was water boarded in 1970 during SERE trainig prior to going to Okinawa and flying mission off of Viet Nam.
That's it?  Three guys got waterboarded?  Well, there you go.  The CIA run amuck...  What is the world coming to?
The three terrorists the CIA acknowledges waterboarding are still alive.....What do you think Daniel Pearl would say about artificially holding America to a higher standard of behavior than one that scares the truth out of but keeps its enemies alive?

if it saves one soldier,one american ,british,israeli,french
citizen...by all means have at it.
Why is everyone so concered with what Congress says.  You can not tell me that the CIA and others have not used torture methods in the past.  Do people really think terrorists will come out and tell them whats going to happen next?  That will never happen. Life is not a tea party.  So those men and women need other ways of getting that information.  Torture is a nasty business but sometimes its the only way. Could I torture someone?  If thousands of lives were on the line, yes, I could.  If the American people are honest with themselves, the majority would agree.  We are not dealing with normal people.  How can normal methods of questioning work?  Do the lives of innocent people not mean anything to the government anymore?  
Get real America. They murdered 3000 of us and we tortured three of them and probably prevented them from killing a few thousands more. Looks like they got a great deal. Where is the outrage about what they did?
Can someone ask them when these three guys were captured? Because there's a big difference in 5 years ago and 7 years ago around the time of 9/11. Were they tortured in 2003? Why? What imminent danger of attacks when we weren't sure how Al Queda worked? We had already gone to war in Iraq, yet are admitting we didn't know at the time how our enemy worked? Follow up. Follow up. Follow up, PLEASE.
I think we should use what ever methods are NECESSARY.PERIOD
20 years Active Air Force 57-77
Air Guard 55-57
Defense Logistics Agency 80-96(Retired GM-13)
Judging by repsonses from those on the Kumbaya side of interogation techniques. We should sit in a lawnchair and flick popcorn at them in hopes of obtaining vital information to keep your family safe.
Personally I do believe the CIA and our National Intelligence should be able to use ANY technique that they can to get what they need out of these terrorists. I think if most of the families were asked that who lost loved ones in 9/11, they may just may feel the same way.
They have a job to do, and that is to protect America and the world, how can they do that effeciently if they aren't allowed the means to do it?
Kristy Sanborn, Buckhorn, Mo.
any reason we should believe the numbers? generously they have notr counted those they put in other countries jails and where they just look on whats done there. With the public image of America down the drain anyway I guess it does not make much difference, I wonder why the Americans wonder why no one likes them in the Middle East...
Where is the scrutiny of how "they" killed us? CIA's act was patriotic. It was necessary to protect our country and our people. The liberal left's attack on the CIA action is NOT patriotic because it put us all in danger.
If we condone torture we give up everything America stands for, what so many people of courage and honor fought and died for, the essence of liberty and freedom. We regress back into the darkness of history.

There are some principles that are worth dying for.  If one doesn't get that, all words are useless.


The idea of a cadre of 'professional sadists' willing to torture anyone they are ordered to apply thier specialty to does not sound like my America, you know, the one you were taught about in school.  Apparently someone wasn't paying attention in class.
This sounds like "the ckeck' in the mail" routine.

how can anyone believe these guys?

they only lie when their lips are moving.
If we waterboard terrorists, we become terrorists.  Many people say that waterboarding is simulated drowning; actually it's real drowning, but controlled.  

Many people hate the terrorists and they relish the idea of torturing them.  This is sick.  It's perverse.  It's vengeful.  It's foolish.  It's anti-American.  These people need to calm down and think rationally.

Waterboarding is torture.  Torture is illegal and immoral.  So waterboarding is illegal and immoral.

There are many other effective ways to extract information from reticent terrorists besides torture.  We need to use those means in order to prevent further terrorism.

Finally, the people who authorized and engaged in waterboarding need to be held accountable for their crimes.  They need to be prosecuted with the full weight of the law.  The claim that they intended to protect America is an insufficient defense.  There are many ways to protect America that do not violate human rights and civil rights.
It's time to stop terrorizing people in the name of counterterrorism.
How many times have we heard, we don't torture??
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.

~Voltaire
Well, personally if the American Government allows torture to 1, 21, 101, or 1001 POW's which is what these men are (terrorists were the member os the American government that nuked Japan)then we have no right to declare war against any country that violates human rights, even by killing Americans.  We became a dangerous third world country when we justified Hiroshima.  Excusing the name of mass murder or torture in the name of democracy is like saying if just because satin really isn't even because he does it with a smile and good intentions.
Although I don't agree with Bushs' reason for invading Irag and strating a war. I do feel that within such nefarious times, one must utilize any technique available to extract information. Why are we protecting the rights of the very people who behead our citizens on the www? Are they having meetings on how to attack Americans in a more civil manor? Doubtful. One can't fight a war with futile methods, surely this redundant methodology will come back to haunt us. CIA, employ any means necessary to prevail against the terrorist. Bush got us into this mess, now you have to get us out!
Those of you on the "anti" side of this argument are hypocrites:.... "a person who pretends to have virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that he or she does not actually possess, esp. a person whose actions belie stated beliefs".....or, you are simply naive....
While you may be justifiably critical of our government's policies, and maybe you even find yourself "ashamed to be an American" just remember this....you enjoy the freedom, prosperity, and opportunity that comes with US citizenship. These are all products of a foreign policy that has for the most part not changed in our 230+ year history as a country. We go to war overseas at times to protect our interests, to further our interests, and to uphold our alliances with other friendly nations....and we do so with great, but not unlimited restraint...that's about all the average citizen needs to know..If the thought of murderous terrorists on a waterboard troubles you....I suggest you consider this argument carefully... Then speak out or blog away if you want to.....but don't say stupid things like "I'm ashamed to be an American".    
To all,

Ask yourself this question - If (1)you were responsible for making the decision to use or not use waterboarding on a terrorist on September 10, 2001 and (2)you knew there was a major attack (expected to kill over 3000 Americans) of some sort planned for the next day and he had the information to thwart it, what would you do.  What explanation would you give to the families of the 3000 people killed if you decided not to use waterboarding to same their loved ones?
Ryan Veer, Bozeman, Montana wrote "Why should we give terrorists rights that they would never uphold if the situation was reversed."

We believe these rights are not ours to give.  They are endowed by our creator.  They are also not ours to take away.
Shame on everyone who dismisses or denies that lives were saved because of this last resort used.   Moral understanding of self-defense and saving life in the face of horrible evil should not be based on politics.  But to the left and the Bush-haters, moral understanding and saving innocent lives are less important than...hating Bush.  

CNN: "KSM's information led U.S. officials, they say, to several alleged terrorists who were actively putting together another 9/11-style plot, this time to attack the West Coast."

BOB GRENIER, FMR. CIA STATION CHIEF: "I strongly doubt, had it not been for the capture of KSM and the successful interrogation, that we would have found Hambali in time."  (CNN)

The left whines about ‘lost right’ and is against every single measure this administration has ever used to protect them – the Patriot Act, conditional wire-taps, and even the thought of selective and intelligent security profiling disturbs them.  But they sure have no problem taking away rights when they want to ban public smoking, plastic bags and even light bulbs.  This encapsulates the priorities of the left.  Besides self-serving and mostly pointless, they also keep us far less safe.

No, all of these examples along with the left’s absolute contempt for Bush and what was done here is just more proof of how and why they are unqualified to defend the innocent people of this country.   The rest of us are justifiably grateful that the CIA got KSM to spill his beans.  God bless them!!!  The infinitely greater wrong was prevented as a result!

Only the morally-challenged Bush-hating left cares less than they continue to just hate anything/everything Bush.  Nothing to be proud of.
No, we should not waterboard. Besides being inhumane, it does not bring the truth. After so much waterboarding they will say whatever you want them to say.
Has everyone already forgotten the fact that they caught our people and cut there heads off on camera?
For those on the "America Can Do Anything It Wants" kick.  Why don't all of you torture and war supporters ask any American vet that was tortured for the safety of the nation it was tortured by, if they though it was the right thing.  

Ask them what it's like to live with that hanging over them.

Ask an American vet's parents if it was Ok to torture their son in Viet Nam.

Any means necessary to protect our country and our citizens abroad.  Waterboarding doesn't kill innocent civilians.  Interrogation helps in stopping terrorists whose intent is to kill our children. We need to toughen up to the new realities of our world.
In the West Bank city of Hebron, relatives of Shadi Zghayer and Mohammed Herbawi said they learned from watching Hamas' Al Aqsa TV that the two were named as the Dimona bombers. The men, Hamas members in their 20s, left home early Monday, without giving their destination, their relatives said.

"I am proud of my son and hope he goes to heaven," said Zghayer's mother, Aziya.

And we complain about waterboarding to get information to help save lives.  People of America those who want to kill us have no regard for human life.


Send a comment

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

Your name, city and state (John Doe, Seattle, Wash.): 

Your e-mail address (jdoe@msnbc.com):

Your website (it's okay if you don't have one):

Remember me? (We'll keep it private)

About the blog

Deep Background is NBC News’ investigative blog. It covers national security, terrorism, spies, Iraq, and politics, as well as government waste, fraud and abuse. It is edited by NBC News Senior Investigative Producer Jim Popkin.

Archives


Browse by topic:

Add this blog to your news reader